“You Could Learn a Lot About Guardrail From a Dummy…

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCHRP 350 Crash Test Program NCHRP 350 CRASH TESTING OF WORK ZONE DEVICES 1997 FHWA started requiring work zone devices to be crashworthy. New purchases.
Advertisements

Barrier Design Principles. Principle 1: Distance from Roadway Place Guardrail As Far From Traveled Way As Practical.
Barrier End Treatments and Crash Cushions
”Vision Zero Motorcycle Road” Before & After Morten Hansen - General Secretary, Norwegian Motorcycle Union in cooperation with the Norwegian Public Roads.
M.A.S.H.: The New Safety Hardware Crash Testing Criteria
Barrier End Treatments and Crash Cushions RDG Chapter 8.
Status of the Roadside Design Guide Update AASHTO Subcommittee on Design July Indianapolis, Indiana Keith A. Cota, New Hampshire Department.
Florida Department of Transportation T EMPORARY C RASH C USHIONS FDOT Contacts: District One Construction Marshall Douberley marshall.douberley.
Median Barriers RDG Chapter 6. Warrants for Median Barriers Prevent cross-over crashes Median width and traffic volumes are variables.
A Comprehensive Study on Pavement Edge Line Implementation Presented by: Mark J. Morvant, P.E. Associate Director, Research Louisiana Transportation Research.
Regional Asphalt Seminars Pavement Wedge Guidelines and Specifications EMMETT R. HELTZEL, P.E. STATE MAINTENANCE ENGINEER.
Oklahoma’s Experience with Wire Rope Safety Fence.
Appurtenances HDM Ch. 10.
Maintenance of Traffic (MOT)
UPDATE OF THE U.S. CRASH TEST PROCEDURES UPDATE OF THE U.S. CRASH TEST PROCEDURES Revision of NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance.
SUMMARY CHANGES FOR NCHRP REPORT 350 GUIDELINES [NCHRP (02)] Keith A. Cota, Chairman Technical Committee on Roadside Safety May 4, 2007.
Learning Outcomes Identify safety issues unique to local and rural areas. Identify common challenges to improving road safety. Explain why road agencies.
HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.
3R Standards Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation Ch. 7 1.
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
June 2011 Statewide Traffic Engineers Meeting Interstate Guide Sign Upgrade Projects.
Detours – Selection and Design Highways & Engineering Conference March 2, 2006.
Spring 2013 Section Engineers Conference March 5, 2013 Guardrail Items Terry Chism, Div of Const.
Bureau of Materials and Research 2014 AASHTO RAC/TRB Annual Meeting High Value Research Sweet 16 Ann Scholz, P.E., Assistant Research Engineer
Florida Department of Transportation T EMPORARY B ARRIERS AND C RASH C USHIONS 1.
Tender Packages (Consistency with Current Design Bulletins) Basic Knowledge for Roadway and Bridge Projects Seminar for CEA Members Edmonton February 12,
2002 AASHTO ROADSIDE DESIGN GUIDE A CONCISE OVERVIEW.
1-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS. 1-2 Introduction Highway Traffic Fatalities Trend.
Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Scoping Meeting March 4, 2014.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Federal Highway Administration Wisconsin Division January, 2010 Jason P. Spilak, PE, ARRA Engineer.
Wisconsin Contractor-Engineer Conference January 22, 2009 Safety Apparel, FHWA Work Zone Safety Subpart K Rule & Permanent Concrete Barriers Bill Bremer,
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
Fall 2014 Most of the Material taken from: Roadside Design Guide (2011) published by AAHSTO.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Office of Highway Safety Highway Factors David S. Rayburn.
Vegetation Control For Safety Russ Johnson – Maintenance Supervisor - WSDOT Don Petersen – Safety/Design Engineer - FHWA.
Session 9 Guardrail Attachments to Bridge Ends
2009 ACEC/ODOT CONFERENCE ODOT’S 1R PROGRAM Liz Hunt, P.E. ODOT Pavement Services Engineer.
A Focus Technology of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Technology Implementation Group (TIG) CABLE MEDIAN.
ROW, AASHTO OKLAHOMA CITY 2009 MELVYN R. COOPER REALTY OFFICER South Carolina Nonconforming Sign Upgrade/Removal (Pilot) Project.
Traffic Barrier Guidelines Section 3.0 Potential Roadside Obstacles Hands-On Workshop III July
Crashworthiness Simulation of ET2000 Guardrail Extruder Terminal.
Session 9 Guardrail Connections to Bridge Ends. Common Deficiencies in Bridge Railings Inadequate Dynamic Strength Potential for Snagging Use of “Safety”
2009 ROADWAY CONFERENCE 1R PROGRAM Cathy Nelson Steven Lindland.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
Session 3 Grading Requirements for Guardrail End Treatments.
Chapter C Cross Section (ANSWERS )
Roadside CE 453 Lecture 23. Sideslopes – Foreslope (Backslope) Design 1.Considerations: Stability and Vehicle Recovery a.if slope “>” 3:1 use barrier.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 101 Wyoming DOT Place guardrail when there is a fill slope of.
NCHRP 350 UPDATED. NCHRP 350 Historical Review Document Source Year Issued Number of Pages Test Vehicle & Weight HRB # lb. car NCHRP #115.
FHWA Data Mining Efforts to Develop Better Insights on Causes and Outcomes of Rollover Crashes Ana Maria Eigen Kenneth S. Opiela Federal Highway Administration.
Test Documentation and Reporting AASHTO Task Force 13 Subcommittee 7 Laboratory Accreditation Spring 2006 Meeting Lido Beach, Florida May 11-12, 2006 Subcommittee.
Traffic Barrier Guidelines Tracy Borchardt February
Two Test Level 4 Bridge Railing and Transition Systems For Transverse Timber Deck Bridges by Ronald K. Faller, Ph.D., P.E. Michael A. Ritter, P.E. Barry.
Overview of the “Recommended LRFD Seismic Design Specifications for Highway Bridges” Ian M. Friedland, P.E. Bridge Technology Engineer Federal Highway.
Kansas DOT Research Project Implementation Presented By Rick Kreider (Chief of Research) Created By Susan Barker (T 2 Engineer)
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
Ezzeldin Benghuzzi, P.E UPDATE TRAINING Contact Information: Ezzeldin Benghuzzi, P.E ezzeldin. Contact Information:
2011 Road School Work Zone Traffic Control Handbook.
FHWA: Revision of Thirteen Controlling Criteria for Design; Notice for Request and Comment. Comments Due: December 7, 2015 Jeremy Fletcher, P.E., P.S.M.
April 4, 2011 ITE Technical Conference Lake Buena Vista, Fl Implementation of AASHTO’s Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) 2016 Update from the.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 Funding Resources for Highway Safety (FY2001 Fed-Aid) $1.4 $5.6 Min. Guarantee Bridge Surface Transp. Program National Hwy.
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
Guardrail Leaveouts 606 special provision July 6, 2016.
Implementation of MASH
Roadside Safety Design
Length of Need LR = dist for vehicle off the roadway to stop.
HERO UNIT Training Module
Georgia ATSSA Chapter Meeting: MASH Implementation
David Dennis, CSHO, SSH Director of Safety, OHL USA.
Presentation transcript:

“You Could Learn a Lot About Guardrail From a Dummy… “You Could Learn a Lot About Guardrail From a Dummy…..(and his crash tests)” Guardrail Basics for Design and Construction Scott Keller MDT Conference January 2007

Why Guardrail? ‘The main purpose of guardrail is to reduce the potential for, and severity of accidents involving vehicles that leave the road’

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

Guardrail Saves Lives Just ask this guy!

Statistics Approximately 42,000 fatalities on U.S. highways annually Nearly 12,000 of these occur as a result of run-off-the-road (R.O.R.) accidents Approximately 1,200 of the R.O.R. fatalities are caused by guardrail as the first harmful event

A guardrail installation is a hazard when... Is Guardrail A Hazard? A guardrail installation is a hazard when...

Blunt End - Flared Terminal

Disastrous Results with BCT

Modified Eccentric Loader Terminal (M.E.L.T)

Turndown Approach Terminal

Blunt End - Bridge Transition

Guardrail Is Often A Hazard Since Guardrail itself is a hazard, it should be used only as a last option. Before using guardrail: Remove the hazard completely (Trees, Large Rocks, etc.) Eliminate the hazard (fill depressions, holes, etc.) Then, and only then: Protect the hazard with barrier Use the minimum amount of barrier required to protect hazard Protect the barrier end with an approved end terminal

AASHTO Roadside Design Guide

< Length of Need (LON) > Example of simple barrier installation guideline

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Policy requires the following roadside safety features used on the National Highway System to meet the performance criteria of NCHRP Report 350 Traffic Barriers Barrier Terminals Crash Cushions Bridge Railings Light Pole Supports Sign Post Supports Work Zone Hardware

What is the NCHRP Report 350?

