Proposition 8 Post-Election California Voter Survey Prepared by David Binder Research Conducted November 6 th - 16 th, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
California and U.S. Teen Birth Rates, U.S. California Year Sources: Teen births: Public-User File Birth Statistical Master File, years
Advertisements

1 Who’s in Prison? The Changing Demographics of Incarceration Amanda Bailey Public Policy Institute of California.
Mental Health Data Workbook and Training Ann Arneill-Py, PhD, Executive Officer CA Mental Health Planning Council Stephanie Oprendek, PhD, Senior Associate.
Monthly THP-Plus/THP+FC Conference Call Thursday, September 12 th : 10:00 to 11:00 a.m.
Changes in Race and Hispanic Distributions within California, James P. Allen and Eugene Turner California State University, Northridge California.
State & Local Production Model Agricultural Core Curriculum: Supplement University of California, Davis 111.T 1.
1 California and U.S. Teen Birth Rates, U.S. California Year Sources: Teen births: Birth Statistical Master File, years , Office of.
© 2004 by David T. Olson Sample - Not for Public Use1 A Sample Presentation of The State of the Church in Northern California and the Bay Area, Sacramento.
PRESENTATION TO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MARCH 8, 2011 VICTOR E. SALAZAR County Clerk/Registrar of Voters.
Strategic Environmental Compliance for Fire Safe Council & Community Wildfire Protection Plan Projects Project Scope and Conservation Strategies: Wildlife.
2008 Election Prof. B. Jones. Outcome As of 1:19 PM, Nov. 5 (from CNN) Obama: 63,568,329 (349 ECV) McCain: 56,198,499 (162 ECV) –Missouri, North Carolina.
A CHURCH FOR EVERY PERSON Church Planting in California in 2015.
Northwest Biosolids Management Association Conference Stevenson, WA : September 2011 Natalie Sierra San Francisco Public Utilities Commission.
Thyroid Cancer From the “Cancer” Group Scott “Superstar” Lydon Jenny “Jackhammer” Boirgas Kristine “Kryptonite” Sexton.
California PREP Chapter Property Records Education Partners Presented by Phyllis Yanagihara, CEO, CEI Calif. AEA Director, CEA National Affairs.
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE FOR CHILDREN (EMS-C) Cynthia Frankel EMS-C Coordinator Alameda County EMS.
7/1/2010 CHDP DIRECTOR/DEPUTY DIRECTOR TRAINING SECTION XIV Resources/Networking 1.
The Sapphire Grant Program (CA & Nevada)
Monthly THP-Plus/THP+FC Conference Call Thursday, November 14 th : 10:00 to 11:00 a.m.
April 9, After School Education and Safety (ASES) Program – Prop 49 Sandra McBrayer, CEO The Children’s Initiative Dennis Petrie, Deputy Director.
AB109, ACP and Centerforce: Opportunities and Challenges Carol F. Burton, LMSW Julie Lifshay, PhD Centerforce January 26, 2012 Centerforce Information,
Thyroid Cancer From the “Cancer” Group Scott “Superstar” Lydon Jenny “Jackhammer” Bogios Kristine “Kryptonite” Sexton.
INVEST, INSURE AND UNITE!. Invest in a Slice of RAF Pie.
MJSWTG Biosolids Work Group BIOSOLIDS Safe and Sustainable Management Options.
California’s Cash Cow- Agriculture! The Economic Impact of California Agriculture Standard C1.4.
California Ag Commodities Lesson
History of Trauma System Development in California David Hoyt, MD, FACS Professor and Chairman Department of Surgery University of California, Irvine Orange,
What Are We Doing With Our Biosolids: Is it Sustainable? Presented by: Natalie Sierra, SFPUC Bob Gillette, Carollo Engineers June 2, 2008 BACWA Biosolids.
Monthly THP-Plus/THP+FC Conference Call Thursday, January 9 th : 10:00 to 11:00 a.m.
