1 Utility Wind Integration Group Workshop ACE Diversity Interchange (ADI) Project Sharing Area Control Errors July 2007 Sponsoring Utilities: British Columbia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ColumbiaGrid Reliability Workshop October 1, 2007 Developmental and Staffing Reliability Functional Agreement (DSRFA) Details This program is the cornerstone.
Advertisements

DYNAMIC SCHEDULES AD HOC WORK GROUP ANN DAVIS, CHAIR MARILYN FRANZ.
1 ACE Diversity Interchange. 2 ADI Pilot Project Founded on Negotiation Theory: A transaction should occur if the parties involved are either held harmless.
Dynamic Schedule e-tagging Requirements Criterion WECC-087 (formerly INT-008) ISAS Report January 2012.
1 October 30, 2008 WECC Meetings Marina Del Rey, California ACE Diversity Interchange: Overview and Update.
1 ColumbiaGrid Activities Supporting Integration of Renewable Generation Presentation to the Market Interface Committee At the October 30, 2008 Meeting.
WECC Reliability Based Control Field Trial
CREPC Meeting November 5-6, 2007 Snapshot of Major Transmission Proposals and Status of Transmission Planning Presenters: Paul Arnold and Jeff Miller.
Discussion of Inter-RTO Seams Issues Presented by: Midwest ISO and NYISO Independent Market Monitor David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics October 7,
PacifiCorp-CAISO EIM Initiative Overview
Montana Energy Summit Transmission Planning Process April 22, 2008.
Low Load Process David L. Plant March Objectives Describe the three stages of the Low Load Process and their time requirements Describe the three.
Control Performance Frequency Analysis Control Standards Surveys Inadvertent Interchange Time Error Frequency Bias Settings Control Area Assistance Automatic.
9/22/00 1 Jerry W. Smith. 9/22/00 2 Jerry W. Smith.
System Operator Conference NERC Standards Review for: Simulator Drill Orientation 2014 System Operator Conferences Charlotte NC & Franklin TN SERC/SOS.
Load Shed Service for Import Information Session Market Services April 17, 2014.
WECC PCC Meeting Salt Lake City, UT July 16, 2014.
NERC LTRA Update / CDR Capacity Counting Issues
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
Utah Schedule 37 Update June 25, Schedule 37 Background Schedule 37 – Published rates for standard power purchase agreements with qualifying facilities.
PLWG Report to ROS July 9, PGRRs needing vote PGRR043 – FIS Scoping Amendment – PGRR043 moves the Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) Study out of the.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
What is Sure BDCs? BDC stands for Batch Data Communication and is also known as Batch Input. It is a technique for mass input of data into SAP by simulating.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Adding Incremental Flexibility to the Pacific Northwest Power System? Maury Galbraith Northwest Power.
PDCWG Report to ROS August 12, 2010 Sydney Niemeyer.
1 Adjusting the “Dispatch Instructions” to the Defined Metering Point (DMP). “Functional Deferral 6 (FD-06)” Market Operations Standing Committee (MOSC)
Reserves Issue For years there has been disagreement over reserves issues and what constitutes firm power. We’ve been able to function as a market, despite.
Variable Generation Subcommittee Paul Arnold and Michelle Mizumori Northwest Wind Integration Forum Technical Work Group October 29, 2009.
2013 Calendar Year Customer Survey Results
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
WestConnect Activities Charles Reinhold WestConnect Project Manager 2008 ACC BTA Workshop Phoenix, AZ May 22, 2008.
1 The Northwest Wind Integration Action Plan Status Update December 14, 2010.
Generation Inputs Workshop July 24, BPA Balancing Authority Reliability Tool.
2014 Calendar Year Customer Survey Results. Background Open for comment February 12, 2015 through March 31, 2015 for evaluation of prior year – 21 close.
Joint Outreach Team Implementation Plan July 12, :30-11:30 a.m.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 EDS 3 Release 5 Monday / Friday Market Updates November 30, 2007.
1 Joint Initiative Northwest Wind Integration Forum Policy Steering Committee Meeting January 6, 2010.
Reserves…Where are we??? Service Schedule C Service Schedule C C-3.10 Seller shall be responsible for ensuring that Service Schedule C transactions are.
Application and Implementation of State Estimator at Idaho Power Company S. Kincic and M. Papic.
Klondike Wind Power Project, Oregon Donald Furman Senior Vice President - Business Policy and Development December 3, 2009 Energy Bar Association Mid-Year.
1 Compliance Update May Control Performance Highlights  NERC CPS1 Performance Performance further declined in March  March performance comparison.
Montana Energy Summit April 22, 2008 Ancillary Service – Regulating Reserves.
Successful Restructuring: The Way Forward Mark Bennett Senior Manager of Policy Electric Power Supply Association Restructuring and the Wholesale Market.
Date 05/01/2012 MIT Manual TEC Analysis Sandip Sharma ERCOT.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department October 11, 2006.
1 1 Beacon Power Corporation Energy Storage – Regulation Issues Prepared for: Emerging Technologies Working Group January 5, 2011.
1 UFE Workshop Sponsored by COPS October 19, 2004.
Analysis of ERCOT Regulation Service Deployments during 2011 David Maggio Market Enhancement Task Force Meeting 3/29/
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
FERC Staff’s Report on Demand Response and Advanced Metering.
1. Non-Dispatchable Resources and EIS Market Carrie Simpson May 30,
BAL-001-TRE-01 ERCOT CPS2 R2 Waiver Regional Variance April 16, 2009 Sydney Niemeyer.
After-the-Fact Workgroup Update Sheryl Welch ISAS Meeting January 12-13, 2016 Phoenex, AZ.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting June 20 th, 2008 Austin, TX.
Document number Anticipated Impacts for FRRS Pilot Program ERCOT TAC Meeting September 7, 2012.
ColumbiaGrid Reliability Activities ColumbiaGrid Board Meeting Presentation August 15, 2007.
Generation: Control & Economic Dispatch 2016 System Operator Seminar.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
TEPPC Review Task Force January 11, Purpose Advise and make recommendations on Future potential future generation and load balance Adequacy of the.
EIM/EDT Update ColumbiaGrid Planning Meeting June 2, 2011.
NERC BAL-005, BAL-006, FAC-001 Gary Nolan WECC ISAS April 20, 2016.
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
Automatic Generation Control (AGC)
Proposed Energy Imbalance Market The Basics
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
Dynamic Scheduling Overview
After-the-Fact Workgroup Update Sheryl Welch
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
Assigned to the WEQ OASIS and WEQ OASIS/BPS Subcommittees
Presentation transcript:

1 Utility Wind Integration Group Workshop ACE Diversity Interchange (ADI) Project Sharing Area Control Errors July 2007 Sponsoring Utilities: British Columbia Transmission Corporation Idaho Power Company NorthWestern Energy PacifiCorp

2 ADI Project Founded on Negotiation Theory: A transaction should occur if the parties involved are either held harmless or made better off.

3 Purpose of Presentation: Provide Update on the ADI Project: –current scope of ADI –status of the project –what ADI is and is not –how ADI works –why the companies are implementing ADI –the inherent safety of ADI –ADI suspension protocols –how ADI relates to inadvertent interchange –next steps

4 Current Scope of ADI : The initial Participating Control Areas are: –Idaho Power Company –NorthWestern Energy –PacifiCorp – Eastern Control Area –PacifiCorp – Western Control Area The British Columbia Transmission Corporation is the “host” of this activity. Any control area operator located in the WECC and adjacent to and interconnected with one or more Participating Control Areas may join as a new ADI participant.

5 Status of the Project: The ACE Diversity Interchange Agreement (including the Technical Design) was executed November, Operating Group’s implementation goal - March 31 st, –ICCP links; ADI logic; information exchanges all in place. –ADI Suspension Protocols are completed and posted. –Testing completed; operating manuals developed. –All four control areas are operating ADI. –Evaluation on-going (July 2007). The Operating Group’s goal to “GO LIVE” March 31, 2007 was achieved; the cost of implementation was less than $100,000. ADI presentations made to FERC and WECC; discussions regarding ADI with NWPP.

