Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Some Desirable Features in a Next Generation WIMP Detector  Background rejection as close.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Ann Van Lysebetten CO 2 cooling experience in the LHCb Vertex Locator Vertex 2007 Lake Placid 24/09/2007.
Advertisements

Mar. 21, 2005 J.I. CollarUoM HEP seminar Recirculating chiller (-10 degrees) Glass dewar Cameras Safety shield box Superheated CF 3 Br First prototypes:
Geiger-Muller detector and Ionization chamber
Radiation Detectors / Particle Detectors
DMSAG 14/8/06 Mark Boulay Towards Dark Matter with DEAP at SNOLAB Mark Boulay Canada Research Chair in Particle Astrophysics Queen’s University DEAP-1:
The PICASSO experiment - searching for cold dark matter
Status of COUPP Experiment in the MINOS tunnel Erik Ramberg AEM 4 February, 2008.
COUPP-60 NuMI Commissioning Andrew Sonnenschein All Experimenters Meeting, Oct 18, 2010.
Bubble Chambers: Old Tools In New Searches For Dark Matter Geoffrey Iwata Physics /16/10.
Backgrounds. Their removal and avoidance Tom Shutt Princeton University.
The XENON Project A 1 tonne Liquid Xenon experiment for a sensitive Dark Matter Search Elena Aprile Columbia University.
PANDAX Results and Outlook
COUPP: First Results Dark Matter Limits From a Bubble Chamber TeV PA 2009 M.M. Szydagis 13 July 1 of 20.
These considerations bring to 3 different techniques for DARK MATTER SEARCH: I)Bubble Chambers Continuosly Sensitive (See COUPP) II)S.D.D. (Superheated.
30 Ge & Si Crystals Arranged in verticals stacks of 6 called “towers” Shielding composed of lead, poly, and a muon veto not described. 7.6 cm diameter.
IDM2004, September 6-10, 2004 J.I. Collar Some Desirable Features in a Next Generation WIMP Detector  Background rejection as close to 100% as possible.
ZEPLIN II Status & ZEPLIN IV Muzaffer Atac David Cline Youngho Seo Franco Sergiampietri Hanguo Wang ULCA ZonEd Proportional scintillation in LIquid Noble.
Direct Detection of Dark Matter: CDMS and COUPP
COUPP: Chicagoland Observatory for Underground Particle Physics (FNAL Test Beam Program T-945) J. Collar, K. Crum, D. Nakazawa, B. Odom, J. Rasmussen,
Anticipated activities for the PICO project during the next SAP Long Range Planning period. Tony Noble, Queen’s University (For the PICO Collaboration)
A screening facility for next generation low-background experiments Tom Shutt Laura Cadonati Princeton University.
Dec. 13, 2005 J.I. Collar UCNew Views Direct Detection of CDM: The challenge ahead Non-baryonic Galactic Dark Matter close to a paradigm (certainly in.
LRT2004 Sudbury, December 2004Igor G. Irastorza, CEA Saclay NOSTOS: a spherical TPC to detect low energy neutrinos Igor G. Irastorza CEA/Saclay NOSTOS.
A large water shield for dark matter, double beta decay and low background screening. T. Shutt - Case R. Gaitskell - Brown.
FNAL PAC COUPP, from T-945 to P-961 J.I. Collar 10/19/06 COUPP, the “Chicagoland Observatory for Underground Particle Physics” From T-945 to P-961 University.
Ultra-low background HPGe detector at ChyeongPyung Underground Laboratory TaeYeon Kim and KIMS(Korea Invisible Mass Search) Collaboration. * Contents *
J.T. White Texas A&M University SIGN (Scintillation and Ionization in Gaseous Neon) A High-Pressure, Room- Temperature, Gaseous-Neon-Based Underground.
SIMPLE Tom Girard ( for the SIMPLE Collaboration )
Future work Kamioka Kyoto We feel WIMP wind oh the earth NEWAGE ~ Direction Sensitive Direct Dark Matter Search ~ Kyoto University Hironobu Nishimura
A Study of Background Particles for the Implementation of a Neutron Veto into SuperCDMS Johanna-Laina Fischer 1, Dr. Lauren Hsu 2 1 Physics and Space Sciences.
K. Miuchi K. Miuchi July 10, 2008 Dark Matter and Dark Energy Direction-Sensitive Dark Matter Search --NEWAGE-- Kentaro Miuchi (Kyoto University) (New.
