Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Low Head / Low Power Resource Assessment of Hydrologic Units 11 and 17 Randy D. Lee December 18,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydro Networks in GIS Network model Flow on Networks Hydrologic networks Linear referencing on networks Some slides in this presentation were prepared.
Advertisements

National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) HIS Symposium March 8 Prepared & Presented by Horizon Systems Corporation Sponsored by US Environmental Protection Agency.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Action Plan for the Development of Watershed and Sub-Watershed Boundaries for northwestern Mississippi.
Terrain for the Lower Colorado River Flood Damage Evaluation Project Erin Atkinson, Halff Associates, Inc. Rick Diaz, Lower Colorado River Authority Symposium.
An Update on NHDPlus July 9, 2013 Tommy Dewald Cindy McKay
Introduction to NHDPlus: A Framework for Advanced Water Applications Cindy McKay Horizon Systems Corporation Cindy McKay Horizon Systems Corporation.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
National Hydrography Data Use and Applications.
GIS-Data Sources Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Srikanth Koka Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University.
1-Degree USGS DEM Control Points Locations National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Drainage Lines Corrected Stream Lines Filled DEM Burned DEM Flow Area Accumulation.
Improving Estimates of Hydrologic Extremes: Applications to the Olympic National Forest Ingrid Tohver PNW Climate Science Conference September 14, 2011.
Evaluating river cross section for SPRINT: Guadalupe and San Antonio River Basins Alfredo Hijar Flood Forecasting.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: List the essential data needed for water resource modeling Identify sources of water resources.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
SPARROW Water- Quality Modeling: Application of the National Hydrography Dataset What is SPARROW? Use of NHD SPARROW results By Craig Johnston and Richard.
NHD Watershed: Tools and Applications
Federal Columbia River Power System Operations Planning.
National Basin Delineation Project Team: Ken Howard Ami Arthur Gina Cox Dave Slayter Nathan Kuhnert Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Alabama Water Science Center StreamStats: By Kernell Ries and J.
NHD Stream Order Possibilities Timothy R. Bondelid Research Triangle Institute Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (919) ; fax (919)
Flow Time Time Series Hydro FeaturesHydro Network Channel System Drainage System ArcGIS Hydro Data Model.
Introduction National Hydrography Dataset Plus (NHDPlus) Version 2.
GIS in Watershed Analysis. Why watershed Analysis with GIS? Concepts Important datasets Analysis Tools.
NHD Products and Applications InterMountain GIS 2014 NHD Workshop April 7, 2014.
Idaho’s Water Energy Resources and Hydroelectric Potential Douglas G. Hall, Program Manager INL Hydropower Program August 2006.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Implementation of the U.S. Geological Survey’s StreamStats Program in Kansas— A Web Application.
Watershed delineation and data preparation for groundwater modeling using GIS in the Savannah River Site GIS term project presentation November 25, 2003.
Assessment of Economic Benefits of the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Hydrologic and Hydraulic Case Studies Adapted from a Presentation to NRC.
Fluvial Geomorphic Analyses of the Llano River and Sandy Creek Basins, Central Texas, using GIS and Arc Hydro Tools Franklin T. Heitmuller CE 394K November.
Introduction 1. Climate – Variations in temperature and precipitation are now predictable with a reasonable accuracy with lead times of up to a year (
HYDROLOGIC DATA. BACKGROUND Analysis and synthesis of data is required to perform any hydrologic computation. The engineer needs to: Identify and define.
Adjustment of Global Gridded Precipitation for Orographic Effects Jennifer Adam.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2011.
National Basin Delineation Project Team: Ken Howard Ami Arthur Gina Cox Dave Slayter Nathan Kuhnert Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological.
February 18, 2014 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 1.
NHD Tools for the Evaluation of Watershed Condition and Management Performance Authors: William Cooter (presenter) Peter Ilieve. Tim Bondelid Mark Bruhn.
1 Contractor for the USGS at the EROS Data Center NHD Plus as a geospatial framework for drought indicators Jim Verdin.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
Introduction to GIS in Water Resources David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin CRWR.
Using GIS to aid in Modeling the Susquehanna River Basin Presented by Monica Wedo December 5, 2000.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Idaho District Office (208) Estimating Hydropower Potential Using EDNA Stage.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia (703) NHD Flow and Velocity Project Greg Schwarz, Reston,
By Pete Steeves Rainy River and Lake of the Woods (RRLOW) StreamStats Demonstration for the International Joint Commission October 2, 2014 U.S. Geological.
The Future of NHDPlus 2009 NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, 2009 Tommy Dewald.
Hydrological impacts of climate change over the contiguous United States: Project overview.
DIRECT RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH FOR UNGAUGED BASINS USING A CELL BASED MODEL P. B. Hunukumbura & S. B. Weerakoon Department of Civil Engineering, University of.
Water Census Progress: DRB Focus Area Perspective Bob Tudor Deputy Director Delaware River Basin Commission.
Hurricane Irene in Connecticut River Milena Spirova CE 394 K 2015.
WATERWAYS AND BRIDGES IN TEXAS “Final” Presentation by: Brandon Klenzendorf CE 394K Dr. Maidment.
May 1, 2002 Streamflow and Water Availability Estimates in Ungaged Streams California’s North Coast Region GIS Layers Lorri Peltz-Lewis U.S. Bureau of.
Using the NHDPlus for drainage area delineation and site matching Kirsten Cassingham, NC Water Science Center Silvia Terziotti, NC Water Science Center.
Experience ∙ Innovation · Results CALCASIEU PARISH – SABINE RIVER AND BAYOU LACASSINE BASINS STORMWATER MASTER PLAN Engineers ∙ Surveyors · Environmental.
1 Application of SDI in hydrology for assessment of hydropower potential of small streams Subija IZEIROSKI Bashkim IDRIZI Sotir PANOVSKI Igor NEDELKOVSKI.
Bdsfbdsfb NHDPlus for Corpus Christi Bay Term Project Report Nishesh Mehta Nishesh Mehta 21 st November st November 2006.
Modeling Source-water Contributions to Streamflow
Creating a Generalized Hydrologic Water Budget for Cache Valley, UT/ID
Kiran Chinnayakanahalli
National Hydro Data Programs
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
River Reach Codes Used for river address locations
Calculating Hydrologic Parameters for Estimating Surface Water Flow at Ungaged Locations Richard Hoffpauir Water Resources Engineering.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Comparison of Streamflow and Precipitation in the Provo River Watershed CEE 6440 By: Steven McKee.
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
Little Bear River 100-Year Storm Flood
RELIABLE, & AFFORDABLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Chapter Four RUNOFF When a storm occurs, a portion of rainfall infiltrates into the ground and some portion may evaporate. The rest flows as a thin sheet.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by Ayse Irmak, David R
Presentation transcript:

