2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Supervisors.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
10 Keys to Delivering Performance Reviews
Advertisements

Performance Management
Performance Management
What is Pay & Performance?
1 Performance Assessment Process: The Reviewer’s Perspective May 2014.
Nova Southeastern University Nova Southeastern University facilitated by: facilitated by: Aaron Greenberg and Maureen Simunek-Appelt Office of Human Resources.
4/6/2017 Department of Human Resources New Performance Appraisal Forms Tutorial Effective: January 2013.
Welcome to the Writing Performance Plan Elements & Standards Workshop.
The University of Alabama Annual Employee Performance Evaluation Supervisor Tutorial (Length/Completion Time: 21 Slides/Approximately 10 Minutes)
1. Set expectations and measure performance ◦ What employees are expected to do for their organization in return for pay and benefits ◦ Allows employees.
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
Performance Management Review FAQs
Performance Management at UMASS Medical School
2012 Performance Evaluation System. Why An Evaluation? O Set expectations between Supervisor and the employee. O Valuable tool for an employees in their.
Performance Assessment Process: The Employee’s Perspective May 2014.
System Office Performance Management
Performance Appraisal System Update
WHAT TO SAY AND HOW TO SAY IT. Conducting Performance Reviews.
Performance Appraisal
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
STAFF APPRAISAL PROGRAMS
Hitting the Jackpot with Your Performance Review SWON Staff Symposium.
System Office Performance Management
Annual Review Process Georgi Lowe UWSA Office of Human Resources & Workforce Diversity.
Performance Management Training
Performance Evaluation Process June 19th and June 26 th.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
Annual Self Assessment Workshop for Employees
Performance Management
Performance Planning Presented by: Mike Dougherty AVP for Human Resources.
RESETTING PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT – MANAGER AS COACH Manager Briefing & Discussion Sessions Winter 2013.
Making the most of the Performance Evaluation Process 2009.
National Food Service Management Institute
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
Making the Most of Your 2009 Performance Evaluation
Lecture 23.
18 Evaluating Staff Performance.
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
Engaging in Effective Performance Discussions June 6, 2013.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
DMS Leadership Team Meeting September 23, :00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
Chapter 4 Performance Management and Appraisal
Performance Management  Performance Management Cycle  Organizational Success  Shared Responsibilities  Setting Goals and Expectations.
Performance Development at The Cathedral of the Incarnation A Supervisor’s Guide.
Successfully Conducting Employee Performance Appraisals Wendy L. McCoy Director HR & Benefits Florida Conference of The United Methodist Church.
System Office Performance Management Human Resources Fall 2015.
A Guide for Management. Overview Benefits of entity-level controls Nature of entity-level controls Types of entity-level controls, control objectives,
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
Performance Management Petr Eliáš, NGO conference Vienna 2011.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
New Supervisors’ Guide To Effective Supervision
Unit II PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK.
1 Chapter 19: Evaluating Performance Coaching Essentials of Performance Evaluation Making the Evaluation The Appraisal Interview Follow-Up Legal Aspects.
2015/16 Staff Performance Appraisals Webinar for ANR Supervisors Spring 2016.
Performance Evaluation Policy Macon County. Performance Appraisal is a process... Not a form or document.
Unrepresented Staff Yearly Performance Reviews Tips for an Effective Review.
Organizational Behavior (MGT-502) Lecture-43. Summary of Lecture-42.
Performance Management Training. ©SHRM Objectives Performance management v. performance appraisal Creating the “right” environment Learning to develop.
HSA Performance Management Program 2016 Performance Development Plan.
Performance Appraisals Guide for Supervisors. Table of Contents Why Do Performance Appraisals?3 What Employees Want To Know4 Why Performance Appraisals.
Performance Management
Performance Management
Performance Management Training
My Performance Journey
Performance Management Training
Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees
Performance Management Training
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
My Performance Journey
Presentation transcript:

2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Supervisors

Discussion Overview  Effective Performance Management Process Components  2009 Performance Evaluation Summary  Process Enhancements  Results  Preparing for 2010 Performance Evaluations  Process Enhancements  Tools and Tips for Conducting Effective Evaluations

Components of an Effective Performance Management Process  Connects individual performance to SU’s Mission, Vision, Values and Strategic Initiatives  Measures and Recognizes Individual Performance and Contributions  Promotes Excellence and Professional Development

Connects to Mission, Vision, Values & Strategic Initiatives Job Description Professional Dev. Individual Mission, Vision, Initiatives Policies, Procedures, Expected Competencies Division/Department Mission, Vision and Values Strategic Initiatives Policies, Procedures, Expected Competencies University

2009 Performance Evaluation Summary Enhancements  Professional Competencies linked to University Mission, Vision and Values  Option of Narrative or Structured Format  Overall Rating, expanded to 5-point scale  Refined Goals Section  Solicited information on Development Needs and, Supervisory Support and Improvement Opportunities

2009 Performance Evaluation Summary Results  Overall University Completion Rate = 84%  Professional Skill Development Needs Expressed  Supervisory  Communications  Project/Time Management  Software/ OIT

2010 Staff Evaluation Process Enhancements  Further Refined Rating Definitions  Created separate Self-Evaluation and Supervisor Evaluation Forms  Addition of Supervisory/Leadership Competency Section

The Performance Management and Evaluation Process 5 Key Performance Management Processes Performance Evaluation Overview/Timeline Tips on Preparing Performance Evaluations

