MICE Target Report Chris Booth (for target team) Sheffield 23 rd April 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Target Status Chris Booth 3 rd March 2004.
Advertisements

MICE MICE Target Mechanism Paul Smith University of Sheffield 8 th June 2010 (Based upon talk given by Chris Booth at CM26)
MICE Target Report Video Conference 15/03/07 Chris Booth Sheffield 15 th March 2007.
MICE Target Shaft Joint Change l MICE Target Ti shaft »Baseline stock material = drawn tube lower joined to solid upper (rather than manufacture from solid)
The MICE Target Lara Howlett University of Sheffield.
MICE Target Status Chris Booth 30 th March Chris BoothUniversity of Sheffield 2 The challenge ISIS beam shrinks from 73 mm to 55 mm radius during.
Target Status Report Lara Howlett University of Sheffield.
Target Operation and Status Report Chris Booth for Target Team 20 th October 2008.
MICE MICE Target Status P J Smith CM 25 Wed 4 th November 2009.
MICE TARGET HARDWARE C. Booth, P. Hodgson, R. Nicholson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England. 1 - The MICE Experiment.
ISIS Related Issues for MICE Adam Dobbs Proton Accelerator Development Meeting, RAL 24 th March /03/20111A. Dobbs.
MICE Target Development Chris Booth Sheffield 8 th June 2006.
MICE Electronics Upgrade P J Smith (University of Sheffield) J Leaver (Imperial College) 17 th June 2009.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
MICE Target Report Chris Booth (for target team) Sheffield 7 th May 2009.
Extra Control Electronics? Chris Booth Sheffield 27 th November 2008.
MICE Target Schedule Chris Booth Sheffield 12 th June 2006.
March 2003 Paul Drumm MICE Collaboration Meeting, CERN 1 Beam Line & Installation Plans Paul Drumm CLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Status of Electronics & Control System P J Smith University of Sheffield 16/12/2009.
MICE Target Report Chris Booth (for target team) Sheffield 24 th March 2010.
MICE Target Status Chris Booth Sheffield 10 th May 2006.
1 MICE PM Report Installations to date Future installation work Preparations for Phase Two Target status MICE Video Conference, 22nd May, 2008.
Target Specifications & History (to avoid reinventing a broken wheel!) 2 nd December 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
Target Control Electronics Upgrade 08/01/2009 J. Leaver P. Smith.
Stator Plan & Schedule Chris Booth 2 nd March stators to construct for mid-April. One complete coil assembly recovered from ISIS drive. Coils recoverable.
MICE Target Review Chris Booth Sheffield 12 th June 2006.
A Tale of Two Targets … 7 th September 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
MOM - M.ApollonioAccel. R&D/Physics and IADR - RAL - 19/3/ Summary of MICE operations – 14/15 March 2008 AIMS - establish MICE beamline in ISIS synchrotron.
Target Assembly and Installation Update 20 th August 2009 Paul Hodgson The University of Sheffield.
DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF THE MICE TARGET Target Drive The linear electromagnetic drive that has been designed to meet these requirements consists.
MICE Target Report Video Conference 05/07/07 Chris Booth Sheffield 5 th July 2007.
Target Design – Status and Plans Chris Booth Sheffield 12 th January 2005.
Target Operation and Status Report Chris Booth for Target Team 13 th January 2009 Outline Current target performance Investigation of demonstrator failure.
MICE Target Mechanical Design l Jason Tarrant – STFC »Working on upgrade of Target Mechanics l Contents »Main features of upgrade design »Progress & schedule.
12/09/2015Sheffield University 1 Target Electronics Recap - Decision has been made to rebuild the target electronics control system so that it is upgraded.
MICE Target Mechanical Design l Introduction - Issues with the current Target Assembly - Re-engineered Target with a ‘core’ based on stiff central housing.
MICE: overview K. Long, 18 March, Contents ► Introduction ► Beam line ► Infrastructure ► MICE steps ► Phase II (comment) ► Conclusions.
Target Report Introduction Chris Booth Sheffield 20 th November 2008.
MICE Target Mechanical Design l Contents »Status of modelling and drawing »Work being undertaken at RAL on shaft and bearing prototypes »Procedure for.
Chris BoothMICE-UK I.C. 16th January Useful meeting held at RAL last Thursday. Representatives of MICE, ISIS & others with Sheffield electronic &
MICE Target – Design Update and Test Plans Chris Booth Sheffield 22 nd October 2005.
MICE MICE Target Mechanism Control Electronics Upgrade P J Smith – University of Sheffield James Leaver – Imperial College 2 nd March 2009.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
24/10/2015Sheffield University 1 Target Electronics Recap - Decision has been made to rebuild the target electronics control system so that it is upgraded.
Status of installed target Preparation of “demonstrator” target Chris Booth Sheffield 25 th January 2008.
MICE Target - Risk Lara Howlett University of Sheffield.
Target Status Target installed in ISIS “Demonstrator” target in R78 Chris Booth Sheffield 7 th February 2008.
Target Status CM19 RAL October 2007 P J Smith – University of Sheffield.
MICE Target Mechanical Design l Status of Target ref. Schedule »Drawings –Drawing list created (see next slide) includes inventory –Drawings being released.
MICE Target l Jason Tarrant – STFC l Investigative work on T2 with plastic bearings »Stopped after >2 million cycles »Disassembly with photographic investigation.
Status of Target Design Chris Booth Sheffield 28 th October 2004.
MICE Status & Plans MICE-UK paul drumm 15 th September 2004.
Jason Tarrant / November 2008 MICE Target Mechanical Design l Jason Tarrant – STFC l Introduction »Investigations into target shaft failure »Current suspicions.
Jason Tarrant / November 2008 MICE Target Mechanical Design l Contents »Shaft Bearing Redesign –Cross section shape –Anti-rotation device and location.
March 18, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Status1 MICE Beamline Status (March 18, 2008) Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Illinois Institute of Technology.
Target tests 1 st – 2 nd Nov. Chris Booth Sheffield 7 th December 2006.
Target Commissioning Target installed in ISIS “Demonstrator” target in R78 Initial commissioning plans Chris Booth Sheffield 11 th February 2008.
Programme for “Target 3” – test of alternative bearing materials (from Jason Tarrant) –Drawing updates by 11 th November –Bearings: Material approval –
Target Status Report Chris Booth & Paul Hodgson Sheffield 18 th Sept ember2008.
MICE Target Failure UKNFIC Meeting Adam Dobbs - when and why 4 th July 2008.
Chris BoothUniversity of Sheffield 1 Target Status & Progress 1 st February 2006 Disappointingly slow progress over last 2 months. However, progress is.
MICE Target – Status & Plans Chris Booth Sheffield 28 th February 2006.
Target Status 27 th August 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
Chris Booth Sheffield 29th March 2006
Stator Plan & Schedule Chris Booth 2nd March 2009
Target Installation Plan
P. J. Smith on behalf of the MICE target team.
MICE Target Mechanical Design
MICE Target Report Video Conference 29/11/07
Presentation transcript:

MICE Target Report Chris Booth (for target team) Sheffield 23 rd April 2009

Chris BoothUniversity of Sheffield 2 Summary of 2008 (1) MICE target drive is linear actuator, synchronised to ISIS, driving target in & out of beam in ~30 ms. Intended to have two parallel systems, one in ISIS plus “demonstrator system” outside. ISIS target installed January 2008 –Commissioned March. –Beam-loss and particle production studied to optimise dip depth & timing. –Used to commission MICE upstream beam-line and detectors. –Over 190K pulses by December. –Reliable operation; reproducible behaviour. –“Incident” on 29 th November when target accidentally parked in beam and ISIS manually restarted several times. –Subsequently needed ~8 mm increased depth for same beam-loss. –Erratic behaviour on 20 th December; jammed on 21 st. –Removed from ISIS in January shut-down.

Chris BoothUniversity of Sheffield 3 Examination of ISIS Target End of target blade melted. ~8 mm of length lost. Collar (end-stop) loose on shaft. Shaft seriously bent. Slight damage to DLC coating of lower shaft. Interpretation? –Melting occurred in 29 th November incident. –(Note: Interlocks now prevent parking of target when frame lowered!) –Loose collar caused shaft to jam, and probably damage to coating. –Was shaft bent during removal? Or due to impact of jammed collar on lower bearing? –(Note: Collar was a “fix” due to incorrect end-stop dimensions!)

