Michael F. Lovenheim (Cornell University and NBER) and Patrick Walsh (St. Michael’s College) April 26, 2014 Conference on Subnational Government Competition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Financial Aid: An Informational Tool for Middle School Students and Families.
Advertisements

Preparing for Cycle III School and District Accountability Ratings and AYP Determinations Information Sessions August 26 & 27, 2004 Juliane Dow, Associate.
Marketplace models and premiums: Evidence from the first open enrollment period Kelly Krinn, University of Minnesota Pinar Karaca-Mandic, University of.
No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
Educational Services and Choices: Information for Parents Florida PIRC at USF (Parental Information and Resource Center)
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness--EOC Tim Walker Nathaniel Session.
May 23, 2005Andrew LaManque, Ph.D.1 Maintaining Access for Low Income Students at California Community Colleges: BOG Tuition Waivers and Financial Aid.
Explaining Race Differences in Student Behavior: The Relative Contribution of Student, Peer, and School Characteristics Clara G. Muschkin* and Audrey N.
STOCK RETURNS AND THE BUSINESS CYCLE Michael DeStefano.
Lessons Learned from AYP Decision Appeals Prepared for the American Educational Research Association Indiana Department of Education April 15, 2004.
What You Need to Know about Financial Aid Financial aid is funds provided to students and families to help pay for postsecondary educational expenses.
Higher Education: Improved Tax Information Could Help Families Pay for College (GAO ) Presentation at the 30 th Annual SFARN Conference June 21,
Thank You to MeckEd’s Sponsors To make a donation in support of MeckEd, please visit and click “donate.” Please know your investment will.
IPEDS C ollege O pportunities O n- L ine COOL.
Justine Hastings, Yale University and NBER Jeffrey Weinstein, Yale University Information, School Choice, and Academic Achievement: Evidence from Two Experiments.
Vouchers Chapter 14 C. Eugene and Eric Twombly John Goodwin.
Different Types of Schools School Funding. Public Schools  Established by states (10 th Amendment)  Paid for by tax dollars  Usually run by local board.
Kauchak and Eggen, Introduction to Teaching: Becoming a Professional, 3rd Ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 8 Governance.
The Role of Agents and Brokers in the Market for Health Insurance Pinar Karaca-Mandic, Roger Feldman, and Peter Graven University of Minnesota.
 School choice gives parents the freedom to choose their child’s educational journey.  School choice offers parents a healthy alternative to the traditional.
Equitable Services for Private School Students March, 2012 Consultation Process & Meeting Agenda’s Marcia Beckman, Director Elementary & Secondary Education.
FINANCIAL AID BASICS. DEFINITION OF FINANCIAL AID Financial aid consists of funds provided to students and families to help pay for postsecondary educational.
A New Vision for Summer School Jeff Smink Bridge Conference Seattle, WA October, 2011.
Martin F. Lueken Anna M. Jacob Jennifer Ash Prepared for the Campbell Collaboration Colloquium Copenhagen 2012 Thursday, May The Effects of Charter.
Competitive Effects of Means-Tested School Vouchers David Figlio, Northwestern and NBER Cassandra Hart, Northwestern December 2009.
International Conference “Accessibility of Higher Education” June 2004, Moscow Lessons from Austria Tuition Fees and Student Participation Lessons.
Testing Overview Parent University.  *Readi Step  * PSAT  *SAT  *ACT  *AP Exams.
P arent I nvolvement A nalysis? The Parent Involvement Analysis is designed and developed by Academic Development Institute What is.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
The Voluntary System of Accountability (VSA SM ).
Debunking the Myths of Financial Aid Information for students and parents.
ORGANIZATIONS Education HEGN Board of Directors Policy Comm. C4/PAC (Political) Executive Committee Appoints a Majority of CCT/SCI Boards Board of CCT.
May 25,  MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual.
1 Chronic Absence in the Early Grades: Presentation to NNIP An Applied Research Project funded by the Annie E. Casey Foundation (October 2008)
Kenyon College 2008 Financial Aid Optimization Analysis Prepared October 2008.
TAKS-Alt ReportingInformation for Parents Copyright © 2007, Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. Reproduction of all or portions of this work is.
+ Private or Public? By: Maura Costello Education 610.
High rates of attrition exist among college students in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) fields, especially among women and minorities.
School Accountability and School Choice: Effects on Student Selection across Schools Comments: Eric J. Brunner University of Connecticut.
Reforms – improve teacher quality & School Curriculum standards (what students should know) If you have questions about yesterday’s material – ask now!!
An examination of retirement rate patterns among California pre-K–12 certificated educators California Educational Research Association Annual Conference.
N G A Center for Best Practices Institute for Governors Education Policy Advisors William H. Leighty Chief of Staff to Governor Mark R. Warner Commonwealth.
Copyright © All rights reserved to Student Insights. 1 Student-View ™ Report Level Two July, 2007 SAMPLE REPORT.
“Value added” measures of teacher quality: use and policy validity Sean P. Corcoran New York University NYU Abu Dhabi Conference January 22, 2009.
West Central Community School District Performance Document: Formative Evaluation Tool By John Johnson ortheast Iowa Charter School Northeast Charter School.
Modeling Health Reform in Massachusetts John Holahan June 4, 2008 THE URBAN INSTITUTE.
Economics, Finance, & Strategy Michael Townsley, Ph.D.
Impediments to the estimation of teacher value added Steven Rivkin Jun Ishii April 2008.
Title I What Parents Need to Know!. What is Title I? Title I is a program that provides funds from the federal government to improve student learning.
School-level Correlates of Achievement: Linking NAEP, State Assessments, and SASS NAEP State Analysis Project Sami Kitmitto CCSSO National Conference on.
Parent Satisfaction Surveys What is the Parent Satisfaction Survey?  Each year schools from our district are selected to participate in the.
Researching Technology in South Dakota Classrooms Dr. Debra Schwietert TIE Presentation April 2010 Research Findings.
14-Feb-03RAND1 Vouchers and Charter Schools What We Know and What We Need To Know Brian Gill RA.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
1 Testing 1, 2, 3: An Analysis of 4Sight in Pennsylvania A Paper Presented at the 2009 North American Summer Meeting of the Econometric Society Robert.
Metrics of Economic Opportunity and the Virginia Longitudinal Data System Tod R. Massa Policy Research and Data Warehousing Director State Council of Higher.
Media Growth Summit, April 6, 2017
Planning for College Brittany Cochran
Neighborhoods, Obesity and Diabetes- A Randomized Social Experiment
blended Approach to academic literacy in so100 self & society
Private School Choice Programs Special Education Scholarship Program Independent Charter Schools Program Open Enrollment Program Blue Ribbon Commission.
UNIT SIX| EDUCATion.
David Bryant, Guidance Counselor
Trends in College Admissions (From the National Association for College Admission Counseling and the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education)
MKT 498 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
MKT 498 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Advanced Placement (AP)
WHERE ARE WE? THE STATE OF DUAL CREDIT/ENROLLMENT IN MISSOURI
Quality Education Commission
Your One-Stop-Shop for Cash for College
Presentation transcript:

Michael F. Lovenheim (Cornell University and NBER) and Patrick Walsh (St. Michael’s College) April 26, 2014 Conference on Subnational Government Competition Does Choice Increase Information? Evidence from Online Search Behavior

Introduction School choice policies have grown dramatically in past several decades.  Open enrollment  Charter schools  Vouchers for private school enrollment By decoupling link between residence location and school location, choice policies induce more competition between schools and districts. For choice to be effective, a critical mass of parents must:  Value academic quality of schools  Be able to accurately assess academic quality of schools

Introduction Until recently, lack of data on parental information has hampered research on these assumptions We examine a unique question in this literature: does parental school quality search information respond to the choice environment?  Lends insight into whether there is “full information” in this market.  Part of the benefits of school choice may be due to more accurate parental decision-making, especially for low SES families.

What We Do We link search data at the city- and county-level from Greatschools Inc. over a 4-year period to changes in local school choice policies. We examine 5 school choice policies:  State open enrollment  State tuition vouchers  State charitable scholarship tax credits  State tuition tax credits  NCLB-induced choice at the district level. Main Results: expansions in all but one of these choice policies leads to significant increases in searches for local school quality information.

Greatschools Search Data Greatschools.org is a website that allows users to compare school quality measures in a local area.  Information on test scores and a ranking from 1-10 based on these scores  Student demographics  “Community Ratings”: 1-5 stars for teacher quality, leadership and parent involvement  User reviews of schools. The test score information has been shown in other settings to lead parents to choose schools that increase test scores (Hastings and Weinstein, 2008). The reviews and ratings are unique to this setting.

Greatschools Search Data We have the universe of search terms from 1/1/2010 – 10/31/2013.  102,616,862 individual searches that contain over 3 million unique search terms  Can search for city, district, school, zip code or address.  Match each search term toCBSA for cities and to county for the others. Can match about 60% of unique terms, 80% of searches.  A large portion of unmatched searches are due to errors that would not lead to search results. Calculate total searches by month and searches for specific terms, like “elementary” and “charter.”

School Choice Policies Collected information on 4 types of state policies and when they are announced and enacted:  Open enrollment, vouchers, charitable tax deductions and tuition tax credits.  Policies consist of multiple laws. We construct indices that count the number of laws in a state-month. NCLB requires any Title I school that fails AYP 2 years in a row to offer students the opportunity to transfer to a “non- failing school.”  In 24 states, we calculate proportion of schools in each district- year that are subject to such sanctions.  Also have an indicator for whether a waiver granted that exempts state from NCLB sanctions.

Variation in Choice Environment

Methodology Difference-in-Difference models that relate changes in policies to changes in search prevalence:  Model includes month, year and “Search Unit” fixed effects.  Search Units are the city or county. Main identification assumptions:  Changes in the choice environment are uncorrelated with prior trends in search prevalence  The timing of changes in the choice environment are uncorrelated with unobserved local shocks that independently influence search behavior.

Baseline Results A 1 standard deviation increase in  open enrollment increases search by 2.7%  tuition vouchers increases search by 6.2%  tuition tax credits increases search by 25.5% A 1 standard deviation increase in NCLB choice percentage increases search by 8%.

Identification Questions NCLB results biased by trends in SES composition of localities?  If so, results would be biased downwards – results are lower bound  But NCLB wavier would not be negative & significant if choice policies didn’t drive search  Searches interacted with NCLB choice peak in June/July “Other choice policy” results driven by trends in SES composition?  High-SES families move to area, lobby for choice, and also search?  High-choice areas attract high-SES families, who also search?  These choice policies vary at state level: families move states?  Could either effect operate in 4 years?

NCLB Choice Estimates by Month

Results for Specific Search Terms

Conclusion Online school quality search prevalence is strongly influenced by changes in school choice policies.  Suggests incomplete latent school quality information amongst parents.  Online search tools can help overcome school quality information asymmetries  An added benefit of school choice policies is to increase parental knowledge of local schooling options. Policymakers could use these types of online search tools explicitly to increase effectiveness of choice policies. Ultimately want to know how student outcomes are affected by this information.