Accounting for black C in the modeling of soil organic matter turnover Dr Saran Sohi 1,2, Dr John Gaunt 1,2,3, Dr Elisa Lopez-Capel 4, Helen Yates 1 &

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 On-line resource materials for policy making Ex-Ante Carbon-balance Tool Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Learning how using.
Advertisements

The Carbon Farming Initiative and Agricultural Emissions This presentation was prepared by the University of Melbourne for the Regional Landcare Facilitator.
Figure 3. Outlines of the study with links between different components used. The figure presents the main inputs and outputs from the model used (Glob3PG)
Spatial Modeling of Soil Heterogeneities and their Impacts on Soil-Phosphorus Losses in a Quebec Watershed By Alaba Boluwade Department of Bioresource.
Summary discussion Top-down approach Consider Carbon Monitoring Systems, tailored to address stakeholder needs. CMS frameworks can be designed to provide.
Zhengxi Tan *,1,2, Shuguang Liu 2, Carol A. Johnston 1, Thomas R. Loveland 3 Jinxun Liu 4, Rachel Kurtz 3, and Larry Tieszen 3 1 South Dakota State University,
CENTURY ECOSYSTEM MODEL Introduction to CENTURY. WHY CENTURY Evaluate Effects of Environmental Change Evaluate Changes in Management.
Integrating plant-microbe interactions to understand soil C stabilization with the MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization model (MIMICS) Background Despite.
SOM control: Controls on soil organic matter in Swiss forest soils: The impact of forest productivity, land-use history, climate and physico-chemical stabilization.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Sacramento Model Derivation of Initial Parameters.
Using the Crosscutting Concepts As conceptual tools when meeting an unfamiliar problem or phenomenon.
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
Johannes Lehmann Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University John Gaunt GY Associates, UK Marco Rondon TSBF-CIAT, Cali, Colombia Bio-char.
Soil Carbon and Agricultural Land Management in Semi-Arid Central Spain Darcy Boellstorff Assistant Professor, Bridgewater State College, Massachusetts.
Carbon Sequestration Akilah Martin Fall Outline Pre-Assessment  Student learning goals  Carbon Sequestration Background  Century Model Overview.
Climate Change and Agriculture in the Great Lakes Region Potential Impacts of Climatic Variability and Change Jeffrey A. Andresen Dept. of Geography Michigan.
CSIRO LAND and WATER Estimation of Spatial Actual Evapotranspiration to Close Water Balance in Irrigation Systems 1- Key Research Issues 2- Evapotranspiration.
Box 1 CO 2 mitigation potential of managed grassland: An example Franzluebbers et al. (2000; Soil Biol. Biochem. 32: ) quantified C sequestration.
Tradeoff Analysis: From Science to Policy John M. Antle Department of Ag Econ & Econ Montana State University.
Christian Klar and Peter Neuhaus Working group ‚Agroecosystems‘ Designing an object-oriented architecture for process- based modelling of soil.
Case Study 1 Canadian Prairies: Soil C management Biophysical information M. Boehm, B. McConkey & H. Janzen Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada How can we.
Fire Prevention as a GHG Mitigation Strategy Presented by Robert Beach, RTI International Brent Sohngen, The Ohio State University Presented at Forestry.
Scaling up Crop Model Simulations to Districts for Use in Integrated Assessments: Case Study of Anantapur District in India K. J. Boote, Univ. of Florida.
The Next Generation Science Standards: 5. Crosscutting Concepts Professor Michael Wysession Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Washington University,
Modeling Soil Organic Matter Distribution in a Northern Hardwood Forest and Tropical Watershed. Kris Johnson* Fred Scatena* and Yude Pan** *University.
IntroductionIntroduction Land-use change or intensification can influence the dynamics and storage of soil organic matter (SOM) and the extent of carbon.
SOIL CONDITION INDEX – (SCI) AS AN INDICATOR OF THE SOIL ORGANIC MATTER DYNAMICS AT THE FARM BUTMIR NEAR SARAJEVO Prof. Dr. Hamid Čustović Tvica Mirza.
Soil carbon in dynamic land use optimization models Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University.
