TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February 5 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Advertisements


Teacher Effectiveness and the Equitable Distribution of Effective Teachers 2009 National Forum on Education Policy Education Commission of the States July.
Implementation of NCLBs Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements November 2003.
Highlights from the Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A State Activities Funds August 2014.
Helping State Leaders Shape Education Policy Presentation Prepared for Panel Discussion Colorado Association for Teacher Educators Spring 2004 Conference.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Annual Parent Meeting Klein Road Elementary. © Not for use of distribution without permission. Why are we here?  NCLB law requires that Title I Schools.
Teacher Effectiveness in Urban Schools Richard Buddin & Gema Zamarro IES Research Conference, June 2010.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Highly Qualified Teachers & Paraprofessionals No Child Left Behind Archived Information.
Certification and HQT Christina Linder, Director Certification and Professional Standards Teacher Quality
Elementary and Secondary Education (ESEA) Law NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND.
1 Highly Qualified Teachers New Results for
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
The Basics of Title I Florida Public School Choice Consortium's Annual Conference (FPSCC) Anke Toth November 18, 2009.
The Educator Preparation Reform Act S Sponsored by Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) H.R Sponsored by Representative Mike Honda (D-CA) 1.
Transition to Teaching Recruiting, Preparing, and Retaining Science Teachers through TTT Beatriz Ceja, Gillian Cohen-Boyer and Thelma Leenhouts U.S. Department.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Teacher Education Accountability: Impact on States and Teacher Preparation Programs Sophia McArdle, Ph.D. Office of Postsecondary Education.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
By: Becky Chopp.  Teacher quality is important and matters. It is the most important school-related factor influencing student achievement.  Having.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
1 August 22, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D, Assistant Commissioner Division of Educational Standards and Programs SURVEY RESULTS OF THE HIGHLY QUALIFIED.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Title II A: Teacher and Principal Training and Recruiting The primary goal of the program is to provide professional development to increase student achievement.
Charter School Leadership Institute October 7, 2015 Title IIA Improving Teacher Quality.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
A BLUEPRINT FOR REFORM Presented by Julia Renberg EDLE 813.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
The Importance of Equitable Access to Effective Educators.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
Strategies for Promoting Equity with Diverse Student Populations: Students in Rural Communities 1.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
“TEACHER EDUCATION FOR 21ST CENTURY TEACHERS ” Reforming Teacher Preparation: Meeting the Challenges of the 21 st Century Dr. Adriane E. L. Dorrington.
Meeting the highly qualified teacher challenge. USDOE - Continued emphasis on equitable distribution OESE priority (of 3): Teacher quality, equity and.
Grant Activities, Needs Assessments And other SPDG application Issues to Consider.
Title I Annual Meeting West Orange Elementary School Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools.
Every Student Succeeds Act 2015
Welcome Family and Community
Highly Qualified Teachers & Paraprofessionals
Effective Educators Title II, Part A
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
What Parents Need to Know
Title I Schools: “ESSA” Every Student Succeeds Act Information Meeting Pershing M. School Library October 12, 2017 Pershing Middle School Houston Independent.
What Parents Need to Know
No Child Left Behind.
What Parents Need to Know
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
What Parents Need to Know
Title II Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Ismail Ardahanli.
What Parents Need to Know
Presentation transcript:

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION This presentation will focus on:  Federal legislation relating to principal and teacher quality  The difference between teacher quality and effectiveness  The impact of principals on student outcomes and their teachers  How to effectively evaluate principals and teachers Today’s lesson

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Federal Legislation

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Provide support to states and school districts and ensure their flexibility to establish programs to enhance teacher/principal quality, focusing on preparation, recruitment, retention, and evaluation NSBA’s Position

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Title II - Supporting Excellent Teachers and Principals States' set-aside funds must be used to assist LEAs in recruiting, preparing, placing, developing and retaining highly qualified teachers for high-need schools and low-performing schools. States must also set aside at least 2% of their funds for professional development for principals. States may use funds to establish teacher evaluation systems. LEAs must achieve equitable distribution of high quality teachers. Senate HELP Bill

