PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission Committee Accountability and Oversight Committee Victoria’s New Integrity System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Australasian Study of Parliament Group 2013 Annual Conference Reflections on a Fourth Branch of Government by The Honourable Wayne Martin AC Chief Justice.
Advertisements

Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
COMPLAINTS AGENCIES IN THE COMMONWEALTH Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative.
Presentation to OAS officials/ representatives 2 nd October, 2012.
The Role of the Ombudsman in Resolving Disputes
Supporting and Protecting Adults From Harm Community Planning Board 10 th November 2011 Wendy Hinnie.
Search and Seizure on the Premises of the Danish Parliament (the Folketing) Conditions, background and practice.
Preventing public sector corruption: The relationship between parliamentary committees and corruption commissions Dr Lyndel Bates CARRS-Q Peter Rogers.
1 NSW Work Health & Safety Act Session 3 WHS Act.
The Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007 (“the Act”) Level 1.
The Corruption and Crime Commission: Threat to organised crime, or to our concept of justice? Malcolm McCusker AO QC The John Curtin Institute of Public.
RIPA John Riddell Weightmans LLP 12 th February 2015.
DEFINING A NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTION
The National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Kyiv University of Law Anna Vasilchenko Department of International Law Group IL-41.
IBAC. Who we are. What we do. Alistair Maclean, Chief Executive Officer 14 May 2015.
Transparency in Public Administration – FOI and EIR
Institutional set-up for fighting corruption in India: Recent changes and their effectiveness.
Minimum Wages Act History of Minimum Wages ILO Convention no26 in1928 Recommended Machinery for Fixation of minimum wages The Standing Labour Committee.
Commission for the Prevention of Corruption Republic of Slovenia INTEGRITY I ACCOUNTABILITY I RULE OF LAW.
1 WHAT IS A NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTION? THE PARIS PRINCIPLES Chris Sidoti ppt 1.
“Worldwide Review of the Profession” Competition & Regulatory Developments ALAN HUNTER.
1 POLICY AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS. By the Secretariat.
Good practices from and for the EU accountability process Irena Petruškevičienė Vilnius, 17 October 2006.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
INTEGRITY COMMISSION OF GUYANA. BACKGROUND The Integrity Commission was established on the 24 th September, 1997 and the Act provides for the appointment.
Powers and Duties of Ombudsmen in the Aspect of Ethics Under the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E By Professor Siracha Charoenpanij Secretary-General.
Lecture 4. OUTCOMES What must the equity plan include?. What must affirmative action measures include? Which factors are taken into account in determining.
New rights for people complaining about adult social care providers – an introduction.
Polona Tepina, legal adviser Information Commissioner of Slovenia Beograd, April INDEPENDENCE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER OF SLOVENIA AND ITS.
CODE OF ETHICAL CONDUCT FOR MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT.
Towards improvement: Institution of appeal in public procurement – topical procedural and evidentiary issues Kyiv, April , 2012 Oleksandr Voznyuk.
Parliamentary committee reviews of police oversight agencies: A Queensland case study Dr Lyndel Bates, CARRS-Q Peter Rogers, Queensland Parliamentary Service.
OHS Seminar DO THE TIME – avoid the crime! Miles Crawley 8 June 2007.
SEYCHELLES EXPERIENCE Hon. Nichole Barbe, PAC Member, Seychelles.
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF KENYA PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE (PAC) 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY CONFERENCE RESOLUTIONS IMPLEMENTATION STATUS OF RESOLUTIONS.
Confidentiality of Government Records and Reasons for Refusal Presentation to Boards and Committees 18 th November 2008 Carole Excell FOI Unit.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
3.2 – Police Powers – Searching Suspects and property 1 answers/police-powers-and-your-rights/getting- searched.
PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA. OECD GUIDELINES: BASIC PRINCIPLES OF NATIONAL APPLICATION Collection Limitation Principle There should be limits to the collection.
Minimum Wages Act 1948.
The Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement Kevin Prendergast Corporate Compliance Manager, ODCE.
Policy and Procedure for the Handling of Complaints against the AG Consultation with the Standing Committee on the Auditor-General 9 April 2008 Wandile.
Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool MODULE 11 “POA 9: ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY”
Dr Jarosław Sułkowski.  Constitution of the Republic of Poland  the Act of 15 July 1987 on the Commissioner for Human Rights LEGAL ACTS.
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION Getting to grips with the Act.
THE ROLE OF THE AUDITOR- GENERAL RP MOSAKA Business Executive: Parliamentary Services OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR-GENERAL.
CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE Presentation on the South African Police Service Amendment Bill, March 2012.
CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE AMENDMENT BILL [B ] 19 JUNE 2012 CAPE TOWN PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON SECURITY.
Fifteenth Board Meeting Geneva, April 2007 Ethics Committee Annual Report Professor Sheila Dinoshe Tlou, M.P., POH (Chair) Dr Brian Brink (Vice Chair)
Public sector whistleblowing: Ombudsman Victoria’s experience 10 June 2010 Glenn Sullivan, Director Ombudsman Victoria.
Unit 4 Seminar. Tell me what the Miranda warning is and what it means to you.
the POLICE – EXECUTIVE RELATIONSHIP IN TANZANIA: A FRAMEWORK
The Military Ombudsman Bill [B9 of 2011]
INTERNAL AUDIT SERVICE of the REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS
Australasian Study of Parliament Group 2013 Annual Conference
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
Portfolio Committee on Police DNA National Forensics Oversight and Ethics Board 23 November 2016.
Protected Disclosures Amendment Bill, [B40B -2015]
(Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services)
legislative – EXECUTIVE RELATIONS
APRL's Seventh International Professional Responsibility Conference, Paris Lawyer’s Reporting Obligations in Corporate Transactions: When does legal privilege.
PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE ON SECURITY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT 9 FEBRUARY :00 -11:30 PROCLAMATIONS BY THE PRESIDENT UNDER SECTION 26.
MILITARY OMBUD BILL JUNE 2011 Gen Mmono
Presentation to Portfolio Committee June 2018
Protected Disclosures Amendment Bill, 2015
The Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007
Parliament of Victoria
Portfolio Committee on Police DNA National Forensics Oversight and Ethics Board 23 November 2016.
Parliamentary Committees
Formal Law Reform Bodies
Presentation transcript:

PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission Committee Accountability and Oversight Committee Victoria’s New Integrity System Mr Clem Newton-Brown MP Mr Philip Davis MLC

IBAC Establishment The IBAC was formally established in July 2012 with responsibility for identifying and preventing serious corrupt conduct across the whole public sector, including: members of Parliament. the judiciary. state and local government. police personnel misconduct.

Reforming Victoria’s integrity system Other bodies established or amended for Victoria’s integrity system include: The Public Interest Monitor. The Freedom of Information Commissioner. The Victorian Inspectorate. Amendments to powers of the Ombudsman and the Auditor General. The IBACC and AOC in the Victorian Parliament.

Purpose and functions of the IBAC to strengthen the integrity of the public sector, and enhance community confidence in public sector accountability; identify, expose and investigate serious corrupt conduct and police personnel misconduct; receive complaints about corrupt conduct and police personnel misconduct; examine systems and practices in, consult with, and make recommendations to, the public sector; provide information and education to the community

Corrupt Conduct Conduct that would constitute a relevant offence and that: adversely affects the honest performance by a public officer or public body of his or her or its functions; constitutes or involves the dishonest performance by a public officer or public body of his or her or its functions; constitutes or involves knowingly or recklessly breaching public trust by a public officer or public body; involves misuse of information or material acquired in the course of performing the functions of a public officer or public body, whether or not for the benefit of her or him or it or any other person; could constitute a conspiracy or an attempt to engage in any of the above.

Police Misconduct Conduct by a Police Officer: that constitutes an offence punishable by imprisonment; that is likely to bring the police force into disrepute or diminish public confidence in it; that is disgraceful or improper conduct (whether in the member’s official capacity or otherwise). Conduct by police personnel that are not members of the police force “which is likely to bring police personnel into disrepute or diminish public confidence in police personnel.”

Complaints to the IBAC Public sector body heads, the Chief Commissioner of Police, and Executive Officers of local governments may notify IBAC of matters they believe comprises corrupt conduct. The Chief Commissioner of Police must notify IBAC about all complaints of corrupt conduct by non-member personnel. Upon receipt of a complaint, the IBAC must dismiss, investigate, or refer the matter back to the originating agency or a prosecutorial body.

Investigative Powers In relation to an investigation into a breach of discipline, the IBAC may require a member of the police force to: give it any relevant information; produce any relevant document; or answer any question. The Commissioner may authorise IBAC officers to enter police premises to obtain documents or things relating to an investigation.

Investigative Powers (cont.) An authorised officer may also apply to a Judge of the Supreme Court for a search warrant of a particular premises, or a particular vehicle, vessel or aircraft located in a public place. A person may claim privilege, but Crown and journalistic privilege does not apply, nor any obligation on police personnel to maintain secrecy.

Examinations The IBAC is able to convene examinations that are not bound by the rules of evidence, in which the procedure of examination is determined at the IBAC sees fit. The proceedings of all examinations must be video recorded. Examinations are generally be conducted in private, unless the IBAC determines that: there are exceptional circumstances; and it is in the public interest to hold a public examination; and a public examination can be held without causing unreasonable damage to a person's reputation, safety or wellbeing.

Examinations (cont.) The IBAC has the power to summons people to give evidence at an examination. Witnesses are entitled to seek legal representation, unless the IBAC directs a witness not to seek representation from a particular legal practitioner. A person is not excused from answering a question, giving information, or providing a document on the ground that it might tend to incriminate the person. However, evidence provided in this manner is, except in particular circumstances, inadmissible in court.

