THE ROLE OF JURIES Juries decide on ‘questions of fact’ e.g. Did the defendant commit the crime? They decide on the ‘verdict’ Guilty or Not Guilty Jury.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Involuntary Manslaughter/Murder “Trials”. Trial Each person will sign up for a role depending on what they would like to argue. For each Trial there will.
Advertisements

CHAPTER 2: CRIME Area of Study 2: Criminal Law. The need for criminal law Read The need for criminal law, Definition of a crime, Elements of a crime,
Introduction to Criminal Law Trials. The criminal justice system is a system of rules, roles, and procedures that determine whether or not someone has.
16.2- Criminal Cases.
IV. Jury Duty. Primary Source “I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles.
 Chapter 10 Faceoff (Young Offender or Adult)  Folder time  Folders being Checked Tomorrow.
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
+ The Criminal Trial Process. + The Charter Section 11(d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that a person charged with an offence is to be.
Mock Trial.  GOAL IS TO MAP OUT YOUR CASE IN A STORY  TELL A STORY FROM YOUR PERSPECTIVE  DO NOT ARGUE!
Courtroom Terms / Justice System
Guided notes provided Chapter 16 Sections 1 & 2.  Courtrooms job is to provide a place for the plaintiff and defendant to resolve their differences.
U.S. Government Chapter 15 Section 3
The Jury Effectiveness and Efficiency.. For and Against A Jury: ForAgainst Accepted by societyTrials are time consuming, costly and create delays Used.
What are our duties under the law? I n Canada, law and justice is not only the business of Members of Parliament, judges, lawyers and police services!
Chapter 16 Lesson 2 Civil and Criminal Law. Crime and Punishment crime  A crime is any act that harms people or society and that breaks a criminal law.
Civil vs. Criminal courts
Courts at Work. Criminal cases An adult criminal case has many steps It usually is not completed in one day, especially felony cases The first step is.
The Scottsboro Case The Criminal Justice Process: An Overview.
Chapter 16.2 Criminal Cases.
Unit 4 Notes. Judges act in three major roles: 1. Adjudicator – must assume a neutral stance between the prosecution and the defense. Must apply the law.
Breaking The Law How the Legal System Operates. Criminal Law Two types of Crimes Misdemeanors Felonies.
Courtroom Terms Twelve Angry Men. 10/18/2015 copyright ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 2 Amendments 5 th Amendment: Guarantees due process—each.
Criminal Law. Types of Crime Most crime committed in the US breaks state laws Each state has its own penal code, or written laws that spell out crimes.
JURY Janaya Di Pietro. INTRODUCTION A jury is a group of ordinary citizens brought to a court to hear evidence and decide on issues of fact on the basis.
Jurors Criminal Justice 1010 Abigail Hogan. Where did we get the idea for trial by jury?  The jury system started in England.  In the Declaration of.
Twelve Angry Men By: Reginald Rose. Discussion What is a jury? How is it chosen? What responsibility does an individual have to accept jury duty? How.
Criminal Courts may be State or Federal Government. Always involve the violation of some standing law. Unlike a civil case, if no law was broken, a Criminal.
You Decide: A Jury Simulation Amendment Unit P.S. 3.
Law and Your Rights 7.1. “Equal Justice Under Law”  Carved over entrance of Supreme Court Building All US citizens equal and guaranteed equal protection.
Which of the five types of crimes are shown in the pie chart? Bell Ringer.
Civil and Criminal Court Cases. Civil Courts Civil courts help people settle disputes. This is the procedure in a civil case: 1.The plaintiff files a.
Bellwork:  Open the Bill of Rights in the Constitution App on your iPad  Work together to figure this out:  What are the two amendments that guarantee.
The Criminal Justice System
THE PENAL SYSTEM AN OVERVIEW. Why do we have a penal system? Incapacitation: remove dangerous people from society so they don’t harm the rest of us. Deterrence:
Mitigation and Aggravation Material from Tiersma, “Dictionaries and Death: Do Capital Jurors Understand Mitigation” Utah Law Review (Vol. 1: 1995)
JURY SYSTEM LEGAL STUDIES 3C. JURY SYSTEM  True or false.
judge decides on a punishment.
DEFENCES TO CRIMINAL CHARGES -Complete Defences -Partial Defences to Murder ‘Defences’ are reasons/excuses for committing a crime that mean you don’t get.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 3.
{ The Jury System Should it stay or should it go?.
APPEALS Appeal against conviction Appeal against sentence Generally only by the defendant if he/she is found guilty (but the Prosecution can appeal a Not.
Basic Legal Rights Review Article I of the Constitution & the Bill of Rights, gives basic rights to all people.
This guide simplifies the arrest-to-sentence process in New York County.
The Criminal Justice System. Arrest Procedure The Arrest: To arrest a person the police must have probable cause. (reason to believe that criminal activity.
THE ADULT JUSTICE SYSTEM. ADULT JUSTICE SYSTEM  Characterized as Civil or Criminal  Criminal laws are characterized as felonies or misdemeanors  For.
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
The Courts. The Criminal Justice System has three major components: Police Courts Corrections Each plays an important role in the system and all three.
Criminal Court Proceedings. Investigation Police gather evidence in the crime, in order to get an arrest warrant signed by a judge. Police may arrest.
Pretrial and Courtroom Procedures Principles of LPSCS.
BURDEN OF PROOF STANDARD OF PROOF In a criminal case, it is the prosecution/state/Crown/Regina/R that has to prove that the person committed the crime.
“It is better to let 10 guilty people go free then that one innocent person be punished.” Innocent until proven guilty.
Paper Preparation solo
Government Governments are created to provide safety, order, and to serve the people. They depend on citizens taking active, responsible roles.
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 & 6 Criminal Cases
Criminal Law ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS Why does conflict develop? How can governments ensure citizens are treated fairly?
Equal justice under the law
Criminal Legal Process
Chapter 5 Law and Civics Mr. Newman
Judicial Branch Lindquist.
Steps of a Crime.
Lesson 5-2 Criminal Procedure.
Warm-Up (61L) TURN BACK SEVERAL PAGES…
Charge Negotiation Where the prosecutor AGREES to REMOVE some charges
Criminal Law Defenses Lesson 5-2 Quiz Review.
It is NOT the defendant’s job to prove that he/she is not guilty!
Steps in a Criminal Case
DETENTION AND INTERROGATION;
The Structure of Canada’s Courts
What are the basic rights and freedoms of the American people?
Presentation transcript:

THE ROLE OF JURIES Juries decide on ‘questions of fact’ e.g. Did the defendant commit the crime? They decide on the ‘verdict’ Guilty or Not Guilty Jury trials are RARE. Only about 3% of criminal trials in NSW used juries last year. When making their decision, they can only use the evidence the judge allowed into the trial. They are not allowed to investigate for themselves.

THE ROLE OF JURIES EVALUATE the effectiveness of the jury system in the criminal trial In the syllabus: PROBLEM 1: Juries sometimes do their own investigating. This causes serious problems: If the judge finds out that jurors did any of their own investigating, it will cause a mistrial. e.g. In the first Bilal Skaf case, they had to have a new trial because a couple of the jurors went out to the scene of the crime and investigated it for themselves.

THE ROLE OF JURIES EVALUATE the effectiveness of the jury system in the criminal trial In the syllabus: PROBLEM 1: Juries sometimes do their own investigating. This causes serious problems: This is a difficult problem to fix. Even when it’s a crime, jurors STILL do their own research. Jurors often research because they’re too afraid to ask the judge questions (e.g. “What do reasonable doubt mean?”, which is the question someone googled in Victoria and it caused a mistrial). Jurors playing detective should not be a crime (SMH 2013)

THE ROLE OF JURIES EVALUATE the effectiveness of the jury system in the criminal trial In the syllabus: PROBLEM 2: Juries can’t be forced to listen: A District Court judge has to discharge (sack) a jury in a major drug trial because the jurors were playing Sudoku for “more than half” the trial… The trial had cost over a million dollars and had seen 105 witnesses. Huge waste. Drug Trial Abandoned after jurors play Sudoku (ABC 2008)

THE ROLE OF JURIES EVALUATE the effectiveness of the jury system in the criminal trial In the syllabus: PROBLEM 2: Juries can’t be forced to listen: Some people used this as a reason to argue against using juries (we should just have judges). But judges aren’t exactly perfect. Cesan (2007): A judge fell asleep for long periods during a trial. The defendant appealed, but the appeals judge said that the first judge falling asleep is NOT a reason by itself to cause a mistrial (even though it IS against section 80 of the CONSTITUTION!!!). SO  Sleeping judge – fine. Sudoku-playing jury – BAD.