NEWAGE Hironobu Nishimura ( Kyoto University) K. Miuchi T. Tanimori, H. Kubo, S. Kabuki, A. Takada, K. Hattori, K. Ueno, S. Kurosawa, T.Ida, S.Iwaki A.
PICASSO, COUPP and PICO - Search for Dark Matter with Bubble Chambers
Underground Laboratories and Low Background Experiments Pia Loaiza Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane Bordeaux, March 16 th, 2006.
Dan Bauer - CDMS Project ManagerAll experimenters meeting - April 23, 2007 Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (CDMS) Progress at Soudan since last summer Successful.
Véronique SANGLARD Université de Lyon, UCBL1 CNRS/IN2P3/IPNLyon Status of EDELWEISS-II.
Searching for Dark Matter with a Bubble Chamber Michael B. Crisler Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory 14 February, 2009.
PHYSICS 225, 2 ND YEAR LAB NUCLEAR RADIATION DETECTORS G.F. West Thurs, Jan. 19.
WIMP search Result from KIMS experiments Kim Seung Cheon (DMRC,SNU)
? At Yangyang beach, looking for something in the swamp of particles and waves. 1 The recent results from KIMS Seung Cheon Kim (Seoul National University)
Kamioka Kyoto We feel WIMP wind on the earth NEWAGE Direction-sensitive direct dark matter search with μ-TPC * 1.Dark.
Low Background Studies at the Soudan Underground Laboratory-9/20/ Low Background Studies at the Soudan Underground Laboratory The Soudan Underground.
Dark Matter Search Results from the COUPP 4kg Bubble Chamber Russell Neilson for COUPP ICHEP 2012, Melbourne July 7, 2012.
A screening facility for next generation low-background experiments Tom Shutt Case Western Reserve University.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
DARK MATTER SEARCH Carter Hall, University of Maryland.
Ray Bunker (UCSB) – APS – April 17 th, 2005 CDMS SUF Run 21 Low-Mass WIMP Search Ray Bunker Jan 17 th -DOE UCSB Review.
1 Status and background considerations of XMASS experiment Yeongduk Kim Sejong University for the XMASS collaboration LRT2006 Oct. 3, 2006.
ZEPLIN III Position Sensitivity PSD7, 12 th to 17 th September 2005, Liverpool, UK Alexandre Lindote LIP - Coimbra, Portugal On behalf of the ZEPLIN/UKDM.
Scintillating Bubble Chambers for Direct Dark Matter Detection Jeremy Mock On behalf of the UAlbany and Northwestern Groups 1.
Slides for IG NewS : GG – analysis june juin 2016 Spherical detector: recent developments I. Giomataris, CEA-Irfu-France Spherical detector at.
18-20 May 2015, Underground Science Conference, SDSM&T 1John Harton, Colorado State University Recent Results from the DRIFT Directional DM Experiment.
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
Alex Howard, Imperial College Slide 1 July 2 nd 2001 Underground Project UNDERGROUND PROJECT – Overview and Goals Alex Howard Imperial College, London.
Bubble Chamber A novel technique for measuring thermonuclear rates at low energies Rashi TalwarAPS April Meeting 2016.
C OUPP is a series of progres- sively larger, refrigerant filled bubble chambers (from 50g to a proposed 500kg device) in the hunt to directly detect dark.
From Edelweiss I to Edelweiss II
Dark matter detection with bubble chamber detectors
Comparisons of neutron production by muons in GEANT4 and toy model
A Bubble Chamber for Dark Matter Detection
SoLid: Recent Results and Future Prospects
Dark Matter Search With an Ultra-low Threshold Germanium Detector proposed by Tsinghua University Seoul National University Academia Sinica Qian Yue.
UK Dark Matter Collaboration
Measuring Stellar Reaction Rates with Bubble Chamber
Dark Matter Detection with Superheated Liquids
CRYOGENICS OPERATIONS 2008 Organized by CERN
Neutronics Studies for the Nab Experiment
Yue, Yongpyung, Korea Prospects of Dark Matter Search with an Ultra-Low Threshold Germanium Detector Yue, Yongpyung, Korea
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
The Estimated Limits For A 5g LE-Ge Detector
Presentation transcript:

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Some Desirable Features in a Next Generation WIMP Detector  Background rejection as close to 100% as possible  Large, safe and inexpensive target mass: room temperature operation can go a long way to help there.  Simple target replacement to help ascertain a WIMP signal (e.g. neutron background and WIMP signal do not scale the same way in different target materials).  Simultaneous sensitivity to spin-dependent and -independent neutralino cross sections, maximal on both (fluorine then a must for the first, a heavy nucleus for 2nd).  Lowest possible energy threshold to maximize acceptance of signal.  Excellent neutron background rejection/shielding (the ultimate nemesis).  Sensitivity to tell-tale modulations (annual, recoil direction) An old precept: Attack on both fronts

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Enter superheated liquids:  Two ongoing experiments (SIMPLE, PICASSO) exploit Superheated Droplet technique (SDD)  Sexy heavy-liquid targets such as CF 3 Br and CF 3 I hard to introduce in SDDs;  -emitters migrate to droplet boundary  try bulk (=Bubble Chambers, a possibly trickier endeavor). These liquids are safe and non-toxic (used in fire extinguishers).  Total insensitivity to MIPs, yet sensitive to low-E nuclear recoils (tunable dE/dx and E thresholds)  ~$40/kg, room T …a fast path to tonne detectors?

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Enter superheated liquids:  Two ongoing experiments (SIMPLE, PICASSO) exploit Superheated Droplet technique (SDD)  Sexy heavy-liquid targets such as CF 3 Br and CF 3 I hard to introduce in SDDs;  -emitters migrate to droplet boundary  try bulk (=Bubble Chambers, a possibly trickier endeavor). These liquids are safe and non-toxic (used in fire extinguishers).  Total insensitivity to MIPs, yet sensitive to low-E nuclear recoils (tunable dE/dx and E thresholds)  ~$40/kg, room T… a fast path to tonne detectors?

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Recirculating chiller (-10 degrees) Glass dewar Cameras Safety shield box Superheated CF 3 Br First prototypes: ~20 ml active volume Pressure: psi Temp: -80 to + 40 degrees C Stereo photography of bubbles Three triggers: acoustic, pressure and video Acoustic sensor Quartz pressure vessel Glass dewar with heat-exchange fluid Piston Camera (1 of 2) Propylene glycol buffer liquid prevents evaporation of superheated liquid. 3-way valve

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors”

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” A Typical Scattering Event with Am-Be Neutron Source (bubble expansion ~1 mm/ms) X CameraY Camera

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Can Bubble Chambers be made stable enough?  Old Bubble Chambers radiation-ready for only few ms at a time (coincident with beam spill)  Gas pockets in surface imperfections and motes can act as inhomogeneous nucleation centers.  A BC dedicated to WIMP searches must remain superheated indefinitely, except for radiation-induced events. Low degree of superheat helps, but is not enough.  Recent progress in neutralization of inhomogeneous nucleation sites (from work unrelated to bubble chambers!). E.g. use of liquid “lid”, outgassing in presence of buffer liquid, cleaning techniques and wetting improvement via vapor deposition. P. Reinke, Exp. Heat Transf. 10 (1997) 133