Econometric Estimation of The National Carbon Sequestration Supply Function Ruben N. Lubowski USDA Economic Research Service Andrew J. Plantinga Oregon.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
Research programmes in ecology Jacques Baudry 1, Françoise Burel 2, and Agnès Ricroch 3 1 INRA of Rennes, 2 University of Rennes/CNRS, 3 University of.
Crosscutting Concepts Next Generation Science Standards.
Effects of Forest Management Practices on Carbon Storage Coeli M. Hoover USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station Forest PLUS, Washington DC December.
Adaptation Baselines Through V&A Assessments Prof. Helmy Eid Climate Change Experts (SWERI) ARC Egypt Material for : Montreal Workshop 2001.
INFLUENCE OF LANDUSE ON ORGANIC MATTER DISTRIBUTION IN SOIL AGGREGATE SIZE FRACTIONS IN ILE-IFE, SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA By Oyedele, D.J.; Pini, R.; Sparvolli,
Soil Carbon Accounting in the SEEA Kirsty Leslie London Group Meeting Wiesbaden, 30 November - 4 December 2009.
Louis Gross, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Mathematics, University of Tennessee Thoughts on Raccoon Rabies Models.
Twinning water quality modelling in Latvia Helene Ejhed
Site Description This research is being conducted as a part of the Detritus Input and Removal Treatments Project (DIRT), a cross-continental experiment.
Extent and Mask Extent of original data Extent of analysis area Mask – areas of interest Remember all rasters are rectangles.
Soil Carbon and Phosphorous Fractions in Ciampitti I.A. 123, F.O. García 1, G. Rubio 2 and L.I. Picone 4 Field Crop Rotations of the Argentine Pampas Ciampitti.
A Cropping System Oriented Carbon-Nitrogen Simulation Model Claudio O. Stöckle, Armen R. Kemanian Biological Systems Engineering Department Washington.
Rescaling Reliability Bounds for a New Operational Profile Peter G Bishop Adelard, Drysdale Building, Northampton Square,
WP coordinator meeting June 17/ WP3 progress report.
The Application of Observation Adjoint Sensitivity to Satellite Assimilation Problems Nancy L. Baker Naval Research Laboratory Monterey, CA.
Arrhenius Kinetics Reaction Velocity = A e -Ea/RT where, A = pre-exponential factor, or y-intercept Ea = activation energy of the substrate R = universal.
Eucalyptus globoidea productivity in New Zealand Dean Meason, Tobias Herrman, Christine Todoroki.
MODELLING CARBON FLOWS IN CROP AND SOIL Krisztina R. Végh.
WCRP Extremes Workshop Sept 2010 Detecting human influence on extreme daily temperature at regional scales Photo: F. Zwiers (Long-tailed Jaeger)
2/1/20161 Soil Carbon Sequestration Methods and Tools for Measurement, Monitoring and Verification Charles W. Rice University Distinguished Professor Department.
ESA living planet symposium Bergen Combination of GRACE and GOCE in situ data for high resolution regional gravity field modeling M. Schmeer 1,
Greater root carbon storage compared to shoot carbon storage in soil Fig 1 We labeled cereal rye cover crop with 13 CO 2 (left) aboveground biomass was.
Manuscript Review: A Checklist From: Seals, D.R and H Tanaka Advances in Physiology Education 23:52-58.
NOAA Northeast Regional Climate Center Dr. Lee Tryhorn NOAA Climate Literacy Workshop April 2010 NOAA Northeast Regional Climate.
Fontaine S., Barot S., Barré P., Bdioui N., Mary B., Rumpel C. Nature (2007), Vol. 450,
Eleanor (Swain) Reed1*, David Chadwick1, Paul Hill1, Davey Jones1
Beach Modelling: Lessons Learnt from Past Scheme Performance Project: SC110004/S Specific Modelling Tools & Techniques.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Carbon Sequestration Akilah Martin Fall 2005.
Implications of Alternative Crop Yield Assumptions on Land Management, Commodity Markets, and GHG Emissions Projections Justin S. Baker, Ph.D.1 with B.A.
The C sequestration efficiency of soils
Olivier Maury, Olivier Aumont, Jean-Christophe Poggiale
3-PG The Use of Physiological Principles in Predicting Forest Growth
ASSESSING AND MANAGING SOIL QUALITY FOR SUSTAINABLE
Soils and their Significance
Soil carbon and farming systems
WJEC GCE Geography Guidance for Teachers: Assessment at AS/A level.
A Dynamic System Analysis of Simultaneous Recurrent Neural Network
Amelia Bertozzi-Villa IDM Symposium April 17, 2019
GL 51 – Statistical evaluation of stability data
Presentation transcript:

Accounting for black C in the modeling of soil organic matter turnover Dr Saran Sohi 1,2, Dr John Gaunt 1,2,3, Dr Elisa Lopez-Capel 4, Helen Yates 1 & Prof Johannes Lehmann 2 1 Agriculture & Environment Division, Rothamsted Research, UK 2 Dept. of Crop & Soil Sciences, Cornell University, NY 3 GY Associates, Harpenden, UK 4 Civil Eng. & Geosciences, University of Newcastle, UK USDA Symposium, March 2005, Baltimore

Introduction Purpose & objectives of talk Placing approaches to SOC modeling in the context of black C Outline: Why do we need (SOC) models? What type of SOC models do we have? Can they be modified to account for black C (BC)? What other models can be developed to explain the effects of BC?

Purpose of SOC models Description versus prediction Originally: to make generalizations about land-use impacts on SOC content –Sustainability of production –Descriptive, site-specific, and plot scale Recently: to predict net changes in SOC from changing agronomic management –diverse landscapes, regional scale –carbon sequestration So far we are using the same models Will new models allow mechanisms of stabilization to be elucidated? What is the impact of black C on SOC turnover

Why models are required Rates of decomposition are not simple first-order % added material remaining in SOC Jenkinson, 1990 Years after addition Observed Constant reactivity (1st order decay curve)

SOC models Why they are required and how they can be assessed Organic matter added to soil decomposes Decomposition is not proportional to what is there i.e., not first-order How is the actual relationship represented in models How the relationships are tested CO 2 (measuring where organic matter goes - sensitive in short term) SOC (measuring what is left - changes slowly, easy to measure) How are these relationships affected by black C?

Why models are required Reactivity of substrate declines with time Concept: Rate of carbon ‘release’ from different molecules reflects the balance between the energy gained and the energy expended (in enzyme synthesis) Time Specific reactivity, k, of a residual substrate

Reactivity profiles for SOM Inputs & decomposition are continuous & simultaneous Proportion of C in soil Continuously distributed reactivity Reactivity, k

A SOM reactivity profile Inferred from thermal analysis Lopez-Capel et al., 2005

Reactivity profiles Inferred from thermal analysis Lopez-Capel et al., 2005

Predictive, and versatile descriptive models imply and must embody some: universal or defined reactivity-distribution These distributions will be impacted by the presence of abundant black C

Two pools sufficient for specific descriptions Optimise reactivity and size Measured

Two pool description of short term CO 2 release Liang et al., 2005

Four pool model (RothC) Reliable for general long term predictions * Reactivity and/or size optimised to work in multiple situations (and to account for soil texture) Measurable Measured * * * * Measurable Source: Coleman et al., 2000

Reactivity distributions Implicit in an established SOC model, RothC Humus “Inert” Resistant Decomposable Specific reactivity,k (day ) Proportion of SOC of greater reactivity (%)

SOC modeling Summary - where we are at Existing models work by allocating SOC to discrete, linked pools of defined & contrasting ‘reactivity’ These pools cannot be measured but from extensive parameterization we know their likely size in typical soils (given information on site, texture and climate) Descriptions of C accumulation and equilibriums in long term experiments under contrasting conditions Prediction of C accumulation and equilibriums at sites with known management history Extended to forest systems Integrated with GIS for regional scale predictions These models are not able to automatically account for atypical and/or black soils…..

SOC modeling – Black carbon Context and relevance Recent studies suggest (Schmidt et al., Skjemstad et al.) –black C is a ubiquitous constituent of soil organic carbon (SOC) in agricultural soils –black C is not only significant, but an often major (or even dominant) constituent of SOC If black C comprises stable or most stable C, its abundance must strongly affect SOM reactivity profiles –SOC accumulation –SOC equilibrium

Many aspects to modeling black C A range of models are required Context –Soil C stocks –C sequestration –Feedback effects Description, prediction, spatial –Sensitivity (land-use or agronomic level) –Spatial resolution (soil type or climatic zone) –Time-scale & time-step (field or lab incubation experiments) Empirical, mechanistic –Model initialization –Assessing intervention Issues addressed: –Permanency

Modifying a typical four pool model Assigning black C to the inert (IOM) pool in RothC Black C component measured using photo- oxidation method (Skjemstad et al.) Measurable Measured * * * * Measurable

A revised reactivity profile for ‘black’ soil Implicit in calibration of RothC (Skjemstad, 2004) Humus “Inert” Resistant Decomposable Specific reactivity,k (day ) Proportion of SOC of greater reactivity (%)

Modeling black C Using an amended four-pool model Context –C stocks Descriptive and spatial modeling –Land-use level –Regional scale projections –Time-scale of decades; time-step of months (field data) Empirical model –Revised ‘rules’ for initialization Issues addressed: –C-sequestration potential (re-assessed)

Black C Can models gain us a mechanistic understanding? Models based upon relevant (distinct) and verifiable (measurable) pools offer a tool for elucidating underlying mechanisms of C stabilisation ―Sohi et al, Our simulations using SOMA would account explicitly for black C present in each pool ―Black C appears not to be characterized by a single physical location within the soil matrix (Glaser et al., 2000) Success would not be entirely dependent upon relevant black C measurement techniques ―The impact on the reactivity of each pool can be inferred

15 g soil + 90 ml NaI solution (1.80 gcm -3 ) Dissolved organic matter Organomineral (heavy) Density separation Free organic matter (light) Sohi et al., 2001, SSSAJ 64 Ultrasonic dispersion Density separation Intra-aggregate (light) A procedure to isolate SOM pools suitable for modeling

* Reactivity optimised for several soils of increasing clay content Measurable Measured * * * * Measurable Sohi et al, in prep. Measurable * * Five pool model - SOMA A tool for investigating SOM stabilization? Calculable

Conclusions: Using models to understand BC in soil Simple modification to existing models e.g. RothC, re-defining the inert/passive fraction Re-optimizing new mechanistic models e.g. SOMA for soils with/without known amounts/types of black C > Strategies for purposeful amendments that maximise soil C stabilisation