JOHN BURTON FOUNDATION Beyond Data Collection: Using the Tracking System to Measure Progress THP-Plus Institute July 27, 2009.
Presented by Mark DiCamillo Director, The Field Poll November 15, 2012 CSU, Sacramento presented by Mark DiCamillo Director, The Field Poll November 15,
JOHN BURTON FOUNDATION Statewide THP-Plus Data Collection and Outcomes: Results from the First Year California Connected by 25 Initiative Convening May.
Agriculture Production in California. Delta Region Milk Vegetables Asparagus Corn Counties: San Joaquin,Contra Costa, Solano.
What is AGRICULTURE? the science or practice of farming, including cultivation of the soil for the growing of crops and the rearing of animals to provide.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review California July 2013.
California and U.S. Teen Birth Rates, U.S. California Year Sources: Teen births: Birth Statistical Master File, years , Health Information.
What is Latinos for Meg? A coalition of Latinos and dedicated Californians working to elect Meg Whitman the next Governor of California. 3.
Carla Ayala CSU Monterey Bay Psychology Major. “Youthquake” California's birth rates to teens are between 4 and 12 times higher than are the rates for.
San Joaquin County Citizens for Constitutional Redistricting Ending the Gerrymanders of San Joaquin County 1.
Waste Tire Enforcement Grant Program Integrated Waste Management Board –Georgianne Turner (916) $30 Million Waste Tire Recycling Fund –$1.75 per.
California GEAR UP MiraCosta Community College Oceanside San Diego State University San Diego Palomar Community College San Marcos Rancho Santiago CCD.
California Competes: Higher Education for a Strong Economy 50 California St., Suite 3165, San Francisco, CA v:(415) f:(415)
© 2004 by David T. Olson Sample - Not for Public Use1 The State of the Church in Northern California Dave Olson
What Are We Doing With Our Biosolids: Is it Sustainable? Presented by: Natalie Sierra, SFPUC Bob Gillette, Carollo Engineers June 2, 2008 BACWA Biosolids.
Political Theories and Beliefs. Political Theory and Beliefs and their influence on individuals (10-20 percent) Elitist, pluralist, and hyperpluralist.
Welcome to our Latino Community Leaders October 15, 2014.
Managed Care: What is it and how can I make it work for me and my family? Family Voices 14th Annual Health Summit Monday, March 14, 2016 Gregory S. Buchert,
California LifeLine Program Update Presented by Communications Division Low-Income Oversight Board October 29, 2015.
California Competes : Higher Education for a Strong Economy November 2013 Patterns of participation: California’s community colleges.
3% TO 5% GRANT PRODUCT & FHA 1 ST TD FUNDS FORGIVEN NO RECAPTURE NO REPAYMENT The Sapphire Grant Program CA & Nevada 1/28/
Special Programs Jamie Jones, Special Programs Manager
Work-Based Learning Tools
The Hispanic Market United States California Southern California
CA Small Group 2017 Network Comparisons
California’s Sector Strategies A Foundation for Change
Introduction to CA Agriculture.
SUD Policy: Accomplishments & Priorities All Member Meeting October 12, 2017 County Behavioral Health Directors Association of California.
Essex 5% Grant Products Presenting Sapphire & HELP CA & Nevada
What would it take to get to zero overdose deaths in California?
California Competes: Higher Education for a Strong Economy
Gloria Miele, Ph.D., Tom Freese, Ph.D., UCLA ISAP
The Roots of Juvenile Delinquency
Family Voices of California 15th Annual Health Summit
California Competes: Higher Education for a Strong Economy
FYE 2017 Data Points.
Large City Application Status
Home Ownership Today (HOT)
Presentation transcript:

Proposition 8 Post-Election California Voter Survey Prepared by David Binder Research Conducted November 6 th - 16 th, 2008

Research Methodology

800 voters living in California who voted in the November 2008 election, plus an additional oversample of 266 Asian, Latino, and African American voters. Methodology Respondents Dates Poll was conducted November 6th to 16th, Margin of Error Margin of error: 3.0% 3

Summary Findings 4

Summary Findings: Overall Overall Results Proposition 8 was passed on November 4, 2008 by a margin of 52% to 48% by a margin of about 600,000 votes out of 1.3 million votes cast. Two areas of the state stood out: The Central Valley counties overwhelmingly supported the measure by 71%-29%, while the more populous Bay Area was strongly opposed (39%-61%). However, the Southern California counties which comprise 55% of the total vote supported Prop 8 by 54% to 46%. In Los Angeles County, 69% voted for Barack Obama for President, but slightly less than 50% voted no on Proposition 8 – a gap of 19 percentage points (compared to a 13 point differential statewide). 5

Summary Findings: Demographics Results by Subgroup Political ideology was the factor that corresponded most highly to the Proposition 8 vote, with 22% of liberals voting yes on 8, compared to 51% of moderates and 82% of conservatives. Election day exit polls that showed 70% of African American voters supporting Proposition 8 appear incorrect. Our survey shows 58% of Blacks voting for 8. Precincts in Southern California’s most concentrated areas of African American voters – Carson and Compton – show 65% support for Prop 8. Predominately African American precincts in other areas of LA County and in San Francisco showed support in the low-to-mid 50 percent range. The factor next most important in determining vote on Prop 8, after ideology, was religion, with voters who worship regularly being strongly more likely to support Prop 8, by a 70% to 30%, while those who worship less often voted 38% to 62% against Prop 8. Blacks and Latinos who worship less than once a week opposed Prop 8. 6

Summary Findings: Reasons for Vote and Influencers Reasons for Vote Supporters of Prop 8 most frequently cited their view that marriage is between a man and a woman. Secondarily, Prop 8 supporters disclosed religious reasons as motive for their support. Opponents of Prop 8 most frequently cited their view that same sex marriage was an issue of civil rights and equal rights, as well as their view that everyone should have the freedom to marry the person of their choosing. Most voters stated they were most influenced by discussions with friends, family and coworkers. This pool of voters opposed Proposition 8. About one-quarter said they had a strong personal opinion on the issue that was not swayed by other communications. This pool voted yes. About 8% said they were swayed by the church. This pool voted yes by 94% to 6%. 7 Influ- encers

Summary Findings: Communications TV ads Among the yes on 8 ads, the message that stood out was that Prop 8 will cause the teaching of same sex marriage in schools. Among the no on 8 ads, most saw the ad featuring Senator Dianne Feinstein. The ads with Feinstein and Sam and Julia Thoron were statistically more likely to cause a no vote than were other ads. The History ad narrated by Samuel L. Jackson was also convincing. Vast majority of voters said mail and telephone calls were not influential. Only 5% visited official campaign websites, but those who visited the no on 8 website rated it more influential than visitors to the yes site. About 10% said they received information from a church, and 49% felt this information was convincing – a much higher proportion than other sources, such as labor unions, newspaper editorials and television ads. 8 Other Commu- nication sources

Summary Findings: Messaging Messa- ging Only about 17% of yes on 8 voters could name something tangible that could cause them to change their mind and support same sex marriage, including: Call marriage by another name Ensure that same sex marriage will not be taught in schools Ensure that churches will not be forced to perform same sex marriages Approval, or lack of formal opposition, from churches or religious leaders 9

Election Results

California Election Results November 4, 2008 President Obama8,274, % McCain5,011, % Prop 8 No6,401, % Yes7,001, % Gap between Obama vote and No on 8 vote was 1.8 million, or 14%

12 Prop 8 vs Obama Prop 8 Map – 52% Yes vs 48% NoPresidential Vote -- 61% Obama vs 37% McCain

13 Other Southern California: Riverside, San Bernardino, Santa Barbara, Ventura Central Valley: Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, Stanislaus, Tulare Sacramento / Tahoe: Amador, El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Yolo Bay Area: Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Mendocino, Napa, SF, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma Central Coast: Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz Inland / Mountains / Other: Alpine, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Humboldt, Inyo, Lake, Lassen, Mariposa, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity,. Tuolumne, Yuba LA County had 19% difference between vote for Obama and vote against Prop 8 Region % Obama% No on 8 % Obama – Prop 8 LA County San Diego County54468 Other Southern California Central Valley Sacramento / Tahoe Region Bay Area Central Coast64568 Inland / Mountains / Other46406 Total

