Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Session 3. Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Chapter 2 – Argument Coordination Relationship between arguer and recipient as.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argumentation.
Advertisements

SPEAKING PURSUASIVELY 15 © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
Standardizing Arguments Premise 1: New Mexico offers many outdoor activities. Premise 2: New Mexico has rich history of Native Americans and of Spanish.
Speaking To Persuade & Appendix B – Sample Speech
Human Communication THIRD EDITION ◄ Judy C. Pearson  Paul E. Nelson  Scott Titsworth  Lynn Harter ► C H A P T E R F I F T E E N Persuasive Presentations.
The Persuasive Process
©2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Thinking and Speaking Critically.
Writing Persuasive Messages Chapter 10. Purpose To change your audience’s beliefs, actions, or values by providing sound, credible advice to solutions,
Stephen E. Lucas C H A P T E R McGraw-Hill© 2004 Stephen E. Lucas. All rights reserved. Methods of Persuasion 16.
Persuasive Speaking.
Speaking to Persuade Persuasion Defined Motivating Your Audience
Chapter Seventeen: Persuasive Speaking. Ch17: Persuasive Speaking Copyright © 2006 Wadsworth 2.
Persuasive Speaking Chapter 14.
How Informative & Persuasive Speeches are Similar: Extemporaneous delivery Time limit (4-6 minutes) Outline required Same number of sources (four)
PERSUASIONANDARGUMENT Chapter 15 Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2009 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
Chapter 16 Persuasive Speaking. The nature of persuasive speeches Persuasive Speeches attempt to influence audience members.
Basics of Argumentation Victoria Nelson, Ph.D.. What is an argument? An interpersonal dispute.
Persuasion Principles of Speech Chapter What is Persuasion? How have you been persuaded today? Used in all aspects of life Both verbal and non-verbal.
Grading Criteria for Assigment 1 Structure – –sense of time, present and past –conflict with two distinct sides –description of cause of conflict –shared.
Persuasive Speaking.  Define the goals of persuasive speaking  Know how to develop a persuasive topic and thesis  Understand your listeners and tailor.
AP English Language and Composition
1 Persuasion & Reasoning Chapter Logos The logical arrangement of evidence in a speech The logical arrangement of evidence in a speech.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Types of Informative Speeches.
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
Persuasive Speaking. The process of influencing attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors.
McGraw-Hill©Stephen E. Lucas 2001 All rights reserved. CHAPTER SIXTEEN Methods of Persuasion.
PERSUASIVE SPEAKING SPEAKING TO CHANGE THE BELIEF, ATTITUDE OR ACTION OF THE AUDIENCE.
Chapter 4: Listening and Evaluating Public Speaking Coach Robbins.
Chapter 16 The Strategy of Persuasion
Copyright © 2007, Terry Hudson Session 1. Copyright © 2007, Terry Hudson Classical Rhetorical Analysis Aristotle: “Rhetoric is the observance of all available.
Argument: Ethos, Pathos, Logos Mr. Eagan English 110.
Introduction to Public Speaking Chapters 15 and 16.
Methods of persuasion Chapter 17 Recap.
Chapter 10 (a deliberate attempt to influence the thought and behavior of others through the use of personal, psychological, and logical appeals)
{ Methods of Persuasion Speech class.  The audience perceives the speaker as having high credibility  The audience is won over by the speaker’s evidence.
Understanding Persuasive Messages © Stockbyte / SuperStock.
Arguments Analysis and Criticism Week 8. Learning Objectives Benefits Of Arguments Analysis An Approach For Analysis Understanding Fallacies.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2004 Chapter 17 The Structure of Persuasion This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
 College requires critical reading and writing skills. This tutorial is designed to get you started by teaching you to attend to critical features of.
Rhetorical Proofs and Fallacies Week 10 – Wednesday, October 28.
Introduction to Argument Chapter 2 (Pgs ) AP Language Demi Greiner | Arlyn Rodriguez Period 4.
Persuasive Speaking. The nature of persuasive speeches Persuasive Speeches attempt to influence audience members Speakers want to: –have audience adopt.
Write down 3 sentences 2 sentences should be truths about yourself. 1 sentence should be a lie about yourself. For example: I was raised in Houston. I.
Structures of Reasoning Models of Argumentation. Review Syllogism All syllogisms have 3 parts: Major Premise- Minor Premise Conclusion Categorical Syllogism:
Chapter 24: Persuasive Speaking
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 4TH EDITION Chapter 24
A SPEAKER’S GUIDEBOOK 4 TH EDITION CHAPTER 24 The Persuasive Speech.
Chapter 16 Recap/Lecture
Chapter 14 Persuasion.
Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies
Chapter 16 The Persuasive Speech
Persuasive Speaking Structures and Appeals
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
Unit 15: Using Persuasive Strategies (Chapter 17)
Chapter 17 Methods of persuasion.
Chapter 16 and 17 Review December 8, 2008.
Writing the Argumentative Essay
University of Northern IA
University of Northern IA
Persuasive techniques
Chapter 12 Persuasive Speaking
Chapter Fourteen The Persuasive Speech.
Logical Fallacy Study Guide
SPEAKING TO CHANGE THE BELIEF, ATTITUDE OR ACTION OF THE AUDIENCE
Developing Arguments for Persuasive Speeches
Rhetorical Appeals.
Chapter 17: Persuasive Speeches
Chapter 15 Objectives Identify four action goals of persuasive speaking Distinguish between immediate behavioral purposes and ultimate goals Describe and.
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Session 3

