Issue Identification, Tracking, Escalation, and Resolution.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 1 Medicare Marketing Danielle R. Moon, J.D., M.P.A. Director, Medicare Drug & Health Plan Contract Administration Group National Association of Health.
Advertisements

Special Education Leadership Meeting November 30, 2010 An Update on Special Education Compliance Monitoring Jennifer L. Kline, Esq. Education Associate.
Understanding Basic Components:
PACTS Online Tools Adriana Golumbeanu, Loretta Brown and Randall Richardson Office of Federal Programs.
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
CIP Cyber Security – Security Management Controls
SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS The Technical Contract Within the Master Agreement.
2012 CMS Fall Conference Part D Coverage Determinations, Appeals & Grievances (CDAG) Jennifer Smith, Director Division of Appeals Policy Medicare Enrollment.
COMPLYING WITH HIPAA PRIVACY RULES Presented by: Larry Grudzien, Attorney at Law.
External Quality Review Process August 6, The Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence (CCME) A physician-sponsored, nonprofit health care quality.
SOX and IT Audit Programs John R. Robles Thursday, May 31, Tel:
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
IS Audit Function Knowledge
Random Moment Time Study (RMTS) Coordinator Training Summer/Fall 2014
Management Responsibility Procedure Tutorial. Introduction to Management Responsibility In this presentation we will discuss how to write a procedure.
SEMINAR NAIC/ASSAL/SVS REGULATION & SUPERVISION OF MARKET CONDUCT © 2014 National Association of Insurance Commissioners Complaint Handling.
ASPEC Internal Auditor Training Version
2012 Fall Conference Program Audits
Administrative Reviews Determining Compliance. Administrative Review Basics Formal “full” reviews – At least once every 3 years – Announced or unannounced.
CBER Managed Review Process Sheryl A. Kochman Deputy Director, DBA, OBRR, CBER September 15, 2009.
Quality Representative Training Version
NOAA Financial Policy and Compliance Division 1.  Background  Purpose  Preapprovals  Validations 2.
8 th Annual Managers’ and Law Enforcement Seminar IFTA Funds Netting Information.
Medicare Part D Overview of Options, Creditable Coverage, Required Notices, COB and Health Care Reform.
Federalwide Assurance Presentation for IRB Members.
Establishing a Hospital Patient
Audit and Fiscal Oversight Responsibilities VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP December 15,2010.
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
1 Workforce Investment Act Methods of Administration Two-Year Recertification Presenters: Julia Mankata-Tamakloe, Chief of the Office of Compliance Assistance.
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
Pitfalls and Lessons Learned: Advanced Implementation Strategies for a Compliant Grant Process National CME Audioconference December 9, 2008.
1 The Impact of SAS 112 on Governmental Financial Statement Audits GAQC Member Conference Call January 4, 2007 Presented by Chuck Landes, CPA.
PREPARING FOR A TRIENNIAL PROGRAM OVERSIGHT AND COMPLIANCE REVIEW PRESENTED BY: ANDREA KUHLEN, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR ISABEL CHAVEZ, BEHAVIORAL HEALTH MANAGER.
1 HOW TO WRITE A CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP) Presented by Nancy Gates Chief, Financial Policy and Compliance Division April 29, 2008.
Avoid Disputes, Not Complaints Presented by: Stuart Ayres and Derek Pullen Stuart Ayres, Scheme Manager Derek Pullen, Scheme Adjudicator.
Graduate Degree Progress & Clearance Graduate School Office Amy Gillett and Amy Corr.
CHDP DIRECTOR/DEPUTY DIRECTOR TRAINING SECTION III EPSDT: A Comprehensive Child Health Program 1 7/1/2010.
ISO NON-CONFORMANCE, CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTION.
University of Minnesota Internal\External Sales “The Internal Sales Review Process” An Overview of What Happens During the Review.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
Guidance Training (F520) §483.75(o) Quality Assessment and Assurance.
Internal Control Systems
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.
ITPD ISSUE MANAGEMENT PROCESS SEPTEMBER 5, 2008
Audits Allegations Secret Shops Corrective Actions.
1 City of Shelby Wastewater Treatment Division Becomes State’s Second Public Agency to Implement a Certified Environmental Management System CERTIFICATION.
Plans of Correction (PoC) Donna Tiberi, RN Standards Interpretation p: e: 1.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
January 2009: PRS Template Presentation PRS for Music Code of Conduct.
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MEMORANDUMS OF AGREEMENT PROCESS Amy Monroe, Procurement Teri Mason, Budgets Thelma Hawkins, Grants Management Karen Wirth,
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
Complaint Handling Medical Device Reporting May 19, 2016 Rita Harden, Director Customer Relations & Regulatory Reporting.
1 Auditing Your Fusion Center Privacy Policy. 22 Recommendations to the program resulting in improvements Updates to privacy documentation Informal discussions.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
SUBRECEPIENTS POST-AWARD PROCEDURES
Causal Analysis & Resolution (CAR) Support Category
Module 6 Corrective Action Request (CAR) Overview
IRB reporting updates.
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
HIPPA/HITECH Act Requirements Under the Business Associate Agreement Between CNI and Military Health Services.
Renewal Animal Training
Training Appendix for Adult Protective Services and Employment Supports June 2018.
DRAFT - FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
The Process for Final Approval: Ongoing Monitoring
What are the Major Changes to the IRB under the Final Common Rule?
Prompt response compliance TRAINING
Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials
CMS PDR 101 ICE Presentation 2014.
Presentation transcript:

Issue Identification, Tracking, Escalation, and Resolution

Objectives MedPOINT Management is committed to complying with all federal and state regulations, standards and sub-regulatory guidance. When an issue of non- compliance is identified, MedPOINT Management is required to report it to the Health Plan. Depending on the issue identified, the Health Plan contact varies. MedPOINT Management follows Health Plan processes to contact whomever we normally would to resolve similar issues (Compliance Officer). An issue of non-compliance is defined as a deviation or suspected deviation from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) program requirements or other regulations that impact one or more beneficiaries. This training is designed to ensure that all MedPOINT Management employees and Business Affiliates understand the escalation process for reporting issues of non-compliance to the Health Plan. Training Goals: – Explain Requirements – Outline Policy Expectations – Ensure clarity on expectations for implementations

Requirements CMS requires that Health Plans operate in compliance with CMS regulations and report any issues that may be out of compliance. MedPOINT is required to report any issues that may be considered out of compliance to their Health Plan Compliance Officer immediately upon learning of an issue. All first-tier providers (those who hold a direct contract with Health Plan) and downstream providers (entities with which a first-tier entity contracts to provide services to MA members) and first-tier and downstream employees must complete this training. First-tier entities are responsible for their downstream entities’ completion of the training. Training must be completed annually by December 31 and must also be a part of orientation for new employees. This process is subject to audit upon request from Health Plan The process is not related to and is separate from any provider appeals and grievance process.

Issue Reporting All Health Plan MA FDRs must report issues to established Health Plan Compliance Officer as soon as the issue is identified. FDRs should include the following information when reporting the issue to the Health Plan Compliance Officer. a.Member(s) Name b.Date of Incident c.Identification of Issue d.Summary of Issue

Issue Evaluation Upon receipt of a reported issue, the Health Plan Compliance Officer must evaluate it to determine whether an issue write- up is required An issue write-up is required if the answer is Yes to any of the following questions: a.Does the issue have a negative impact on the member, such as impeding access to care? b.Does the issue impact, or potentially impact, more than one member? c.Will there be political or media interest in the issue? d.Could this be harmful to the member’s health? e.Will the issue result in a complaint to Medicare through the Complaint Tracking Module (CTM)? f.Does the issue impact appeals and grievances, or first-tier, downstream and related entities or vendor’ access to medication, enrollment/diserollment or sales/marketing systems?

