ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 4-5 Comparison of Alternatives Annual Worth Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Engineering Economy Practice Problems
Advertisements

Present Worth Analysis
Chapter 5: Evaluating a Single Project and Comparing Alternatives
Present Worth Analysis
ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 4-5 Comparison of Alternatives Annual Worth Analysis.
Rate of Return Analysis
8/25/04 Valerie Tardiff and Paul Jensen Operations Research Models and Methods Copyright All rights reserved Economic Decision Making Decisions.
Dealing With Uncertainty
Lecture slides to accompany Leland Blank and Anthony Tarquin
COMPARING ALTERNATIVES
Interest Formulas – Equal Payment Series
Chapter 11 Replacement Analysis.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives Lecture No.18 Chapter 5 Contemporary Engineering Economics.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Blank & Tarquin: 5th Edition. Ch. 6 Authored by: Dr. Don.
Intro to Engineering Economy
ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 4-1 Comparison of Alternatives.
ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 5 Depreciation.
Establishing the Planning Horizon
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 4-2 Comparison of Alternatives Establishing the Planning Horizon.
Lecture slides to accompany
Chapter 6 Future Worth Analysis.
Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fifteenth Edition By William.
The second objective today is to evaluate correctly capital investment alternatives when the time value of money is a key influence.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 6-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 6-1 Developed.
AW involves converting all cash flows into an A value The AW for one life cycle is the same AW for 2,3,4, or or an infinite number of life cycles,as long.
Evaluating a Single Project
ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 4-4 Comparison of Alternatives Future Worth Analysis.
Copyright ©2009 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fourteenth Edition By William.
Chapter 7 Annual Worth Analysis.
ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 4-3 Comparison of Alternatives Present Worth Analysis.
Exam 3 Practice Problems For Engineering Economy By Douglas Rittmann.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 5-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
ISU CCEE CE 203 Present Worth Analysis (EEA Chap 5)
Financial Mathematics 1. i = interest rate (per time period) n = # of time periods P = money at present F = money in future –After n time periods –Equivalent.
Principles of Engineering Economic Analysis, 5th edition Chapter 8 Rate of Return Analysis.
Ch 10-1 © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ Ostwald and McLaren / Cost Analysis and Estimating.
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 6-1 Developed.
ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 4-1 Comparison of Alternatives.
AW involves converting all cash flows into an A value The AW for one life cycle is the same AW for 2,3,4, or or an infinite number of life cycles,as long.
Lecture No.18 Chapter 5 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5 th edition, © 2010.
ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 3 EQUIVALENCE.
L16: Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives ECON 320 Engineering Economics Mahmut Ali GOKCE Industrial Systems Engineering Computer.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives.
Chapter 6 Annual Equivalent Worth Criterion. Chapter 6 Annual Equivalence Analysis  Annual equivalent criterion  Applying annual worth analysis  Mutually.
Class # 7 Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 5-1.
Comparison of alternatives
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 5: Evaluating a Single Project
Lecture slides to accompany
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
Chapter 5: Evaluating a Single Project
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Comparison of Alternatives
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Establishing the Planning Horizon
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
Rate of Return Analysis
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
Lecture slides to accompany
Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy, 8th edition
Lecture slides to accompany
Capitalized Cost Refers to the present worth of an infinite series A
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Lecture slides to accompany
Adopted and modified by Dr. W-.W. Li of UTEP, Fall, 2003
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Presentation transcript:

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 4-5 Comparison of Alternatives Annual Worth Analysis

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Systematic Economic Analysis Technique 1. Identify the investment alternatives 2. Define the planning horizon 3. Specify the discount rate 4. Estimate the cash flows 5. Compare the alternatives 6. Perform supplementary analyses 7. Select the preferred investment

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Annual Worth Analysis Single Alternative

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Annual Worth Method converts all cash flows to a uniform annual series over the planning horizon using i=MARR a popular DCF method

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM SMP Investment A $500,000 investment in a surface mount placement machine is being considered. Over a 10-year planning horizon, it is estimated the SMP machine will produce net annual savings of $92,500. At the end of 10 years, it is estimated the SMP machine will have a $50,000 salvage value. Based on a 10% MARR and annual worth analysis, should the investment be made? AW(10%)= -$500K(A|P 10%,10) + $92.5K + $50K(A|F 10%,10) = $14, =PMT(10%,10,500000,-50000) = $14,264.57

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM SMP Investment How does annual worth change over the life of the investment? How does annual worth change when the salvage value decreases geometrically and as a gradient series?

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Annual Worth Analysis Multiple Alternatives

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Example 7.4 Recall the example involving two alternative designs for a new ride at a theme park: Alt. A costs $300,000, has net annual after-tax revenue of $55,000, and has a negligible salvage value at the end of the 10-year planning horizon; Alt. B costs $450,000, has revenue of $80,000/yr., and has a negligible salvage value. Based on an AW analysis and a 10% MARR, which is preferred? AW A (10%)= -$300,000(A|P 10%,10) + $55,000 = -$300,000( ) + $55,000 = $ =PMT(10%,10,300000) = $ AW B (10%)= -$450,000(A|P 10%,10) + $80,000 = -$450,000( ) + $80,000 = $ =PMT(10%,10,450000) = $ Analyze the impact on AW based on salvage values decreasing geometrically to 1¢ after 10 years.

