Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Association for Career and Technical Education 1 Changes and Implications of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Advertisements

Perkins IV Update Legislation and Funding Legislation and Funding Technical Skill Attainment Indicator Technical Skill Attainment Indicator Accountability.
Purposes of the Act Develop challenging academic and technical standards and related challenging, integrated instruction Increase opportunities for individuals.
Criteria for High Quality Career and Technical Education Programs National Career Pathways Network Orlando, FL November 14, 2014.
Selecting and Identifying Programs of Study Division of School and Community Academic Programs Camden County College Camden Pathways Professional Development.
How Can I Spend Perkins Funds? CESA #4 Network Night 11/17/2010 Sherri K. Torkelson.
Career and Technical Education in Minnesota Presentation to the Governor’s Workforce Development Council March 13, 2008 Minnesota Perkins State Career.
IL State Board of Education - 9/18/2007 Perkins IV - Secondary Indicators Carol Brooks Illinois State Board of Education.
Perkins IV State Plan Working Group Hosted by the Mississippi Department of Education Office of Vocational and Technical Education and the State Board.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Career and Technical Education TEKS.
Perkins Postsecondary Reserve Fund Grants WELDING PROGRAM OF STUDY.
CTE Accountability and Planning Perkins Planning Meeting March 2013 MSDE/DCCR Accountability Team Pat Mikos, Program Manager George Comegys, CTE Specialist.
CATE UPDATE Susan Flanagan, Director Office of Career and Technology Education March 12, 2013.
Perkins IV Overview Public Hearings February 28-29, 2008.
DQI State Plan Accountability Requirements, Guidelines, Timeline, Student Definitions and Indicators John Haigh, U.S. Department of Education Savannah,
PERKINS NEW COORDINATOR TRAINING SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 PERKINS 101.
11/15/07 1 Career-Technical Education Accountability Ohio Department of Education Sharon Enright Dave Ozvat Erica Cheyney Ohio School Improvement Institute.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 “…will allow students … to get a vision of what can be achieved, what they can do in technical.
Perkins IV Overview Presented to C C T O D A November 30, 2006.
Bureau of Career and Technical Education PA Department of Education Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006 The New Perkins.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Using CTE/Perkins Data to drive Program Improvement Program.
Next Steps – Dual Credit, Career Pathways and the Perkins Act Office of Vocational and Adult Education United States Department of Education, April 2005.
CTE Special Populations Coordinators
11 Don’t Be Afraid of the New Tech Prep Accountability! ! NACTEI CONFERENCE Boise, Idaho May 21 & 22, 2008.
CARL D. PERKINS SPRING INFORMATIONAL SESSION for NEW PERKINS COORDINATORS TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2003 OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM NEW PERKINS COORDINATORS.
TECH PREP PERFORMANCE MEASURES & PROGRAMS OF STUDY NACTEI Annual Conference May 2012.
Understanding the Implications and Opportunities of the Perkins Career Technical Education Act of 2006 By Hans Meeder The Meeder Consulting Group, LLC.
The Carl D. Perkins Act of 2006 An Overview for Career and Technical Education WI Dept. of Public Instruction Academic Excellence Division Deborah Mahaffey,
Perkins Update FY16 Federal Legislation Assistance Division Josh Miller Janet Cooper.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Vocational and Adult Education Division of Academic and Technical Education Progress of the State Perkins Accountability.
CTE Data and EDFacts September 22 & 23, Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) For , due December 31, 2010 – Either CAR or EDFacts, not both –
Click to edit Master title style 1 What Data? California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Dr. W. Charles Wiseley, “Chuck” Career Technical Education.
Perkins IV: The Special Populations Perspective Mimi Lufkin, CEO CCCAOE Conference October 22, 2008 San Diego, CA National Alliance for Partnerships in.
111 TECH PREP ACCOUNTABILITY IN PERKINS IV National Association of Tech Prep Leadership September 30, 2009 NCPN October 2, 2009.
Perkins Update July 9, 2015 Federal Legislation Assistance Division Josh Miller Janet Cooper.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Foundations for Perkins Accountability: Core Indicators, Annual Reports, Targets, and Gap Evaluation Carl D Perkins.
Dale Gruis Ag Ed Consultant Iowa Dept. of Education
Perkins IV – What ’ s In Store? Mimi Lufkin NAPE/Women Work National Conference April 6, 2008 National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity.
Key Considerations in Collecting Student Follow-up Data NACTEI May 15, 2012 Portland, OR Promoting Rigorous Career and Technical Education Programs of.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY New Administrator’s Meeting September 23, 2011 Krishnan Sudharsan Office of Career and Technical Education Michigan Department of.
Using Perkins Data To Improve CTE Sharon Enright, Ph.D. Ohio Department of Education Office of Career-Technical Education 1 NCLA Conference October 1,
Convention Center B213 2:15-3:15 Perkins Implementation Update Changes That Will Impact Your Program.
OPERATIONALIZING PERKINS IV ACCOUNTABILITY DRAFT.
What is Perkins About and Why Should I Care? Student Services Endorsement Program November 3, 2015 Federal Legislation Assistance Division Janet Cooper.
CTE by the Numbers CTE data entry, verification and reporting Counselor & Administrator Conference Dover, Delaware January 26, 2016.
1 Don’t Be Afraid of the New Perkins Accountability! ! NACTEI May 17, 2007 Savannah, GA.
IS CTE THE NEW VOC ED? MI CAREER EDUCATION CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 2016.
Federal - Perkins IV Programs of Study (Pathways) Secondary/Postsecondary Links Improving Student Performance –Academic and Technical Skills –Graduation/Completion.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Just the Facts Perkins IV Presented by: Carolyn Zachry Career.
A Brief Look at Career and Technical Education NCCCS - Perkins Update
Perkins IV Data and Accountability
Perkins 101 Review Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006 Purpose and Expectations Act aims to increase the quality of.
$164 million K12 Strong Workforce Program and Funding Overview
TECH PREP PERFORMANCE MEASURES & PROGRAMS OF STUDY
TECH PREP ACCOUNTABILITY IN PERKINS IV
CTE & YTP YTP Fall Regional Meeting
Overview of Ohio’s Career-Technical Planning District Report Card
Strengthening CTE for the 21st Century Act
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
Perkins 101 Alisha Hyslop, ACTE.
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
Arkansas Perkins V Stakeholder Meetings 2019
Strengthening Secondary Indicators under Perkins V
Arkansas Perkins V Stakeholder Meetings 2019
Arkansas Perkins V Stakeholder Meetings 2019
Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting
CNM Carl D. Perkins Grant
Presentation transcript:

Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Timeline August 2006 – Perkins IV August 2006 – Perkins IV April 16, 2007 – Transition plan submitted April 16, 2007 – Transition plan submitted July 1, 2007 – Transition plan approved July 1, 2007 – Transition plan approved July 1, 2007 – June 30, 2008: Transition year July 1, 2007 – June 30, 2008: Transition year April 1, 2008 –State Plan submitted April 1, 2008 –State Plan submitted July 1, 2008 State Plan approved July 1, 2008 State Plan approved July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2013: Perkins State Plan July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2013: Perkins State Plan

Perkins IV – Overview It is authorized 6 years (till FY 2012) not 5 like before It is authorized 6 years (till FY 2012) not 5 like before Significant changes in context and focus: Significant changes in context and focus: –“career and technical education” instead of “vocational education” –Stronger accountability system for improvement and results –Coordination within CTE system –Stronger academic and technical integration –Connections between secondary and postsecondary education –Links with business and industry

Perkins IV – Definitions “Career and Technical Education”: Sequence of courses Sequence of courses Challenging academic standards and relevant technical knowledge and skills Challenging academic standards and relevant technical knowledge and skills Leading to and industry-recognized credential, a certificate, or an associate degree Leading to and industry-recognized credential, a certificate, or an associate degree May include prerequisite courses (other than remedial courses) May include prerequisite courses (other than remedial courses)

Perkins IV – Definitions “Postsecondary education Tech-Prep student”: A student who completed the secondary education component of a Tech-Prep program and A student who completed the secondary education component of a Tech-Prep program and A student who has enrolled in the post secondary education component of a Tech Prep program in an HE institution A student who has enrolled in the post secondary education component of a Tech Prep program in an HE institution

Perkins IV – Definitions “Nontraditional fields”: Occupations or fields of work for which individuals from one gender comprise less than 25 percent of the individuals employed in each such occupation or field of work Occupations or fields of work for which individuals from one gender comprise less than 25 percent of the individuals employed in each such occupation or field of work “Postsecondary institution”: Institution of higher education that provides not less than a 2-year program of instruction that is acceptable for credit toward a bachelor’s degree Institution of higher education that provides not less than a 2-year program of instruction that is acceptable for credit toward a bachelor’s degree Nonprofit educational institution offering certificate or apprenticeship programs at postsecondary levels Nonprofit educational institution offering certificate or apprenticeship programs at postsecondary levels

Perkins IV – Definitions “Special population”: Individuals with disabilities Individuals with disabilities Economically disadvantaged Economically disadvantaged Individuals preparing for non-traditional fields Individuals preparing for non-traditional fields Single parents, including single pregnant women Single parents, including single pregnant women Displaced homemakers Displaced homemakers Individuals with limited English proficiency Individuals with limited English proficiency Academically disadvantaged were removed from the list Academically disadvantaged were removed from the list