Oversight of the IBAC The IBAC is required to advise the Victorian Inspectorate that it will convene a public examination at least 7 days prior to that examination taking place. The IBAC must inform the Victorian Inspectorate if it exercises its power to direct a witness not to seek representation from a specific legal practitioner. The Victorian Inspectorate (described below) has a range of oversight responsibilities in regard of the IBAC. The IBAC Committee in the Victorian Parliament also have oversight roles in regard of the IBAC.

Recommendations and reports The IBAC may make recommendations to a principal officer (public sector body head, Chief Commissioner, or CEO of a council), the responsible Minister, or the Premier. A report on actions taken, or not taken, in regard of a particular recommendation must be provided. The IBAC may also table a report in each House of Parliament on any matter relating to the performance of its functions and duties.

The IBAC Committee The IBAC Committee is established under the Parliamentary Committees Act 2003 (Vic). The functions of the IBAC Committee include to: Monitor and review the performance of the duties and functions of the IBAC, and specified duties of the Victorian Inspectorate. Examine any reports of the IBAC, or in regard of specified duties and functions of the Victorian Inspectorate. Report to both Houses of the Parliament on any matter connected with the performance of the duties and functions of the IBAC, or specified duties and functions of the Victorian Inspectorate. Consider any proposed appointment of an IBAC Commissioner or Victorian Inspector.

Functions of the IBAC Committee (cont.) The IBAC Committee is not able to investigate particular complaints or disclosures made under relevant acts, or to review any decision, finding, recommendation or determination of the IBAC or the Victorian Inspectorate regarding the investigation of particular complaints or receipt of protected disclosures.

Powers of the IBAC Committee The IBAC Committee has the powers generally possessed by Victorian Joint Investigatory Committees. The IBAC Committee may be required to inquire into, consider and report on any proposal, matter or thing that is relevant to its functions. The IBAC Committee is not compelled to table any report in Parliament unless, in the Committee’s opinion, matters arise that “require the attention of the Parliament.” The Committee also is empowered under the Parliamentary Committees Act 2003 (Vic) to take evidence in public and in private.

Membership Mr Clem Newton-Brown MP (Chair) Ms Jill Hennessy MP (Deputy Chair) Hon. Andrew McIntosh MP Mr Paul Weller MP Mr Matthew Viney MLC

Accountability & Oversight Committee The Committee was established in February 2013 under the Parliamentary Committees Act 2003 and has the following functions under the Act — to monitor and review the performance of the duties and functions of the Ombudsman; to report to both Houses of the Parliament on any matter connected with the performance of the duties and functions of the Ombudsman that requires the attention of the Parliament; and to examine any reports by the Ombudsman that are laid before a House of the Parliament.

AOC functions (cont’d) –The Accountability and Oversight Committee cannot: investigate a matter relating to particular conduct the subject of any particular complaint, protected disclosure complaint, referred complaint or referred matter; review any decision to investigate, not to investigate or to discontinue an investigation of, a particular complaint, protected disclosure complaint, referred complaint or referred matter;

AOC functions (cont’d) review any findings, recommendations, determinations or other decisions of the Ombudsman in relation to a particular complaint, protected disclosure complaint, referred complaint or referred matter or an investigation conducted by the Ombudsman;

AOC functions (cont’d) disclose any information relating to the performance of a function or duty or the exercise of a power by the Ombudsman which may— (i)prejudice any criminal proceedings or criminal investigations, or investigations by the Ombudsman, the IBAC or the Victorian Inspectorate; or (ii)contravene any secrecy or confidentiality provision in any relevant Act.

Why was the Committee set up? The AOC was set up as part of the establishment of an integrity regime in Victoria. It has an oversight role of the following agencies: –Freedom of Information Commissioner –Victorian Ombudsman –Victorian Inspectorate

Scope of Committee Role of the AOC is limited to analysing the outputs of the three agencies for which it has oversight responsibility and monitoring their overall performance. This includes reviewing their annual reports. It is NOT a review mechanism or an alternative investigative body.

Recent activity Committee is currently reviewing the role and work of equivalent committees and agencies in other jurisdictions. Committee travelled in September to Brisbane and Sydney for meetings. Prior to the ASPG conference the Committee also met with members of the WA Public Administration Committee, the WA Ombudsman and WA Information Commissioner.

Membership Members were appointed to the AOC on 7 February 2013 The first meeting was held on 7 March 2013 Bipartisan Committee of five Members: three from the Government and two from the Opposition Membership drawn from both Houses

Membership cont’d AOC Members: –Mr Philip Davis MLC, Chairman –Ms Jennifer Kanis MP, Deputy Chair –Hon. Andrew McIntosh MP –Hon. Lisa Neville MP –Mr David O’Brien MLC

Questions?