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Chapter 2 – Argument Coordination Relationship between arguer and recipient as important as the content of the argument Relationship between arguer and recipient as important as the content of the argument Perspectives Perspectives  Logical  Dialectical  Rhetorical

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Arguer-Based Approaches - Syllogism Major premise Major premise Minor premise Minor premise Conclusion Conclusion Categorical Categorical Disjunctive Disjunctive Hypothetical Hypothetical

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Arguer-Based Approaches - Toulmin Data Data Claim Claim Warrant Warrant Backing Backing Qualifier Qualifier

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Co-Orientational Approach Level of Dispute Level of Dispute Argument Situations: Rhetorical situation is context of persons, events, objects, relations…that invites arguments. Argument Situations: Rhetorical situation is context of persons, events, objects, relations…that invites arguments.  Situations  Argument fitting to situation  Situation prescribes criteria for response  Situations impermanent

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Co-Orientational Approach - Relationships Interdependent connections between arguer and recipients Interdependent connections between arguer and recipients Competing Competing Collaborating Collaborating Avoiding Avoiding Compromising Compromising Accommodating Accommodating

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Chapter 3 – Argument Analysis, Criticism Benefits Benefits  Better understand the argument  Enable recipient to judge and evaluate

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Approach for Analysis Simple Arguments – One Premise and a Claim Simple Arguments – One Premise and a Claim  What the arguer means  Number the statements in the argument  Identify arguer’s main claim  Diagram the argument

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Approach for Analysis (Cont.) Other Structural Patterns Other Structural Patterns  Type II complex arguments have two or more premises supporting claim  Type III arguments – Argument Chains  Type IV compound arguments use one or more premises to support more than one conclusion.

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Approach for Analysis (Cont.) Application Application  Ascertain the meaning  Number the statements  Identify the primary claim  Construct a diagram  Criticize the argument

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Argument Analysis - Fallacies Fallacies – flawed by irrelevant or inadequate evidence, erroneous reasoning, or improper expression. Fallacies – flawed by irrelevant or inadequate evidence, erroneous reasoning, or improper expression. Audience-based Audience-based  Ad Hominem  Ad Populum  Appeal to Tradition  Straw Arguments

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Fallacies (Cont.) Language-based Language-based  Equivocation  Amphiboly  Emotive Language Grounding Fallacies Grounding Fallacies  Begging question  Non Sequitur

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Fallacies (Cont.) Reason-based Reason-based  False Analogy  Hasty Generalization  False Cause  Slippery Slope

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Chapter 5 - Audience Hostile Audiences Hostile Audiences Setting and Occasion as Rhetorical Field Setting and Occasion as Rhetorical Field  For whom you speak  When you speak  Where you speak  Events surrounding your speech  The occasion

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Audience Analysis Classroom audience Classroom audience Ask direct questions Ask direct questions Questionnaire Questionnaire Inferential audience analysis – demographic categories Inferential audience analysis – demographic categories Adapt remarks to an audience Adapt remarks to an audience

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Chapter 14 – Persuasion Theories Aristotle’s artistic proofs Aristotle’s artistic proofs  Ethos  Logos  Pathos Intensification/downplay model Intensification/downplay model Evoked recall model Evoked recall model

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Persuasion Theories (Cont.) Beliefs, attitudes and values model Beliefs, attitudes and values model  Beliefs –Primitive beliefs –Shared beliefs –Derived beliefs –Matters of taste  Attitudes  Values

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Giving a Persuasive Speech Enhancing speaker credibility Enhancing speaker credibility Enhancing message credibility Enhancing message credibility Propositions of fact, value, policy Propositions of fact, value, policy Choosing message strategies Choosing message strategies  One-sided vs. two-sided arguments  Explicit vs. implicit conclusions  Evoked recall appeals

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Giving a Persuasive Speech (Cont.) Organization in a motivated sequence Organization in a motivated sequence  Attention  Need  Satisfaction  Visualization  Action Avoiding fallacies Avoiding fallacies

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Chapter 15 – Construct an Argument Argument from sign Argument from sign  Sign infallible?  Always lead to the conclusion?  Always a relationship between sign and conclusion? Argument from cause Argument from cause  Real connection?  Other causes?  Anything prevented this cause?  Cause sufficient?

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Construct an Argument (Cont.) Argument from authority Argument from authority  Qualified  Capable?  Behavior consistent?

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Construct an Argument (Cont.) Argument by definition Argument by definition  Operational  Example  Association  Definition confusing?  Means more than one thing?  Emotionally loaded?  Generally agreeable?

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Construct an Argument (Cont.) Argument from analogy Argument from analogy  Important points of comparison  Any points of difference?  Comparison outweighs difference? Argument from example Argument from example  Extended  Example typical?  Enough examples?  Example relevant?

Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Construct an Argument (Cont.) Argument by deduction Argument by deduction  Nature of the groups true?  This member truly belongs to this group? Process of proving – degrees of proof Process of proving – degrees of proof  Impossible  Possible  Plausible  Probable  Certainty