What is the NCHRP Report 350? NCHRP Report 350 is the research report adopted by FHWA as the standard for determining safe and acceptable performance of roadside features for use on the National Highway System.

What types of longitudinal guardrail, guardrail end terminal and crash cushion installations are NCHRP 350 approved? http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/programs/roadside_hardware.htm

Longitudinal Barriers

NCHRP Report 350 Test Levels For Longitudinal Barriers

NCHRP 350 Approved and Non-Approved Guardrail (Concrete Barrier Rail not shown)

Guardrail on Steel Post with Steel Block

Guardrail on Wood Post and Wood Block

Guardrail on Steel Post with Wood Block

Guardrail on Steel Post with Plastic Block

W-Beam Grading Requirements: Provide 10:1 or flatter slopes in front of rail and terminal sections. Provide two feet (600 mm) of soil behind the posts to develop adequate soil resistance. Use new 7 foot (2.1 M) posts with half-post spacing design in areas that you cannot provide two feet (600 mm) of widening. (See Dtl. Drwg. No. 606-11A and 606-11B)

Plant Mix Overlays and W-Beam Guardrail Three inch (75 mm) tolerance on height of rail Replace rail when the overlay exceeds 0.25 feet or 75 mm in thickness

Guardrail End Terminals

1994 FHWA Memorandum Dean Carlson, Executive Director “…some obsolete roadside hardware or poor practices thought to have been upgraded or eliminated …still remain on the Nation’s main roadway systems” “...FHWA has a responsibility to identify hardware designs and practices that are no longer acceptable for specific conditions” “…the following nationwide traffic barrier upgrading issues, most of which involve terminals, are identified as needing attention: Replacement of Blunt End Terminal Use of Turn-Down Terminals Breakaway Cable Terminal (BCT) Terminal Replacement

1994 FHWA Memorandum Dean Carlson, Executive Director Breakaway Cable Terminal (BCT) The BCT does not pass 100 km/hour testing with the 820 kg car. Use of BCT no longer accepted for installation after 1 year of referenced memorandum on the approach end of high speed, high volume roads on the NHS. Existing BCT units should be replaced with crashworthy terminals when units are damaged, or when significant roadway work is done in the same area.

NCHRP 350 Guardrail Terminal Test Matrix

ET-Plus With Wood Posts

ET-2000 with HBA Posts

ET-PLUS and SKT 350 Advantages: Softer Ridedown for smaller vehicles Address Future Side-Impact Testing Criteria Successfully Tested to NCHRP Report 350 Test Level 3 Criteria Easier to install (New Heads are Lighter)

ET-Plus with HBA Posts

ET-Plus and SKT 350 Advantages: NCHRP Report 350 Test Level 3 Approved Wood Post or Steel Post Options Tangent terminal reduces installation costs Majority of parts are reusable after end on impact

Impact Attenuators

Crash Cushion Attenuator Test Matrix

Crash Cushion Attenuator Test Matrix

TRACC Advantages: NCHRP Report 350 Approved: 6.4 Meter Length Test Level 3 (100 km/hour) Majority of parts are reusable after end-on impact All-steel construction extends product life and minimizes maintenance Installed on Concrete or Asphalt

Newest Tracc Family Member - Widetracc TL-3

Quadguard Advantages: NCHRP Report 350 Approved: 6 Bay Design Meets Test Level 3 (100 km/hour) Majority of parts are reusable after end-on impact Collapsible cartridges extend product life and minimizes maintenance Installed on Concrete or Asphalt

QUEST is the newest MDT approved Impact Attenuator Very similar to TRACC in design and appearance Majority of parts are reusable after end-on impact All-steel construction extends product life and minimizes maintenance

Transitions/ Bridge Approach Sections

Concrete Bridge Transition Test

MDT Detailed Drawings Guardrail – W-Beam, Box Beam, Cable, and Concrete Barrier Rail Terminal Sections Bridge Approach Sections Impact Attenuators Guardrail Hardware

Additional Information Scott Keller, P.E. MDT/MSU Design PO Box 174252 Bozeman, MT 59717-4252 (406) 994-1843