2011 Bridge to Excellence Master Plan Annual Update Review Division of Student, Family, and School Support Office of Finance Division of Academic Reform.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Putting it Together ….Student + Teacher Standards = ?
Advertisements

Superintendents Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2009.
INTENT OF FUNDS. INTENT OF TITLE I A Title I Director salary and benefits Title I Administrative Assistant/Secretary salary and benefits Teachers Educational.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
2012 Bridge to Excellence Master Plan Annual Update Review Division of Student, Family, and School Support Office of Finance Division of Academic Reform.
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding E.S.E.A. (Elementary And Secondary Education Act)
Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP. This presentation is a product of the Maryland State Department of Education 03/03/10 American Recovery and Reinvestment.
STIMULUS AND STATE FISCAL STABILIZATION BOROUGH ASSEMBLY MEETING AUGUST 20, 2009 NANCY WAGNER, FNSBSD SUPERINTENDENT TRACI GATEWOOD, GRANTS AND SPECIAL.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act School Finance Officials April 16, 2009.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
ONTARIO SCHOOL DISTRICT State Revenue and Budget Planning 2010.
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION National Teacher Forum U.S. Department of Education April 30, 2009.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.
ARRA Title I: The chance of a lifetime to address our most vexing challenges Reform and Restore: Implementing the ARRA Michigan Institute for Educational.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
FY RACE TO THE TOP
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Race to the Top Scope of Work Broward County Public Schools.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Cambrian School District Board of Education Presentation April 3, 2014 Local Educational Agency Plan (LEAP)
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Program Evaluation NCLB. Training Objectives No Child Left Behind Program Series: Program Evaluation To provide consistency across the State regarding.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
5/13/10 National Expectations for Learning in Arts Education A brief look at what has come before and how educational context shapes the work ahead.
SAM REDDING ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING CENTER ON SCHOOL TURNAROUND BUILDING STATE CAPACITY AND PRODUCTIVITY CENTER.
At the nexus of sound education policy and practice™ American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 U.S. Department of Education.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and America’s Public Schools The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and America’s Public Schools AASA Advocacy.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Michigan and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Governor’s Education Summit April 28, 2009.
MEGS Applications and Reporting Requirements Restore and Reform: Implementing the ARRA Michigan Institute for Educational Management Kellogg Center, May.
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
June 15th, 2010 U.S. Department of Education Strategic Use of Title I & IDEA: How to Maximize ARRA, FY09 & FY10 Funds.
Application for Funding for Phase II of the Education Fund under the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Program CFDA Number:
No Child Left Behind Application NCLB Application – Common Elements Virginia Department of Education.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
TARGETED ASSISTANCE SCHOOLS 2010 Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education Julia B. Keleher, Ed. D, PMP April 13, 2010.
An Affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Primer on NCLB Reauthorization Implications from Federal Stimulus Programs September 20, 2010.
C&I 212 Dr. Brown. Federal Role in Education  Bill of Rights (10th Amendment)  Morrill Acts  Smith-Hughes Act (1917), George-Barden Act (1946)  GI.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
How can ARRA Funds Be Wisely Applied? How Researchers Can Help Lou Cicchinelli, Ph.D. Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning Fourth Annual IES.
GRANTS FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW Presented by: Darrell M. Haley Grants Financial Management Office Business Operations Department Division of Business.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
ICN, December 18, 2009 Agenda  DE Updates  January Workshops  AEA Snapshots  Sustaining and Increasing Capacity  Next Steps.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Local Control Accountability Plan Board of Education June 25, 2015 Alvord Unified School District Students | Teachers | Instructional Content.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Objectives Define what Title I is and why it is important to be a Title I school Highlight your rights as a Title I parent Describe ways you can be involved.
What are Federal Programs and How Can I be Involved?
ANNUAL TITLE Grants MEETING
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
Radford City Schools School Board Presentation
BCCHS Annual Title I Meeting A Single-School District LEA September 10, 2015 December 3, 2015.
Title II Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Ismail Ardahanli.
WAVE Presentation on Draft ESSA Plan.
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
Presentation transcript:

2011 Bridge to Excellence Master Plan Annual Update Review Division of Student, Family, and School Support Office of Finance Division of Academic Reform and Innovation

Purpose of the 2011 Master Plan Update Foci of the annual review: Discuss local school systems’ progress toward meeting their master plan goals (based on 5 NCLB Goals) Approve year 2 RTTT scope of work and identify goals for year 3 RTTT scope of work Evaluate the alignment of local school system priorities and their annual budgets

RTTT Four Assurances and NCLB Standards and Assessments NCLB Goal 1 Reading, Math, and Science Proficiency NCLB Goal 2 English Proficiency for non- native speakers Data Systems to Support Instruction Great Teachers and Leaders NCLB Goal 3 Teacher Quality High Quality Professional Development NCLB Goal 4 Safe Schools NCLB Goal 5 Graduating from High School Turning Around Lowest Performing Schools