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Background Counting Rate at ~ 6 m.w.e. Bonner sphere(s) n flux measurement in LASR underground lab Mean survival time for superheated state varies due to periodic episodes of nucleation on chamber walls, but is usually ~ 10 minutes. Live time (due to long recompression cycle) is already 62%. Counting rate for “real events” is 4/hour (compatible with measured fast neutron flux in the lab). Intrinsic gamma rejection factor (from absence of excess nucleation rate in presence of Y-88  1.3E6  interactions / s) is  1E9 (  14 C not a concern even at the multiton level)

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Background Counting Rate at ~ 6 m.w.e. Mean survival time for superheated state varies due to periodic episodes of nucleation on chamber walls, but is usually ~ 10 minutes. Live time (due to long recompression cycle) is already 62%. Counting rate for “real events” is 4/hour (compatible with measured fast neutron flux in the lab). Intrinsic gamma rejection factor (from absence of excess nucleation rate in presence of Y-88  1.3E6  interactions / s) is  1E9 (  14 C not a concern even at the multiton level)

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Sensitivity to < 7 keV recoils demonstrated (while having no response to 3mCi  source). In agreement with models. Sensitivity to ~1 keV recoils in progress (Sb-124/Be source) Further studies in progress (efficiency, sharpness of threshold, disentanglement of I and F response). Detector is insensitive to gammas (see previous transparency) yet fully responsive to low-E recoils Lines show Seitz model prediction for top boundary of data point distribution (onset of sensitivity during decompression) CF 3 Br data (CF 3 I in progress and looking good) Well-defined low energy threshold

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Sensitivity to < 7 keV recoils demonstrated (while having no response to 3mCi  source). In agreement with models. Sensitivity to ~1 keV recoils in progress (Sb-124/Be source) Further studies in progress (efficiency, sharpness of threshold, disentanglement of I and F response). Well-defined low energy threshold

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Fancy: Position Reconstruction Bubble positions can be reconstructed in 3 dimensions by scanning images taken by two cameras offset by 90 degrees. Position resolution is currently 530 microns r.m.s. (approximately 1/4 bubble diameter) Uniform spatial distribution of background events, consistent with background neutrons. 163 background events (1.5 live days) intermediate step in automatic inspection algorithm using NI Vision Development Module (2 kg chamber)

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Neutron Background Rejection Potential Multiple simultaneous bubbles are present in ~4% of events in our “background” data set. Neutrons can do this, WIMPs cannot. The response to neutrons and WIMPs interacting mostly via SI is very different for refrigerants containing F only (C 3 F 8 ) and F+I (CF 3 I); more favorable situation than Ge/Si to verify a WIMP signal (generally speaking)

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Neutron Background Rejection Potential (bis) Larger chambers are “self-shielding” (innermost fiducial volume will have good rejection of energetic neutrons able to penetrate moderator) This might reduce sensitivity to dreaded high energy “punch through” neutrons down to the ~1 count/tonne/month range  allowing for exhaustive exploration of supersymmetric WIMP models. MCNP-POLIMI simulations

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Meet COUPP (2 kg CF 3 I target, installation at 300 m.w.e. (FNAL) Jan. 2005) Central design issue is how to avoid metal contact with superheated liquid. Bellows mechanism compensates pressure inside and outside of inner vessel in present design

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Central design issue is how to avoid metal contact with superheated liquid. Bellows mechanism compensates pressure inside and outside of inner vessel in present design Meet COUPP (2 kg CF 3 I target, installation at 300 m.w.e. (FNAL) Jan. 2005)

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Central design issue is how to avoid metal contact with superheated liquid. Bellows mechanism compensates pressure inside and outside of inner vessel in present design Meet COUPP (2 kg CF 3 I target, installation at 300 m.w.e. (FNAL) Jan. 2005)

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Central design issue is how to avoid metal contact with superheated liquid. Bellows mechanism compensates pressure inside and outside of inner vessel in present design Meet COUPP (2 kg CF 3 I target, installation at 300 m.w.e. (FNAL) Jan. 2005)

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” recent NIST study points at excellent CF3I stability during >5 y storage (at up to 100°C !) as long as certain metallic alloys are avoided Central design issue is how to avoid metal contact with superheated liquid. Bellows mechanism compensates pressure inside and outside of inner vessel in present design Meet COUPP (2 kg CF 3 I target, installation at 300 m.w.e. (FNAL) Jan. 2005)