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Example 7.5 For The Scream Machine alternatives (A costing $300,000, saving $55,000, and having a negligible salvage value at the end of the 10- year planning horizon; B costing $450,000, saving $80,000, and having a negligible salvage value), using an incremental AW analysis and a 10% MARR, which is preferred? AW A (10%) = -$300,000(A|P 10%,10) + $55,000 = -$300,000( ) + $55,000 = $ =PMT(10%,10,300000) = $ > $0 (A is better than “do nothing”) AW B-A (10%) = -$150,000(A|P 10%,10) + $25,000 = -$150,000( ) + $25,000 = $ =PMT(10%,10,150000) = $ > $0 (B is better than A) Prefer B

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Example 7.6 If an investor’s MARR is 12%, which mutually exclusive investment alternative maximizes the investor’s future worth, given the parameters shown below? Consider 3 scenarios: individual life cycles; least common multiple of lives; and “one-shot” investments

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Example 7.6 (Continued) Scenario 1: individual life cycles AW 1 (12%)= -$10,000(A|P 12%,3) + $ $5000(A|F 12%,3) = $ =PMT(12%,3,10000,-5000)+5000 = $ AW 2 (12%)= -$15,000(A|P 12%,6) + $5000 +$2500(A|F 5%,6) = $ =PMT(12%,6,15000,-2500)+5000 = $ AW 3 (12%) = -$20,000(A|P 12%,6) + $3000(A|G 12%,6) = $ =PMT(12%,6,-1000*NPV(12%,0,3,6,9,12,15)+20000) = $

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Scenario 2: least common multiple of lives AW 1 (12%)= -$10,000(A|P 12%,6) + $ $5000(A|F 12%,6) - $5000(A|P 12%,3)(A|P 12%,6) = $ =PMT(12%,6,10000,-5000) PMT(12%,6,PV(12%,3,,-5000))= $ AW 2 (12%)= $ = $ AW 3 (12%)= $ = $ Example 7.6 (Continued) Identical results!

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Scenario 3: “one-shot” investments AW 1 (12%)= {-$10,000 + [$5000(P|A 12%,3) + $5000(P|F 12%,3)]}(A|P 12%,6) = $ =PMT(12%,6,10000-PV(12%,3,-5000,-5000)) = $ AW 2 (12%)= $ = $ AW 3 (12%)= $ = $ Example 7.6 (Continued)

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Considering scenarios 1 and 2, is it reasonable to assume an investment alternative equivalent to Alt. 1 will be available in 3 years? If so, why was the MARR set equal to 12%?

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Example 7.7 Three industrial mowers (Small, Medium, and Large) are being evaluated by a company that provides lawn care service. Determine the economic choice, based on the following cost and performance parameters: Use AW analysis to determine the preferred mower, based on a MARR of 12%.

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Example 7.7 (Continued) AW small = -$1500(A|P 12%,2) + $20(1000) = $19, =PMT(12%,2,1500)+20*1000 = $19, AW med = -$2000(A|P 12%,3) + $25(1100) = $26, =PMT(12%,3,2000)+25*1100 = $26, AW large = -$5000(A|P 12%,5) + $24(1200) = $27, =PMT(12%,5,5000)+24*1200 = $27, What did we assume when solving the example?

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Example 7.8 If a 5-year planning horizon were used, what salvage values are required to have the same AW as before? The small mower will be replaced at the end of year 4; the medium mower will be replaced at the end of year 3. One year of service of the small mower will have the following cash flows: SV small = $19,112.45(F|A 12%,1) - $20,000(F|A 12%,1) + $1500(F|P 12%,1) = $ =FV(12%,1, )-FV(12%,1,-20000,1500) = $ SV med = $26,667.30(F|A 12%,2) - $27,500(F|A 12%,2) + $2000(F|P 12%,2) = $ =FV(12%,2, )-FV(12%,2,-27500,2000) = $ SV large = $0

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Principle #8 Compare investment alternatives over a common period of time

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Capital Recovery Cost

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM CFD for Capital Recovery Cost (CR).

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Capital Recovery Cost Formulas CR = P(A|P i,n) – F(A|F i, n) CR = (P-F)(A|F i, n) + Pi CR = (P-F)(A|P i,n) + Fi CR =PMT(i,n,-P,F) Example P = $500,000 F = $50,000 i = 10% n = 10 yrs CR = $500,000( ) - $50,000( ) = $78, CR = $450,000( ) + $500,000(0.10) = $78, CR = $450,000( ) + $50,000(0.10) = $78, CR =PMT(10%,10, ,50000) = $78,235.43

ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM