1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
Advertisements

School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Jefferson Township Public Schools Spring 2007 Testing Analysis Presented to: Jefferson Township Board of Education Presented by: Mary K. Thornton, Ph.D.
Adequate Yearly Progress 2012 Comfort ISD. Measures Evaluated Reading/ELA – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board Presentation March 25, 2008.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
The Special Education Leadership Training Project January, 2003 Mary Lynn Boscardin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Preston C. Green, III, Ed.D., J.D., Associate.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Greenwood Forest Elementary School Home of the Grizzly Bears! Misty Valley Drive Houston, TX Klein Independent School District.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
WBCSD District Strategic Goals Update August 10, 2015.
1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
Adequate Yearly Progress
OLMOS ELEMENTARY. WHOOOO WE ARE SCHOOL FACTS: ENROLLMENT: 657 RATING: IMPROVEMENT REQUIRED GRADES: PK-5 SPECIAL PROGRAMS: PK, BILINGUAL/DUAL, ALE CAMPUS.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
1 WELCOME! Pocatello/Chubbuck District #25 SIOP Coaches Training.
Welcome and Introductions H.O.B. – Helping Our students “BE” successful!
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Annual Student Performance Report September
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
State and Federal Accountability Old English Consortium Assistant Principals’ Conference October 2009.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Goal 1: To successfully educate all students Objective 3 Identify subgroups and content areas which contributed Identify subgroups and content areas which.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Completed forms may be placed in the box at the back of the room or mailed to C/SAC, Office of Staff Development. Questions? See Dixie at the registration.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.
NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND Adequate Yearly Progress Report August 2009.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Academic Report 2007/2008 AYP.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
Presentation transcript:

1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress

2

3 Idaho Reading Indicator (IRI) Grades K-3. Individual reading test administered three times/year was a new test and is a new baseline Scores: 3 – Benchmark 2 – Strategic 1 – Intensive On Target: –Reach the Spring Benchmark or –Increase the percentage of students meeting Benchmark (3) by 5% from Fall to Spring.

4 13 out of 14 schools met the Benchmark for Kindergarten. Kindergarten

5 12 out of 14 schools met the Benchmark for first grade. First Grade

6 9 out of 14 schools have met the Benchmark for second grade. Second Grade

7 12 out of 14 schools have met the Benchmark for third grade. Third Grade

8 Idaho Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) Reading, language usage, math in grades 3 through 8 and Fall & Spring – Spring only. Science in grades 5, 7, & 10. Given on computer. Used to measure adequate yearly progress (AYP) in the spring. Passing score required for graduation. –Retest opportunity offered four times each year.

9 ISAT DATA The first set of graphs show: The percent of students proficient in grades 3-8 & 10, state and district longitudinal data, based on the NCLB items from the ISAT.

10 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring rd Grade

11 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring th Grade

12 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring th Grade

13 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring th Grade

14 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring th Grade

15 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring th Grade

16 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring th Grade

17 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring Science

18 ISAT DATA The next set of graphs show: The percent of students proficient in grades 3-8 & 10, Spring 2008 school data, based on the NCLB items from the ISAT.

19 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring rd Grade

20 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring th Grade

21 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring th Grade

22 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring th Grade

23 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring th Grade

24 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring th Grade

25 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring th Grade

26 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 ISAT % Proficient based on the NCLB items from the ISAT Spring 2008 Science

27 ISAT DATA The next set of graphs show: The percent of students proficient in grades 3-8 & 10 based on AYP calculations from the ISAT by sub-groups.

28 Percent Proficient by Ethnicity

29 Percent Proficient by Ethnicity

30 Percent Proficient by Special Programs

31 Percent Proficient by Special Programs

32 NCLB and AYP The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act requires that all: students meet the standards for reading and math by schools demonstrate adequate yearly progress (AYP) toward achieving that goal.

33 NCLB and AYP Each state has set incremental benchmarks to reach 100% proficiency by Math requirement: – : 70% students proficient – : 70% students proficient – : 80% students proficient Reading requirement: – : 78% students proficient – : 78% students proficient – : 85% students proficient

34 AYP Incremental Benchmarks Year MATH Intermediate Goals 70% 80% 90% 100% Year READING Intermediate Goals 78% 85% 92% 100%

35 NCLB and AYP Facts Sixth year held accountable for No Child Left Behind (NCLB) / Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). 41 targets to meet proficiency benchmarks. Entire student population – or any one of the subgroups – does not meet targets, school is deemed not to have made AYP. AYP is only one measure of a school’s success.

36 School AYP Accountability

37 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District AYP Status Eight of thirteen elementary schools met AYP. One elementary school is on alert. Seven elementary schools are in School Improvement. All middle schools are in School Improvement. Two of four high schools met AYP. All high schools are in School Improvement.

