Technology Summit Kickoff Kim Wyman Secretary of State April 8, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OPERATING EFFECTIVELY AT WESD. What is Internal Control? A process designed to provide reasonable assurance the organizations objectives are achieved.
Advertisements

Goals of Workshop District Education Technology Plan Goals 8 goals aligned to State/National Education Technology Plans Strategies to meet challenges.
Confidential & Proprietary to Cooper Compliance Corporation Revised September 8, 2014 AUDiT-READY TM.
Voting & People with Disabilities Margaret Jakobson San Diego Regional Office PAI.
Observing Elections From Polls to Vote by Mail in 2012 Kim Wyman Thurston County Auditor Olympia, Washington.
1 Compliance with Election Laws Legislative Audit Bureau January 2008.
1 Executive Office of Public Safety. 2 National Incident Management System.
Voter Access & Modernized Elections 2013 LEGISLATION.
Bringing Technology to the Rural Hospital Rural Telecon ‘07 October 17, 2007.
Human Factors in Voting Systems John O’Hara IEEE Usability-Accessibility Working Group Chair HFES Voting System Task Force Chair Advisory Board Meeting.
OHT 14.1 Galin, SQA from theory to implementation © Pearson Education Limited 2004 Software quality infrastructure components The need for procedures and.
Our Business Phone System Stepping Back & Looking Forward Add your logo here [Delete this text box.] Add your logo here [Delete this text box.]
Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Ministry of Education EMIS Directorate.
Vote By Mail A County Perspective Dolores Gilmore, Elections Manager
Voting System Qualification How it happens and why.
United States 1 Election Assistance Commission 1 Inspiring Change & Modernization in Election Administration Seattle, WA June 10, 2015.
National Incident Management System. Homeland Security Presidential Directive – 5 Directed the development of the National Incident Management System.
New Hampshire’s Approach to the State Plan for the Help America Vote Act (HAVA)
HAVA FUNDS MANAGING, RECORDKEEPING, REPORTING & AUDITING FOR COUNTIES MARCH 14, 2006 SBOE TRAINING Don Wright.
2011 Requirements Payments Instructions. Webinar Agenda 1.State Plan Updates 2.Instructions for Requesting Funds 3.Title III Certification 4.Minimum Payment.
Business Analysis and Requirements Project Thanks for joining us!
Demystifying the Independent Test Authority (ITA)
DAS: State Controller's Division1January 2010 Department of Administrative Services State Controller’s Division Updated January, 2010.
Natick Public Schools Technology Presentation February 6, 2006 Dennis Roche, CISA Director of Technology.
An update from the National Committee on Levee Safety Presented to the TWCA by Karin M. Jacoby, PE, Esq. June 17, of 14An Involved Public and Reliable.
- 1 - Roadmap to Re-aligning the Customer Master with Oracle's TCA Northern California OAUG March 7, 2005.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Statewide Strategic IT Consolidation (ITC) Initiative ANF IT Consolidation Website Publishing / IA Working Group Kickoff.
Lucity GIS and IT Services. Lucity IT Services.
1:1 Computing Initiative RttT Fidelity Check Spring 2013.
Election Resources Introduction to IED The election division is a bi-partisan agency that: Certifies candidates and election results for candidates that.
Election Accessibility 2004 Christina Galindo-Walsh National Association of Protection and Advocacy Systems (NAPAS)
Secretary of State Voting System Security Standards Juanita Woods Secretary of State Elections Division HAVA Information Security.
Hardware Independent Voting Systems. Caveats I am not talking about nor endorsing internet voting (or the slippery slope to lead to it) There are many.
What Happens Now? From a Local Election Administrator’s Viewpoint.
Annual Training for County Election Officials NC State Board of Elections August 14, 2012.
Scott Hilkert, Managing Principal NIST Workshop on a Common Data Format for Electronic Voting Systems. Oct , 2009.
County Canvassing Board Training 2010 Sheryl Moss Certification and Training Manager Office of the Secretary of State (360)
New Hampshire’s Approach to the State Plan for the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) Disabilities Access and Voting Systems Task Force.
Senate Bill 223 Public Confidence in Elections. Current Law State Board certifies and decertifies voting equipment. Decertification could be a four year.
Voting System Grant Program. Help America Vote Act  Provides funding to help accomplish the various requirements of the Act.
…..Kansas Department of Revenue – Property Valuation Division – Kansas GIS Policy Board - DASC ….. Statewide Tax Units Database A collaborative partnership.
1 The Evolution of Voting Systems Paul DeGregorio Vice Chairman Donetta Davidson Commissioner The U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
Chapter © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Election Reform The Open Voting Consortium. Elections are important Voting is how we ultimately control.our government Many elections are decided by just.
Voting System Planning and Testing R. Michael Alvarez Caltech/MIT VTP Voting Systems Testing Summit 2005.
NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Department of Homeland Security Executive Office of Public Safety.
The Background EBR was born as initiative by some of the public bodies responsible for company registration and legal publicity, to create the telematic.
The Impact of High Intensity Volunteers in RI NNIP – San Antonio Kim Pierson An NNIP cross-site project on Integrated Data Systems funded by the Annie.
Elections - The ultimate time constrained project Marie Gregoire, PMP 1.
1 Computer Assisted Audit Tools National Audit Office of Lithuanian accepts the challenge Meeting of representatives of Baltic, Nordic and Polish SAIs.
Developing Local and Regional Incident Management Teams Bob Koenig Incident Management Team Coordinator Texas Forest Service.
Setting Up a Project for Success:
Jitasa Overview.
Ken Detzner, Secretary of State
Election Security Best Practices
Voter’s Choice Act: Big Changes Ahead for California Elections
Election System Modernization
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Institutional Framework, Resources and Management
Certification Phase: Closeout Agency Head: Maggie Toulouse Oliver
Maintaining Voter Registration Records State Board of Elections
Secretary of State Voter Registration Election Management System
Election Security Best Practices
Type your topic here Electoral Commission
Obtaining a New Voting System
Office of the Minnesota
Secretary of State Voter Registration Election Management System
OU BATTLECARD: Oracle Systems Learning Subscription
SOS SERVIS Phase 3 - Modernizing the NM Election System
SOS IRIS Phase 3 - Modernizing the NM Election System
Presentation transcript:

Technology Summit Kickoff Kim Wyman Secretary of State April 8, 2014

The Fundamental Question Knowing what you know today about registration and tabulation systems – factoring in all federal and state requirements, and public expectations for accessibility, integrity, and earlier, meaningful results – would you build the election system we currently have to meet our needs?

The Fundamental Question NO YES we are done here and we can all go back to work. we need to chart a course to prepare for the next 10 years.

Technology Summit Purpose Identify Technology Challenges Explore Solutions Create a Plan To create a team and develop a plan to improve registration and elections technology in Washington

Technology Summit Agenda Help America Vote Act (HAVA) - Refresher - How the Money was Spent Challenges - VRDB, WEI, MyVote and MyBallot Systems - 39 Registration and Voting Systems Look to the Future

Help America Vote Act (HAVA) Enacted in 2002 Created minimum standards Centralized responsibilities Provided funding

Federal HAVA Requirements The EAC was born

Federal HAVA Requirements 1 Replace voting systems

Federal HAVA Requirements 2 Improve elections administration

Federal HAVA Requirements 3 Provide accessible voting

Federal HAVA Requirements 4 Expand voter education and outreach

Federal HAVA Requirements 5 State responsibility for voter registration

State HAVA Requirements 1 States responsible for the voter registration lists 2 Creation of a statewide voter registration database

State HAVA Requirements 3 Provide provisional voting 4 Provide voting information

State HAVA Requirements 5 Update and upgrade voting equipment

State HAVA Requirements 6 Establish Voter Identification Procedures

State HAVA Requirements 7 Create an administrative complaint procedure

HAVA Funds in Washington State HAVA funds $65,340,381 State matching funds $2,790,877 Earned interest $6,694,542 Total $74,825,800

Required and Discretionary HAVA Spending

HAVA Spending $15,663,057

Voting Systems

Voter Registration and VRDB -Development of the VRDB -County EMS -Maintenance and enhancements to the VRDB

Voter Access and Education -Minority language requirements for counties -Educating voters -Provisional notifications -Improving accessibility

Other Improvements $15,663,057 -Election official training -MOVE Act compliance -Election equipment -Ballot drop boxes

Administration of HAVA -Development of state plan -Grants managements and fiscal support -Federal audits -County support

Funds Spent and Committed $6,538,720

Funds Committed Voter Registration$3,084,923 Voter Access and Education$2,075,362 Administration of HAVA$200,000 Other improvements$1,178,434 Total$6,538,720

What’s in our future? County SystemsState Systems

State of the County Systems 39 counties – Operate one of three election management systems – Operate one of three tabulation systems – Partner with multiple vendors providing miscellaneous services and products Aging hardware Outdated software Ongoing maintenance needs Certification deadlock

State of the State Systems $2.1 million per biennium to maintain existing technical programs – VRDB and WEI/MyVote $200,000 per biennium for accessible voting and minority language requirements

Washington’s VRDB System What we built and why? Hindsight is always 20/20. Does this look familiar?

VRDB Workflow From the perspective of a voter pretty straight forward

VRDB Workflow Behind the scenes Not so much !

Challenges Coordinating three EMS systems Making changes and enhancements Keeping data in sync Running reports Time!

WEI/MyVote - Challenges Lack of support for mobile devices Lack of cross-browser support MyBallot Online Voters’ Guide presentation issues

Voting Systems - Challenges Need new equipment Varying levels of commitment and customer service from vendors AVUs

Technical System - Challenges Lack of ability to respond quickly We have to share data Not very efficient Systems need to work together

Identifying 10-year Challenges Let’s brainstorm! Divide into 3 groups: A Auditors - policy B Administrators - mechanics C IT staff – technical

Identifying 10-year Challenges From your group’s perspective, identify: 1 Needs for Washington’s election system 2 Roadblocks to success 3 Best solutions

Look to the future 1 Hear from stakeholders 2 Learn from other states 3 Work with vendors Today we start to build a system that serves us, our voters, and all our stakeholders. 4 Develop a plan for the future (Technology Summit 2015)

Questions & Thank you Kim Wyman Washington Secretary of State