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Low Head / Low Power Resource Assessment of Hydrologic Units 11 and 17 Randy D. Lee December 18, 2002

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Hydro Power Background 1989 DOE initiated a National Energy Strategy –Identify energy resources for expanding demand –Major differences in estimates from FERC and COE 70,000 MW – 600,000 MW –No previous estimates of undeveloped power 1998 Interagency Hydropower Resource Assessment Team established –Assessment addressed resources of 1 MW or greater 2000 DOE initiated an assessment of U.S. hydropower resources of less than 1 MW –Low head (less than 30 feet) –Low power (less than 1 MW)

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Project Objective Develop and demonstrate a method for estimating the hydropower potential for a large geographic area USGS – provided flow, elevation, and power estimates by stream reach INEEL – analyzed, assessed and reported on potential hydropower resources

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory US Hydrologic Regions

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Arkansas White Red Hydrologic Region - 11

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Pacific Northwest Hydrologic Region –17

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Synthetic Stream Networks Provided by USGS - developed from the Elevation Derivatives for National Applications (EDNA) Dataset Stream channels derived from digital elevation models (DEMs) Stream reaches are generally defined as segments between confluences (average reach length  2 mi.) EDNA associates local runoff surface area (catchment) with each stream reach (average catchment area  3 mi. 2 ) Total drainage area supplying runoff to reach outlet obtained by summing area of upstream catchments

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Total Drainage Area: mi 2 Synthetic Stream Networks (Continued)

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Stream Reach Flow Estimation EDNA catchments were overlaid with climate data from the Oregon State University PRISM Dataset –Mean annual precipitation –Mean annual temperature Stream flow regression equation from: Vogel, Wilson, and Daly (1999), “Regional Regression Models of Annual Streamflow for the United States”: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, May/June 1999, p

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Stream Reach Flow Estimation (Continued) Stream Flow Regression Equation Arkansas White Red Region Q 11 = e A P T where Q is the mean flow for a site in Region 11 (A-W-R), in cubic meters per second A is drainage area, in square kilometers P is mean annual precipitation, in mm/yr T is mean annual temperature, in degrees Fahrenheit times 10

