District Testing Report: Analyzing The Data Danielle M. Shanley Director of Curriculum and Instruction October 17, 2011 New Milford School District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
Advertisements

Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Knowledge is Power Pitt County Schools Title I Workshop.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.
1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Jefferson Township Public Schools Spring 2007 Testing Analysis Presented to: Jefferson Township Board of Education Presented by: Mary K. Thornton, Ph.D.
Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2013 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Review of NCLB Testing For Fair Lawn Board of Education and Public---October 2012 N.J.A.C. 6A:8-4.3(a) Accountability “Chief school administrators shall.
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Analysis of Student Performance on Assessments
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 TEST SCORE PRESENTATION.
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
How are we doing? Where are we going? How are we doing? Where are we going?
Title I Parent Information Session Applegate School Laura Donovan School.
Seaford School District Annual Parent Meeting 1. Title I Funding and Programs Parent Meeting Agenda Title I Program Presentation Document Review Parent.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District December 16, 2010.
State Test Results & AYP Status Shelton School District SY Pam Farr, Director of Teaching & Learning Gail Straus, Director of ECE & Federal Programs.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Integrating Success The Transition of All Students From High School to College November 2007 Iowa Educational Research & Evaluation Association Annual.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Quality Annual Assurance Report 2005 What you believe is what you achieve.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge Science 2015 Carmela Triglia.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
District Assessment Report School Year.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
EDU 4245 Class 5: Achievement Gap (cont) and Diagnostic Assessments.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
NJASK 3-5 Report Sean Siet Director of Curriculum and Instruction October 20, 2011.
Loretta L. Radulic, Assistant Superintendent Roxbury Township Public Schools October State Assessment Results and Analysis.
EHT Grades K to 2, Thanks and Congratulations! You Accomplished! Pacing guides based on NJCCS! Quarterly tests! Ton of work for NJ PASS! Professionalism!
Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge
Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
PARCC RESULTS: PRESENTATION FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT OCTOBER 2, 2018
Presentation transcript:

District Testing Report: Analyzing The Data Danielle M. Shanley Director of Curriculum and Instruction October 17, 2011 New Milford School District

The State of NJ requires LEAs to publically present test data, with attention to each subgroup. Overview of the 2011 district test results on New Jersey standardized tests, with some historical analysis. Comparison of New Milford schools to State averages and districts in similar District Factor Groupings (DFG), a measure of average household income and educational level, ranked A – I, with A being most impoverished and I being most affluent. New Milford’s DFG is an “FG” grouping. Other Bergen County FGs include: Edgewater, Fair Lawn, Hasbrouck Heights, Fort Lee, Maywood, Midland Park, Rutherford and Woodridge.

NCLBNo Child Left Behind Act AYPAdequate Yearly Progress NJASKNew Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge HSPAHigh School Proficiency Assessment APAAlternative Proficiency Assessment LEPLimited English Proficient SESpecial Education AHSA Alternative High School Assessment

 Subgroup = One of 40 groups identified within the whole group tested.  A subgroup must have 30 students (n=30) in it to be measured for AYP.  Common sub groups are Special Education, Limited English Proficient, Impoverished, Ethnic, Racial groups etc.  State changed benchmark scores for making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)  Anticipating changed process of evaluation, with the focus shifting to growth of “cohorts” instead of year to year growth of different groups of students.

Content Area Grade SpanStarting * Language Arts (LAL) Elementary (Gr. 3-5) Middle (Gr. 6-8) High School (Gr. 11) MathElementary (Gr. 3-5) Middle (Gr. 6-8) High School (Gr. 11) NJ Reset the benchmark NJ State Benchmarks for Adequate Yearly Progress (Updated November 2009) Notice Increase

GRADE% Partially Prof.% Proficient% Advanced Prof. Grade 3 Berkley (71) Gibbs (91) DFG STATE Grade 4 Berkley (47) Gibbs (90) DFG STATE Grade 5 Berkley (74) Gibbs (84) DFG STATE

Mathematics

GRADE% Partially Prof.% Proficient% Advanced Prof. Grade 3 Berkley (72) Gibbs (91) DFG STATE Grade 4 Berkley (50) Gibbs (90) DFG STATE Grade 5 Berkley (76) Gibbs (84) DFG STATE

GRADE % Partially Proficient% Proficient % Advanced Proficient Grade 6 DEOMS (167) DFG STATE Grade 7 DEOMS (179) DFG STATE Grade 8 DEOMS (155) DFG STATE

Mathematics

GRADE % Partially Proficient% Proficient % Advanced Proficient Grade 6 DEOMS (167) DFG STATE Grade 7 DEOMS (179) DFG STATE Grade 8 DEOMS (157) DFG STATE

GRADE % Partially Proficient% Proficient % Advanced Proficient Grade 4 Berkley (50) Gibbs (90) DFG STATE Grade 8 DEOMS (157) DFG STATE NJASK Sections 4 & 8 - Science

GRADE % Partially Proficient% Proficient % Advanced Proficient NMHS Total Students (165) DGF State Results for BIOLOGY Competencies

Must meet Benchmark score to making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 92% Language Arts 86% Math Banking of Scores began in 2009 (w/graduating class of 2010) Students have 3 opportunities to “pass” the HSPA in addition to AHSA SRA changed to more rigorous AHSA process State Testing Parameters for HSPA

GRADE 11% Partially Proficient % Proficient% Advanced Proficient NMHS (168) DFG State

Mathematics

GRADE 11 % Partially Proficient % Proficient% Advanced Proficient NMHS (168) DFG State