THE ROLE OF JURIES EVALUATE the effectiveness of the jury system in the criminal trial In the syllabus: PROBLEM 3: Juries don’t always understand the judge’s instructions: At the end of a trial (where there is a jury), the JUDGE SUMS UP the facts of the case AND gives the jurors some INSTRUCTIONS. e.g. “If you have any reasonable doubt that the defendant committed this crime, you must find him not guilty”

THE ROLE OF JURIES EVALUATE the effectiveness of the jury system in the criminal trial In the syllabus: PROBLEM 3: Juries don’t always understand the judge’s instructions: BOCSAR (2008) found that only 67% of jurors said that they understood everything the judge said. AND some of them were probably lying to the researchers. When researchers have actually ASKED jurors questions, it turns out that only 55% of jurors even understand the what ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ means!!! That’s the MOST BASIC THING they need to understand to do their job!!!

THE ROLE OF JURIES EVALUATE the effectiveness of the jury system in the criminal trial In the syllabus: PROBLEM 3: Juries don’t always understand the judge’s instructions: This issue was so bad that the NSW Law Reform Commission was asked to look at ways of fixing it. They recommended that in summing up, judges: -Should explain things more clearly -Use visual aids (like PowerPoint presentations) -Use flowcharts (to help decision-making) Judges should also encourage questions from jurors (even throughout the trial!). Jury Directions, NSWLRC Report 136 (2012)

THE ROLE OF JURIES EVALUATE the effectiveness of the jury system in the criminal trial In the syllabus: PROBLEM 4: Social media makes jury trials difficult: Because social media has allowed anyone to publish comments about the defendant, the defendant might be able to argue that he can't get a fair trial (because the jurors will already have read things that would not be allowed in evidence in the actual trial). This was a big worry in the Jill Meagher case in Victoria. As soon as the name of the defendant came out, people started commenting on Facebook. The Victorian Police warned people about the dangers of this (because the defendant could say that the jury is already biased).

THE ROLE OF JURIES EVALUATE the effectiveness of the jury system in the criminal trial In the syllabus: HOWEVER: Juries can sometimes “do the right thing” when judges wouldn’t: The jury in the Cairns abortion case (R v Leach (2010)) really over-ruled the law by returning a not guilty verdict. SHE WAS GUILTY of “the crime”, but the jury didn’t feel she deserved to be found guilty of a law that most of society finds unacceptable, so the jury ignored their instructions and “did the right thing” instead. ‘Did abortion jury ignore law in favour of common sense?’ (SMH 2010)

THE ROLE OF JURIES -Including Verdicts Does every juror have to vote the same way? Before 2006: Jurors USED to have to reach a ‘UNANIMOUS verdict’ (meaning that they all had to vote the same way, 12-0). Since 2006: The Juries (Amendment) Act 2006 (NSW) brought in ‘MAJORITY verdicts’. This means that in a criminal trial, the voting can go 11-1 and STILL be counted as a proper verdict (or 10-1).

Do ‘majority verdicts’ achieve justice? From ‘Majority Verdicts’ NSW Law Reform Commission (2005) THE ROLE OF JURIES -Including Verdicts Arguments FOR majority verdictsArguments AGAINST majority verdicts Quicker and easier verdictsVerdicts may be reached without enough negotiation time A juror that has some doubts has less pressure to “conform” with what the rest of the group is saying Majority verdicts are against the standard of proof (if one juror says no – isn’t THAT a reasonable doubt?) Gets rid of the “rogue juror” effect (when one nutcase that won’t change their mind) Only resolves an extra 1.7% of criminal cases (which would have been “hung verdicts” without majority verdicts) EVALUATE the effectiveness of the jury system in the criminal trial

THE ROLE OF JURIES -Including Verdicts One more controversial thing about juries... Juries can be overruled by the judge if they have found someone guilty when the judge thinks they shouldn’t have! In R v Leung (2009, 2011 and 2013), the defendant was found guilty TWICE by two different juries, but in BOTH situations, the judge gave a ‘directed verdict’ of Not Guilty. So, he was put on trial, found guilty of murder by a jury, but the jury was overruled by the judge, so they charged him again, put on trial again, he was found guilty again by a jury, but the jury was again overruled by the judge, so he was charged AGAIN, put on trial for a THIRD TIME, and found guilty by the jury (but they weren’t overruled by the judge then). He’s now serving 8 years in jail by the way.