1 The Ewing Public Schools 2011-12 Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Advertisements

2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
AMOs 101 Understanding Annual Measurable Objectives Office of Educational Accountability Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2012.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Rhode Island Accountability Process Revisions for School Years 2015 and 2016 A Presentation to the Accountability 3.0 Statewide Webinar March 27, 2015.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Testing Requirements of NCLB test annually in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8 test at least once in reading and mathematics.
Overview of the Idaho Five Star Rating System Dr. TJ Bliss Director of Assessment and Accountability
4 Principles of ESEA Flexibility 1 January College-and-Career-Ready Expectations for All Students ( ) 2.State-Developed Differentiated Recognition,
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
SIP Training Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 29, 2012.
DLT September 28, State Indicators and Rating for OFCS (have) Key Factors and Points to Keep in Mind (have) This power point presentation (will.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2010 Results Leslie Wilson, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability and Assessment July 20, 2010 State.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Contractors’ Meeting March 4, 2013 Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D.
Collecting data & information Talking with teachers, administrators, service providers Progress Monitoring Consolidated Planning /Use of Data Alternative.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Annual Student Performance Report September
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION DECEMBER 8, 2015.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
Accountability Scorecards Okemos Board of Education September 2013.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC Results: Year One Belleville Public schools January 25, 2016.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS DECEMBER 16, 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE NETCONG SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER 15, 2015 Dr. Gina Cinotti, CSA.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
NORTH CAROLINA ESEA Flexibility Request Globally Competitive Students (GCS 1) 1Wednesday, February 1, 2012.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
OFFICE OF CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report
PARCC RESULTS: PRESENTATION FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT OCTOBER 2, 2018
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather
Presentation transcript:

1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent

2 Public Presentation of the Formal Report on NCLB Submitted to the Board on November 26, 2012

What Is Our Status? All Ewing Public Schools are Non-Categorized

Revised NCLB Waiver The State of New Jersey was awarded an NCLB waiver in the spring of The revised NCLB waiver:  Redefines a new Accountability Metric (Priority, Focus, Reward and Non-Categorized Schools)  Revises ‘School Score Card’ to a new Performance Report  Transitions from AYP/Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) to Performance Targets  Utilizes Growth Model to define student progress  Creates new data collection and analysis systems

Accountability Metric The NCLB Waiver categorizes schools as:  Priority  Focus  Reward  Non-Categorized

Accountability Metric Priority Schools:  The lowest performing schools across the State with regard to absolute achievement or graduation outcomes (<60%) and those that are persistently low achieving (approximately 75 across the State) Focus Schools:  The schools who demonstrate large within-district variance in between the highest and lowest performing subgroups

Accountability Metric Reward Schools:  Recognizes, celebrates and rewards schools with high overall and subgroup achievement levels and those that are demonstrating great progress Non-Categorized Schools:  Schools who do not fall into the other categories

Performance Targets The revised NCLB waiver transitions from Annual Measurable Targets to Performance Targets:  Equal annual increments are established, reducing by 50% the partially-proficient students in 6 years with 2011 results serving as baseline data

Performance Targets Equal increments are established by:  English Language Arts and Math  School  District  State  Subgroups

Performance Target Established the Statewide goal of:  95% Participation Rate  90% Attendance Rate  90% Performance Target (95% in 2015)

Sample AMO Table PROCESS: DETERMINING SIX-YEAR GOALS Subject Sub Population 2011 Partially Proficient 2011 Partially Proficient divided by 2 Current 2011 % Proficient Annual Equal Increments 2012 P% Target 2013 P% Target 2014 P% Target 2015 P% Target 2016 P% Target 2017 P% Target ELAT ELASE ELAEC ELALEP ELAW ELAB ELAH ELAA ELAN ELAO

Sample Data SubjectELA Sub PopulationSchoolwide 2011 Proficient Partially Proficient Partially Proficient divided by 222 Current 2011 % Proficient56 Annual Equal Increments P% Target Result57.67 Meet TargetNO 2013 P% Target63.34

Performance Determination Met Performance Goal of 90% MET GOAL YES YES* NO Met Progress Target Met Progress Target (Confidence Interval applied ) Missed Progress Target

14 Good News Ewing High School English Language Arts Exceeded the 90% State Performance Target Subgroups: Schoolwide, White, African American and Economically Disadvantaged

15 Good News Students with Disabilities Exceeded Performance Targets at the Elementary Schools

16 Good News Antheil, Lore and Parkway Elementary Schools Exceeded their Performance Targets in all subgroups across English Language Arts and Mathematics

