Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 Student Integrity and Misconduct Training for Administrative Staff supporting the Misconduct Process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monash University Ethical and Professional Conduct.
Advertisements

2011 Suspension Centre Conference Brief history and DEC guidelines Fred Burley Head Teacher Welfare Glenfield Suspension Centre NSW Department of Education.
Staff Development Emergency Operations 1. Identify 5 purposes of the offender/student grievance process Identify 5 grievable issues Identify 12 non-grievable.
1 Discipline, Capability and Grievance resolution: for those with responsibility for others Jessie Monck, PPD, Human Resources Division.
Student Integrity and Misconduct Training and support for decision makers and Academic Integrity Officers.
FERPA Refresher Training Start. Page 2 of 11 Copyright © 2006 Arizona Board of Regents FERPA Refresher Training What is FERPA FERPA stands for Family.
Principals’ Meeting PS 273 October 9, 2013 Progressive Discipline Office of Legal Services.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
COMPLAINTS POLICY JULY COMPLAINTS POLICY Why do we have this Policy? We are committed to delivering high quality services to all of our customers.
The Disciplinary Procedure Presented by Paula Fisher Practical HR Ltd.
Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1. What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers.
Ombudsman UMKC SOM GME. Ombudsman Objective: The position of Ombudsman for Graduate Medical Education (GME) was developed to promote a positive climate.
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
Managing Human Resources Bohlander  Snell  Sherman
SUGGESTED BUSINESS PRACTICES FOR COUNCILS. Prepare an application Lodge and pay fee Register, scan and create file Allocate fileAssess Further information.
Dean of Students Office a part of the Division of Student Affairs University of Florida 202 Peabody Hall
Ottawa Police Service Chief’s Complaint Investigations Insp. T. Youngson-Larochelle and S/Sgt. M. Marin.
HSC Complaints Procedure
Contacted for Audit: What to Expect November 13, 2013 Presented by Tennessee Department of Revenue.
How to … use the new Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures Heidi Gibaut, Law At Work 5 March 2014.
BOPTA Clerk’s Training & Roundtable Oregon Association of County Clerks 2014.
Service Charters [Nome del progetto] [Nome del relatore]
April 2, 2007 Ontario Human Rights Commission Introduction to the Enhanced Complaints Process (ECP) – Pilot.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
How to conduct an Academic Misconduct investigation in the FOA New policies and procedures effective September 2007 (Adapted for use in the FOA by Michael.
PREVENTIVE LAW WORKSHOP Investigating Employee Misconduct Mary Elizabeth Kurz, Vice Chancellor and General Counsel Dianne Sortini, Director, Employee Relations.
EDSE 539 Special Education Leadership in Schools Parent Rights and Relationships Dispute Resolution Remedies.
Disability Services Queensland Preventing and responding to the abuse, assault and neglect of people with a disability Funded organisations POLICY AND.
 Part IV of the ECU Faculty Manual  To get to the Faculty Manual 1. Go to ECU Home and click on “Faculty & Staff.” 2. Scroll down to the “Policies”
Accountability Presented by Mollie Schaffer August 13 th, 2014.
1 GAEP Study Tour An Overview of the Ombudsman for Workplace Safety May 16, 2007.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
Dismissal Procedure Checklist. Initial Warning 1.Has the company acted immediately upon becoming aware of the unsatisfactory performance? 2.Was the employee.
Derbyshire County Council PUBLIC HANDLING GRIEVANCES - BRIEFING FOR MANAGERS.
Queensland Ombudsman – our role with local government Peter Cantwell, Assistant Ombudsman Office of the Queensland Ombudsman 25 October 2012.
ODAO Information Sharing Day Presentation February/March Office of the Disability Appeals Officer Oifig an Oifigigh Achomhairc um Míchumas National.
A&D 101 A Beginner’s Guide to understanding the A&D process.
First Level Investigation Introduction Donna Dark.
Performance Management of Staff Disciplinary Process Richard Walsh Manager – Human Resources.
HANDLING DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE CASES – INCLUDING INVESTIGATIONS BY GAIL ESCOLME EMPLOYMENT LAW SOLICITOR.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Academic Integrity, Student Misconduct, Deferred Exams and Special Consideration, Student Appeals Procedures, Equity and Access Plans and ANU Student Support.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Upgrades to ODE Collaboration Center and New Complaint Form and Procedures January 15, 2015.
January 2009: PRS Template Presentation PRS for Music Code of Conduct.
Bylaw Enforcement: Best Practices Guide for Local Governments Presentation to Southern Interior Local Government Association Conference, Kelowna, BC April.
Performance Management – Part 3 BCUHB Capability Procedure (WP3A) 69.
Using the Disciplinary Procedure Human Resources.
Filing an Academic Grievance
Title IX & Relevant Legislation overview
The Military Ombudsman Bill [B9 of 2011]
Process Overview.
Sexual Harassment Seminar
Managing Unreasonable Behaviour – The Legal Ombudsman Journey
Education Employment Procedures Law of 2001
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
Professional support guides
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
HUD’s Coordinated Entry Data & Management Guide
Faculty Grievance & Dispute Resolution Office
Presentation transcript:

Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 Student Integrity and Misconduct Training for Administrative Staff supporting the Misconduct Process

Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 Student Integrity and Misconduct  Overview  Policy and Guidelines  Process  Checklist steps  Evidence and Record Keeping  The importance of good record keeping  Support and Resources  The role of the Student Complaints and Grievance Resolution Unit (SCGRU)

Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 Overview  Student Integrity and Misconduct – Policy & Guidelines PPL Staff involved in the administration of the Student Integrity and Misconduct process are required to familiarise themselves with the content of both the policy and guidelines. Since the implementation of PPL on 1 September 2011 a number of issues in the practical application of the policy have been identified. Through the application of the policy further areas for improvement may emerge.

Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 Process  Checklist Steps  Preliminary Investigation (Steps 1-10)  Advise an Integrity Officer or the Academic Registrar of the matter and conduct investigation in consultation  Schedule a meeting with the student (if required)  Collect relevant information/evidence  Conduct a TRIM check  Contact SCGRU for a recidivist & online tutorial check  Provide the completed preliminary investigation to the Integrity Officer or Academic Registrar: = Template/s provided for use

Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 Process  Checklist Steps  Preliminary Investigation (Steps 1-10)  Integrity Officer/Academic Registrar decides on an action  No further action (no record on student file)  Counselling/Warning (letter recorded on TRIM only)  * Referral to a Decision-maker: The Integrity Officer or Academic Registrar must determine the level of misconduct and refer to an appropriate decision-maker for consideration (decision matrix). This begins the formal misconduct process. * From receipt of the preliminary investigation to referral to a decision maker = within 5 working days.

Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 Process  Checklist Steps  Decision-maker decides on an action (Step 11)  Refer-on to another decision maker; or  * Issue Allegation Notice  Allegation Notice (Step 12)  * The allegation notice should contain clear details of the alleged misconduct and a hearing date and time  Consideration should be given to applying an RW to the student’s studies report  If requested provide the student with a copy of the evidence before the hearing (Step 13) From receipt of a referral to the issue of an allegation notice = within 14 working days From the issue of an allegation notice to the scheduled hearing = within 20 working days

Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 Process  Checklist Steps  Hold a hearing (Step 14)  Document the proceedings  Issue a decision letter to the student (Step 15)  The decision letter should clearly communicate the decision and how it was reached. Any penalty should also be clearly communicated along with the student’s right to appeal. From issue of the decision letter to student lodging an appeal = within 20 working days Send all paperwork to SCGRU for recording and forwarding to RAMS to create a misconduct file (Steps 16 & 17). * Penalties must not be implemented until after the appeal period lapses. The SCGRU will issue a finalisation letter activating the application of penalties.

Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 Evidence and Record Keeping  It is important to document all procedural steps and associated evidence including relevant s, written statements, assignments, memos, telephone contact, etc.  Good record keeping enhances accountability  The appeal body and/or ombudsman will scrutinise all information to confirm there has been procedural fairness.

Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 Communications and Confidentiality  Be mindful of language and tone  Ensure all internal communications are professional and impartial  Keep the issues between those who need to know  Respect the right to privacy and confidentiality Failure to observe these important points can compromise the appeal process

Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 The Role of the Student Complaints and Grievance Resolution Unit (SCGRU)  The Student Complaints & Grievance Resolution Unit is a central unit to support and administer the student misconduct process across the University. Webpage: Contacts: Manager: Ms Sandy Williams Administrative Support Officer: Ms Kerryn Biles SCGRU mailbox:

Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 QUESTIONS?