38 Elementary Schools that Met AYP (and are not in School Improvement) Chubbuck Elementary Ellis Elementary Gate City Elementary Greenacres Elementary Tendoy Elementary

39 Elementary Schools that Met AYP (but are still in School Improvement) Indian Hills Elementary Improvement 2 Reading Tyhee Elementary Improvement 2 Reading Washington Elementary Improvement 1 Reading

40 Elementary School On Alert Edahow Elementary – Alert Reading Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (75.51%) Elementary Schools in School Improvement 1 Lewis & Clark Elementary School – Improvement 1 3 rd Indicator – Language, Improvement 1 Reading, Improvement 1 Math Total Population Language Proficiency (69.32%) Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (72.88%) Economically Disadvantaged Math Proficiency (68.36%) Syringa Elementary School – Improvement 1 Math Economically Disadvantaged Math Proficiency (68.5%)

41 Elementary School in School Improvement 2 Jefferson Elementary School – Improvement 2 Reading, Improvement 1 Math Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (77.16%) Students With Disabilities Reading Proficiency (25.58%) Students With Disabilities Math Proficiency (44.19%) Elementary School in School Improvement 3 Wilcox Elementary School – Improvement 3 Reading Hispanic Reading Proficiency (72.97%) Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (71.76%) Students With Disabilities Reading Proficiency (52%)

42 Middle School in School Improvement 2 Franklin Middle School – Improvement 2 Reading, Improvement 2 Math, Improvement 1 3 rd Indicator-Language Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (72.41%) Students with Disabilities Reading Proficiency (50%) Total Population Language Proficiency (73.24%) Economically Disadvantaged Math Proficiency (54.6%) Students with Disabilities Math Proficiency (30.36%) (missed safe harbor because of SWD Language Proficiency)

43 Middle Schools in School Improvement 3 Hawthorne Middle School – Improvement 3 Reading, Improvement 3 Math American Indian Reading Proficiency (57.58%) Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (75.24%) Students with Disabilities Reading Proficiency (26.32%) Students with Disabilities Math Proficiency (17.54%) Kinport Academy – Improvement 3 Reading, Improvement 3 Math Total Population Reading Proficiency (41.67%) Total Population Math Proficiency (33.33%)

44 Middle School in School Improvement 5 Irving Middle School – Improvement 3 Reading, Improvement 5 Math Students with Disabilities Reading Proficiency (57.58%) Hispanic Math Proficiency (67.5%) (missed Safe Harbor because of Hispanic Language Proficiency)

45 High Schools that Met AYP (but are still in School Improvement) Century High School Improvement 1 3 rd Indicator – Graduation Rate, Improvement 1 Reading, Improvement 2 Math New Horizons High School Improvement 2 Reading, Improvement 2 Math

46 High Schools in School Improvement Highland High School – Improvement 1 Math Economically Disadvantaged Math Proficiency (59.26%) Pocatello High School – Improvement 1 Math Total Population Math Proficiency (65.97%) White Math Proficiency (66%)

47 District AYP Accountability

48 District Classified in Improvement Improvement 1 3 rd Indicator-Graduation Rate, Improvement 3 Reading, Improvement 1 Math LEP Reading Proficiency (54.55%) (missed Safe Harbor because of LEP Language Proficiency) Students with Disabilities Reading Proficiency (46.88%) LEP Math Proficiency (56.82%) Students with Disabilities Math Proficiency (42.37%)

49 What Plans Are Being Made for Improvement? Implement Total Instructional Alignment Implement Professional Learning Communities Continue to expand ‘Response to Intervention’ (RtI) model –Continue to expand and offer interventions Continued use of Instructional Reading & Math Coaches Strengthen the District’s Professional Development Offerings –Effective Instructional Strategies –Highly Effective Questioning –Framework for Understanding Poverty –Cultural Competency Training –Love & Logic –Reach Out Continue to focus improvement efforts through the School Improvement planning process (Effective Schools Research) High School / Middle School Redesign After school English and math help sessions for middle school After school math help sessions for high school Continued use of Academic Success Coaches

50 CELEBRATE! AYP is one indicator of school success. The Pocatello/Chubbuck School District was selected for the “What Parents Want” award by School Match Based on: competitive test scores accreditation recognition for excellence by a national foundation competitive teacher salaries average instructional expenditures library/media services class size Only 16% of the nation’s school districts have received this recognition *We are continuing to Maximize Student Learning*

51 CELEBRATE! AYP is one indicator of school success. Pocatello High School and Lewis & Clark Elementary School designated as “FastTrack” Gold Cap Schools awarded by Scientific Learning for exemplary implementation of a computer-based program that helps improve reading, attention and memory PHS had a record-setting five academic state championships Each of the district’s three high schools had academically successful athletic teams *We are continuing to Maximize Student Learning*

52 CELEBRATE! AYP is one indicator of school success. Franklin Middle School implemented a National Junior Honor Society induction of 102 students who met the rigorous academic, leadership and citizenship criteria Over 300 high school students took concurrent enrollment courses 67 high school seniors graduated with highest honors in 2008 *We are continuing to Maximize Student Learning*

53 CELEBRATE! Students excelled at the regional, state and national level: Irving Middle School science students were recognized for their exemplary performance at the Science Olympiads competition Four elementary students qualified for the State Geography Bee and one qualified for the National Geography Bee A Franklin Middle School student received the Spirit of Idaho Award from Congressman Mike Crapo A Hawthorne Middle School student placed 11th in the state MATHCOUNTS competition Two students from Century High School placed seventh in a National Debate Competition A parent and teacher in the district’s Head Start program were selected for awards by the Region 10 Head Start Association *We are continuing to Maximize Student Learning*