Pollen-mediated Gene Flow in Alfalfa : A three-year summary of field research S. Fitzpatrick, P. Reisen, M. McCaslin Forage Genetics International www.foragegenetics.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SELECTIVE BREEDING VS GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS BY: MR. NIEMIECKI.
Advertisements

Question’s posed to panel What steps do you take to safeguard the purity of your crop/seed production? What steps do you take to safeguard the purity of.
NDSU Agriculture NDSU Policy on Biotech Research & GM Wheat Update Duane Hauck Assistant Director – Ag & Natural Resources NDSU Extension Service.
Developing a Standard test for Lodging Resistance in Alfalfa for North America Debra Sharpee, Gary Hoard, Mark Smith, Dave Miller Pioneer Hi-Bred International.
CONSEQUENCES OF PROPOSED EU LEGISLATION ON THRESHOLDS FOR THE ADVENTITIOUS PRESENCE OF GENETICALLY ENGINEERED (GE) SEEDS. Janet Cotter, Greenpeace Science.
Breeding cross-pollinated crops
HETEROSIS IN HYBRID ALFALFA Steve Wagner, Paul Sun, Mike Velde, and Dan Gardner Dairyland Seed Company.
Inheritance of seed coat color of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun) Mukhlesur Rahman, Muhammad Tahir 1 Department of Plant Science, North.
Breeding and Genetics Tools Dr. Brent Hulke Research Geneticist.
Uwe Stolz NERL Postdoctoral Research Fellow Genomics Workshop, Chicago, IL April 29, 2005 Agricultural Biotechnology: Genomic Approaches to Monitoring.
Michael Schechtman Executive Secretary, AC 21. What will and will not be covered Programmatic activities within and outside government Not a comprehensive.
A Simple Guide to GMO Testing
Genetically Modified Organisms
Agricultural Entomology. What is Agriculture? The cultivation of plants/animals for Human Use Includes plants used for : Food (Fruits, vegetables, grains.
GMO Study Committee Iowa State Legislature December 13, 2005 Coexistence and Legal Liability Drew L. Kershen Earl Sneed Centennial Professor University.
Association of Official Seed Certifying Agencies 2008 Insect Resistance Management (IRM) On-Farm Assessment Survey Program.
Managing Quality Chapter 5.
Purdue Ag Summit – September 13, 2002 Larry Svajgr, Executive Director Indiana Crop Improvement Association Maintenance of Product Integrity.
Bill Wiebold Agronomy University Extension. One reason to contract crop sales is to capture value in an identity preserved system.
Safety and Regulation in Agricultural Biotechnology MUPGRET Workshop.
Jane Dever Associate Professor – Cotton Breeder Member, USDA National Genetic Resources Advisory Council Welcome to Hong Kong.
TRANSGENIC:HOW THEY AFFECT ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN NORTH DAKOTA Brad Brummond NDSU Extension Service/ Walsh County 2002.
Use of the Roundup Ready TM Trait to Estimate Selfing in Hand Crosses of Alfalfa Mark McCaslin and Stephen Temple Forage Genetics International.
NDSU Agriculture TRENDS IN THE USE OF CROPS DEVELOPED THROUGH BIOTECHNOLOGY IN THE USA AND THE WORLD BY: Dr. Duane R. Berglund Professor of Plant Science.
Pollen Flow in Wheat Revisited Joel Ransom Extension Agronomist – Cereal Crops.
The Great Plains Canola Germplasm Evaluation System Michael J. Stamm, Kansas State University and Oklahoma State University Table NWCVT Great.
Ag Innovations Program Jeff Tichota Monsanto Technology Development Topics to Discuss – Genuity – Acceleron – SmartStax – Roundup Ready 2 Yield ®
AOSCA 2014 Regional Meetings Report from the AOSCA Certification Requirements and Standards Council.
Key Area 3: Crop protection Unit 3: Sustainability and Interdependence.
SEED QUALITY OF ORGANIC-CERTIFIED CORN HYBRIDS Allen Geyer 1, Peter Thomison 1 *, Deborah Stinner 2, Joseph G. Lauer 4, Leslie Freehill 3, Lori Abendroth.
Gene Flow Through Pollen Drift: A Scientific Perspective Joel Ransom Extension Agronomist – Cereal Crops.
CONVENTIONAL VS. TRANSGENIC: THE SHOWDOWN Robert Hogan, Texas AgriLife Extension; Jason L. Johnson, Texas AgriLife Extension; Jeanne Reeves, Cotton, Incorporated;
Climate and the risk of pests and disease Primary research activities in this area: 1.Participatory evaluations of risk for potato tuber moth and Andean.
Workshop on modern biology & its social impacts 2-5 Dec 2007, Xishuanbanna, Yunnan, China Environmental Impacts of GM Crops for Insect-Resistance Yufa.
Genetically Modified Plants Summary Makes changes to the hereditary material of a living organism Biotechnologies are used to develop plants resistant.
North Dakota Wheat Commission State Meeting December 2010.
Risks and Benefits Associated with Biotechnological/ Pharmaceutical Crops Presented by Dermot Hayes February 22, 2005.
NDSU Extension Analysis of Primary Biotechnology Literature Phil McClean Department of Plant Science North Dakota State University Biotechnology Education.
Genetically Modified Plants By: Amy Chen, Bridget Panych
GMOs A tale of manipulation, monopoly, Monsanto and cheap food Brian Ellis Michael Smith Laboratories UBC October 24, 2008.
Measuring and predicting change in crop wild relative species by Toby Hodgkin and Jozef Turok International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI),
Experimental Design and Data Structure Supplement to Lecture 8 Fall
Hawai’i Public Seed Initiative Seed Saving and Production Basics Growing Seed Crops Russell T. Nagata College of Tropical Agri. and Human Resources Komohana.
Geneflow and persistence Geoff Squire Scottish Crop Research Institute.
Biotechnology Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction Sally McCammon Biotechnology Regulatory Services Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
Almost Everything You Want to Know About Stink Bugs and What You Better Know about Roundup Ready Cotton Certified Crop Advisor Training January 22, 2002.
CROP BREEDING AND IMPROVEMENT
DOW CONFIDENTIAL - Do not share without permission PERFORMANCE OF PHYTOGEN ™ COTTONSEED VARIETIES EXPRESSING WIDESTRIKE ™ INSECT PROTECTION IN 2006 STRIP.
A Brief History of Agricultural Technology Senate District Forum on GMO’s & GMO Labeling Senate District Forum on GMO’s & GMO Labeling Watertown, MA October.
NDSU Agriculture NDSU Biotech Crop Research & Foundation Seedstocks Update.
Crops with Special Traits Herb Ohm Purdue University Implications/Issues: Plant breeding perspective.
Generalities & Qualitative Testing Plans May 8-10, 2006 Iowa State University, Ames – USA Jean-Louis Laffont Kirk Remund.
COEXISTENCE IN NORTH DAKOTA Brad Brummond September 2005.
Crop ImprovementPLS 386 September 9, 2005 Outline of topics: (pp in text) I. Conventional plant breeding II. Methods of breeding III. Breeding.
What does it take to bring a GM crop to market? Alan McHughen UC Riverside
GMO Fact or Fiction?. Fact or Fiction? GMOs are created by injecting chemicals into food AFTER it is harvested Fiction GMOs are developed through genetic.
Grower Awareness of Glyphosate- Resistant Weeds and Resistance Management Strategies for Cotton Production Systems in Mississippi and North Carolina. S.
What do these labels mean to you?. Have you seen these labels? Are there any food labels that could be misleading or meaningless?
What are GMOs? Some technical background on the genetic modification of plants Stuart Brown Associate Professor NYU School of Medicine.
Overview of DAS Quality Assurance Requirements
Genetically Modified Organisms
GMO and agriculture: pest management and how the landscape has changed Midwest and MidContinental Chapter of the Medical Library Association Micheal D.K.
As You sow- So shall You reap.
LibertyLink® Soybean Stewardship & QA
Long-term crop rotations suppress soybean sudden death
Coexistence Coexistence of GM and non-GM cultivations
M. Shen USDA-ARS NCRPIS GEM - December 5,
Genetically Modified Organisms
ROLE OF KEPHIS IN SAFE HANDLING, TRANSFER AND USE OF GMOS.
Earl Creech, Extension Agronomist Utah State University
Presentation transcript:

Pollen-mediated Gene Flow in Alfalfa : A three-year summary of field research S. Fitzpatrick, P. Reisen, M. McCaslin Forage Genetics International

Introduction: Alfalfa gene flow  In nature, alfalfa is cross-pollinated by bees.  Cross-pollination is required for normal seed production and vigor.  Alfalfa does not out-cross to other species in North America (i.e., no gene flow occurs)  Gene flow between alfalfa populations occurs unless controlled by isolation & management.  Cultivated Feral populations  “Cultivar A” “Cultivar B”

Introduction: Varietal purity  Consistent varietal purity is important for all varieties: both traditional and biotech.  Association of Official Seed Certifying Agencies (AOSCA) has set minimum standard for varietal purity:  1.0 % non-variety off-types maximum in certified seed  0.1% non-variety off-types maximum in foundation seed

Introduction: Varietal purity AOSCA minimum standards for isolation*: Field size: < 5 acres Field size: > 5 acres Foundation Class900 ft600 ft Certified Class165 ft50 ft  Standards are based on gene flow studies in which pest resistance genes were used as pollen markers (Brown, et al., 1986); and some state associations have more stringent standards.

Introduction: Varietal purity  The impact of pollen-mediated gene flow on varietal purity has received new attention with the advent of biotech-derived traits.  Biotech traits may be more readily identified than most non-biotech traits.  Adventitious presence (AP) of approved biotech traits in unintended seed lots is an international, national and commercial commerce issue.

Study Objectives  Expand understanding of alfalfa gene-flow dynamics in commercial seed production settings.  Measure gene flow using a newly available pollen-marker system: cp4-epsps transgene + Roundup Ready® trait  Unique, definitive marker gene  Sensitive, high-capacity greenhouse assay Roundup Ready® is a trademark of Monsanto, LLC

Study Objectives (cont.)  Mimic gene flow between seed fields during commercial seed production  Measure flow at 500 feet to 1 mile  Share data and inform alfalfa community:  ASOCA and NAAIC Regulatory Committee have expressed interest in reassessing seed production standards  Seed company quality assurance program development to meet future needs

: Methods  Location: Canyon Co., Idaho  Agronomic management: typical commercial practices for Pacific Northwest  Pollinator: Leafcutter bees  Plot size:  Source plots were 1 or 1.6 A each (+ pollen marker)  Replicated pollen trap plots were 0.3, 0.7, 1.6 or 2.0 A each (no pollen marker)

NOTE: Special precautions and USDA requirements of the study  Roundup Ready alfalfa is regulated by the USDA under the notification acknowledgement process.  Purpose: Containment of test plants to USDA- authorized conditions  The USDA notification process requires: USDA-APHIS authorities review a detailed application and compliance plan and pre-authorize Applicant must follow USDA and state guidelines for isolation, handling and monitoring FGI and Monsanto operated these studies within USDA rules

Experimental details, Isolation Distance 2000 Study2001 Study2002 Study 0 ftSource (1 A)Source (1.6 A)Source (1.0 A) 500 ft4 reps (0.03 A) ft---2 reps ( A) ft4 reps (0.03 A) ft4 reps (0.03 A)2 reps (1.6 A)2 reps (1.0 A) 2000 ft1 rep (2 A) ft (1/2 mi)--- 2 reps (1.0 A) 3960 ft (3/4 mi)--- 2 reps (1.0 A) 5280 ft (1 mi)--- 2 reps (1.0 A)

2000 Study Design Source Plot (with transgene) Trap plot 2000 ft Wheat Bee domicile North 500 ft 1000 ft 1500 ft Area of all trap plots was 0.03 A, except 2000’ trap was 2.0 A. Source plot was 1.0 A. Fallow 2000 ft

2000 Gene Flow Study (actual scale) 2000 ft 500 ft1500 ft1000 ft

2001 Pollen Flow Trial Source Plot (with RR transgene) Trap Plot 900 ft 1500 ft Bee domicile Wheat

2002 Pollen Flow Trial RR 1 mile 1500’ 1/2 mile 3/4 mile Interplot area was planted with various crops and included roadways.

Methods: Greenhouse assay  Seed (progeny) from traps was collected in a grid pattern  Greenhouse grow-out assay used to detect marker gene:  Seedlings + dominant marker survive and, those without marker are killed  + Results were verified by protein assay + marker no marker

Results Isolation Distance 2000 Study2001 Study2002 Study Mean 500 ft1.39 (1.72) (1.72) 900 ft (0.34) (0.34) 1000 ft0.32 (0.45) (0.45) 1500 ft0.07 (0.17)0.13 (0.17)0.03 (0.06)0.08 (0.13) 2000 ft0.00 (0.05) (0.05) 2640 ft (1/2 mi) (0.02) 3960 ft (3/4 mi) (0.01) 5280 ft (1 mi) (0.01) Seed tested per distance 14,75041,25032,400 Table. Percent observed gene flow and upper bound value of the 99.9% confidence interval (in parentheses)

Results: Gene Flow Decay Curve 99.9% C.I. Values: Y CI = (4x10 6 )(X ), R 2 =0.97

Summary  Spatial isolation methods are effective in controlling pollen-mediated gene flow.  Stringency required for varietal purity (% off- type threshold) may be used to calculate minimum field isolation required.  This data may be used to set reasonable and informed seed field isolation standards for the production of high quality conventional and biotech alfalfa seed products.

Acknowledgements  NAAIC Regulatory Affairs Committee  Monsanto  Glen Rogan, Regulatory Technology Manager  Michael Horak and Todd Pester, Ecological Technology Center  Kirk Remund, SeedCalc3 statistical program  Details of studies are published on- line at: foragegenetics.com ALFALFA