Implemented Connected Math Grades 6 and 7 Implemented Everyday Math Grade 4 Intensive Training, New Curriculum, New Textbooks and Math Manipulatives Added Position - Reading Specialist Providing Writers Workshop Intensive Training K-8 Professional Development for teachers on the National Common Core Standards : English Language Arts Mathematics Reading and Writing in the Content Area Classrooms

K-12 Program Improvements Working to REVAMP the ELA program 6-12 to promote more thematic and interdisciplinary units based on essential questions. Socratic Seminar and DBQ Study in Social Studies New Science Curriculum K-12 Study Island Junior Courses Middle School Schedule Modifications – Classrooms Without Walls 25 New Courses offered at the HS and MS

RESEARCH BASED reading, writing, math and science programs EFFECTIVE and meaningful professional development for all teachers Consistency of programs, materials and teacher training Development of common benchmark assessments

NEVER lose sight of authentic assessments, opportunities for classrooms without walls and the learning that takes place in the non-tested areas: Arts and Music, Global Studies, World Language, Technology, Engineering, Business, Future Educators, Experiential and Service Learning, and Civics.

Students (2) # Partially Proficient # Proficient # Advanced Proficient Language Arts Literacy 2 Math 2

Students (3) # Partially Proficient # Proficient # Advanced Proficient Language Arts Literacy 21 Math 111

Students (1) # Partially Proficient # Proficient # Advanced Proficient Language Arts Literacy 1 Math 1

Students (1) # Partially Proficient # Proficient # Advanced Proficient Language Arts Literacy 1 Math 1 Science 1

Students (1) # Partially Proficient # Proficient # Advanced Proficient Language Arts Literacy 1 Math 1 Science 1

NCLB and Making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

No Child Left Behind Act 2001 Signed into law on January 8, 2002 Bi-partisan initiative to increase student achievement Developed by politicians, not teachers NCLB represented some of the most significant changes to the Elementary and Secondary Schools Act (ESEA) since its enactment in 1965 NCLB contains four major education reforms: ► Increased focus on accountability ► Increased flexibility and local control ► Expanded educational options for parents, and ► Focus on research-based methods and practices

ESEA is up for reauthorization, but the “suggested improvements” are still focused purely on mathematics and language arts achievement measured by standardized tests, with no recognition of, attention to or funding for the other critical content areas. NCLB UPDATES

Goal:All students will be assessed 95% of each student group must participate in the assessment process Students enrolled for <1 year will not be included in the accountability process Students with severe disabilities must be assessed utilizing the APA Out-of-district students are included in their home schools’ accountability (we don’t educate these children) LEP students must also be assessed Guidelines for Assessing AYP

Student progress is also assessed by student sub-groups: Ethnicity: American Indian, Asian, Black, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, Other Income: Economically Disadvantaged/Non- Economically Disadvantaged LEP: Limited English Proficient Special Education

How to “MAKE” AYP 1.Meet the participation expectation of 95% AND 2. Meet the Proficiency Benchmarks in each of the subgroup, in each of the content areas (40 out of 40 sub categories in total) OR 3. Meet Calculations for Safe Harbor = 10% reduction in Partial Proficiency from the prior year

Content AreaGrade Span Starting Point Language Arts Literacy Elementary (Grades 3-5) MathematicsElementary (Grades 3-5)

NJ Department of Education Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Status Under the NCLB Accountability Requirements: 2011 Berkley Street School (40/40 indicators met) 95% Participation Rate Made AYP Benchmark Made Safe Harbor LALMALALMALALMA Total PopulationYes Students w/DisabilitiesYes No Yes Limited Eng Prof. WhiteYes African American Asian/Pacif. IslanderYes HispanicYes Economically Disadvantaged

NJ Department of Education Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Status Under the NCLB Accountability Requirements: 2011 Gibbs Elementary School (40/40 indicators met) 95% Participation Rate Made AYP Benchmark Made Safe Harbor LALMALALMALALMA Total PopulationYes Students w/DisabilitiesYes NoYes Limited Eng Prof. WhiteYes African American Asian/Pacif. IslanderYes Hispanic Economically Disadvantaged

Content AreaGrade Span Starting Point Language Arts Literacy Middle School (Grades 6-8) MathematicsMiddle School (Grades 6-8)

NJ Department of Education Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Status Under the NCLB Accountability Requirements: 2011 David E Owens Middle School (40/40 indicators met) 95% Participation Rate Made AYP Benchmark Made Safe Harbor LALMALALMALALMA Total PopulationYes NoYes Students w/DisabilitiesYes No Yes Limited Eng Prof. WhiteYes NoYes African American Asian/Pacif. IslanderYes HispanicYes Econom. DisadvantagedYes No Yes

Content AreaGrade Span Starting Point Language Arts Literacy High School (Grade 11) MathematicsHigh School (Grade 11)

NJ Department of Education Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Status Under the NCLB Accountability Requirements: 2011 High School (40/40 indicators met) 95% Participation Rate Made AYP Benchmark Made Safe Harbor LALMALALMALALMA Total PopulationYes Students w/Disabilities Limited Eng Prof. WhiteYes African American Asian/Pacif. IslanderYes Hispanic Econ. Disadvantaged Banked Class of 2011

ALL FOUR SCHOOLS IN New Milford Made AYP But we will not become complacent!

S.M.A.R.T. Goals for all schools & PLCs focused on Learning and Improved professional practices

 Vertical articulation and review of data with teachers and administration  Analysis of test data by subgroup, with recommendations and follow through on individual instructional decisions  Systematic staff development to increase teachers’ understanding of test format and response construction  District-wide implementation of Professional Learning Communities to increase student achievement. Activities to Promote Progress:

Danielle M. Shanley Director of Curriculum and Instruction Thank you!