OVERVIEW OF H.B. 555. HB 555  Revises benchmarks for Indicators Met and Performance Index to 90% for A  Raises performance proficiency benchmark to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Report Card A Focus on Academic Performance West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation June 21, 2011.
Advertisements

PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
IL State Board of Education - 9/18/2007 Perkins IV - Secondary Indicators Carol Brooks Illinois State Board of Education.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
ESEA Flexibility: College & Career Readiness Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 7 of 8.
Overview of Wyoming Accountability in Education Act (WAEA)
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Agenda 2017 Standards & Instruction –W–What and how should kids learn? Assessments and Data Systems –H–How do we know if they learned it? School and Educator.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
January Virginia Strategies for Reducing the Need for Remediation After Graduation Education Commission of the States January 7, 2010 Dr. Patricia.
PA School Performance Profile January 13, 2013 Superintendent Advisory Council 1.
New Graduation Requirements November 10, Outline 1.Update on Graduation Requirements Work 2.Job Skills Assessment Recommendations 3. Substitute.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
1. 1. All students read “on level” by end of 3 rd grade 2. 85% or more of all students will score at or above proficient in Spring % or more.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
State Board Update: Accountability System March 2013.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
Understanding the SPP September 26, > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Collecting data & information Talking with teachers, administrators, service providers Progress Monitoring Consolidated Planning /Use of Data Alternative.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Welcome to the AHS PCF! September 12, :00 a.m. Room 92 TOPIC: New State Report Card.
OAASFEP Report Card Update Marianne Mottley – October 13, 2015.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION DECEMBER 8, 2015.
PA School Performance Profile 1 Tamaqua Area Middle School.
Annual Public Meeting Data Presentation October 19, 2009 Cabe Student Center 6:00 p.m.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Report Card Update Marianne Mottley, Assistant Director of Accountability.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS DECEMBER 16, 2015.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
2016 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Accountability Committee December 14, CTE Report Card Discussion.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
House Bill 22 Overview ESC PEIMS Coordinator Summer Training | August 1, 2017 Texas Education Agency | Academics | Performance Reporting.
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
CTE Data and Accountability Overview
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
Michigan School Report Card Update
Mississippi Succeeds Madison County Business League & Foundation
Student Growth and Performance Update:
Summary of Final Regulations: Accountability and State Plans
Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators
Overview of Ohio’s Career-Technical Planning District Report Card
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Spencer County Public Schools
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

OVERVIEW OF H.B. 555

HB 555  Revises benchmarks for Indicators Met and Performance Index to 90% for A  Raises performance proficiency benchmark to 80% for SY  Moves social studies assessment from grades 5 and 8 to grades 4 and 6

CHANGES IN ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM  Phased –in letter grade system under which districts and schools are assigned letter grades based on various performance indicators  Adds honors diplomas and industry credentials to report card measures  Groups report card measures into components: - Achievement - Graduation - Gap Closing (replaces AYP) - Progress - K-3 Literacy Progress - Prepared for Success (replaces College & Career Ready)

GRADED REPORTED Letter grade for each of the performance measures: 1. Gap Closing  Annual measurable objectives (AMO) to determine if district/building is making AYP in closing achievement gaps 2. Achievement  Performance Index (PI)  Performance Indicators 3. Graduation  4 (93%) & 5 (95%) year cohort graduation rates  Separate and independent measure 4. Progress  Overall score under the value-added progress  Value-added score for disaggregated groups (gifted, students with disabilities & students in the lowest quintile for achievement on a statewide basis) Letter grade for each of the performance measures: 1. Gap Closing  Annual measurable objectives (AMO) to determine if district/building is making AYP in closing achievement gaps 2. Achievement  Performance Index (PI)  Performance Indicators (80%/85%- 11th) needed to meet indicator) 3. Graduation  4 (93%) & 5 (95%) year cohort graduation rates  Separate and independent measure 4. Progress  Overall score under the value- added progress  Value-added score for disaggregated groups (gifted, students with disabilities & students in the lowest quintile for achievement on a statewide basis) 5. Kindergarten through third-grade Prepared for Success  National standardized test participation rate and remediation-free percentage(never graded only included)  Advanced Placement participation rate and test scores  Dual enrollment program participation rate  Honors diploma  Industry credentials

GRADEDREPORTEDGRADED Letter grade for each of the performance measures: 1. Gap Closing  Annual measurable objectives (AMO) to determine if district/building is making AYP in closing achievement gaps 2. Achievement  Performance Index (PI)  Performance Indicators 3. Graduation  4 (93%) & 5 (95%) year cohort graduation rates  Separate and independent measure 4. Progress  Overall score under the value- added progress  Value-added score for disaggregated groups (gifted, students with disabilities & students in the lowest quintile for achievement on a statewide basis; to receive an “A” minimum subgroup of “B” needed ) 5. Kindergarten through third-grade literacy rate Prepared for Success  National standardized test participation rate and remediation-free percentage (never graded only included)  Advanced Placement participation rate and test scores  Dual enrollment program participation rate  Honors diploma  Industry credentials  International Baccalaureate participation rate and test scores Letter grade for each of the performance measures: 1. Gap Closing  Annual measurable objectives (AMO) to determine if district/building is making AYP in closing achievement gaps 2. Achievement  Performance Index (PI)  Performance Indicators 3. Graduation  4 (93%)& 5 (95%) year cohort graduation rates  Separate and independent measure 4. Progress  Overall score under the value-added progress  Value-added score for disaggregated groups (gifted, students with disabilities & students in the lowest quintile for achievement on a statewide basis)  High School value-added progress measure 5. Kindergarten through third-grade literacy rate 6. Prepared for Success  National standardized test participation rate and remediation-free percentage (never graded only included)  Advanced Placement participation rate and test scores  Dual enrollment program participation rate  Honors diploma  Industry credentials  International Baccalaureate participation rate and test scores  College and career- ready assessment results

KEY DATES April 30, 2013:  State Board must adopt rules describing the performance measures, benchmarks and grading system to be used for SY June 30, 2013:  State Board must adopt rules prescribing the benchmarks and grading methods for only the performance measures that are assessed and graded for the SY December 31, 2013:  State Board must adopt rules prescribing the benchmarks and grading methods for the disaggregated value-added progress dimension assessed and kindergarten through 3 rd grade literacy progress July 1, 2014:  State Board must adopt prescribing criteria for acceptable industry credentials  State Board must develop a measure of student academic progress for high school students  State Board permitted to adopt rules establishing different percentages to begin with the SY

QUESTIONS ?