1 PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE Classified Staff Performance Evaluation To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select “Picture” Locate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Appraisals
Advertisements

Providing Feedback to Employees
Performance Management
Performance Management
What is Pay & Performance?
Performance Development
Manager Performance Evaluation
The University of Alabama Annual Employee Performance Evaluation Supervisor Tutorial (Length/Completion Time: 21 Slides/Approximately 10 Minutes)
1 The Revised PEP Process Presented by… Rick Losemann Director, Employee Relations Division Office of Personnel Services and Benefits.
HOUSTON EMPLOYEE ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW (HEAR) PROCESS INFORMATION SESSION NON-SUPERVISOR For more information, visit
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Supervisors.
1. Set expectations and measure performance ◦ What employees are expected to do for their organization in return for pay and benefits ◦ Allows employees.
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
UMW Administrative and Professional Faculty Performance Evaluation Process.
Evaluations: Administrative & Classified Employees
Introduction Performance appraisals, reviews and evaluations are all terms used to describe a process for documenting and communicating employees’ performance.
Supervision: Concepts and Practices of Management,
Performance Management Review FAQs
+ NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS March 2010-April 2011 and January 2011-December 2011.
2012 Performance Evaluation System. Why An Evaluation? O Set expectations between Supervisor and the employee. O Valuable tool for an employees in their.
How to organize your thesis? Ku-Yaw Chang Department of E.E. National Cheng-Kung University No.1 University Rd. Tainan, Taiwan, R.O.C. To insert your company.
WRITING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Penn State ITS 1. Goals for Today 2  Introduction  Performance management timeline  Process for Job Responsibilities.
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of The Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management Human Resources Center The Department of Labor’s Performance.
Performance Appraisal in the Public Sector
Human Resource Management, 8th Edition
How to Conduct Effective Performance Reviews. Session Objectives You will be able to: –Identify the importance and benefits of Performance Reviews –Assess.
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Annual Review Process Georgi Lowe UWSA Office of Human Resources & Workforce Diversity.
Performance Review. Keys to a Successful Performance Review  Know and understand the University and department mission  Understand the importance of.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
Please take time to introduce yourself and exchange business cards with others at your table…
BASICS OF WORKFORCE PLANNING
United States Fire Administration Chief Officer Training Curriculum Human Resource Development Module 6: Managing the Workforce.
Lecture 23.
Preparing your Cover Letter To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select “Picture” Locate your logo file Click OK To resize the.
To insert your business’ logo on this slide From the Insert Menu, Select “Picture” Locate your logo file, click OK To resize the logo Click anywhere inside.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
Chapter 4 Performance Management and Appraisal
Career Decisions and the World of Work Career & Advising Services Reid Hall
Lecture 10: Performance Appraisal. Class Overview n Course Administration n Performance Appraisal Discussion.
HUMAN RESOURCES Teach Cobb! It’s Better at the Top! Evaluating Central Office Employees Evaluator Training for Clerical Evaluations July 2008.
Accountability Presented by Mollie Schaffer August 13 th, 2014.
RBA TOP TEN LIST RBA TOP TEN LIST To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select “Picture” Locate your logo file Click OK To resize.
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
Chapter 6 Some Human Aspects of Organizing. Advanced Organizer.
Module 1: Writing Your Functional Competency Assessment East Carolina University Department of Human Resources Classification and Compensation.
Office of Human and Resources 2014/2015 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS & GUIDELINES.
Preparing your Cover Letter To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select “Picture” Locate your logo file Click OK To resize the.
Unrepresented Staff Yearly Performance Reviews Tips for an Effective Review.
Introduction to SEPAP: An Explanation of the Program  Importance of employee participation in the appraisal process  Learn the three phases of SEPAP.
MODULE 3 Policies, Procedures & Supervisor Responsibilities.
2014 – 2015 EVALUATION PERIOD KCTCS ePerformance Training.
Continuing Medical Education Guidance for Planners of Regularly Scheduled Series (RSS) To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select.
STARS! GoalsTraining Strategic Talent Assessment and Reporting System
Performance Management
Performance Management
Human Aspects of Organizing Reading: pp. 173 – 183.
TOPS TRAINING.
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION: THE CAREER ADVANTAGE
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Kristan Williams Soave HR Dept
Performance Management System
Employee Performance Management System
Employee Performance Management System (EPMS)
PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS – WHY DO THEY GO WRONG?
Performance Management Training
Kristan Williams Soave HR Dept
HWKgraphics0.
Presentation transcript:

1 PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE Classified Staff Performance Evaluation To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select “Picture” Locate your logo file Click OK To resize the logo Click anywhere inside the logo. The boxes that appear outside the logo are known as “resize handles.” Use these to resize the object. If you hold down the shift key before using the resize handles, you will maintain the proportions of the object you wish to resize. 2006

2 Introduction to the Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Process Performance evaluations must be conducted annually for all classified staff not more than ninety (90) days before and not less than (30) days prior to the employee anniversary date. Employees are rated annually using the standards based performance scale shown on the right using alpha categories (E,AA,S or U). RATING SCALE PERFORMANCE RATING SCALE E= EXCEEDS STANDARD - A rating reflecting the performance of the duties and responsibilities of the job and productivity at a level that substantially exceeds the “Above Average” level of performance. Average” level of performance. AA=ABOVE AVERAGE - A rating reflecting the performance of the duties and responsibilities of the job at a level which is above the “Satisfactory” level of performance. S=SATISFACTORY - A rating reflecting the performance of the duties and responsibilities which demonstrates competency in the performance of the duties and responsibilities of the job. U=UNSATISFACTORY -A rating reflecting the performance of the duties and responsibilities at a level that is consistently unacceptable in accuracy, quality, or timeliness.

3 Why Do Performance Evaluation? Acts 100 and 101 of 1985 require that all state employees occupying positions covered under provisions of Arkansas State Code , as amended, be evaluated once a year.

4 Performance Evaluation Overview  An Employee Performance Review for all classified staff is required annually to determine if their level of job performance is at least Satisfactory or greater in their performance of assigned job duties.  An Employee Performance Review for all classified staff is required annually to determine if their level of job performance is at least Satisfactory or greater in their performance of assigned job duties.  Performance Review for all classified staff is required at Pulaski Tech six (6) months after employment to give new employees feedback and direction as they perform their essential job duties at Pulaski Tech. Performance evaluations are required annually for all classified staff.  Performance Review for all classified staff is required at Pulaski Tech six (6) months after employment to give new employees feedback and direction as they perform their essential job duties at Pulaski Tech. Performance evaluations are required annually for all classified staff.

5 What Role Do I Play In The Performance Evaluation Process Reviewing Official – Assigned responsibility to review overall rating upon completion. Rater – Responsible for conducting annual rating as the employee immediate supervisor. Employee – Perform daily duties to best of ability.

6 Role of Reviewing Official The reviewing official for the Performance Evaluation process for classified staff is the HR Director. The reviewing official reviews ratings conducted by supervisors, provides guidance and feedback to raters, monitors the overall evaluation process and answer questions form raters and/or employees.

7 Role of Supervisors Role of Supervisors Identify Specific Job Tasks to be performed by employee. Identify Duty Areas (grouping of similar job tasks). This is usually no more than five (5) Duty Areas and no less than three (3). Identify Performance Standards (requirements to perform job at satisfactory level). A Duty Area may have more than one Standard. Observe employee performance to record necessary documentation to arrive at overall rating at end of evaluation period. Communicate to employee job expectations and provide feedback concerning performance. Coach. Complete annual review no less than thirty (30) days prior to employee anniversary date. Anniversary date, sometimes called increase eligibility date, is one year from date of hire. Communicate performance results to employee, listen and provide feedback. Route completed Evaluation forms to Human Resources, Administration Building, Room 103. Develop rating forms for the next twelve (12) month rating period, sign, keep original on file and send copy to HR.

