ENGAGE Guide to Performance Management 2010-11 Updates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Advertisements

On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
PRD Group Maturity Matrix 31/07/08. Maturity Matrix Guidance Notes Aims of the Matrix The Maturity Matrix is a tool aimed to support groups during their.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
1 Performance Assessment Process: The Reviewer’s Perspective May 2014.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
System Office Performance Management
GOAL SETTING CONFERENCES BRIDGEPORT, CT SEPTEMBER 2-3,
System Office Performance Management
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
Performance and Development Process What to take from 2014/15 Improved understanding of the guidelines Reflective Teacher Practice Genuine and meaningful.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) “101”
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Reservoir Primary School Literacy Share Day
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Overview.
Strategic Planning and AdvancEd Accreditation In partnership with Quality New Mexico Taos NMSBA Leadership Conference July 13, 2012.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Quality Standards Beginning of The Year Self-Assessment.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 September 2015.
TAPCo. Full Staff Mtg March 17 th Agenda ● ADVANCE ● Regents.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Education Unit The Practicum Experience Session Two.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
System Office Performance Management Human Resources Fall 2015.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Developing Personal and Academic Excellence in the Catholic Tradition Developing Leaders Through the AdvancED Accreditation Process Rapid City Catholic.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
R 0 G125 B 177 R 78 G 47 B 145 R 185 G 50 B 147 R 245 G132 B 107 R 255 G234 B 83 R 123 G193 B 67 R149 G169 B 202 Goal Setting Guide 2015.
Office of Service Quality
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
© PeopleAdvantage 2013 All Rights Reserved We will Show You How to Easily Conduct Effective Performance Appraisals LCSA Conference 2013.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Goal Setting and Professional Development Plan Teacher Overview.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Goal Setting and Professional Development Plan Teacher Overview.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Butler University Goal and Performance System (GPS) Human Resources
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Licensed Educator Professional Growth and Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

ENGAGE Guide to Performance Management Updates

The Purpose of ENGAGE  The ENGAGE performance management plan allows us to create methodical and predictable ways to improve results across the organization in an effort to achieve our strategic targets.  The accompanying guide helps make ENGAGE clear, comprehensive and cohesive.  Setting goals, tracking progress, and receiving feedback are connected to supervisor and coach support.  Rubric expectations drive the performance management process and help ensure excellence for our students!

Creating Greater Transparency  ENGAGE, along with other tools like Data Dashboards, allows us to bring transparency to the performance of all adults in our organization

Major Components of ENGAGE Guide  Pieces of the performance management puzzle  Step-by-step sequencing & timeline  Goal-setting & portfolio examples  Templates to document progress  Communication tips  Definitions of key terms  Answers to common questions

What’s New Since Last Year?  ENGAGE expanded to include all staff members (teachers, administrators, coaches, non-instructional, etc.)  Common forms/procedures aligned with the steps outlined in the timeline for each role  Deadlines set for key benchmarks and reporting information  Goal-setting and feedback process better linked to ongoing observations and protocol for both coaches and administrators  Better aligned to DCPS IMPACT AND BALTIMORE PBES  Technology like digital pens and posting to SharePoint should be used more consistently to create efficient ways to document progress on a day-to-day basis  Using HRB system for electronic reporting of mid-year and end-of-year final ratings may be replaced by a platform with broader analytic capabilities and greater ease-of-use – stay tuned!

What’s New Since Last Year?  For teachers - individual target to move 100% of students one grade level changed to a range of between % to better recognize outstanding staff that may have just a few students prevent them from hitting that target  % is full achievement of that target  50-79% is partial achievement of that target  Below 50% does not meet that target  Similarly, for teachers - individual target to move at least 25% of students more than one grade level can also be partially achieved:  25% or more is full achievement of that target  20-24% is partial achievement of that target  Below 20% does not meet that target  For teachers - when calculating an overall rating:  Rubric worth 40%  Individual targets 40%  School-wide targets 20%  Shift based on increasing demand to focus more on individual classroom data tied to student achievement (matches Arne Duncan’s requirements for Race to the Top)

What’s New Since Last Year?  For teachers - number of self-selected goals reduced from 3 to 2 to be able to give more weight to each one – selected from any two value-drivers, but they must be two different value-drivers  For teachers - Self-Rating and Action Plan forms updated to be more functional and user-friendly, more of a growth/support tool  For teachers - rubric supported by DICE handbook that outlines the baseline practices that can lead to rubric proficiency and gives more detail about techniques that can lead to growth in each area  For all staff - meeting enrollment eliminated from list of school-wide targets to give more weight to other measures that have more of a year- long focus  For all staff – “needs improvement” rating changed to “in progress”

