AN INTRODUCTION TO NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE POLICY FOR TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM REVIEW AND APPROVAL Professional Educator Preparation Program Orientation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCHOOL LEADER PREPARATION: A BLUEPRINT FOR CHANGE Submitted to the Illinois Board of Higher Education by the Commission on School Leader Preparation in.
Advertisements

Reviewer Training for Onsite Program Review 1. Welcome & Introductions 2.
Transforming Teacher Education through Clinical Practice: A National Strategy to Prepare Effective Teachers - Dr. Dwight C. Watson - University of Northern.
The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
REVIEWER TRAINING NH Department of Education Program Approval.
1 Educator Preparation Advisory Council (EPAC) September, 2013.
Selecting and Identifying Programs of Study Division of School and Community Academic Programs Camden County College Camden Pathways Professional Development.
A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.
Data & Accountability DPI Career & Technical Education.
School Site Council Guidelines Roles and Responsibilities Adapted from: Administrator’s Guide to School Site Councils Prepared by California.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 “…will allow students … to get a vision of what can be achieved, what they can do in technical.
Sherry A. Key, Director Alabama State Department of Education Career and Technical Education Section Sherry A. Key, Director Alabama State Department of.
Jim Schoelkopf Reflect, Transform, Lead: A New Vision for Career Technical Education.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
Teacher Preparation Presentation to the Higher Education Coordinating Council May 2, 2012 Kathy Hebda, Deputy Chancellor for Educator Quality.
CLASS PROJECT: CAREER PATHWAYS CSD 509J Mid-Year Update.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
GEORGIA’S PRE-K PROGRAM Bright from the Start: Georgia Department of Early Care and Learning Marsha H. Moore, Commissioner.
George Laskaris New Jersey Higher Education Network.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
1 Educator Preparation Advisory Council (EPAC) July 31, 2013 A New Framework to Strengthen School Leader Preparation in Connecticut.
Maryland Technology Grant “ Our goal is to ensure that all Maryland teacher candidates are proficient in integrating technology in the classroom for teaching.
Connecticut Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform (CEEDAR) Grant.
Title I Program Evaluation Report to the IDOE (Site Visit): April 3 rd, 2014 Parent Advisory Meeting/Program Evaluation: May 27 th, 2014 Report to the.
Purpose of this webinar Orient NH institutions of higher education (IHEs) to the basics of state policy on teacher education program review and approval.
Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.
Building the pipeline of STEM professionals to fuel Massachusetts 21 st century innovation economy MA STEM Pipeline Fund & Regional STEM Networks Administered.
How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.
The Community Collaboration Coaches Roles, Strategies, and Tools.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Online Learning Communities: What goes on inside? Sofia Pardo PhD Lead Researcher ideasLAB.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
Reviewer Training 5/18/2012. Welcome & Introductions Co-Chairs: NHDOE Representative:Bob McLaughlin.
KY NT3 Kentucky Network to Transform Teaching. KYNT3 is funded by a US Department of Education Supporting Effective Educator Development (SEED) grant.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Greater Essex County District School Board Regulation: School Councils Reference NO: R-AD-03 Principal Chris Mills.
School/City/Community Work Plan Year 1 Progress Report.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
NH Professional Development Center Network Task Force Report to State Board of Education on August 21, 2002.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
1 Senate Bill 130 Innovation Schools Act of 2008.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Mathematics and Science Partnership (CaMSP) Grant.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
North Carolina Standard for School Executives Standard 1 By: Barbara Bumgardner Aleen Besmer James Westbrook Kristy Christenberry.
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Compact Goals Improved capacity of Ohio teacher, administrator, and related services personnel preparation programs to better prepare professional educators.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Co-Teaching in the 21st Century
EDU827 : EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Introductions Introduction
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Professional Learning Teams
Introductions Introduction
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

AN INTRODUCTION TO NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE POLICY FOR TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM REVIEW AND APPROVAL Professional Educator Preparation Program Orientation

Agenda Purpose of Program Approval Role of the State Boards and Councils Ed 600 Standards: Effective 2013 Key Changes in Ed 600 Standards Focus on Continuous Improvement Assessment Matrices Outcomes

Professional Educator Preparation Program Approval The purposes of professional educator preparation program approval are to ensure that all future educators in New Hampshire are highly qualified and well prepared to serve all students effectively. Preparation programs utilize data on their students’ preparedness for professional practice and other essential indicators for continuous program improvement.

State Board of Education initiates state education policy. State Department of Education implements state education policy. State Professional Standards Board, by statute, recommends administrative rules to the State Board of Education for:  Educator Certification.  Educator Preparation Program Approval.

Council for Teacher Education, by statute, serves as an advisory and coordinating council for teacher education. In addition, CTE members:  Recruit program reviewers  Chair program review teams  Advise DOE on matrices for program review  Advise DOE on reviewer and IHE training  Vote on recommendations to state board for program approval

Program Approval Standards Ed 604: Learning facilitation (program structure and organization) Ed 606: Candidate Assessment Systems Ed 609: General Education Ed 610: Professional Education Ed 611: General studies in area of concentration Ed 612: Program requirements at the baccalaureate level Ed 614: Program requirements at the Post- baccalaureate level

Key Changes in Ed 600s Redefine the role of the educator from content deliverer to learning facilitator. Provides candidates with effective research-based pedagogy in classroom and field experience. Encourage IHE’s flexibility, experimentation and collaboration.

Key Changes in Ed 600s Eliminate duplication of effort and expense for IHEs seeking state approval when programs are nationally approved. Encourage IHEs to examine and assess candidate work samples for each certification standard. Encourage the use of K-12 student learning data to inform program improvement and assessment.

Focus on Continuous Improvement The program review team will assess how effectively the IHE uses data to: Ensure candidate mastery of general, professional education and content standards.

Improve its programs curriculum, pedagogy, candidate assessment and resources based on such evidence as:  Candidate data  Research on effective practice  Faculty observations  Alumni and employer surveys  P-12 student data

Assessment Matrices Assessment matrices aligned to Ed 600s will be used by: IHEs to prepare for external review of their programs Reviewers to assess programs and the IHE’s system for continuous improvement

Outcomes: New Hampshire is the first state in the nation to undertake a statewide initiative to adapt professional practices to the challenges of the new millennium. The goal is to define and realize our shared vision for New Hampshire's children, their educators and the institutions that prepare them. In addition, state and federal policy makers are intensifying pressures, begun under the No Child Left Behind Act, for educators to be "accountable" and "effective". New Ed 600 standards and the reformed IHE Program Approval system will be more responsive to these needs. Through the program approval process, we introduce a sustained, intensive conversation among New Hampshire's educators, educator developers, and policy makers, to define together, in practical terms, just what we in New Hampshire mean when we talk about 21st century pedagogy, assessment, skills, learning environments and educator development.

For further information: New Hampshire Department of Education Bureau of Credentialing Division of Program Support 101 Pleasant Street Concord, NH