8 Role of Employee Perform assign duties at a level of satisfactory or greater. Communicate with supervisor for feedback concerning performance of job duties. Partner with supervisor in career development and performance of assigned duties.

9 Need for Documentation Legal requirements. Describes performance which exceeds standards, is above average, satisfactory or falls short of the fully satisfactory level. Provides record of communication to employee regarding performance review. Provides written goals and communicates priorities of the department. Can be used a management tool.

10 Guidelines for Documentation Be consistent for all employees. Document activities not attitudes. Make the file accessible to the employee but confidential. Document incidents that describe all levels of performance. Good performance should be documented as well as poor performance. Be timely, record activity as soon as possible after the occurrence. Be accurate and record only the facts. It is a good idea to let the employee sign the note file. Make sure documentation reflects the complete picture, don’t build a case.

11 Some Common Rater Errors Error A: Tendency to rate employee relative to other individuals. Error B: Tendency to make an initial favorable or unfavorable judgment about an employee that is not justified by the employee’s subsequent job behavior. Error C: Inappropriate generalization from one aspect of a person’s performance to all aspects of the person’s job performance. Solution A: Base evaluation on per-determined job performance. Solution B: Reserve judgment until end of rating period. Be a note taker more than an evaluator during the interval. Solution C: Don’t listen to comments about an employee until you have made your own evaluation. A person may perform well in one duty area while performing poorly in another.

12 More Common Rater Errors Error D: A tendency to judge more favorably people who are similar rather than dissimilar in attitudes and background. Error E: Consistently rating employees at the midpoint of a scale. Error F: Consistently rating employees at the low or high end of the scale. Solution D: Make certain all criteria on which employees are evaluated are clearly job related. Solution E: Record exactly the performance observed. Compare what you record with the standards. Solution F: Rate the employee’s performance of the key responsibilities in relation to the performance standards of the position.

13 Advantages of Performance Evaluation Advantages of Performance Evaluation  Employee understands clearly what is expected.  Allows employee feedback while performing job.  Allows supervisor to provide guidance for job improvement.  Allows assessment of progress toward shared goals.  Allows employee to meet clearly stated department needs.

14 Other Guidelines When an employee is promoted, demoted or transferred during the evaluation period, the following should apply: A. If the employee is promoted, demoted or transferred within the first six months of the rating period, the new supervisor will evaluate the employee on the established performance standards for the new position and the former supervisor need not complete an evaluation. B. If the employee is promoted, demoted or transferred after the first six months of the rating period, a formal evaluation should be completed by the former supervisor. The new supervisor has final authority to establish the performance evaluation plan and determine the overall performance category. C. If a rating supervisor is transferred to another section or terminates employment, performance evaluations should be completed for those employees whose most recent evaluation was completed more than 90 days prior to the supervisor's termination date.

15 TIPS Clearly state Performance Standards. Performance Standards identify expected job performance at the satisfactory level. Performance Standards should be measurable. Performance standards should include a method of monitoring the standard. Give legitimate reasons for criticism. Praise good and exceptional performance. Avoid criticizing using subjective criteria. Conduct ratings using objective criteria that is job related. Maintain good documentation.

16 Performance Evaluation Time Line STEP 1 - Develop standards for new employees within thirty (30) days of hire. STEP 2 - Forward signed copy of evaluation at the beginning of rating period signed by employee and supervisor (signatures for the beginning of rating period are placed at top part of page 4) to Human Resources. STEP 3 - Maintain original copy as employee file. STEP 4 - Document performance during evaluation period. STEP 5 - Complete evaluation for new employee six (6) months after initial hire date. STEP 6 - Complete annual evaluation thereafter at least (30) days prior to employee anniversary date (one year from date of hire). STEP 7 - Forward the completed evaluation signed by employee and supervisor ( signatures for the end of the rating period are placed at bottom half of page 4) to HR. STEP 8 - Repeat STEP 2 above to began new rating period on an annual basis.

17 We appreciate you taking time to learn more about the Performance Evaluation Process. Thank you !

18 Who to ask? Who to ask? For Assistance Contact : Human Resources Essie Cleveland - ( )