Good News  Math scores continue to increase across the district  Elementary schools’ Mathematics scores exceed/meet English Language Arts scores in all subgroups

District Overview by Building

19 Parkway Elementary School Language Arts  Exceeded/Met Performance Target in all subgroups Mathematics  Exceeded/Met Performance Target in all subgroups

20 Parkway Elementary School English Language Arts  Total Students increased 4.6%  White Students decreased 3%  African-American Students increased 5.7%  Hispanic Students increased 15.5%  Students with Disabilities increased 11.8%  Economically Disadvantaged Students increased 5.3% Mathematics  Total Students increased 8.5%  White Students increased 4.6%  African-American Students increased 10.7%  Hispanic Students increased 10.5%  Students with Disabilities increased 10.8%  Economically Disadvantaged Students increased 8.5%

21 Lore Elementary School Language Arts  Exceeded/Met Performance Target in all subgroups Mathematics  Exceeded/Met Performance Target in all subgroups

22 Lore Elementary School English Language Arts  Total Students increased 11%  White Students increased 4%  African-American Students increased 9.9%  Students with Disabilities increased 9.3%  Economically Disadvantaged Students increased 17.7% Mathematics  Total Students increased 13.5%  White Students increased 6.6%  African-American Students increased 14.7%  Students with Disabilities increased 5.6%  Economically Disadvantaged Students increased 21.2%

23 Antheil Elementary School Language Arts  Exceeded/Met Performance Target in all subgroups Mathematics  Exceeded/Met Performance Target in all subgroups

24 Antheil Elementary School English Language Arts  Total Students increased 6%  White Students increased 6.4%  African-American Students increased 6.5%  Students with Disabilities increased 5.9%  Economically Disadvantaged Students increased 10% Mathematics  Total Students increased 18.8%  White Students increased 16.4%  African-American Students increased 21.4%  Students with Disabilities increased 24.4%  Economically Disadvantaged Students increased 24.6%

25 Fisher Middle School Language Arts  Met* Performance Target, White, Hispanic, Asian subgroups  Did not meet Performance Target Schoolwide, African American, Students with Disabilities and Economically Disadvantaged Mathematics  Demonstrated growth across White, Hispanic, Asian subgroups  Students with Disabilities did not meet the Performance Target

26 Fisher Middle School English Language Arts  Total Students decreased 3.3%  White Students decreased 1.9%  African-American Students decreased 1.6%  Hispanic Students increased 3.9%  Students with Disabilities decreased 1.9%  Economically Disadvantaged Students decreased 3% Mathematics  Total Students increased 1%  White Students increased 4.4%  African-American Students increased.4%  Hispanic Students increased 2%  Students with Disabilities decreased.3%  Economical Disadvantaged Students increased.5%

27 Ewing High School Language Arts  Exceeded/Met Performance Target in all subgroups Mathematics  Demonstrated growth across most subgroups  Students with Disabilities did not meet the Performance Target

28 Ewing High School English Language Arts  Total Students increased 3%  White Students increased 4%  African-American Students increased 3%  Students with Disabilities increased 1.5%  Economically Disadvantaged Students increased 6.5% Mathematics  Total Students increased 1%  White Students increased 2%  African-American Students increased 3%

Next Steps District Focus includes:  New Common Core Standards in English Language Arts and Mathematics  Teaching and Learning  Teacher Evaluation System  Using data to inform instruction  Closing the achievement gap  Student Success in Mathematics  Student Success in Language Arts  Fisher Middle School

Next Steps All district and building level school improvement plans address math curriculum and instruction concerns and the achievement gap  School Professional Development (SPDC - all 5 buildings)  Local Professional Development (LPDC - district)  Title I (elementary schools)  CAPA Recommendations  SIA Recommendations  Curriculum and Achievement Gap recommendations Offer professional development aligned with all district and building level school improvement plans with a focus on the Common Core Standards in English Language Arts and Mathematics Establish common benchmark assessments and data analysis processes in all content areas

Priority #1 Student Success in Mathematics Targeted Subgroups  Total Population  African American  Students with Disabilities  Economically Disadvantaged

Priority #1 Student Success in Mathematics SMART Goals Eighty percent of kindergarten-second grade students will show a 10% increase in grade level benchmark assessments in Number Sense and Numerical Operations by the end of the school year as measured by pre- and post-assessments which are specific to each grade level To increase students’ achievement on the NJ ASK 3-8, HSPA Math by 10%, or meet Performance Targets across Total Population (Grades 3-8, 11), African-American (Grades 3-8, 11), Economically Disadvantaged (Grades 3-8, 11) Students with Disabilities (Grades 3-8, 11)

Questions?