5 Key Performance Management Processes  Articulation of Expectations: Job Clarification and Goal Alignment  Consistent Performance Tracking  Check-In Meetings: interim performance conversations  Manage Performance Problems as they occur  Wrap it all together: The Annual Performance Evaluation

Performance Evaluation Overview and Timeline  Set date and time for an evaluation meeting  Prepare for the meeting, including completion of a performance evaluation form  Exchange evaluations forms prior to the meeting date  Meet to review and discuss performance and set forth plans for the future  Supervisor and employee finalize evaluation forms, and submit to HR by August 31st

Preparation: Information Gathering  Notes from on-going meetings, assignments, observations, performance discussion reflections during the year  Job Description  Individual’s Resume  Previous Performance Evaluation and projects, goals  Feedback from students/customers, co-workers, others  Work samples, accomplishment

Objective and Valuable Documentation  Accurate Objective facts, records, and incidents  Time Appropriate Events or incidents should have taken place within the evaluation period  Behavioral Address what someone does, rather than his or her thoughts or beliefs  Consistent Use similar information and level of detail for each person evaluated  Complete Include sufficient details and specific examples to back up conclusions on performance.

Writing Do’s and Don’ts Do  Describe behaviors  Be specific  Document observed behaviors  Document impact of behavior Don’t  Use labels or judgments  Be general  Rely on hearsay  Judge based on personal preference

Overall Performance Rating  The scale of 1-5 is used with specific definitions for each point on the scale.  Consistency between ratings and comments on performance, goals and professional development needs  Use whole numbers when rating a specific job performance area or overall performance.

Not Acceptable Performance Performance Needs Development Meets Expectations Exceeds ExpectationsOutstanding Performance is consistently below job expectations. A corrective action plan has been or is being developed to achieve specific results. Employee’s performance will be review again according to the corrective action plan’s objectives and timeline. Performance meets most of the job requirements but requires more than usual supervisor follow-up and direction. Employee will require additional education and coaching from the supervisor in order to consistently meet job expectations. Performance consistently meets and sometimes exceeds job requirements. All critical goals are achieved. Results are consistent with those of a fully trained, highly competent employee. Over the past year has made the expected contributions to the department. Performance consistently meets and frequently exceeds job requirements and established goals. Results frequently exceed competent peers in the same or similar positions. Over the past year has made a significant contribution to the department. Performance and demonstrated expertise is consistently at a superior level. Employee achieves outstanding results and models effective behaviors that are an inspiration to others. Over the review period, employee has consistently made exceptional or unique contributions to the department.

Rating Pitfalls to Avoid  The Halo Effect: Allowing one good aspect of a person’s character or performance to influence the entire evaluation.  The Horns Effect: Allowing one negative aspect of a person’s character or performance to influence the entire evaluation.  Partial Rating: Basing the rating on the most recent period of time, not the total evaluation period.  Similar to me: Evaluating more favorably those who are similar to the rater  Favoritism: Evaluating friends higher than other employees.

What’s the harm in a bit of “evaluation inflation”?  Impacts the person being evaluated: loss of full potential, professional development, motivation  Impacts the work group: communicates that people are not held fully accountable or that there is preferential treatment  Impacts you as a manager: leadership effectiveness, management decisions  Impacts overall performance of work group, department, divisions, the university

Goal Setting Goal setting is completed as part of the annual evaluation process. As you review accomplishments and performance for the previous period, you also set goals for coming year. Both the employee and supervisor should agree on the goals.  What’s a goal? Specific statements that describe results to be achieved  What’s a task? The steps needed to accomplish a goal  SMART Goals  Specific  Results Oriented  Measurable  Time Bound  Achievable

Evaluation Meeting Preparation  What are the important items you want to discuss at the meeting?  Is there one central message or critical point to be addressed?  What questions do you have for the meeting?  What do you want to get out of this meeting?  In what ways will you actively contribute to a meaningful, constructive and productive dialog?

At the Evaluation Meeting  Make sure the time and place are planned; allow for enough time; no interruptions; a comfortable setting.  Be prepared. Know your goals for the meeting, have examples ready.  Listen. To have a full picture, you need the other person’s perspective.  Be candid—get to the point.  Be constructive in feedback

The Five Levels of Listening 1.Listening to UNDERSTAND 2.Listening for APPLICATION 3.Listening to TELL MY STORY 4.Listening for JUDGMENT 5.NOT Listening

Giving Feedback Constructive Feedback is:  descriptive of behavior and impact  specific not general  directed at behavior that can be changed  interactive to ensure clear communication  stated in the first person to assign responsibility  based on observed behavior  balanced

Receiving Feedback  Breathe! – it helps the body to relax and the brain to focus  Listen Actively to understand the other’s perspective Paraphrase and Ask Questions to ensure you are accurately receiving the intended message  Take time to absorb what you heard  Take responsibility for your actions and behavior  Focus on the whole message, not just one or two aspects

Wrap Up and Next Steps  Review the key points  Assure the employee that you want to work together to help continue his or her development  Summarize agreed-on actions you will both take – including writing of goals and their due dates  Ask the employee to sign the evaluation form

Components of an Effective Performance Management Process  Connects individual performance to SU’s Mission, Vision, Values and Strategic Initiatives  Measures and Recognizes Individual Performance and Contributions  Promotes Professional Excellence and Professional Development