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Central design issue is how to avoid metal contact with superheated liquid. Bellows mechanism compensates pressure inside and outside of inner vessel in present design Meet COUPP (2 kg CF 3 I target, installation at 300 m.w.e. (FNAL) Jan. 2005)

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” Central design issue is how to avoid metal contact with superheated liquid. Bellows mechanism compensates pressure inside and outside of inner vessel in present design Meet COUPP (2 kg CF 3 I target, installation at 300 m.w.e. (FNAL) Jan. 2005)

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” COUPP ( Chicago Observatory for Underground Particle Physics ) Where we might be by end of 2004 (take these with a grain of salt) are these projections overly cautious? Better safe than sorry (e.g., alpha backgrounds from Rn emanation from steel - however only few  Bq/m 2 expected if some precautions taken - The inner chamber is a closed system to Rn penetration) ~latest CDMS

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” COUPP ( Chicago Observatory for Underground Particle Physics ) Where we might be by end of 2004 (take these with a grain of salt) are these projections overly cautious? Better safe than sorry (e.g., alpha backgrounds from Rn emanation from steel - however only few  Bq/m 2 expected if some precautions taken - The inner chamber is a closed system to Rn penetration) ~latest CDMS

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” The near future  2 kg CF 3 I chamber stable and seemingly dominated by environmental neutrons at 6 m.w.e. Still learning some of the interesting peculiarities of this new system. Systematic study of effect of recompression time, decompression speed, “direction” of heating, etc.  Complete studies of CF 3 I and C 3 F 8 response to neutron recoils (down to ~1 keV recoil energy with 124 Sb/Be source)  Idem for sharpness of threshold, efficiency and separation of I vs F recoils.  Installation in FNAL Minos-near gallery (~300 m.w.e.) during Replacement of inner chamber elements with attention paid to Rn release (electron welding of bellows, o-rings). Eventual move to Soudan (~1,800 m.w.e.)  Measure concentration of U,Th in target liquids. At what level will purification be necessary? (1 ppt~1c/kg/d) A bit further in the horizon  Ongoing conceptual design for larger chambers (collaboration with FNAL)  Recently funded by DOE/NNSA to explore applications to low-level neutron detection (Natl. Security, collab. with PNNL)

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” The near future  2 kg CF 3 I chamber stable and seemingly dominated by environmental neutrons at 6 m.w.e. Still learning some of the interesting peculiarities of this new system. Systematic study of effect of recompression time, decompression speed, “direction” of heating, etc.  Complete studies of CF 3 I and C 3 F 8 response to neutron recoils (down to ~1 keV recoil energy with 124 Sb/Be source)  Idem for sharpness of threshold, efficiency and separation of I vs F recoils.  Installation in FNAL Minos-near gallery (~300 m.w.e.) during Replacement of inner chamber elements with attention paid to Rn release (electron welding of bellows, o-rings). Eventual move to Soudan (~1,800 m.w.e.)  Measure concentration of U,Th in target liquids. At what level will purification be necessary? (1 ppt~1c/kg/d) A bit further in the horizon  Ongoing conceptual design for larger chambers (collaboration with FNAL)  Recently funded by DOE/NNSA to explore applications to low-level neutron detection (Natl. Security, collab. with PNNL) adapted from C. Chung et al., NIM A301(1991)328

Dec. 9-10, 2004 J.I. CollarKICP “Next Generation DM Detectors” UoC Low-Background Detector Group KICP Postdoctoral Fellows: Brian Odom Andrew Sonnenschein Graduate Students: Phil Barbeau Dante Nakazawa Joaquin Vieira Undergraduate Students: Joe Bolte David Miller Julia Rasmussen Kevin O`Sullivan Aza Raskin Waterboy: Juan Collar FNAL Group Mike Crisler Dan Holmgren Robert Plunkett Erik Ramberg