No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) An Overview. Resources Policy Guidance NCLB Brochures
Advertisements

Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
No Child Left Behind The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), also known as the “No Child Left Behind Act,” will have.
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
No Child Left Behind. ALL students will attain proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by ALL limited English students will become.
No Child Left Behind The New Age: No Child Left Behind.
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
Coal City Unit District #1 Title I Parent Meeting.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
The Special Education Leadership Training Project January, 2003 Mary Lynn Boscardin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Preston C. Green, III, Ed.D., J.D., Associate.
Assessment & Accountability TEP 128A March 7, 2006.
The Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test Michele Hunter Supervisor of Curriculum and Instruction Mobile County Public Schools.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Module 4 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 4 Explain the current official federal and state standards, including professional and accrediting groups.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Contemporary Issues October 20, Technology Report Presentations Introducing…… 1. Sarah!!!! 2. Allison!!!! Clap! Clap! Clap! Applause!!!!
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Presenters: Emily & Lily Professor: Dr. James C. Lawlor Date: July 23rd.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001 Public Law
The Do’s and Don’ts of High-Stakes Student Achievement Testing Andrew Porter Vanderbilt University August 2006.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Jill Daignault ED 613 Unit III Assignment.
No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind  NCLB Overview  Assessment and Accountability Requirements  Educator Quality.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Greathen Derenne EDU 536.  All students fill out a Home Language Survey when they register. There is a box to check about which language is spoken at.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
NCLB. Introduction Increased federal mandates and requirements on states Increased federal funding to states by almost 25% from the previous year Movement.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
No Child Left Behind Title I Newport News Public Schools.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
The Every Student Succeeds Act Highlights of Key Changes for States, Districts, and Schools.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
No Child Left Behind Passed by Congress in 2001 A reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
6/14/2016 “A Horse of a Different Color” No Child Left Behind and Accountability The State Testing Program Louisiana.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
Types of Statewide Assessments Currently Used in Grades 3-8.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
No Child Left Behind.
Analysis of No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
EDN Fall 2002.
Presentation transcript:

No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education

Introduction to the Presentation Prior to beginning this presentation, you should have read Chapter 8 of Yell’s (2006) The Law and Special Education, 2nd Edition Prior to beginning this presentation, you should have read Chapter 8 of Yell’s (2006) The Law and Special Education, 2nd Edition Upon completion of this presentation, you should be able to summarize the implications of the NCLB in terms of students with disabilities Upon completion of this presentation, you should be able to summarize the implications of the NCLB in terms of students with disabilities

Development of NCLB Elementary & Secondary Education Act (1965) created Title I for “disadvantaged students” Elementary & Secondary Education Act (1965) created Title I for “disadvantaged students” National Education Summits resulted in National Educational Standards Improving America’s Schools Act (1994) implemented standards-based education nationwide

Purpose of NCLB Ensures that students in public school reach learning goals in safe classrooms with well-prepared teachers Ensures that students in public school reach learning goals in safe classrooms with well-prepared teachers All students at 100% proficiency levels within 12 years ( ) All students at 100% proficiency levels within 12 years ( ) Close achievement gaps Close achievement gaps Adequate yearly progress (AYP) Adequate yearly progress (AYP) Highly qualified teachers

Structure of NCLB Title I - disadvantaged and low-income students; Reading First Title I - disadvantaged and low-income students; Reading First Title II - highly qualified teachers and principals Title II - highly qualified teachers and principals Title III - limited English proficient and immigrant students Title IV - drug and violence prevention Title V - research-based instructional practices Title VI - local control of funds; state assessment

Major Principle of NCLB - Accountability Statewide standards (reading, math, & science) Statewide assessments (95% of students; disaggregate scores; annual report cards) Students with disabilities (testing accommodations - based on 504 plan or IEP, alternate assessments 1%)

Major Principle of NCLB - Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress Reading and math; Grades 3-8 Reading and math; Grades % proficiency by % proficiency by Assessments + another academic measure of progress (e.g., graduation rates) Assessments + another academic measure of progress (e.g., graduation rates) Entire student body + students w/ disabilities subgroup Entire student body + students w/ disabilities subgroup

Major Principle of NCLB - Accountability School Meets AYP? Closing gap between lowest and highest performing students = rewards Closing gap between lowest and highest performing students = rewards Outstanding progress for 2 years = rewards Outstanding progress for 2 years = rewards School Fails AYP? Technical assistance plan; Technical assistance plan; 2 years = technical assistance + school choice option 2 years = technical assistance + school choice option 3 years = technical assistance + school choice option + supplemental services 3 years = technical assistance + school choice option + supplemental services

Major Principle of NCLB - Accountability School Fails AYP? 4 years = technical assistance + school choice option + supplemental services + corrective actions 4 years = technical assistance + school choice option + supplemental services + corrective actions 5 years = technical assistance + school choice option + supplemental services + major restructuring 5 years = technical assistance + school choice option + supplemental services + major restructuring District Fails AYP? Improvement plan Improvement plan State Fails AYP? Corrective actions Corrective actions

Major Principle of NCLB- Scientifically Based Instruction Application of rigorous, systematic, & objective procedures to obtain relevant knowledge Reading First - cornerstone of NCLB Phonemic awareness Phonemic awareness Phonics Phonics Vocabulary development Vocabulary development Fluency Fluency Comprehension Comprehension What Works Clearinghouse

Major Principle of NCLB - Highly Qualified General education - Core content areas by (Bachelor’s degree at minimum; Full state teacher certification/licensure; & Pass state- administered tests) Special education - highly qualified in special education + core content areas taught; MSD - special education + basic elementary curriculum Paraprofessionals - high school diploma + 2 years of college/associate’s degree/pass state test