1 NSSE Results 2001 - 2004 Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
Advertisements

Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
Intro Tour of the Male Student Mind In American Higher Education European Access Network National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland June 28, 2007 Tom.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
The Towson University Learning Environment Results of the 2002 National Survey of Student Engagement Linda Suskie, Director Office of Assessment.
Lessons from the National Survey of Student Engagement Dan BureauMahauganee Shaw Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
College of Engineering. Table of Contents Introduction about the National Survey of Student engagement. NSSE response rate Benchmarking areas Areas of.
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
NSSE When?Spring, 2008 Who?Freshmen and Seniors random sample How?Electronic and Snail mail follow up Respondents?30% response rate 26% freshmen.
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
National Research Agenda to Support Transformation National Learning Infrastructure Initiative Focus Session June, 2003 Copyright Jillian Kinzie, 2003.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
1 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2013 Tiffany Franks Assistant Director, Office of Planning & Analysis October 25, 2013.
BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago Elizabeth Owolabi, Ph.D. Director.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
NSSE – Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona October 2, 2013 – Academic Senate.
Presentation of Results NSSE 2003 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
1 N ational S urvey & F aculty S urvey of S tudent E ngagement (NSSE) & (FSSE) 2006 Wayne State University.
1 NSSE Columbus State University Program Overview  What do you know about college student engagement?  Why is student engagement important?
The Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) measures faculty expectations for student engagement in educational practices that are known to be empirically.
Student Engagement at Towson: NSSE 2005 Telling and Selling the Story Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 11, 2006.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Topic #1 – COMPLETERS (Graduation and Transfer) Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Topic #2 – FIRST-GENERATION Students Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Highlights of NSSE 2001: University of Kentucky December 10, 2001.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness April 25, 2011 QEP DATA ANALYSIS.
What does “Supportive Campus Environment” mean at a commuter institution? Analysis of a NSSE benchmark Marcia Belcheir Boise State University.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
Diversity at Stetson: Perspectives of Students and Faculty John Tichenor Associate Professor of Decision and Information Science.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE): Overview of 2008 Results for Rutgers University.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, & Assessment
Your Institutional Report Step by Step
The NJIT Student Experience
Presentation transcript:

1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical and Professional Staff March 17, 2005

2 Why are we here?  Part of the assessment initiative at Indiana University Kokomo  Learn about student engagement at IU Kokomo  Generate ideas about how staff can help increase student engagement

3 Student Engagement  What is student engagement?  Active involvement in academic and out of class activities

4 Student Engagement  Why is it important?  Research is clear: Students who are engaged gain more from their college experience than those who are not  Student engagement is one measure of the quality of the institution

5 NSSE: National Survey of Student Engagement  Designed to measure how active students are in academic and out of class activities  Assesses effective educational practices  student-faculty contact  active learning  high expectations  cooperation among students  respect for diverse talents and ways of learning

6 What Does the NSSE Measure? Student Behaviors in College Institutional Actions And Requirements Institutional Actions And Requirements  Student Reactions to College Student Background Information Student Background Information Student Learning & Development

7 What Does the NSSE Measure?  Level of Academic Challenge  Active and Collaborative Learning  Student-Faculty Interaction  Enriching Educational Experiences  Supportive Campus Environment

8 Supportive Campus Environment  This cluster of questions looks at how committed people in the institution are to helping students succeed.  Students do better at universities that encourage and develop supportive relationships among different campus groups.

9 Supportive Campus Environment  We can look at NSSE results in this area two different ways.  First, we can look at how our students responded compared to how students at other institutions responded.  Our peer group is composed of “Baccalaureate- General” institutions—schools that offer mainly bachelor’s degrees, with fewer than half coming from the arts and sciences.

10 Supportive Campus Environment: IU Kokomo Results  We like to think of ourselves as being very student-oriented  However, compared to other Baccalaureate- General institutions, IU Kokomo students find IU Kokomo to be a less supportive campus  We can look at this by year in school

11 Supportive Campus Environment: Benchmark Scores for Freshmen

12 Supportive Campus Environment: Benchmark Scores for Seniors

13 Supportive Campus Environment: Another Way to Look At It  The Baccalaureate-General classification includes private schools, schools with very restrictive admissions standards, and residential schools.  Many argue that it’s not fair to compare IU Kokomo to those schools.

14 Supportive Campus Environment: Institutional Engagement Index  NSSE will also compare our students’ responses to what we would expect our students to report, given the kinds of students and the type of campus we have.  Scores near zero (-0.5 to +0.5) mean that the students reported levels of campus support about as predicted.  Scores above zero mean students reported more support than predicted.  Scores below zero mean students reported less support than predicted.

15 Supportive Campus Environment: Institutional Engagement Index

16 Campus Support  We can understand these results better by looking at individual questions.  “Overall, how much does your institution provide support you need to help you succeed academically? cope with non-academic responsibilities? thrive socially?”  Students responded either Very Much, Quite a Bit, Some, or Very Little

17 Campus Support

18 Campus Support  Most (70%) freshmen said IU Kokomo provides a lot of support to help them succeed academically.  Most (78%) freshmen said IU Kokomo provides relatively little support to help them cope with non-academic responsibilities.  Most (72%) freshmen said IU Kokomo provides relatively little support to help them thrive socially.

19 Campus Support  Most (68%) seniors said IU Kokomo provides a lot of support to help them succeed academically.  Most (84%) seniors said IU Kokomo provides relatively little support to help them cope with non-academic responsibilities.  Most (88%) seniors said IU Kokomo provides relatively little support to help them thrive socially.

20 Quality of Relationships  “Thinking about your overall experience at this institution, how would you rate the quality of your relationships with other students?”  Students responded on a scale of 1 (Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sense of Alienation) to 7 (Friendly, Supportive, Sense of Belonging)

21  Good news!

22 Quality of Relationships

23 Quality of Relationships  82% of Freshmen and 82% of Seniors say their relationships with other students are friendly and supportive

24 Quality of Relationships  Thinking about your overall experience at this institution, how would you rate the quality of relationships with faculty and administrative personnel and offices?  Students responded on a scale of 1 (unhelpful) to 7 (helpful)

25 Quality of Relationships  20% see staff as relatively unhelpful (responded 1, 2, or 3)  60% see staff as relatively helpful (responded 5, 6, or 7)

26 Other NSSE Findings  Our students spend more hours working for pay off campus, and fewer hours working for pay on campus than do their peers.  Our students spend less time in co-curricular activities, and more time providing care for dependents living with them than do their peers.

27 Where Do We Go From Here?  What do you think?  What can staff do to increase the engagement of our students so that they are more likely to be successful?