State and Federal Accountability Directors of Special Education October 10, 2013 Region One Education Service Center Office of School Improvement, Accountability,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESEA Flexibility Request Arizona Overview. Background and Overview The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was reauthorized in 2002 and then.
Advertisements

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION UPDATE DECEMBER 7, 2011 AYP DETERMINATIONS ESEA WAIVER.
March 6-7, 2012 Waterfront Hotel - Morgantown, WV Federal Programs Spring Directors Conference Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
Alignment of CCSSO's Accountability Principles and USED's ESEA Flexibility Package: Supporting State Leadership through NCLB Waivers Council of Chief State.
Title I A Requirements under NCLB Public Law Office of Federal Programs September 2014 Oklahoma State Department of Education.
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
ESEA Reauthorization and Waivers AFT Teachers PPC Meeting March 13, 2012 New York, NY.
BIE Flexibility Request Summary of Key Provisions Bureau of Indian Education U.S. Department of the Interior.
ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 1 INTRODUCTION STATES LEADING REFORM States and districts have initiated groundbreaking reforms and innovations.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Integration of State Planning and Reporting Functions Using Indistar® Indistar® Summit March 24-25, 2014 Office of School Improvement Virginia Department.
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Request Frequently Asked Questions April 30, 2012 April 27,
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS Gayle Pauley Assistant Superintendent Special Programs and Federal Accountability
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: ADDRESSING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES AND ENGLISH LEARNERS January 11, 2012.
Vaudeville comedians would often begin a story by stating, "A funny thing happened on the way to the theater".
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011.
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education SECRETARY OF EDUCATION’S PRIORITIES.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents
Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
ESEA FLEXIBILITY REQUEST September 26, 2012 Educational Service District 113 Andy Kelly, Assistant Superintendent, Travis Campbell, Director K12 Office.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY Virginia Federal Programs Statewide Conference.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Contractors’ Meeting March 4, 2013 Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Florida’s Proposal November 14,
ESEA Renewal What does it Mean for Title I? Program Improvement and Family Support Branch Title I Administrative Meeting September 17, 2015.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
Pennsylvania’s ESEA Flexibility Proposal May 23, >
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW September 26, 2011.
Building Capacity to Support High Quality Instruction Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs.
No Child Left Behind Waivers: Promising Ideas from Second Round Applications By Jeremy Ayers and Isabel Owen with Glenda Partee and Theodora Chang.
Priority Schools September 25, Support Team Ms. Annette Barnes, Assistant Commissioner for Public School Accountability Mr. Elbert Harvey, Coordinator.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Federal Accountability Accountability Policy Advisory Committee (APAC) and Accountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) Meeting | March 5, 2012 Texas.
March 30, 2012 Marriott Hotel- Charleston, WV Committee of Practitioners Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student. Brad Neuenswander, Deputy Commissioner KSDE.
July 26,  To move away from the narrowly defined accountability system in NCLB  To have a new accountability system that uses multiple measures.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM September 29, 2011 Carmel Martin, Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
Indiana ESEA Flexibility Waiver. Background -Indiana was a part of cohort 1 -Why cohort 1? -USED Approval February Approval through School.
2016 ©Region One Education Service Center Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Priority and Focus Schools 1003(a) Office of School Improvement, Accountability.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Office of Improvement and Innovation Jo Hannah Ward, Director Office of Improvement and Innovation.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education Tuesday, October 23, 2012 Michael Yudin and Deb Delisle.
What just happened and what’s next? Presenters: Steve Dibb, MDE Debra Landvik, MDE AYP 2011.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS December 2, 2011 House Education Committee Bob Harmon, Assistant Superintendent
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): Overview and Implications for New Jersey Peter Shulman & Jill Hulnick Deputy Commissioner.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT – FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY BECCA MARSH, DIVISION OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT AND SUPPORT TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©2013.
NORTH CAROLINA ESEA Flexibility Request Globally Competitive Students (GCS 1) 1Wednesday, February 1, 2012.
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Freehold Borough Public Schools ESEA/Title I Presentation
Harrison County Elementary Strategic Planning
Federal Program Directors Spring Meeting
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
Inaugural Meeting - September 14, 2012
Collaboration Among Programs December 2016
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
NORTH CAROLINA ESEA Flexibility Request September 12, 2012
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Presentation transcript:

