Wave Equation Applications 2011 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pile Foundations Module #9 Prepared by Dr. Randy R. Rapp July 2005.
Advertisements

Pile foundations.
2009 PDCA Professor Pile Institute
PILE FOUNDATION.
An-Najah National University
8. Axial Capacity of Single Piles
Tutorial 5: Two walls connected with strut and base slab Deep Excavation LLC DeepEX 2015 – Advanced course1.
DRIVEN PILE SPECIFICATIONS
Pile Capacity Based on Dynamic Methods & Wave Equation Bigman Hutapea-Prodi Teknik Sipil,FTSL-ITB Sebagian besar materi diambil dari materi kursus singkat.
INTRODUCTION Session 1 – 2
Pile Driving Equipment
Special Design and Construction Considerations
Large Diameter Open-End Pipe Piles for Transportation Structures Dan Brown, PhD., P.E., D.GE.
Session 25 – 26 DRILLED SHAFT And CAISSON FOUNDATION
AASHTO LRFD Section and 10
USING THE RAPID LOAD TESTER TO PROVIDE PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL.
Piles and Pile-Driving Equipment
STUDENT EXERCISE #2 Use the α-Method described in Section a and the Nordlund Method described in Section c to calculate the ultimate pile.
Foundations. Feature common to bridge and building structures Deep vs. shallow Safely transfer dead and live loads with acceptable levels of settlement.
Foundations. Foundation supports weight of structure –Includes soil and rock under foundation –Building construction described by foundation type Slab.
A pile driving model applied to the hammering insertion of the MUPUS penetrator Preliminary results Norbert Kömle, Günter Kargl Space Research Institute,
Pile Testing and Evaluation for the Sand Creek Byway, Sandpoint, Idaho Presented by Dean E. Harris, P.E., CH2M HILL.
BRIDGE FOUNDATION DESIGN
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS Spread footings Mat (Raft) foundations Square
Tutorial 4: Two walls connected with struts Deep Excavation LLC DeepEX 2015 – Advanced course1.
INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS
PILE FOUNDATION BY-.
Introduction to Deep Foundations.
Session 17 – 18 PILE FOUNDATIONS
Direct Shear Test CEP 701 PG Lab.
Subsurface Investigation Building structure system.
Footings.
INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS
Additional Design Considerations 2011 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.
Settlement Criteria  f f f for clays, silty clays, plastic silts: Chapter 5 (short term) Chapter 7 (long term, i.e., consolidation)  i i i in this.
Bridge Engineering (3) Foundations – Pile Foundations (1) 1. *Types of foundations 1.1 Shallow foundations (buried less than 5m deep) Spread (isolated)
STRENGTHS Chapter Intro Dealing with relationship between the external loads applied to an elastic body and the intensity of the internal forces.
1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 15-16, 2009.
Driven Pile Design George Goble. Basic LRFD Requirement η k Σ γ ij Q ij ≤ φ g R ng η k – factor for effect of redundancy, ductility and importance γ ij.
OMAE 2009 Honolulu, HI - May 31 to June
PILE CHECK A NEW DYNAMIC PILE TESTING SYSTEM GEORGE GOBLE GOBLE PILE TEST.
Classical and Finite Difference Method to Estimate pile Capacity Compared With Pile Load Test Results Yogesh Prashar, P.E., GE Force Pulse Conference,
Chapter 13 Concrete Form Design. SLAB FORM DESIGN Method WALL AND COLUMN FORM DESIGN DESIGN OF LATERAL BRACING.
Wave Equation Applications 2009 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.
PLAN Square Base Plate, A1, in2 Finding Size of Plate ( __in x __in) FINDING THICKNESS OF PLATE (__in) Square Concrete Pedestal, A2, in2 Basic Sizing of.
Session 19 – 20 PILE FOUNDATIONS
DEEP FOUNDATIONS Course Work Topics
Latest Developments in Equipment and QA/QC systems in Driven Pile and Drilled Shaft Systems By George Piscsalko, PE Pile Dynamics Inc.
Midwest Geotechnical Conference Implementation of the AASHTO LRFD Geotechnical Strength Limit State for Bearing Resistance of a Single Driven Pile.
Engineering Presentation. Basic Soil Mechanics Soil type classification Gravel, sand, silt, clay Soil strength classification Granular soils (sand and.
1 MISCELLANEOUS Pile driving formulae To develop the desired load carrying capacity, a point bearing driven pile must penetrate sufficiently into a dense.
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Chapter 15 Soil-Bearing Capacity for Shallow Foundations
Pile Foundation Reason for Piles Types of Piles
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-III (CE 434)
Deep Replacement Presented by: M. Taromi
Soil mechanics and foundation engineering-III (CE-434)
Prepared by:- Barham Jalal
Direct Shear Test.
PILING TECHNIQUES.
AN OVERVIEW OF SHALLOW AND DEEP FOUNDATION SYSTEMS
The Engineering of Foundations
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS BY, Babariya Ashish Gondaliya Ronak Gondaliya akshay Javiya hardik
DARSHAN INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
S S SUBMITTED BY:- CHARU BHARDWAJ civil engineering
Foundations.
DEEP FOUNDATIONS PILES.
CONSTRUCTION METHODS & TECHNOLOGY
CONSTRUCTION METHODS & TECHNOLOGY
Presentation transcript:

Wave Equation Applications 2011 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.

