IRIS’s Large N Initiative Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 John Hole, Virginia Tech Chair of IRIS Large N Working Group SPATIAL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WP 3.4 High Frequency GPS: a potential contribution for monitoring a active faults Test site Irpinia Roma, 24 marzo 2010 Resp. Antonio Avallone M. Marzario,
Advertisements

Society-relevant Arrays for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges in South Africa Andy Nyblade Penn State University Workshop on Arrays in.
OBSIP Overview Instrumentation Centers: Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory A. Barclay, J. Gaherty, M. Tolstoy Scripps Institution of Oceanography J. Babcock,
Imaging with Non-Aliased Seismic Wavefields Large N (and not just sensors) John Hole, IRIS Active Source Workshop, 2014 John Hole Virginia Tech SPATIAL.
Faults in Focus: Earthquake Science Accomplishments Thomas H. Jordan Director, Southern California Earthquake Cente r 28 February 2014.
Rethinking Array Seismology in Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Monitoring Steven J. Gibbons Workshop on Arrays in Global Seismology, Raleigh, North Carolina, May.
IMW Strategic Planning August 14, “Options for Political Activism to Get Increased Funding” John G. Anderson Director, Nevada Seismological Laboratory.
New Mexico Seismic Networks 1. New Mexico Tech Seismic Network Rick Aster, Sue Bilek (NMT EES Dept Contacts)
Data centres and observablesModern Seismology – Data processing and inversion 1 Data in seismology: networks, instruments, current problems  Seismic networks,
Existing Infrastructure for International Exchange of Seismic Data Raymond J. Willemann GEM Technology, Washington, D.C. IASPEI:Includes commissions for.
SUPERSITES COORDINATION WORKSHOP Monday 10 June 2013
Visualizing the Seismic Wavefield with EarthScope’s Transportable Array AGU, Fall 2008 Chuck Ammon, Penn State Bob Woodward, IRIS Kevin Furlong, Penn State.
Correlations 1 Surface waves and correlations  Correlation of time series  Similarity  Time shifts  Applications  Correlation of rotations/strains.
Fine-scale structure of the San Andreas fault zone and location of the SAFOD target earthquakes Thurber, Roecker, Zhang, Baher, and Ellsworth Geophysical.
Sealing the deal? A seismic source model for strombolian explosions at Fuego volcano, Guatemala John Lyons Greg Waite Tricia Nadeau 17.
Las Vegas Valley Seismic Response Project Catherine Snelson, Wanda Taylor, and Barbara Luke University of Nevada Las Vegas John Louie, John Anderson, and.
An Earth science program to explore the 4D structure of the North American continent.
4 th COPS Workshop, Hohenheim, 25 – 26 September 2006 Modeling and assimilation efforts at IPM in preparation of COPS Hans-Stefan Bauer, Matthias Grzeschik,
CoCom 2012 April Budget framework: NSF merger of IRIS Cooperative Agreement & IRIS USArray into a single proposal - NSF (and gov’t) envisions.
Industry-style combined active/passive dense array surveys: directions and issues. Dan Hollis, NodalSeismic, LLC 26 January 2014Active Source Workshop.
RAPID SOURCE PARAMETER DETERMINATION AND EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PROCESS IN INDONESIA REGION Iman Suardi Seismology Course Indonesia Final Presentation of Master.
Seismic Reflection Image along I-64 Pratt et al., 1988 Coruh et al., 1988.
High Sensitivity Magnetic Gradiometer for Earthquake Research Applications ISRAEL 2005 Ivan Hrvoic H. Ginzburg, H. Zafrir, G. Steinitz, B. Shirman, G.
Larry D. Brown, Diego Quiros and Anastasija Cabolova Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Cornell University, Ithaca, NY … and AIDA Virginia.
Seismic interferometry-by- deconvolution for controlled-source and passive data Kees Wapenaar, Joost van der Neut, Elmer Ruigrok, Deyan Draganov, Juerg.
The following figures show three modeled measures of network capability 1) Minimum magnitude threshold 2) Network detection time 3) Earthquake Location.
Iranian National Broadband Seismic Network (BIN)
Bill Ellsworth U.S. Geological Survey Near-Source Observations of Earthquakes: Implications for Earthquake Rupture and Fault Mechanics JAMSTEC International.
IRIS workshop on “Managing Waveform Data and Related Metadata from Seismic Networks” Hotel Windsor Suites, Bangkok, Thailand 08-13, January, 2012 Ashvin.
A U.S. Sponsored Observing System of the Global Earth Observing System of Systems  Focus on the Network –Data Management –Products Global Seismographic.
1 EarthScope: Plate Boundary Observatory William Prescott UNAVCO, Inc AAPG Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah 12 May 2003.
Cross-over Seismology : Blurring the line between passive and active source experiments Diego Quiros Cornell University.
Seismic Networks Operated by Central Weather Bureau in Taiwan Ta-Yi Chen Central Weather Bureau.
Overview of EarthScope 2010 May, 2010 Slides that may be used and modified for presentations involving instrumentation, data, science results, and education.
Instrumentation Centers: Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory A. Barclay, J. Gaherty, M. Tolstoy Scripps Institution of Oceanography J. Babcock, A. Harding,
The role of gliders in sustained observations of the ocean Deliverable 4.1 or WP 4.
An Earth science program to explore the 4D structure of the North American continent Kaye Shedlock EarthScope Program Director.
An array analysis of seismic surface waves
Large Earthquake Rupture Imaging Using the Back-Projection Technique and Improving the Array Response Function Student Researcher: Kevin Kwong Thesis Advisor:
Disaster Mitigation and Management Organization
Research opportunities using IRIS and other seismic data resources John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Michael Wysession, Washington.
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
Seismograph Networks in China: Present State and Development Program Yun-tai Chen, Gong-wei Zhou and Rui-feng Liu Institute of Geophysics China Earthquake.
USArray Year 10 IRIS CoCom Meeting Chicago April 9-10, 2012.
Some Thoughts on IMW And Opportunity We represent a big area of the ANSS national program Bob Smith Univ. of Utah.
By Tim Ahern, Program Manager IRIS DMS A “Short” Introduction to the IRIS Data Management Center Data Holdings, Data Organization, and Data Access.
“Integrated observational system of systems” (~$200 million) SAFOD: 3.1 km borehole into the San Andreas Fault PBO: 1099 geodetic stations; 81 strainmeter/seismic.
GSN Budget CoCom meeting Chicago April 9-10, 2012.
Large Earthquake Rapid Finite Rupture Model Products Thorne Lay (UCSC) USGS/IRIS/NSF International Workshop on the Utilization of Seismographic Networks.
Summary of seismology component of the course Sources Waves Location Magnitude/Intensity Focal mechanisms Other topics.
A facilities program for collection and distribution of seismological data for research and education related to: Earthquakes Earth Structure Earth Dynamics.
By Tim Ahern, Director of Data Services, IRIS A short introduction to the IRIS Data Management System Data Holdings, Data Organization, and Data Access.
By Tim Ahern, Director of Data Services, IRIS An Overview of IRIS Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology.
THE INGV NATIONAL SEISMIC NETWORK IN 2013 : A dense and high-quality integrated network, a powerful tool for both early warning and investigating earthquake.
Community Activities Budget Justification, Proposal All costs are inflated at 2.5% / year. Costs in years 2 and 4 are higher to hold SITS. Direct Costs:Year.
WiMax Monitoring Systems Felix Lopez Wimax360 Contest Participant – Category #4 Draft Version#1.
eSciDoc Community Model Draft eSciDoc Community Model Overview 1.Introduction 2.Requirements on the Community Model 3.Organizational.
Validation strategy for aerosol retrievals of the future Lorraine Remer and J. Vanderlei Martins Dec
Seismicity of Norway Seismo group, Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Norway Location of stations in the Norwegian National Seismic.
Earth Science Division E RNEST O RLANDO L AWRENCE B ERKELEY N ATIONAL L ABORATORY B ERKELEY L AB EM-01G MEQ Monitoring of Injection at the Tiwi Geothermal.
By Tim Ahern, Program Manager IRIS DMS An Overview IRIS Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology.
10 January 2006AAS EVLA Town Hall Meeting1 The EVLA: A North American Partnership The EVLA Project on the Web
Info-Tech Research Group1 Info-Tech Research Group, Inc. Is a global leader in providing IT research and advice. Info-Tech’s products and services combine.
A brief introduction to NERA – NA3 work package ‘Networking accelerometric networks and strong- motion data users’ Sinan Akkar On behalf of entire NERA-NA3.
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 22 Apr 2016
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
RECENT SEISMIC MONITORING RESULTS FROM THE CENTRAL
Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble, France
Lisa M. LaFlame Steve Cole
Presentation transcript:

IRIS’s Large N Initiative Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 John Hole, Virginia Tech Chair of IRIS Large N Working Group SPATIAL ALIASING

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 IRIS’s current instrumentation and field procedures are ~20 years old this limits the number of instruments per project most earthquake seismology is badly spatially aliased currently limited in the science that we can do new array analysis methods have been developed directly invert or image using the full wavefield huge improvement in resolution is possible but requires data to be not spatially aliased past decades have seen rapid improvements in technology improved instruments are possible improving technology enables new science IRIS’s Large N Initiative

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 “Large N” = 1-2 orders of magnitude more instruments per deployment = unaliased arrays - much less expensive - much simpler deploy & retrieve instrument - much simpler to retrieve data; dirt to desktop solutions - high quality - broadest possible range of applications, from 10 m to 10,000 km transform how we acquire data IRIS’s Large N Initiative SPATIAL ALIASING resolution

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 Large N Example 1: Russia - USA M7.7 earthquake Sea of Okhotsk, Russia 580 km depth recorded on - broadband array - controlled-source array

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 EarthScope IDOR (Idaho-Oregon) 450 km long arrays 8 hour drive time 4WD, some hiking broadband: 85 stations 6 skilled crew 3 months deploy (29 inline) controlled-source: 2555 stations 44 beginners + 6 skilled 3 day deploy

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 EarthScope IDOR (Idaho-Oregon) P PcP Hz 60 s PmS

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 EarthScope IDOR (Idaho-Oregon) P PcP Hz on 4.5 Hz geophones! 60 s more traces than pixels! PmS

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 EarthScope IDOR (Idaho-Oregon) P PcP 1-10 Hz 60 s PmS

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 EarthScope IDOR (Idaho-Oregon) P PcP 1-10 Hz 60 s PmS

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 Large N Example 2: Virginia M5.8 earthquake central Virginia 8 km depth Washington MonumentNational Cathedral North Anna nuclear power plant

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 Aftershock Imaging with Dense Arrays (AIDA) Virginia blue & red: traditional aftershock array 42 3-component some telemetered ~20 people, 3 days green: controlled-source sensors component 30 3-component 7 people, 1 day

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 Aftershock Imaging with Dense Arrays (AIDA) Virginia 200 m spacing

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 Aftershock Imaging with Dense Arrays (AIDA) Virginia 200 m spacing

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 Aftershock Imaging with Dense Arrays (AIDA) Virginia Sumatra-Andaman 2004 M9.0 earthquake Japan HiNET km spacing source back-projection by reverse-time migration Ishii et al., km 30 s420 s resolution ~100 km and ~20 s

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 Aftershock Imaging with Dense Arrays (AIDA) Virginia Wang, Hole et al., in prep. Virginia 2011 M2.9 aftershock AIDA m spacing source back-projection by reverse-time migration resolution ~0.5 km and ~0.05 s 1 km 0 s 0.09 s 0.03 s 0.06 s

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 Today: 1990’s technology broadband ~$35k >100 kg 3-6-hour deployment long period high sensitivity 3-component large memory GPS Texan ~$4k <2 kg 3-minute deployment for Large N: combine the best of both probably some compromises quantity quality

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 Today: 1990’s technology high-quality waveforms high-quality wavefields for Large N: combine the best of both probably some compromises

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 IRIS 5-year proposal for FY14-18 (starts Oct. 2013) sustain the core facilities complete the goals of the EarthScope USArray facilitate evolving science create sustainability beyond 2018 proposal approved by NSF, cooperative agreement being negotiated reduced funding expected IRIS’s Large N Initiative

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 IRIS 5-year proposal for FY14-18 (starts Oct. 2013) sustain the core facilities complete the goals of the EarthScope USArray facilitate evolving science create sustainability beyond 2018 proposal approved by NSF, cooperative agreement being negotiated reduced funding expected in the proposal: IRIS is strongly committed to continue providing existing instrument services global (to 300 s) through to near-surface (to 1000 Hz) and development of Large N develop, purchase, pilot a Large N deployment IRIS’s Large N Initiative

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 plan for implementation (schedule tentative) by early 2014: - develop science objectives, engage stakeholders (workshop May 2012) (Large N Working Group) (webinars, workshop?) - compile needs to enable the objectives (no decisions) - explore technology options and developments (e.g., this meeting) by summer 2014: - make technical decisions, compromises (IRIS governance) - place orders for prototype instruments (~10?) - design integrated systems for technical support, data support IRIS’s Large N Initiative

Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 plan for implementation (schedule tentative) by summer 2015: - test prototype instruments - place place order for prototype array (N = ?) - develop integrated systems for technical support, data support during 2016: - deploy prototype array in pilot project(s) by early 2017: - validate value of Large N system - fund-raising by end of 2018: - place order for multiple large-N systems (MxN = 25,000???) IRIS’s Large N Initiative

SPATIAL ALIASING Hole, Seismic Instrumentation Technology Workshop, June2012 Goal: enable unaliased seismic array deployments completely new science should be enabled by early 2017: - acquire Large N datasets - prove viability of Large N systems - validate value of Large N datasets by 2018: - purchase several Large N systems IRIS’s Large N Initiative