6 What is ACE Diversity Interchange or ADI? ADI is the pooling of individual Area Control Errors (ACE) to take advantage of control error diversity (momentary imbalances of generation and load). By pooling ACE the participants will be able to: –Reduce control burden on individual control areas; –Reduce unnecessary generator control movement; –Reduce sensitivity to resources with potentially volatile output such as wind projects; and, –Realize improvements in Control Performance Standards.

7 What ADI is Not: ADI does not provide load following. ADI is not an energy service. ADI is not an Ancillary Service. ADI does not require the purchase of transmission. ADI does not change any of the existing obligations of the Participating Control Areas. ADI does not require any additional regulatory oversight.

8 How Does ADI Work? ICCP Communication links are established between the Host and the Participating Control Areas. ACE values are sent to the Host. The Host evaluates ACEs for diversity; if there is no diversity, there is no ADI adjustment. If there is diversity, ADI adjustments are calculated and sent back to the Participating Control Areas. The Participating Control Areas choose to either control to their original ACE or control to an ADI-adjusted ACE. The ACE that is controlled to is the reported ACE. ACE data and causes for suspension are broadcast to all participants ensuring transparency and supporting evaluation.

9 Metered Net Interchange Scheduled Net Interchange Freq ACE Calc Logic Gen Control Logic Gen Pulses Gen Dispatch Original ACE Send ACE to Host Net & Allocate ACE Send Back to Utility ACE Modifier Introducing ADI to Existing Operations:

10 ADI Calculation: CARaw ACEADI AdjustmentAdj. ACE A-46 MW+46 MW0 MW B-40 MW+40 MW0 MW C+60 MW-46 MW14 MW D+40 MW-40 MW0 MW Net:14 MW14 MW If there is no diversity, there is no adjustment to ACE. ADI-adjusted ACE is no greater than the pooled Raw ACE. In this example, the “Majority Group” control areas have positive ACE values (Control Areas C and D, consistent with the Net Error); the “Minority Group” control areas have negative ACE values (Control Areas A and B). ADI Adjustments will not force a change in sign (+/-) for a participant.

11 Preliminary Quantification of ADI Benefits: Estimate of improvements to “negative” (load exceeds generation) and “positive” (load is less than generation) ACE values indicate a 20% improvement on average. December 4 th, 2006; 2 hours of continuous ACE values for three participating control areas. Evaluated Control Areas Improvements: A B C Negative ACE14%22%31% Positive ACE15%10%24% Average Improvement:20% Evaluation to included: sum of MW-hours removed from ACE values for all control areas and for individual participants; sum of positive/negative corrections; sum of net corrections. Other analyses may be done on generator movement, CPS performance, etc.

12 Is it Safe for ADI Participants? An ADI adjustment will be calculated only if there is ACE diversity (positive and negative values) among participants. An ADI adjustment will never make ACE worse, i.e., it will always move ACE toward zero or will have no impact. Participants have the right to ignore (suspend) ADI adjustments; suspension means that participants control to original ACE.

13 Is ADI Safe for Neighboring Systems? ADI adjustment limits can be imposed to ensure fail- safe implementation (25 MW limit currently in place). ADI will be settled through the existing Automatic Time Error Correction term and as such, will not have any impact on inadvertent accumulation or return. Participants have the right to ignore (suspend) ADI adjustments; suspension means that participants control to original ACE which is status quo operations.

14 Why Suspend ADI? Host Will Suspend: –If ADI system fails. –If fewer than 3 control areas are participating. Participants Will Suspend: –If directed to suspend by PNSC. –If a frequency problem is detected. –If an OTC violation is in progress or expected. –If reserve sharing is in place. –If AGC is suspended for any reason. –If other concerns arise. Suspension Protocols are posted.

15 Next Steps: Evaluation of the project. Change Management process in place. ADI sponsors have been making presentations to explain the project, UWIG, WestConnect, Wind Integration workgroup, ColumbiaGrid, etc. Establishing operating standards, e.g., frequency of data sends; frequency of ACE calculations, etc. ADI sponsors are having participation discussions with WestConnect utilities.