WAVE EQUATION APPLICATIONS Develop Driving Criterion Blow Count for a Required Ultimate Capacity Blow Count for Capacity as a Function of Energy / Stroke Refined Matching Analysis Adjust Input Parameters to Fit Dynamic Measurements Check Driveability Blow Count vs. Penetration Depth Driving Stresses vs Penetration Depth Determine Optimal Driving Equipment Driving Time

WHAT INFORMATION DO WE NEED FOR GRLWEAP ANALYSIS ?

REQUIRED INFORMATION HammerHammer –Model –Stroke and Stroke Control –Any Modifications Driving SystemDriving System –Helmet Weight (including Striker Plate & Cushions) –Hammer Cushion Material (E, A, t, e r ) –Pile Cushion Material (E, A, t, e r )

REQUIRED INFORMATION PilePile –Length, –Cross Sectional Area –Taper or Other Non-uniformities –Specific Weight –Splice Details –Design Load –Ultimate Capacity –Pile Toe Protection

REQUIRED INFORMATION SoilSoil –Boring Locations with Elevations –Soil Descriptions –N-values or Other Strength Parameters vs Depth –Elevation of Excavation –Elevation of Pile Cut-off –Elevation of Water Table –Scour Depth or Other Later Excavations

Pile Driving and Equipment Data Form RamRam Anvil

Example Problems #1 - General Bearing Graph #2 – Constant Capacity / Variable Stroke #3 – Tension and Compression Stress Control #4 – Use of Soil Setup #5 – Drivability Studies #6 – Driving System Characteristics #7 – Assessment of Pile Damage #8 – Selection of Wall Thickness #9 – Evaluation of Vibratory Driving FHWA Pile Manual – Chapter 16 GRLWEAP Program – 23 Examples

GRLWEAP Standard Examples Example 1: Generation of a Bearing Graph for an Open End Diesel Hammer Example 2: Closed End Hammer, Non Uniform Pile, Equipment Check Example 3: Concrete Pile, ECH, Tension Stress Check Example 4: Diesel Hammer Input Example 5: Pile Segment and Damping Input Example 6: Comparison of Damping Parameters Example 7: Reduced Diesel Fuel and Quake Variation Example 8: Effects of Splice/Slack on Pile Stress Example 9: Residual Stress Analysis (RSA) Example 10: Pile Damping, Long Piles, Diesel Hammer Performance Example 11: Drivability Analysis (Blow Count vs. Depth) Example 12: Inspector's Chart or Constant Capacity Option Example 13: Composite Pile, Second Toe and Critical Stresses Example 14: Two Pile Analysis Considering Follower with Long Skirt Example 15: Mandrel Driven Pile Example 16: Drilled Shaft Test with No Helmet Example 17: Vibratory Hammer Analysis Example 18: Pile and Hammer Gravity Changes Example 19: Static Soil Analysis Example 20: Steel Follower on Concrete Pile Example 21: Using ST and Variable Pile Cushion Stiffness Example 22: Drivability Analysis for a large, non-uniform pipe pile – Offshore Wave 2010 Example 23: CPT Based Static Analysis Input Example

GRLWEAP Example 1 & 2 Problem

GRLWEAP Example 1 Solution 85 blows / ft 27.9 ksi 330 kips 8.4 ft )

GRLWEAP Example 2 Solution ) 8.4 ft 85 blows / ft

GRLWEAP Example 3 Problem

Example 3 Solution – Shallow Depth

Example 3 Solution – Final Depth

Pile: Square Precast Concrete Pile Length 16 m (52.5 ft) Pile Penetration 15 m (49.2 ft) 305 mm (12 inch) Ultimate Capacity 1340 kN (300 kips) Shaft Resistance, 92% Uniform Distribution 1233 kN (276 kips) Toe Resistance, 8% 107 kN (24 kips) Stiff Clay c u = 70 kPa (1.5 ksf) Setup Factor = 1.33 Hammer: Vulcan 08: 35.3 kJ (26 ft-kips) Hammer Cushion: 216 mm (8.5 inch) Hamortex Helmet: 11.6 kN (2.6 kips) Pile Cushion: 152 mm (6 inch) Plywood Depth (m) (ft) GRLWEAP Example 4 Problem

42 blows / ft with anticipated soil set-up (225 kips) 81 blows / ft without anticipated soil set-up (300 kips) Example 4 Solution

Pile: Closed End Pipe Pile Length 20 m (66 ft) Pile Penetration 16 m (52.5 ft) 355 mm (14 inch) x 9.5 mm (3/8 inch) Ultimate Capacity 1800 kN (405 kips) Shaft Resistance, 30% Triangular Distribution 540 kN (121 kips) Toe Resistance, 70% 1260 kN (284 kips) Loose Silty Fine Sand Hammer: ICE 42-S: 56.9 kJ (42 ft-kips) or Vulcan 014: 56.9 kJ (42 ft-kips) Hammer Cushion: Varies Helmet: Varies Depth (m) (ft) Very Dense Silty Fine Sand GRLWEAP Example 6 Problem

GRLWEAP Example 6 Solution 99 bl / ft 228 bl / ft

Questions ? ? ?