PARKLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL DISTRICT REPORT PSSA AND NCLB SEPTEMBER 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report July 22, 2009.
Advertisements

MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Hamilton County Department of Education NCLB Results 2009.
PSSA and the Girard School District An analysis of the 2009 results and their implications. Katrina Johnston ED520INA.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Upper Darby School District Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 2010 Performance.
DATA FOR SCHOOL YEAR Palisades School District Data Presentation Education Programs and Services Meeting September 14, 2011.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Mia Belletieri ESOL Specialist Parkway Manor Elementary/Parkland High School.
PSSA & Keystone Exams Pa School Performance Profile
Accountability State and Federal Ratings August 11, 2009 Board Presentation 1.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
2011 – 12 AYP & PSSA. AYP = Adequate Yearly Progress Requirement of NCLB (No Child Left Behind) Federal Legislation that will require 100% of students.
Reynolds Middle School The Path to Success. Who are We? Reynolds Middle School is a culturally diverse inner city middle school located in Lancaster,
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September
Park County School District #6 MAP and PAWS DATA REPORT FOR
Overview of the Title I Program at [school name] Presenter Date Location.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Welcome to 5 th Grade! Mrs. Bodnar Room Open House Schedule: 7:00-7:20 – Video Presentation 7:20-7:50 – Session 1 7:55-8:20 – Session 2.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Annual Student Performance Report September
Urbana School District #116 AYP Status Report 2009 Report to the Board of Education October 6, 2009 Donald Owen, Assistant Superintendent.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
Using Assessments to Plan for Learning MEAP and MME Data Collection.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
School Report Cards Grades 3 through 12 Missy Wagner Curriculum Coordinator Theresa Gray School Improvement Program Coordinator Data retrieved/prepared.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2012 AYP Presentation.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API December 12, 2011.
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API September 13, 2010.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Broken Arrow Public Schools District Assessment/Accountability Report
Presentation transcript:

PARKLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL DISTRICT REPORT PSSA AND NCLB SEPTEMBER 2012

2012 DISTRICT THEME

PENNSYLVANIA SYSTEM OF SCHOOL ASSESSMENT 2012 DISTRICT RESULTS BY GRADE PARKLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT

2012 PSSA READING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESULTS BY GRADE

2012 PSSA MATH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESULTS BY GRADE

2012 PSSA WRITING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESULTS BY GRADE

2012 PSSA SCIENCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESULTS BY GRADE

PENNSYLVANIA SYSTEM OF SCHOOL ASSESSMENT LONGITUDINAL DATA YEAR TO YEAR BY GRADE

DISTRICT RESULTS GRADE 3 – READING AND MATH

DISTRICT RESULTS GRADE 4 – READING AND MATH

DISTRICT RESULTS GRADE 4 - SCIENCE

DISTRICT RESULTS GRADE 5 – READING AND MATH

DISTRICT RESULTS GRADE 5 - WRITING

DISTRICT RESULTS GRADE 6 – READING AND MATH

DISTRICT RESULTS GRADE 7 – READING AND MATH

DISTRICT RESULTS GRADE 8 – READING AND MATH

DISTRICT RESULTS GRADE 8 - WRITING

DISTRICT RESULTS GRADE 8 - SCIENCE

DISTRICT RESULTS GRADE 11 – READING AND MATH

DISTRICT RESULTS GRADE 11 - WRITING

DISTRICT RESULTS GRADE 11 - SCIENCE

PENNSYLVANIA SYSTEM OF SCHOOL ASSESSMENT LONGITUDINAL DATA BY COHORTS OF STUDENTS

DISTRICT RESULTS FOR THE PRESENT GRADE 5 STUDENTS

DISTRICT RESULTS FOR THE PRESENT GRADE 6 STUDENTS

DISTRICT RESULTS FOR THE PRESENT GRADE 7 STUDENTS

DISTRICT RESULTS FOR THE PRESENT GRADE 8 STUDENTS

DISTRICT RESULTS FOR THE PRESENT GRADE 9 STUDENTS

DISTRICT RESULTS FOR THE PRESENT GRADE 10 STUDENTS

DISTRICT RESULTS FOR THE PRESENT GRADE 11 STUDENTS

DISTRICT RESULTS FOR THE PRESENT GRADE 12 STUDENTS

REVIEW AND UPDATE OF THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND PROGRAM FOR THE 2012 TESTING YEAR

A.Y.P. TARGETS ATTENDANCE RATE 90% 90%90%90% 90% GRADUATION RATE 85% 85%85%85%85% PARTICIPATION RATE 95% 95%95%95%95% READING PROFICENCY63%72%81%91%100% MATH PROFICIENCY56%67% 78%89%100%