Integrated NCLB/RTTT Review Process Approximately 130 reviewers Panels consisted of MSDE and system level representatives, finance specialists, RTTT liaisons, and ELL specialists All panel members analyzed and responded to the entire master plan document (including NCLB and RTTT portions)

New Additions Family Engagement Social Studies Intent: Determine how local school systems share information with parents regarding student academic standards, assessments, and data Determine how local school systems provide professional development to instructional and non-instructional staff, grades preK-12, on working with parents Intent: Determine if school systems curriculum documents were aligned with the State Curriculum for Social Studies Solicit feedback on challenges reported by local school systems in delivering Social Studies instruction

2011 Systems Identified for Improvement System NameStatus DorchesterSystem Improvement Year 1 Montgomery CountySystem Improvement Year 1 Prince George’s CountyCorrective Action WicomicoSystem Improvement Year 2 Baltimore CitySystem Improvement Year 1

Finance Section Revenue Description FY 2012 Planned (in millions) FY 2011 Actual (in millions) FY 2011 Planned (in millions) Local Appropriation$5,318$5,341$5,309 State Revenue4,8964,5174,642 Federal ARRA Revenue Other Federal Funds Other Local Revenue Other Resources/Transfers Total$11,076$11,143$10,971 Reported Revenue

Finance Section FY 2012 Planned Expenditures (in millions) ExpendituresFTE Standards and Assessments Reform Area 1: Adopting standards and assessments that prepare students to succeed in college and the workplace and to compete in the global economy. $1,41419,532 Data Systems to support instruction Reform Area 2: Building data systems that measure student growth and success, and inform teachers and principals about how they can improve instruction Great Teachers and Leaders Reform Area 3: Recruiting, developing, rewarding, and retaining effective teachers and principals, especially where they are needed most. 1,32019,858 Turning Around the Lowest Achieving Schools Reform Area 4: Turning around our lowest-achieving schools. 2413,055 Mandatory Cost of Doing Business 7,91361,182 Other (items deemed necessary by the local Board of Education) 71(972) Total $11,073103,398

Finance Section No Child Left Behind Goals FY 2011 Change (in millions) 1. By , all students will reach high standards, at a minimum attaining proficiency in reading/language arts and mathematics. $ All limited English proficient students will become proficient in English and reach high academic standards at a minimum attaining proficiency or better in reading/language arts and mathematics. (5) 3. By , all students will be taught by highly qualified teachers All students will be educated in learning environments that are safe, drug free, and conducive to learning All students will graduate from high school. 14 Local Goals and Indicators 25 Mandatory Cost of Doing Business (24) Other (items not reported in above categories, including reductions) 118 Total $268 Reported Change in Actual FY 2011 Expenditures

Finance Section Funds by Grant Total ARRA Funds (in millions) National School Lunch - Equipment Assistance $1 Maryland Clean Diesel Program 1 Title II – Enhancing Education through Technology 4 Homeless Children and Youth 0.8 Title I – School Improvement Grants 8 Title I - Grants to LEAs, Neglected and Delinquent 130 IDEA Part B - Grants to States-Pass-Through 200 IDEA Part B - Preschool Grants 7 IDEA Part C - Infants and Families 10 State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Education Program 354 Education Jobs Fund 179 Race to the Top (50% LEA Share) 125 Head Start ARRA COLA Quality Improvement Grant 1 Total $1,021 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)

Finance Section ARRA Assurances FY 2011 (in millions) FTE 1. Increase teacher effectiveness and address inequities in the distribution of highly qualified teachers (recruiting, developing, and retaining effective teachers and principals).$ Establish and use a pre-K through college and career data system to track progress and foster continuous improvement (building data systems that measure student success and inform teachers and principals how they can improve their practices) Make progress towards rigorous college and career-ready standards and high quality assessments that are valid and reliable for all students, including limited English proficient students and students with disabilities (adopting internationally benchmarked standards and assessments that prepare students for success in college and the workplace) Provide targeted, intensive support and effective interventions to turn around schools identified for corrective action and restructuring (turning around lowest performing schools) Other (items not reported in above categories) Total$5132,262.5 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)

Finance Section Race to the Top LEA Project Funds Project Year 1 Project Year 2 Project Year 3 Project Year 4 Total State Success Factors$301,726$264,131$270,368$274,286$1,110,511 Standards and Assessments 3,357,4747,794,3065,292,9113,692,60720,137,298 Data Systems to support instruction 5,279,1039,788,6105,405,4943,054,26723,527,474 Great Teachers and Leaders 3,917,84631,323,64913,979,6869,283,77058,504,951 Turning Around the Lowest Achieving Schools 718,4093,129,1822,558,1081,818,3428,224,041 STEM24,423387,545240, ,782 Multiple Sections1,100,5954,346,5963,691,1003,463,24212,601,533 Total$14,699,576$57,034,019$31,438,574$21,827,421$124,999,590

2011 Master Plan Review Findings

Recommendation on Approvability Status: All 24 Local School System Master Plan Annual Updates are recommended as approvable.