1 Luis Rodriguez, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Life Cycle Cost Analysis Virginia Concrete Conference March 6-7, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Roadway User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems Work Zone User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Federal Highway Administration.
Advertisements

B/C Ratio Engr. Faisal-ur-Rehman CED N-W.F.P UET P.
Executive Session Office of Asset Management
AD/AB - LCCA 2 nd Session Wednesday, January 29th.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Bridges In Search of Better Investment and Engineering Decisions Presented by: Hank Bonstedt Executive Director Prestressed.
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis
Update - Subcommittee on Bridges and Structures Kelley Rehm, PE July 2011.
Pavement Type Selection (Designs, Costs & Bidding) 9 th Annual Concrete Conference for the Maryland Transportation Industry March 24, 2009 Timonium, MD.
December 10, 2014 Highway Maintenance and Preservation Needs WSDOT Can Provide Reliable Long-Term Pavement Estimates, but Accuracy of Bridge Estimates.
Pavement Management Program Overview February 10, 2015 Presented By: Christopher J. Ott, E.I.
Bridge Preservation Update Wade F. Casey, P.E. Bridge Management Engineer Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOM Meeting Louisville, KY July 20, 2011.
An Overview of Notice of Proposed Rulemakings And TAM Plans MAP-21 National Performance Management Measures.
GASB#34 Asset Management TEAM Transportation Fair Presentation by: Charles J. Nemmers, P.E. Charles J. Nemmers, P.E. October 8, 2004St. Louis, Missouri.
NCHRP 07-21: Asset Management Guidance for Traffic Control Devices, Barriers, and Lighting 2014 ATSIP Annual Meeting Presented by Nancy Lefler Vanasse.
Castellanza, 20 th October and 3 rd November, 2010 FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION. Corporate Finance.
Pavement Type Selection – Updated Guidance on Use of Alternate Bidding Virginia Concrete Conference Richmond, VA March 6, 2014.
FHWA Life Cycle Costs Analysis and Pavement Type Selection Guidance Maryland Concrete 2014 Conference March 18, 2014.
Steve Krebs, Bob Arndorfer, and Jed Peters – DTSD-Bureau of Technical Services April 29, 2013.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
Steve Krebs and Jed Peters– DTSD-Bureau of Technical Services July 29, 2013.
Business plan overview (1)
Moving Toward a Performance- based Federal-aid Highway Program Integrating Maintenance AASHTO Subcommittee on Maintenance July 18, 2011 Peter Stephanos.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design - In Search of Better Investment Decisions - Office of Asset Management Federal Highway Administration Executive.
Present Worth Analysis Lecture No.15 Professor C. S. Park Fundamentals of Engineering Economics Copyright © 2005.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
Overview of the Federal Aid Process for Transportation Projects.
Thermally Insulated Concrete Pavements: Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Methods and Preliminary Results January 10, 2011 John Harvey Nick Santero Lev Khazanovich.
Value Engineering. Definition Value Engineering (VE) is defined as a systematic process of review and analysis of a project, during the concept and design.
Stephane Larocque – Consulting Practice Leader, Impact Infrastructure A DECISION MAKING FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT 1 ST INTERNATIONAL.
Patrick DeCorla-Souza, P3 Program Manager, FHWA
Benefit Cost Analysis Nathaniel D. Coley Jr
Benjamin Krom, PE Michigan Department of Transportation.
The Environment and Cost Benefit Analysis in Feasibility Studies
TAM ETG Webinar #3 Network Life Cycle Analysis Part 1: Introduction and Overview Wednesday, July 8,
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
AASHTO SCOP Linking Planning to Programming P2P Link Rural Transportation Summit January 16, 2014 ADOT Vision and Long-Range Plan Planning to Programming.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
1 Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management.
Economic Analysis: Applications to Work Zones March 25, 2004.
AT Benefit Cost Analysis Model Highway Design, Project Management and Training Section Technical Standards Branch Presented by Bill Kenny, Director: Design,
FHWA Reorganization Update Program Performance Management Standing Committee on Performance Management Meeting Detroit, MI October 14, 2011 Peter Stephanos.
National Highway Institute Federal Highway Administration
Project preparation and appraisal. Preparation of project report and appraisal are intimately tied up.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Bridges In Search of Better Investment and Engineering Decisions.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Introduction to Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Agency Energy ManagerLife-Cycle Cost Methodology Mike Mills, CPA, BEP.
Transportation Asset Management Presented by: Eric Gabler Economist, Office of Asset Management Federal Highway Administration FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION.
1 Approaches for Integrating Systems Engineering into Your Agency’s Business Practices Presented by: Amy Tang McElwain August 2, 2007 Talking Technology.
Chapter 3 Framework for Treatment Selection From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG)
Size Standards Analysis: SBA Methodology Presented to: The Council on Federal Procurement of Architectural & Engineering Services (COFPAES) By: Khem R.
FHWA Update Butch Wlaschin, P.E. Director, Office of Asset Management AASHTO Highway Subcommittee on Construction 2010 Annual Meeting Burlington, Vermont.
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Measure Update.
MICHIGAN EXPERIENCE WITH WARRANTY WORK. Warranty Program History Why Warranties ? Warranty Specifications Experience & Lessons Learned.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) of Buildings
Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh April 19, 2005 April 19, 2005 Pavement Preservation Sub-Group on Strategy Selection & Evaluation.
Road Network Evaluation Tools (RONET) Version 2.00 January, 2009 Rodrigo Archondo-Callao.
BLOCK 4 SELECTION OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Pavement Data Collection Project evaluation Select feasible alternatives Reconstruction Restoration Recycling.
Highway Safety Analysis: Engineering Kenneth Epstein, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Programs Safety Data and Analysis Tools Workshop.
PAVEMENT TYPE SELECTION Hesham Mahgoub, PhD, PE. South Dakota State University South Dakota Department of Transportation, Office of Road Design.
97 th Annual Purdue Road School Presented by: Katie Zimmerman, P.E. Applied Pavement Technology Transportation Asset Management.
Accounting systems design & evaluation 9434SB 18 March 2002.
Road Investment Decision Framework
Multi-Year Programming and Predictive Modelling
Capital Budgeting 2 2.
Life-Cycle Costing for Innovative Pavement Preservation Treatments
Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Costing and Finance P R Upadhyay.
Pavement Type Selection – Updated Guidance on Use of Alternate Bidding
Presentation transcript:

1 Luis Rodriguez, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Life Cycle Cost Analysis Virginia Concrete Conference March 6-7, 2014

2  Life Cycle Cost Analysis Definition  LCCA Five Steps Process  Current Issues  Resources / Reference Presentation Outline

3  A process for evaluating the total economic worth of a usable project segment by analyzing initial costs and discounted future costs, such as maintenance, user, reconstruction, rehabilitation, restoring, and resurfacing costs, over the life of the project segment. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Definition Source: Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century

Transportation Performance Management An analytical tool to provide a cost comparison between two or more competing design alternatives producing equivalent benefits for the project being analyzed. LCCA Overview

5  Step 1: Establish alternatives  Step 2: Determine timing of required activities  Step 3: Estimate agency and user costs  Step 4: Compute life-cycle costs  Step 5: Analyze the results The LCCA Process

6  Activities to ensure performance  Initial construction or rehabilitation activity  Future rehabilitation and preservation activities Step 1: Establish Alternatives

7 Terminal Serviceability Index Serviceability Initial Activity Activity One Activity Two Time When will the future preservation and countermeasure costs be incurred? Service Life Analysis Period Step 2: Determine Activity Timing Long enough to capture differences between alternatives

8  Include cost elements that are different between alternatives  Exclude cost elements that are the same between alternatives  Agency overhead costs  Real estate acquisitions  Normal operations user costs Step 3: Estimate Agency and User Costs

9  Approach fundamentals  Compare demand and capacity under normal operations and work zone conditions  Determine how traffic is impacted  Convert traffic impacts into costs Step 3: Estimate Agency and User Costs

10 Cash Flow Diagram User Costs Rehab 1 Work Zone Initial Activity Work Zone Preservation Work Zones Preservation Activities Rehab 1 Initial Activity Agency Costs $ $ Time Salvage or Remaining Value

11 Step 4: Calculate NPV of Life-cycle Costs Net Present Value = of Costs N k = 0 Σ 1 (1 + d) n k (Cost k ) x Cost k = cost of activity N = length of analysis period d = discount rate n k = year of expenditure Present Value Factor

12  How do agency costs compare?  How do user costs compare?  Can trade-offs be made? Step 5: Analyze the Results

MAP 21 and LCCA GAO Report: LCCA – Pavement Selection LCCA and Alternative Bidding Current Issues

Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 and LCCA

Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 to asset management? Each State is required to develop a risk-based asset management plan for the National Highway System (NHS) to improve or preserve the condition of the assets and the performance of the system. (23 U.S.C. 119(e)(1), MAP-21 § 1106)

Transportation Performance Management Highway Asset Management Plan Plan Contents – pavement and bridge inventory and conditions on the NHS – objectives and measures – performance gap identification – lifecycle cost and risk management analysis – a financial plan – investment strategies

Transportation Performance Management GAO and Next Steps

Transportation Performance Management GAO and Next Steps  Define Program Characteristics  Obtain Data  Verify what was used was correct  Document the Estimate  Present Estimate for approval  Update the Estimate

19  What is the FHWA position on alternate bidding for pavement type selection? FHWA considers alternate pavement type bidding a suitable approach for determining pavement type when engineering and economic analysis does not indicate a clear choice between different pavement designs. Alternate Bidding FHWA Program Performance Management 19

Transportation Performance Management Consideration of Challenges Flexibility Consistency LCCA

21 LCCA Resources LCCA Technical Bulletin LCCA Case Study LCCA Primer User Manual

22 RealCost LCCA Software Microsoft Excel based application – existing user expertise and user customizable User interface – separates inputs from analysis methodology Offers both Deterministic and Probabilistic Analysis Available free of charge, regular enhancements and technical assistance from FHWA

23  FHWA LCCA Internet Site: /lcca.cfm  GAO Report : LCCA-Pavement Selection  FHWA TA on Use of Alternative Bidding for Pavement Type Selection: Reference

24 Thank You Luis Rodriguez, P.E. Federal Highway Administration