MEETING A.Y.P. IN 2012 Grade Span Method Elementary LevelGrades 3 – 4 – 5 Middle School LevelGrades 6 – 7 – 8 High School LevelGrade11 District LevelEL – MS – HS

A.Y.P. STUDENT SUBGROUPS (GROUPS OF 40 OR MORE STUDENTS) All Students Ethnic Groups WhiteAsian/Pacific Islander BlackAmerican Indian Hispanic/LatinoMulti-Cultural Special Education StudentsIEP Limited English Proficiency StudentsLEP Economically Disadvantaged Students

PARKLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2012 A.Y.P. RESULTS SEPTEMBER 2012

ATTENDANCE RATE ElementaryGrades K Cetronia96.4%95.6% 96.1% Fogelsville95.9%95.7% 95.9% Ironton96.4%96.2% 96.0% Jaindl-95.9% Kernsville96.1% 96.3% Kratzer96.3%96.0% 96.3% Parkway Manor96.3%96.4% 96.6% Schnecksville96.2%95.8% 95.3%

ATTENDANCE RATE Middle School Grades Orefield96.0%95.6%95.5% Springhouse96.0%95.9% District District96.2%95.9%

GRADUATION RATE High School High School97.4%97.3%95.4% District District97.4% 95.4%

PARTICIPATION RATE Elementary Grades 3-5 ReadingMath Cetronia100%99.7% Fogelsville100% Ironton100% Jaindl100% Kernsville100% Kratzer100% Parkway Manor100% Schnecksville100% District100%

PARTICIPATION RATE Middle School Grades 6-8 ReadingMath Orefield99.9% Springhouse99.9%99.8% District99.9% High School Grade 11 ReadingMath High School99.7%99.6% District99.6%99.5%

READING PROFICIENCY Elementary Grades 3 – Cetronia86.1%86.5%84.8% Fogelsville74.5%79.1%82.5% Ironton82.1%78.8%78.4% Jaindl-75.1%75.9% Kernsville79.5%79.2%83.6% Kratzer69.2%70.6%76.6% Parkway Manor83.7%88.7%84.4% Schnecksville78.6%86.5%77.5% District79.0%80.6%80.4%

READING PROFICIENCY Middle School Grades 6 – Orefield87.6%88.3%85.4% Springhouse89.6%89.5%87.8% District88.1%88.9%86.4% High School Grade High School82.5%82.3%82.4% District82.5%81.5%82.1%

MATH PROFICIENCY Elementary Grades 3 – Cetronia90.4%87.5%88.9% Fogelsville84.2%92.0%90.0% Ironton91.2%87.2%83.2% Jaindl-83.4%83.6% Kernsville87.6%87.4%88.9% Kratzer78.2%79.4%82.0% Parkway Manor89.0%91.7%90.4% Schnecksville87.6%90.8% District86.6%87.0%

MATH PROFICIENCY Middle School Grades 6 – Orefield93.6%93.1%92.4% Springhouse93.1%91.9%93.2% District92.8%92.6%92.4% High School Grade High School78.8%77.8%79.4% District76.9%77.3%79.0%

2012 A.Y.P. STATUS ElementaryA.Y.P. Status CetroniaMet A.Y.P. FogelsvilleMet A.Y.P. IrontonWarning* JaindlMet A.Y.P. KernsvilleMet A.Y.P. KratzerMet A.Y.P. Parkway ManorMet A.Y.P. SchnecksvilleMet A.Y.P. *Based on Reading Performance for IEP Students

2012 A.Y.P. STATUS Middle SchoolA.Y.P Status OrefieldMet A.Y.P. SpringhouseMet A.Y.P. High SchoolA.Y.P. Status Parkland High School School Improvement II * **Based on Math Performance Scores for IEP Students & Reading Performance Scores for Economically Disadvantaged Students DistrictA.Y.P. Status Parkland School DistrictMet A.Y.P.

THE ULTIMATE GOAL STUDENT SUCCESS HELPING EVERY CHILD PERFORM TO THE BEST OF THEIR ABILITY

2012 PSSA READING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESULTS BY GRADE

2012 PSSA MATH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESULTS BY GRADE