Strategies for Empowering New Students to Think Critically in the Humanities GENERATION NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND LaTricea Adams, Ed.S. Tennessee State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
Advertisements

OSSE CSSS Educator Leader Institute Secondary English Language Arts Day 2 July 31 st to Aug 3 rd, 2012 Facilitated by Heidi Beeman.
Making SLOs Work at Southwestern College January 2008.
When the bartender asked, "How's it going, Norm
Division of Youth Services Oct 26, 2012 Common Core & the Content Areas.
Summarizing Passages: An Overlapping and Essential Literacy Skill Vicki Estrem, Minneapolis AE Stacy Hannigan, Metro North ABE Marn Frank, ATLAS.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Reflection: TOPIC: Are people naturally “good” or are they forced to be “good” by social rules and legal institutions? INTRODUCE EVIDENCE: Why do you believe.
Fostering Intellectual Engagement Through Critical Reading.
Critical Thinking in the College Classroom: Teaching the Teachers Bill Reynolds, Mark Berg, & Jedediah Morfit The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey.
FOOTPRINTS OF FREEDOM Elementary UCI History ProjectFall 2012.
Subject: English Language
“The meat and potatoes of differentiated instruction” Tomlinson (1999)
Teaching American History
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
ED 3501: Curriculum and Instruction Section GHI - Fall Understanding by Design Understanding and Creating Effective Instructional Design.
INTRODUCTION AND IMPLICATIONS DELAWARE VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PA Common Core Standards 1.
D. J. HENRY SPEAKING ABOUT ENGLISH PEARSON WEBINAR APRIL 4, 2014 Integrated Reading and Writing.
Objectives Discuss rationale for teaching and learning 21 st Century Skills Provide process for looking more closely at Iowa’s 21 st Century Skills Examine.
Critical Thinking: Close Reading of Texts Presented by Dr. Cheryl Torok Fleming November, 2013 Based on Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2006). Critical Thinking:
Active Learning Strategies to Promote Critical Thinking Richard Cain, PhD
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
A UGUST 2012 Elementary Literacy Standards. New Standards for Literacy Key Intended Learnings– Teachers will… Examine capacities of college and career.
Adapted from: PARCC Model Content Frameworks English Language Arts/Literacy October 2011.
Socratic Seminar #1 UNIVERSAL CONCEPT: ETHNIC STUDIES
Unit 2: Socratic Seminar
Math Fellows Heather Dorsey. Purpose of the Fellows To be a part of and support a system that focuses on math making sense for all students. --Leadership.
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
Presenter Introduction: English Dept. Chair at SRHS Instruct 9 th – 12 th grade students M.F.A. in Creative Writing from ASU 1st Encountered Socratic.
The Socratic Seminar: A Student-Centered Approach to Inquiry-Based Discussion Elizabeth Smith English Language Fellow.
Scaffolding Instruction Support for Learners. Adapted (with permission) from: From Apprenticeship to Appropriation : Scaffolding the Development of Academic.
Students conduct research that leads to an understanding of the southern and Northern man and their perspective regarding expansion of slavery and decision.
Accelerating Content Area Learning through Literacy Instruction, Part 2 FDRESA Winter 2014.
Reflection: TOPIC: Are people naturally “good” or are they forced to be “good” by social rules and legal institutions? INTRODUCE EVIDENCE: Why do you believe.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh The CCSS & Close Reading 1.
COMMON CORE TRANSITION. TRAINING TIMETABLE Reading- Literary Reading- Informational Writing Language Speaking & Listening Foundational.
5 STEPS TO EFFECTIVE READING COMPREHENSION
Teaching Reading Comprehension
Argument in Science Agenda: Define scientific argument. Study the structure of argument. Research an argument. Craft an argument. Publish an argument.
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) & NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES (NGA CENTER) JUNE 2010.
 Textbooks tend to be written in declarative statements  “the civil war stated on April 12 th, 1861”  Educators should change learning from declarative.
EP240 Unit 3 Seminar The English Language Learner: Know Your Student 1.
Thursday, November 19 th, 2015 Please take out the body paragraph you wrote last night for homework, a pen or pencil, and a highlighter. Please take a.
New Writing Expectations Require a New Approach: An Introduction to Ready ® Writing Grades 3-5 Adam Berkin Vice President, Product Development
Inquiry Learning and Social Studies College and Career Readiness Conferences Summer
AUGUST ??, 2011 Critical Thinking Overview. Objectives: Review the 5 critical thinking components and their importance to Honors English III! :) Create.
Stop Learning, and Go Think! Strategies to Challenge Students’ Minds Gem Thomerson, Ed.D.
Socratic Seminar By participating in Scholars will practice academic behavior and language that will be expected in a 21 st century classroom & worksplace.
Metacognition to Motivate Learning
Kerri Lamb Tuesday, January 20, Brain Energizer 2. Using Social Media to Engage Students with Writing 3. Why Students Should Write in EVERY Classroom.
Writing Exercise Try to write a short humor piece. It can be fictional or non-fictional. Essay by David Sedaris.
Adaptive Leadership in Changing Curricular Times Secondary Curriculum Leaders Tuesday, April 13.
C NEW GUIDELINES FOR DBQS Post Redesign Prewriting Strategies Read the document carefully. Understand that you are to answer a question, not simply.
Academic Oral Language Increasing the quantity and quality of output, building on what we are already doing.
Common Core State Standards What you need to know Cambrian School District.
Pedagogy As it relates to the field of linguistics.
EDU650: Teaching Learning and Leading in the 21st Century EFFECTIVE LESSON PLANNING AND DESIGN.
Close Reading (by Jessica Wayton and Emily Cooper) A close reader is NOT this… or this…
Student Engagement Presentation Increasing Student Engagement in the Classroom.
Web Pedagogies Week 8: Systems Approach The No Child Left Behind Policy.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
Pre-Referral to Special Education: Considerations
Ralph Ellison By Kayla Sedbrook.
Instructional Critical Thinking Assessment Item Development
Adaptive Leadership in Changing Curricular Times
Untitled: Four Etchings [C], 1992
Ralph Ellison, “Battle Royal”
A Focus On Close Reading & New Literacies
Your Standards TODAY’S FLOW MORNING: Standards & 1st Unit Curriculum
Elaborate & Clarify What You Could Ask How You Could Respond
Presentation transcript:

Strategies for Empowering New Students to Think Critically in the Humanities GENERATION NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND LaTricea Adams, Ed.S. Tennessee State University Doctoral Candidate Cesar Chavez Public Charter Schools Assessment & Data Specialist

How can we build the cognitive stamina of students who came through the wave of No Child Left Behind? ESSENTIAL QUESTION

 Self-evaluate on the current level of critical thinking of students as evident by current pedagogy (pre- and post survey).  Build the framework for facilitating close reading and Socratic questioning (Socratic Seminar) and incorporating authentic intellectual performance tasks into instructional time. SESSION OUTCOMES

Mini-Segment DescriptionTime Allotted NCLB…The Saga of “Education Reform” 5 minutes Self-Assessment5 minutes Intellectual Standards5 Minutes Close Reading10 minutes Authentic Intellectual Performance Task10 minutes Socratic Seminar10 minutes Next Steps to Moving Pedagogical Practice (Post Self- Assessment) 5 minutes AGENDA

No Child Left Behind… The Saga of “Education Reform” TRANSITION

 In August of 1981, the National Commission on Excellence in Education was chartered under the authority of 20 U.S.C. 1233a.  Their goal was to review & synthesize the data on the quality of learning & teaching in the nation's schools, colleges, and universities, both public and private.  The National Commission on Excellence published a report:  A Nation at Risk, which found that the American school system was falling behind compared to education institutions around the world.  The notion of equal education for all regardless of race or class or economic status had not been met. NCLB…THE SAGA OF “EDUCATION REFORM”

1994 Improving America’s Schools Act (IASA) The Rise of Assessments, Data & Accountability 2001 No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) 2010 NCLB Reform/ESEA Flexibility NCLB…THE SAGA OF “EDUCATION REFORM”

 In 2013, we graduated our first cohort of American students who went K-12 under NCLB… What are some deficits in your students’ critical thinking abilities? How do you think No Child Left Behind affected your students’ level of critical thinking? DISCUSSION

TRANSITION

DISCUSSION How does allowing students to do the heavy “intellectual lifting” look? What are some common instructional practices for establishing this type of learning environment?

INTELLECTUAL STANDARDS

METACOGNITION INTELLECTUAL STANDARDS

TRANSITION

Paraphrasing the Text Sentence by SentenceExplicating the Thesis of a ParagraphAnalyzing the logic of what we’re readingAssessing the logic of what we’re readingSpeaking in the Voice of an Author CLOSE READING

EXCERPT FROM INVISIBLE MAN BY RALPH ELLISON “I am an invisible man. No, I am not a spook like those who haunted Edgar Allan Poe; nor am l one of your Hollywood-movie ectoplasms. I am a man of substance, of flesh and bone, fiber and liquids – and I might even be said to possess a mind. I am invisible, understand, simply because people refuse to see me. Like the bodiless heads you see sometimes in circus sideshows, it is as though I have been surrounded by mirrors of hard, distorting glass. When they approach me they see only my surroundings, themselves, or figments of their imagination – indeed, everything and anything except me.” CLOSE READING PARAPHRASING

CLOSE READING EXPLICATING S State the main point of the paragraph in 1-2 sentences. E Elaborate on what you have paraphrased. E Exemplify meaning by tying it to concrete situations in the real world. I Illustrate with metaphors, analogies, pictures, or diagrams of the basic thesis to connect it to other meanings you already understand.

1.What is the key question the author is trying to answer? 2.What is the author’s fundamental purpose? 3.What is the author’s point of view with respect to the issue? 4.What assumptions is the author making in his/her reasoning? 5.What are the implications of the author’s reasoning? 6.What information does the author use in reasoning through this issue? 7.What are the most fundamental inferences or conclusions in the text? 8.What are the author’s most basic concepts? CLOSE READING ANALYZING THE LOGIC OF WHAT WE ARE READING

ASSESSING THE LOGIC OF WHAT WE’RE READING

CLOSE READING SPEAKING IN THE VOICE OF THE AUTHOR AUTHENTIC INTELLECTUAL PERFORMANCE TASK EXAMPLES OF MARGINALIZED GROUPS IN SOCIETY Below are examples of groups that have been unseen and unheard in different ways throughout history or, in the words of Ralph Ellison, “constantly bumped against by those of poor vision.” 1. Women 2. Native Americans 3. People with Disabilities 4. Workers/Laborers 5. Immigrants 6. Religious Minorities

TRANSITION DISCUSSION What are some concerns with facilitating a classroom around Socratic Questioning? How can these concerns be addressed (organization of the process)?

SOCRATIC SEMINAR  What puzzles me is…  I’d like to talk with people about…  I’m confused about…  Don’t you think this is similar to…  Do you agree that the big ideas seem to be…  I have questions about…  Another point of view is…  I think it means…  Do you think…  What does it mean when the author says…  Do you agree that…

CREATE YOUR OWN… Close Reading Activity (be explicit about the type of thinking/expectations for each level and how to incorporate time for students to “Think about their Thinking”) Socratic Seminar framework Authentic Intellectual Performance Task

TRANSITION Next Steps to Moving Pedagogical Practice (Post Self-Assessment)

Brookhart, S. (2010). How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Education Week (2011). No Child Left Behind. Retrieved from King, F., Goodson, L., Rohani, L. (1997). Higher Order Thinking Skills: Definition, Teaching Strategies, andAssessments. Educational Service Programs. 1. Newmann, F., Bryk, A., Nagaoka, J. (2001). Authentic Intellectual Work and Standardized Tests: Conflict orCoexistence. Consortium on Chicago School Research Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers. (2011). PARCC model content frameworks: English language arts/literacy grades 3–11. Retrieved from pdf Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). How to read a paragraph: The art of close reading. Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking Press. Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2007). The Art of Socratic Questioning. Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking Press. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. REFERENCES