Chris BoothUniversity of Sheffield 4 Summary of 2008 (2) Demonstrator system in R78 –January target (almost untested) failed quickly with electrical breakdown. Improved coil testing and QA. Voltage supply changed from 0 & 220 V to  110 V. –Two new target drives delivered to RAL late July. –One ran in R78 – failed after ~340K actuations. –Serious damage to shaft & bearing surfaces. –Significant abraded material, though little fell through lower bearing. –Same stator had run with old shaft & bearings (same design) for >500K actuations in Sheffield without problem. –Earlier shafts with DLC coatings run >5M cycles. –Unclear why failed setup was different.

Chris BoothUniversity of Sheffield 5 Possible failure causes investigated Misalignment of bearings and shaft - no. Partial demagnetisation of permanent magnets causing non-axial forces - no. Distortion of coils causing non-axial forces - no. Dynamic or static distortion of shaft - possibly. –High speed camera showed large amplitude lateral motion. –FE modelling shows resonance near drive period. Poorer quality DLC coatings on shaft and/or bearings - possibly. –Surface finish (smoothness, cleanliness) is crucial. Thanks to many people (RAL, Oxford, commercial) for help with these studies!

Chris BoothUniversity of Sheffield 6 Conclusion of MICE Technical Board We should not produce more target drives without a major redesign. Target team expanded, including design effort from RAL (Jason Tarrant). Basic linear motor design remains the same, but all components optimised for better QA, alignment, surface finish etc. Revisions to target/shaft, bearings, stator body etc. No changes (at this stage) to coils, magnets, cooling, optical position readout, bearing coatings etc. Major design means a delay in preparing next target is inevitable.

Chris BoothUniversity of Sheffield 7 Target/Shaft Cruciform shaft was insufficiently stiff, difficult to machine with good surface finish. Jason designed cylindrical shaft: –Titanium (as old target) –Tubular lower section (same mass/length). Stiffer. Higher resonant frequency. –Solid upper section. Flat on upper section to provide alignment. –Ground for high quality (bearing) surfaces. –Shortened. Due to changes in stator housing. Reach into beam increased ~10 mm. –Target is continuation of tube, not paddle (again, same mass). Same particle production. Optimisation of production versus beam loss later (geometry, material). –Needs welded join between sections.

Chris BoothUniversity of Sheffield 8 Revised stator body Stiffer Rigid case takes tension off welded seals Bearing mounts machined in situ for accurate alignment.

Upper Bearing Design l Alternative bearing design Wedge & dowel for full x,y,z location of clamp Anti rotation Feature (rounded or flat bearing face options) Single piece main body Wire cut from single piece for accurate wedge fit Full bearing merges into section for anti- rotation M/C with block in place to prevent tool wander Clearance for vane (potential risk if adding vane later otherwise simpler bearing)

Chris BoothUniversity of Sheffield 10 Status & Schedule Design complete. Materials ordered or procured. Production of machining jigs etc started. Sample weld looks very good quality. Tests for shaft machining, centreless grinding etc in progress. Stator coil assembly underway (Sheffield). Two target assemblies (ISIS + demonstrator) due 22 nd July (plus spare). Test, then install in August ISIS shutdown. Running from 2 nd September.

Chris BoothUniversity of Sheffield 11 Target Control Microprocessor-based system currently in use very reliable but “expert system”. –Diagnostics difficult for non-experts. –Switches, LEDs, burning EPROMs, rather than user-friendly GUI running on PC. System at processor & I/O limit – impossible to add new features. Paul Smith (Sheffield) & James Leaver (IC) undertaking ground-up rebuild, using FPGA. –Integrate many elements (separate crates) on one board. –USB interface to control PC. –Auxiliary electronics on daughter cards. Initially mimic current functionality, later enhance. –Full configuration /control / status monitoring via PC. Intended to be ready for integration in ISIS in August – but a lot of work to be done!

23/04/2015Imperial College 12 USBDAQ USB Mini- B 1.2V Regulator 2.5/3.3V Regulator Cypress SX2 USB Interface Differential / Single Ended User IO Single Ended User IO 1M Gate Spartan 3 FPGA 4Mb PROM