Connections between Secondary and Postsecondary Education Requires development of “programs of study” that must: Requires development of “programs of study” that must: –Incorporate secondary education and postsecondary elements –Include academic and career and technical content in a coordinated, nonduplicative progression of courses –Lead to industry-recognized credential or certificate at the postsecondary level, or an associate or bachelor’s degree

Links to Business and Industry Supporting partnerships between secondary schools, postsecondary institutions, baccalaureate degree granting institutions, area career and technical education schools, local workforce investment boards, business and industry Supporting partnerships between secondary schools, postsecondary institutions, baccalaureate degree granting institutions, area career and technical education schools, local workforce investment boards, business and industry Focus on: Focus on: –“high demand” – growth higher than average for all occupations in projections; for Texas: 17.6% –“high skill” –“high wage” – exceed median annual earnings $26,853

Accountability Performance Indicators 1P1: Technical skills attainment 1P1: Technical skills attainment 2P1: Credential, certificate, or degree 2P1: Credential, certificate, or degree 3P1: Student retention and transfer 3P1: Student retention and transfer 4P1: Student placement 4P1: Student placement 5P1: Nontraditional participation and completion 5P1: Nontraditional participation and completion None of the indicators are required to be reported in the transition year

Accountability Level of Performance The state needs to identify levels of performance for each indicator The state needs to identify levels of performance for each indicator Level of performance should be expressed in percentage or numerical form, quantifiable and measurable Level of performance should be expressed in percentage or numerical form, quantifiable and measurable Local accountability of eligible recipients is required in addition to state-level accountability NEW Local accountability of eligible recipients is required in addition to state-level accountability NEW

Accountability Reporting Annual report to the Secretary regarding the progress in meeting the agreed level of performance Annual report to the Secretary regarding the progress in meeting the agreed level of performance Data will be disaggregated by categories of students Data will be disaggregated by categories of students Local programs are required to submit annual reports, the same as the state NEW Local programs are required to submit annual reports, the same as the state NEW The annual report should be made publicly available in a variety of formats The annual report should be made publicly available in a variety of formats

Accountability Improvement and Sanctions If local program or states fail to meet at least 90% of an agreed upon target for any of the performance indicators – improvement plan If local program or states fail to meet at least 90% of an agreed upon target for any of the performance indicators – improvement plan If no improvement is made or the program fails to meet at least 90% of the agreed upon target for three consecutive years - a portion of state’s administrative and leadership funds will be withheld If no improvement is made or the program fails to meet at least 90% of the agreed upon target for three consecutive years - a portion of state’s administrative and leadership funds will be withheld The state may withhold local recipient’s funding using the same criteria The state may withhold local recipient’s funding using the same criteria

Tech Prep Accountability NEW The number of postsecondary students served The number of postsecondary students served The number and percent of postsecondary education students who The number and percent of postsecondary education students who –Are placed in related fields of employment not later than 12 months after graduation –Complete a state or industry-recognized certification and licensure –Complete a 2-year degree or certificate program within normal time of completion –Complete a baccalaureate degree program within normal time of completion

Performance Indicators Concentrator A postsecondary student who: A postsecondary student who: 1.Completes at least 12 academic or CTE credits within a single program area sequence that is comprised of 12 or more academic and technical credits and terminates in the award of an industry-recognized credential, a certificate, or a degree OR 2.Completes a short-term CTE program sequence of less than 12 credit units that terminates in an industry-recognized credential, a certificate, or a degree

Performance Indicators Definitions With the exception of 2P1 indicator, all the definitions are not finalized With the exception of 2P1 indicator, all the definitions are not finalized Nonregulatory guidance is expected from Secretary of Education Nonregulatory guidance is expected from Secretary of Education DO NOT CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS AS THE FINAL ONES THAT WE ARE GOING TO USE FOR ACCOUNTABILITY DO NOT CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS AS THE FINAL ONES THAT WE ARE GOING TO USE FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

Performance Indicators 1P1: Technical Skills Attainment IN WORK IN WORK

Performance Indicators 2P1: Credential, Certificate, Degree (exit cohort) Numerator: number of exiting CTE concentrators who receive or were eligible to receive an industry – recognized credential, certificate, or degree Numerator: number of exiting CTE concentrators who receive or were eligible to receive an industry – recognized credential, certificate, or degree Denominator: Number of CTE concentrators who exit the reporting postsecondary education institution at any time, for any reason during the reporting period. Denominator: Number of CTE concentrators who exit the reporting postsecondary education institution at any time, for any reason during the reporting period. The recommendation was to look backwards for 5 years of data

Performance Indicators 2P1: Credential, Certificate, Degree (entry cohort) Numerator: number of CTE concentrators identified in the entry cohort who receive or were eligible to receive an industry – recognized credential, certificate, or degree at any point between they were identified as concentrators and the current reporting period Numerator: number of CTE concentrators identified in the entry cohort who receive or were eligible to receive an industry – recognized credential, certificate, or degree at any point between they were identified as concentrators and the current reporting period Denominator: Number of CTE concentrators in the identified entry cohort Denominator: Number of CTE concentrators in the identified entry cohort

Performance Indicators 3P1: Retention and Transfer (exit cohort) Numerator: number of exiting CTE concentrators who (1) remain enrolled in their original institution, (2) transfer to another 2-year postsecondary institution, or (3) transfer to a baccalaureate degree program Numerator: number of exiting CTE concentrators who (1) remain enrolled in their original institution, (2) transfer to another 2-year postsecondary institution, or (3) transfer to a baccalaureate degree program Denominator: Number of CTE concentrators who exit the reporting postsecondary education institution at any time, for any reason during the reporting period. Denominator: Number of CTE concentrators who exit the reporting postsecondary education institution at any time, for any reason during the reporting period. Timing of exit: allow 1 year to elapse before assessing the status of existing students

Performance Indicators 3P1: Retention and Transfer (entry cohort) Numerator: number of CTE concentrators identified in the entry cohort who (1) remain enrolled in their original institution, (2) transfer to another 2-year postsecondary institution, or (3) transfer to a baccalaureate degree program at any point between they were identified as concentrators and the current reporting period Numerator: number of CTE concentrators identified in the entry cohort who (1) remain enrolled in their original institution, (2) transfer to another 2-year postsecondary institution, or (3) transfer to a baccalaureate degree program at any point between they were identified as concentrators and the current reporting period Denominator: Number of CTE concentrators in the identified entry cohort Denominator: Number of CTE concentrators in the identified entry cohort

Performance Indicators 4P1: Student Placement Numerator: number of CTE completers identified in the numerator of measure 2P1 who were (1) identified as employed in high skill, high wage or high demand occupations or professions, or (2) identified as employed in another occupation or profession (3) was on active duty in the military, or (4) was placed in an apprenticeship program at any point in the 2 nd quarter following the fiscal year in which they exited postsecondary education Numerator: number of CTE completers identified in the numerator of measure 2P1 who were (1) identified as employed in high skill, high wage or high demand occupations or professions, or (2) identified as employed in another occupation or profession (3) was on active duty in the military, or (4) was placed in an apprenticeship program at any point in the 2 nd quarter following the fiscal year in which they exited postsecondary education Denominator: Number of CTE completers identified in numerator of measure 2P1 Denominator: Number of CTE completers identified in numerator of measure 2P1 Fiscal year: July 1 to June 30 Enrollment in a program is considered positive outcome

Performance Indicators 4P2: Employment Retention Numerator: number of CTE completers who were (1) identified as employed in the numerator of measure 4P1 and who were (2) identified as employed at any point in the 4 th quarter following the fiscal year in which they exited postsecondary education Numerator: number of CTE completers who were (1) identified as employed in the numerator of measure 4P1 and who were (2) identified as employed at any point in the 4 th quarter following the fiscal year in which they exited postsecondary education Denominator: Number of CTE completers identified in numerator of measure 4P1 Denominator: Number of CTE completers identified in numerator of measure 4P1 Fiscal year: July 1 to June 30

Performance Indicators 5P1: Nontraditional Participation Numerator: number of concentrators from underrepresented gender groups who, in the reporting period, were enrolled in a CTE course that is part of a program identified as preparing individuals for employment in a nontraditional occupation or field of work Numerator: number of concentrators from underrepresented gender groups who, in the reporting period, were enrolled in a CTE course that is part of a program identified as preparing individuals for employment in a nontraditional occupation or field of work Denominator: Total number of concentrators – male and female – who, in the reporting period, were enrolled in a CTE course that is part of a program identified as preparing individuals for employment in a nontraditional occupation or field of work Denominator: Total number of concentrators – male and female – who, in the reporting period, were enrolled in a CTE course that is part of a program identified as preparing individuals for employment in a nontraditional occupation or field of work

Performance Indicators 5P2: Nontraditional Completion Numerator: number of concentrators from underrepresented gender groups who received or were eligible to receive an industry – recognized credential, certificate, or degree in a CTE program identified by OVAE as preparing students for employment in a nontraditional occupation or field of work Numerator: number of concentrators from underrepresented gender groups who received or were eligible to receive an industry – recognized credential, certificate, or degree in a CTE program identified by OVAE as preparing students for employment in a nontraditional occupation or field of work Denominator: Total number of concentrators – male and female – who received or were eligible to receive an industry – recognized credential, certificate, or degree in a CTE program identified by OVAE as preparing students for employment in an occupation identified as out-of-gender balance Denominator: Total number of concentrators – male and female – who received or were eligible to receive an industry – recognized credential, certificate, or degree in a CTE program identified by OVAE as preparing students for employment in an occupation identified as out-of-gender balance

QUESTIONS Gabriela Borcoman (512)