State and Federal Accountability Directors of Special Education October 10, 2013 Region One Education Service Center Office of School Improvement, Accountability, and Compliance

©2013, Region One Education Service Center NCLB Waiver September 30, 2013 Conditional Waiver May 2, 2014 Extension Deadline Principal 2

©2013, Region One Education Service Center NCLB WAIVER 1.Three Principles 2.State Identification of Schools 3.Single Intervention System 4.Funding Flexibility

©2013, Region One Education Service Center Principles Principle 1: College and Career-Ready Expectations for All Students Principle 2: State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Principle 3: Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership

©2013, Region One Education Service Center Principle 1: College and Career Ready Expectations for All Students  Adoption of college and career-ready standards  Transition to college and career-ready standards  Development and administration of annual, statewide, aligned, high-quality assessments that measure student growth

©2013, Region One Education Service Center Principle 2: State Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability and Support  Establishment of ambitious but achievable annual measurable objectives  Identification of reward, focus and priority schools  Provide incentives and supports for other Title I schools  Build SEA, LEA, and school capacity to improve student learning

©2013, Region One Education Service Center Achieving Annual Measurable Objectives

©2013, Region One Education Service Center Principle 2: Identification Priority Schools Focus Schools Reward Schools

©2013, Region One Education Service Center Priority Schools Lowest Five Percent of Title I Schools in Texas Based on proficiency on the statewide reading and mathematics assessments, and graduation rates. Focus Schools Priority Schools Title I Schools Rank Order

©2013, Region One Education Service Center Priority Schools SIG/TTIPS Schools High Schools with a graduation rate < 60% Lowest Performing Schools based on proficiency in reading and mathematics at the all student level in the system safeguards

©2013, Region One Education Service Center Focus Schools Lowest Ten Percent of Title I Schools in Texas Based on system safeguard performance gaps in reading and mathematics for each student group compared to the AMO. Focus Schools Priority Schools Title I Schools Rank Order

©2013, Region One Education Service Center Reward Schools Highest Performing Reading, Mathematics, Graduation District and Campus Distinction Designation Academic Achievement Distinction Designation Campus Top Twenty-Five Percent Distinction Designation Highest Performing in Progress

©2013, Region One Education Service Center Interventions Schools identified as priority and focus will have intervention requirements. Districts should consider targeting and/or identifying resources to be afforded to schools following the identification and notification.

©2013, Region One Education Service Center Principle 3: Supporting Effective Instruction  Development and adoption of guidelines for local teacher and principal evaluation and support systems  Provisions ensuring that LEAs implement teacher and principal evaluation and support systems

©2013, Region One Education Service Center ESEA Funding Flexibility Texas school districts will no longer be required to set aside 20 percent of their Title I federal dollars to provide Supplemental Educational Services (SES) or School Choice transportation. A district will now be free to use those funds on academic intervention programs it deems most effective for its students. Texas school districts identified in school improvement will no longer be required to spend not less than 10 percent of the Title I, Part A funds for district-wide professional development. The use of Title 1 funds on non-Title I campuses is not allowable. Texas campuses identified in school improvement will no longer be required to spend not less than 10 percent of the Title I, Part A campus allocation for providing high-quality professional development to the campus principal and teachers. The use of Title 1 funds on non-Title I campuses is not allowable.

©2013, Region One Education Service Center Resources Texas Education Agency. (September 18, 2013) ESEA Flexibility Request. Retrieved from: Texas Education Agency. (September 30, 2013) Letter from US Secretary of Education Arne Duncan. Retrieved: Texas Education Agency. (September 18, 2013) Letter from Commissioner of Education, Michael Williams. Retrieved: Texas Education Agency. (October 3, 2013) Program Monitoring and Interventions TETN. Texas Education Agency. (October, 2013) School Improvement and Support. Guidance on SIP Fiscal Requirements.

©2013, Region One Education Service Center Contacts Division of Instructional Support Office of School Improvement, Accountability and Compliance Dr. Tina McIntyre, Administrator Belinda S. Gorena, Coordinator Benjamin Macias, Evaluation and Assessment Specialist Kelly VanHee, Specialist