Policy Advisory Group (PAG) & Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Leader Primer Presented by: Devin A. Jopp, Ed.D. President & CEO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Orientation for New Regional Directors Official presentation of the Student National Medical Association Board-approved April 2006.
Advertisements

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
Ensuring that building products meet code requirements ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. The ICC-ES Evaluation Committee conducts open public hearings on proposed.
Catholic School Councils A summary of 19 page document listed on school website.
W. Shannon Black Manager, Standards Processes New Chair Orientation.
1 Orientation For Reviews of Initial Credentialing Proposals Ron Briel, Program Manager Licensure Unit Division of Public Health Department of Health &
Secretarial Duties. The secretary records the minutes of the meetings, maintains a register of members and directors, is responsible for sending out the.
NCVHS Panel 6 WEDI Testimony on Health Plan Identifier June 10, 2014 Laurie Darst, Mayo Clinic, Revenue Cycle Regulatory Advisor WEDI Board of Directors.
School Community Council Overview & Orientation Hawaii Department of Education For Training Use Only Office of Curriculum Instruction and Student Support.
International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants Monitoring Group Report Ken Dakdduk Paris June 2010.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
Calice Meeting DESY 13/2/07David Ward Guidelines for CALICE presentations Recently approved by the Steering Committee.
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
The chapter will address the following questions:
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Welcome Elizabeth Schanbacher Assistant Superintendent of Educational Technology.
Voluntary Board Roles & Responsibilities Facilitator: Derek O’Reilly, Training & Support Services.
1 OAR Guidance on -- “Consulting with Indian Tribal Governments” May 21, 2012.
Governance & Leadership Structure Influence Build Connect.
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION COMMITTEE. 2 Group carried over from ECAR, MAAC, & MAIN workgroups that were assembled to address 1200 Urgent Action.
Market Meeting Support Susan Munson ERCOT Retail Market Liaison Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) June 10, 2008.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
Unit 11 Meetings. Overview  Meetings In Business  Types of Meeting  Attending Meetings  Notice and Agenda  Chairman’s Agenda  Minutes of Meeting.
Student Involvement in Decision-Making. Policy 2.3 Part 1: To promote appropriate levels of student participation... Part 1:... students shall have the.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK MARCH 24, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING THE PASADENA.
ASME C&S Training Module B7 MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity.
Annual General Meetings Planning for Success. What is the AGM for ? The required Annual General Meeting of your club. Open to all members. Public statement.
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1.Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment: Roles and Responsibilities.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Part 190 NPRM: Administrative Procedures - 1 -
1 Standard Setting for Nonpublic Entities Activities of the FAF/FASB  2006-FASB created Private Company Financial Reporting Committee (PCFRC)  2008-FAF.
NATIONAL DELEGATES ASSEMBLY TEAM NOMINATING COMMITTEE and REGIONAL CAUCAUS CHAIRS TRAINING 2015 WG Buckner, Training Coordinator BLACKS IN GOVERNMENT.
1 THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 WHAT IS A SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL, AND WHO ARE MEMBERS? The School Site Council (SSC) is an elected or selected group representative.
PPTA Governance Review Shorter term considerations.
3GPP2 Publication Process Training TSG-S PMT. December Presentation Overview Background OP Input and Intent Publication Process Overview The Revised.
Meetings How many meetings do you attend each month & what are they?
Section 4.9 Review Report Request for MAC Approval December 1, 2015.
Consideration Of Updates And Additional Revisions To Procedures For Conducting Board and Committee Activities Board Item # 2.
Doc.: IEEE / 0404r0 Submission March 2015 Slide 1 TGax PHY Ad Hoc March 2015 Meeting Agenda Date: Authors:
1 May 30, 2007 U.S. – China Symposium on Active Industry Participation in Standardization Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC.
DEVELOPMENT OF A WHITE PAPER ON CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Ministry of Correctional Services.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
COUNTY COUNSEL Brown Act Public Records Act Presenter: Janice D. Killion Public Records Act – Ethics – Conflicts of Interest.
BEING NONPARTISAN: Guidelines for 501c3 Organizations Presented by All attendees will receive a copy of this PowerPoint presentation and a link to the.
Paula Feuerbacher Strategic Projects Senior Advisor Tab 5.2: Recommendation Regarding Proposed 2013 ERCOT Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Human Resources.
Fall 2010 Society Bylaws Amendments ***Proposed*** Disclaimer: All text contained in these slides is still under review by the bylaws committee and SWE’s.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
TEXAS NODAL (ERCOT REVISIONS)
Getting More Involved with NFRC
MEETINGS & ELECTIONS Saturday, July 22, 2017
What IS Student Government?
Pre-Investigational New Drug (pre-IND) Meeting with FDA
Updating the Regulation for the JINR Programme Advisory Committees
ILD phone meeting September 5, 2017 K. Kawagoe (PSB chair)
Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC
You Need to Know About the English Learner Advisory Committee
Academic representative Committee CHAIR training
CA STATE COUNCIL BOARD OF DIRECTORSROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING.
CA STATE COUNCIL BOARD OF DIRECTORSROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
National Governing and Leadership Structure
Mark S. Orloff, MD Regional Councillor
REGION VI REGIONAL LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE University of Washington,
THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL
TIBC Budget Formulation Improvement Project
Elizabeth A. Pomfret, MD, PhD Regional Councillor
Region 8 Meeting Harvey Solomon, MD
Formalizing the Wireless Chair’s Meeting
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
MAC Input on Section 4.9 Review
Presentation transcript:

Policy Advisory Group (PAG) & Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Leader Primer Presented by: Devin A. Jopp, Ed.D. President & CEO

Overview How WEDI Collect Industry Input ● WEDI, is named in the HIPAA legislation as an advisor to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. ● In fulfilling that obligation, WEDI works through two vehicles to collect input from the industry in order to formulate an industry perspective on key issues, these include: policy advisory groups (PAGs) and Technical Advisory Committees (TACs)

Policy Advisory Group Definition ● Policy Advisory Groups (PAGs) are best thought of as a public forum where industry is able to review a proposed or final regulation and to allow the healthcare industry an opportunity to collectively provide industry consensus and recommendations on a given policy. ● PAGs can be held both face-to-face or virtually. ● While member and non-members can participate in the PAG, votes are restricted to WEDI members only ● In a PAG, votes are registered and only one representative can vote per member company.

Policy Advisory Group Voting and Approval ● The PAG facilitators (WEDI volunteers) then take the votes and comments and create a findings document ● The findings are reviewed by the WEDI Board of Director’s policy committee and then voted upon by the full WEDI Board of Directors. ● Recommendations are then sent on to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. ● In a face-to-face PAG, each member company is given a yellow card and should display that card to vote ● Straw polls may be used as a way of seeing where the attendees stand before taking official votes.

Policy Advisory Group Example ● WEDI conducted a PAG on Health Plan Identifier and collected industry concerns. These concerns were then reviewed and approved by the WEDI Board of Directors and sent on to the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

Technical Advisory Council Definition ● Technical Advisory Committees (TACs) are also public forums but typically is used to provide feedback to other organizations outside of HHS. ● TACs can be in-person or face-to-face ● Votes are taken in the form of a straw poll. ● In a TAC, all participants can vote (members and non- members)

Technical Advisory Committee Voting and Approval ● The TAC facilitators (WEDI volunteers) then take the votes and comments and create a findings document. ● The findings document is reviewed by the WEDI Board of Director’s policy committee and voted upon by the full WEDI Board of Directors. ● Recommendations are then sent on to the appropriate organization based on what was reviewed (e.g. a particular standard, operating rule, etc…). ● In a virtual TAC, your company is registered at the start of the webinars and votes are conducted during the event

Technical Advisory Committee Example ● WEDI conducted a TAC on the proposed ASC X standard and collected industry issues and concerns. These issues and concerns were then review and approved by the WEDI Board of Directors and sent on to the appropriate organization.

Leading as a Co-Chair (1 of 2) Responsibilities ● Maintain a neutral position both words and conduct and in facilitating audience participation ● Facilitate the group to allow for equal discussion and avoid individuals from dominating the discussion (e.g. “we’ve heard from xxxx; how do others feel?”) ● Communicate with other co-chairs as needed ● Develop an agenda and set of questions to be answered ● Communicate with staff ● Ensure the timely development of materials

Leading as a Co-Chair (2 of 2) Responsibilities ● Identify at least one person to moderate the PAG / TAC and identify at least one other individual to serve as scribe and capture the pertinent discussion and votes ● Produce a draft document to be reviewed by the PAG co- chairs ● Ensure that the presentation and the findings document conform to the WEDI standards (insert link)

Webinar Logistics ● WEDI uses go-to webinar to conduct virtual PAGs and TACs. WEDI staff can arrange for a practice run if needed ● Send your presentation to staff no later than 48 hours prior to the event. Staff will load this into the system. ● Staff will manage voting eligibility dependent upon whether it is a PAG or TAC

Preparing Presentation ● Utilize the WEDI PowerPoint template ● Add in some slides that provide background or basic education on the voting item. Additionally, a webinar can be used before the PAG to provide further background ● Please refer to past WEDI positions to ensure that attendees are aware of prior positions and recommendations are consistent with prior positions. ● Although attendees may feel a different position is warranted, there must be new factors involved other than just a matter of having different attendees.

Voting ● Please phrase voting items as a statement (e.g. Voting item – I agree with the requirements within the(insert voting item) ● Polls are used to collect votes from each voting representative. The results of the poll will be captured and shared with the audience ● Voting items should be phrased in a clear and unambiguous way and re-read before votes so people really understand what they are voting on and what a Yes or No vote means. This has been an issue.

Next Steps ● Notes from the discussion are encouraged and can be included by inserting additional slides to the PowerPoint. ● The final presentation with notes included will be sent to the webinar participants in PDF format ● The co-chairs will develop a draft report for submission to the WEDI policy committee. ● The Board of Director’s policy committee will review the findings to ensure that they are consistent with policy and in the correct format. Additional feedback may be provided back to the Co-chair for modifications to the document

Board Review ● The Policy Committee of the Board is charged with the initial document review. Co-chairs will be invited to participate for discussing the findings ● Once reviewed, the committee recommends to the Board of Directors for approval ● The Board of Directors will provide a final review and votes on whether to approve the document for submission, to refer back to committee, or decline to submit the findings ● While the Board of Directors doesn’t usually go against PAG recommendations, there may be situations where a particular recommendation is not included in the final letter.