Pieces of the ENGAGE puzzle

Updated ENGAGE Components for Teachers

ENGAGE Timeline: Setting Targets/Goals  Teachers complete self-assessment reflection and identify areas of growth within the rubric standards  Supervisors and coaches conduct walkthroughs and use classroom observation forms to note baseline info  Supervisors and staff discuss self-assessment and walkthrough feedback together as they finalize self-selected goals and review pre-set targets  Coaches follow up with staff members and help them flesh out goals within action plan, listing key practices and techniques they will employ to reach their goals, along with support needed

ENGAGE Timeline: Tracking Progress  Supervisors and coaches regularly visit classrooms and provide feedback using observation forms and teacher trackers  Coaches regularly meet with teachers and provide professional development as part of coaching cycle/targeted support  Teachers start to collect artifacts from their teaching practice for their portfolio to demonstrate rubric proficiency  Mid-year conference opportunity to review and discuss progress to date (data includes observations, portfolio, data dashboards, mid-year self-rating form, etc.)

ENGAGE Timeline: Giving Feedback  Teachers compile a final portfolio that includes all of the evidence they have collected throughout the year to support their rubric progress  Teachers fill out the end-of-year portion of their self-rating form and submit to their supervisor  Supervisors add their comments and then discuss along with accumulated data during end-of-year evaluation meetings  Any pending assessment data will be finalized by the Community Office over the summer and added to final ratings  Cycle begins again with review of previous data and performance while planning for the next fall

What does process look like for non- instructional staff?  Observations of performance made throughout the year based on the non-instructional staff rubric  80% of rating based on rubric performance  All staff also held accountable for school-wide goals – 20% of rating  Non-instructional staff will fill out self-rating form before mid and end-of-year conferences and review supervisor’s comments together  Non-instructional staff do not have to complete a full portfolio, but they are still welcome to submit relevant documents that support their proficiency to their supervisor

Key Forms & Templates  Look in the appendix of your guide to find copies of the following forms, as applicable to your role:  Annual Performance Plan (includes Self-Assessment & Target-Setting Guidelines)  Action Planning Form  Portfolio Cover Sheet  Portfolio Reflection Sheet  Performance Behavior Rubric  Self-Rating Form  Classroom Observation Form  Teacher Tracker Example  Supervisors also have supportive templates for classroom walkthroughs, improvement plans, etc.

Key Pages of the Guide  pg (Overview of process)  pg (Timeline with deadlines)  pg. 31 (Overview of components & weightings)  pg. 33 (Quick Start guide to beginning the year)  pg (Annual Performance Plan & Action Plan samples)  pg. 72 (Mid-Year Conference Checklist)  pg. 78 (End-of-Year Evaluation process)  Pg. 90 (Beginning of appendix/forms)

Other Structures that Support ENGAGE ENGAGED Friendship  We expect our teachers to be ENGAGED educators with highly engaging and effective classrooms:  D.I.C. E. is the acronym of how we have organized our teacher trainings to ensure increase performance and more engaged teachers. We have developed the DICE teacher handbook that encompass practices all educators must be able to master as the work toward proficiency ratings in ENGAGE. We have established baseline practices that we will look for in every classroom by the end of September and will ensure to identify the wide range of practices are teachers must master to receive a proficient rating in ENGAGE. We will ensure to build out DICE by establishing a committee where teachers can share techniques that are positively impacting student performance and ensuring they have the college ready skills America needs. The committee will approve techniques and add them to our DICE handbook. The better we become at these techniques and practice the more proficient teachers we will have in our classrooms and in the end more proficient students we will produce.  ENGAGE with Friendship  Our data talk cycle is at the heart of all our performance management work. We have witnessed the better schools, teachers, leaders and all staff are at looking at student data weekly with a different protocols, the better results for their students. In addition, at Friendship learn how all students MUST use PDSA systems to “own their growth” as we push to have world class outcomes in every classroom. Every adult at Friendship should look at weekly data to understand how the demonstrating their ability to produce results that will produce proficient students.

Feedback  Any questions about how to proceed?  Anything in the guide that is not clear?  Your coaches/supervisors will continue to guide you through the ENGAGE process.  We will seek continued feedback via survey throughout the year  For more information, please contact:  Haroldine Pratt, Community Office  , ext. 758 