Issue Write-Up Requirements Issue write-up may not be required for a one- time mistake or error, unless there is a systemic problem that impacts multiple members, such as a wrong letter or form template. If unable to determine whether the issue is reportable, follow the procedures for a reportable issue submission as outlined in this training.

Issue Submission If the Health Plan Compliance Officer deems the issue to be reportable, he or she works with the FDR to report the issue according to the following requirements: a.The FDR completes an issue write-up form, with as much information and detail that is available. Be sure to explain any incomplete information in the communication to Health Plan Compliance Officer, providing clear explanation for the omissions and estimated dates when each item will be available. b.Submit the issue write-up form and supporting impact reports to the Compliance Officer for approval via communication no later than the end of the current business day. c.Place a telephone call to the Health Plan Compliance Officer to ensure he or she has received the issue write-up. d.Continue to follow up until the Health Plan Compliance Officer contact is reached. e.MedPOINT Management must develop and submit a corrective action plan (CAP) to the Health Plan Compliance Officer if the issue has been found to be a reportable issue. If the issue was not deemed reportable to CMS, a CAP may still be required as determined by the Health Plan Compliance Officer. A CAP contains actions to be taken to correct deficiencies identified during an audit, ongoing monitoring or self-reporting and ensure future compliance with the applicable requirements. A CAP usually contains accountabilities and set timelines.

Completion of the Issue Write-Up Form Use clear language that a layperson could understand. Any person reading any section of the issue write-up should be able to understand the system issues, actions and timeline. Identify systems involved such as pharmacy or enrollment Use only widely accepted abbreviations after completely spelling out the term the first time. Explain all acronyms. Do not place blame when explaining issues.

Issue Monitoring to Closure Once a CAP has been created, and approved by the Health Plan Compliance Officer, the FDR should implement the CAP and report CAP status updates to the Health Plan Compliance Officer at least weekly or more often if needed. – To report status, the FDR must confirm whether activities are on-track or if there are actions that need to be modified. The FDR must provide weekly updates (for example, by close of business Thursday) or according to the agreed-upon frequency. The FDR must provide a specific update for any steps with an action due. – If the original CAP requires any modifications, such as change in deadline or change in tasks, the FDR must send a detailed rational for the change with supporting evidence to the Health Plan Compliance Officer. Modifications should be submitted immediately, as soon as they are known. – The CAP should include any training activities, as needed, for new or updated processes resulting from the issue remediation process.

Issue Monitoring to Closure (continued) The Health Plan Compliance Officer oversees progress of CAP implementation until the issue is closed. The Compliance Officer reviews completed activities, completes internal processes and determines when the issue has been remediated. If a previously closed issue recurs, the FDR should report the finding as a new issue with specific details of the issue write-up and the CAP implemented under the field titled, “Description of Similar Past Incidents With Dates”. The FDR must review the write-up “Description of Similar Past Incident With Dates.” The FDR must review the write-up and the CAP implemented on all related submitted issues and provide final CAP. The Health Plan Compliance Officer confirms closure of the CAP when completed.

Issue Write-Up Form Instructions for Completion Who: * Were members impacted? * How many members were directly / indirectly impacted? * Which Health Plan contracts were affected? What: * What occurred? * What systems failed? * What oversight protocols were in place and/or will be put in place? When : * When did the issue occur? * When was the issued identified? * When will the issue be resolved? * What are the key dates for addressing issue/resolving problem and to ensure follow up occurs? Why: * Why did the issue occur? * Why did the systems or processes fail? *w Why did existing oversight protocols fail? How : * How were members impacted? * How was the issue identified? * How will the issue be resolved? * How and when will members be contacted (if access to benefits were denial members need to be contacted immediately)

Questions? Anne Rohr Compliance Manager MedPOINT Management Ph x247 Fx