14 Which one of the 12 state propositions on the November 4 th ballot were you most interested in? Prop 8 generated far more interest than any other state proposition Source: PPIC Statewide Survey, Dec 2008

15 The outcome of Prop 8 was more important to Yes voters than No voters As you may know, Proposition 8 passed. How important to you is the outcome of the vote on Proposition 8? % Very Important Evangelical Christians: 77% (vs all others: 61%) Women: 69% (vs Men: 60%) Latinos: 67% Overall: 65% Whites: 64% Source: PPIC Statewide Survey, Dec 2008

Vote by Subgroups

Prop 8 by gender % voting yes 17

Prop 8 by gender and family status % voting yes 18

Prop 8 by age % voting yes 19

Prop 8 by ethnicity % voting Yes 20

Prop 8 by party % voting yes 21

There is a direct correspondence between voters’ self-placement on an ideological scale and the percent supporting Proposition 8 % voting yes

Prop 8 by religion % voting yes 23

Prop 8 by frequency of worship % voting yes 24

Prop 8 by education level % voting Yes 25 Source: media exit poll

Prop 8 by presidential vote % voting Yes 26

Prop 8 by knowledge of LGBT people % voting Yes 27

Timing & Influences

29 Q8 N=549 What are the reasons why you voted YES on Proposition 8? BASE: Those voting YES Yes voters are driven by the belief that marriage is between a man and a woman

30 Q9 N=515 What are the reasons why you voted NO on Proposition 8? BASE: Those voting NO No voters are driven by belief in equal rights and freedom to choose whom to marry

31 Q12 (N=1066) Which of the following was the most influential to you when deciding how to vote on Proposition 8? Majority of voters were most influenced by discussions with friends and family and their personal opinion, while 8% were most influenced by religion.

32 Q12 (N=1066) Which of the following was the most influential to you when deciding how to vote on Proposition 8? Voters influenced by discussions more likely to vote no, voters influenced by the religion more likely to vote yes % voting Yes

Communications

34 Q28-34 (N=1066) Ads, mail & discussions with friends and family had the greatest reach. Phone calls and newspaper endorsements also had strong reach.

While about one-third of voters report receiving a phone call about Prop 8, 95% say it wasn’t effective Q63 (N=1066)

Seeing gay couples being married on TV did not significantly affect the vote on Proposition 8 Q63 (N=1066) Have you ever seen same sex couples get married on the news or on television? (IF YES:) Did that make you more likely to vote YES on 8, more likely to vote NO on 8, or did it make no difference to you?

About 69% saw a Yes on 8 ad, but only 18% found them convincing Q63 (N=1066)

38 Q27 (N=549) Can you describe for me one television ad for yes on 8 that you remember that was convincing? The Yes on 8 ad most frequently recalled is about the teaching of same sex marriage in schools.

39 Q28-34 (N=1066) No on 8 Ads Seen: Dianne seen by most Percent recall seeing ad

40 Q28-34 (N=1066) No on 8 Ads Seen: Among viewers, Thoron ad is more convincing

41 Q28-34 (N=1066) Voters who saw Dianne and Thoron are more likely to have voted no on Prop 8. *Significant at the.001 level in logistic regression analysis

Takeaways

43 Q49-58 (N=1066) Majority of voters believed that Prop 8 would preserve traditional marriage All Voters

44 Q49-58 (N=1066) Majority of voters agree that it is wrong to eliminate constitutional right of equal protection and that Prop 8 was unfair, unnecessary and wrong All Voters

45 Q49-58 (N=95) 9% voted YES, but believe that Prop 8 is unfair, unnecessary, and wrong. Regression analysis indicates they were motivated by the belief that Prop 8 will preserve traditional marriage & stop the teaching of same sex marriage in school. Yes voters who believe Prop 8 is unfair, unnecessary, wrong *Significant at the.0005 level in logistic regression analysis

46 Q64 N=549 Some people voted no on Proposition 8 because they believe it’s wrong to deny gay people the ability to get married. Is there anything that could change your mind and lead you to support the freedom to marry for everyone some day? What?) 73% of yes voters say there is nothing that could change their mind. 7% want same sex marriage to be called something else.