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Hydropower Potential Estimation Hydropower Potential Equation P =  [Q i * H + (Q o -Q i ) * H/ 2 ] =  H(Q i +Q o )/ 2 where P = power in kilowatts  = (1/11.8) Q i = flow rate at the upstream end of the stream reach in cubic feet per second Q o = flow rate at the downstream end of the stream reach in cubic feet per second H= hydraulic head in feet equal to z i - z o z i = elevation at the upstream end of the stream reach in feet z o = elevation at the downstream end of the stream reach in feet

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Identification of Excluded Waterways Intersect synthetic streams with excluded waterways –Wild & Scenic Rivers and National Parkways Federally protected linear features –Federal and Tribal Lands National battlefields National parks National parkways National monuments National preserves Wildlife preserves Wildlife management areas Wilderness areas

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Region-17 Excluded Areas

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Validation of Synthetic Stream Networks EDNA synthetic stream dataset intersected with National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) to identify false streams Synthetic Streams NHD Streams Red River Drainage

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Power Summation Sum stream reach power potentials for: –All reaches –Excluded reaches –Non-excluded reaches Stream Reach Hydropower Potential Dataset (without false synthetic streams) EXCLUDED Stream Reach Hydropower Potential Dataset NON-EXCLUDED Stream Reach Hydropower Potential Dataset Excluded Waterways Filter Excluded Waterways Filter

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Total Developed Hydropower Capacity Total developed hydropower capacity in the region was obtained from: Hydroelectric Power Resources of the United States - Developed and Undeveloped, Washington: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 1 January 1992, p. 80. Total developed hydropower capacity for each region: 1,966 MW 32,430 MW Region-11 Region-17

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Total Hydropower Potentials – HUC-11 5, ,894 Total Hydropower Potential  All stream reach potentials Total Excluded Hydropower Potential  All excluded stream reach potentials Total Non-excluded Hydropower Potential  All non-excluded stream reach potentials Total Available Hydropower Potential Total non-excluded - Developed 4,8941,966 = = = = 2,928 Megawatts “Available” means Non-excluded, Undeveloped

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Total Hydropower Potential Results Region-11Region-17 Total hydropower potential 5,024 MW76,425 MW Total excluded hydropower potential 130 MW20,294 MW Total non-excluded hydropower potential 4,894 MW56,131 MW Total developed hydropower capacity 1,966 MW32,430 MW Total available hydropower potential 2,928 MW23,710 MW

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Total Hydropower Potential Results (Continued) Total Hydropower Potential 5,042 MW Total Hydropower Potential 76,425 MW Region-11 Region-17

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory The Low Head/Low Power Regime Microhydro Power

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Filter stream reach hydropower potential dataset using low head/low power regime boundaries: LH/LP Technical Approach Stream Reach Hydropower Potential Dataset (without false synthetic streams) EXCLUDED Stream Reach Hydropower Potential Dataset NON-EXCLUDED Stream Reach Hydropower Potential Dataset Excluded Waterways Filter Excluded Waterways Filter

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory LH/LP Hydropower Potential Results Region-11 Total LH/LP hydropower potential 2,021 MW Total excluded LH/LP hydropower potential 53 MW Total non-excluded LH/LP hydropower potential 1,968 MW Total developed LH/LP hydropower capacity 0 MW Total available LH/LP hydropower potential 1,968 MW Region-17 Total LH/LP hydropower potential 1,992 MW Total excluded LH/LP hydropower potential 203MW Total non-excluded LH/LP hydropower potential 1,789 MW Total developed LH/LP hydropower capacity 5 MW Total available LH/LP hydropower potential1,784 MW

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory LH/LP Hydropower Potential Results (Continued) HUC-11

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory LH/LP Hydropower Potential Results (Continued) HUC-17

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Power Potential Results – Region 11 Zero Power Low Head / Low Power High Head / Low Power High Power

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Power Potential Results – Region 17 Zero Power Low Head / Low Power High Head / Low Power High Power Excluded Area

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Conclusions This project has demonstrated a viable technical approach to assessing regional hydropower potential Replication of the technical approach for the remaining 16 hydrologic regions can produce similar results for the entire continental US There is a significant available hydropower potential in the two Hydrologic Regions studied (  2,000 MW in Region 11 and  24,000 MW in Region 17) Two-thirds of the available hydropower potential in the Region 11 is low head/low power Nearly 2,000 MW of the available hydropower potential in the Region 17 falls in the category of LH/LP

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Future Plans