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Title II - Supporting Excellent Teachers and Principals LEAs must conduct a needs assessment in order to receive Title II funds regarding the number of properly licensed teachers, linking them to the teacher preparation program. Competitive grants funds are available for Teacher Pathways (for partnerships of LEAs and others) to prepare, recruit, train, place and support teachers in high-need schools. Other competitive grants include the Teacher Incentive Fund for performance- based teacher compensation and the Principal Recruitment and Training Program for partnerships of LEAs and others to establish and implement principal residency, mentoring and training in eligible schools. Senate HELP Bill

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Title II - Encouraging Innovation and Effective Teachers Act Eliminates Highly Qualified Teacher requirements Shifts the emphasis in the Title II formula grant program from professional development (in NCLB) to establishing teacher evaluation systems. The formula itself is changed, based on the population of 5-17 year olds and the population of those children in poverty. Competitive grants in Part B may be used for a variety of reforms. House Bill

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Title II - Encouraging Innovation and Effective Teachers Act Part A Formula funds from states to LEAs must be used to establish and implement teacher evaluations systems (TES). TES must use student achievement data as a significant part of the evaluation, use multiple measures of evaluation and be used to make personnel decisions. Part A funds may also be used for professional development activities for teachers and principals. Part B (Teacher and School Leader Flexible Grant) funds flow by formula to states, but are competitive for LEAs. Part B funds must be used for teacher certification, licensure and tenure reforms that may include alternate routes to teaching, compensation incentives, retention strategies, and professional development for teachers, principals and other school leaders House Bill

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION NCLB’s Highly Qualified Teacher Provision Teachers in core academic subjects must: Hold a bachelor's degree Be fully certified by the state Demonstrate knowledge of the subject being taught Current Law

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION NCLB’s Highly Qualified Teacher Provision Certified in the subject they teach Current Law

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Teacher Quality

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Some of the traditional ways to describe “good” teachers: have strong credentials teach top students are creative are well-liked by students, parents, and their colleagues care about their students have a passion for their work Teacher quality

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Many policymakers and school leaders now describe a “good” teacher simply as: Someone who gets students to learn what they are expected to learn or more Teacher quality

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Teacher quality is different from teacher qualification Teacher qualifications Teacher characteristics Teacher quality Teacher effectiveness Teacher quality

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Teacher Qualifications

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Subject area knowledge & cognitive skills Teacher training and certification Experience National Board Certification Alternative certification programs Advanced degree not in subject area Do teacher characteristics correlate with student achievement? Particularly in combination

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION No single characteristic is strongly related to student achievement, but the following characteristics stand out when in combination subject-matter knowledge teacher training and certification experience Characteristics and their relationships to student results SOURCE: Center for Public Education, Does highly qualified mean highly effective?, 2009

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Teacher Effectiveness

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Two decades of research on the impact of the teacher on student learning provides empirical evidence that teachers are the single most significant in-school factor in student achievement. Teacher effectiveness SOURCE: Center for Public Education, Teacher Quality and Student Achievement, 2005

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION In Chicago, “effective” math teachers could boost gains by African American 9 th graders by 50% In Texas, “highly effective” elementary teachers for low-income students could close the gap In Los Angeles, “top quartile” teachers could close black-white gap in four years Teachers can close achievement gaps SOURCE: Education Trust, Fighting for Quality and Equality, Too, November 2009

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Jordan, Mendro & Weerasinghe, th percentile in grade 3 end of grade 5 after 3 highly ineffective teachers end of grade 5 after 3 highly effective teachers The effects of teacher quality accumulate over the years

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Jordan, Mendro & Weerasinghe, th percentile in grade 3 end of grade 5 after 3 highly ineffective teachers end of grade 5 after 3 highly effective teachers 76 The effects of teacher quality accumulate over the years

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Jordan, Mendro & Weerasinghe, th percentile in grade 3 end of grade 5 after 3 highly ineffective teachers end of grade 5 after 3 highly effective teachers The effects of teacher quality accumulate over the years

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Principal Quality

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals are second only to teachers in their impact on student outcomes Principal quality

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Experience as principal Tenure as principal Experience as administrator at current school Certification Advanced degrees Education Length of time as a teacher Do principal characteristics correlate with student outcomes?

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principal characteristics are not strongly related to student outcomes although experience is the characteristic most strongly related to student outcomes Characteristics and their relationships to student results SOURCE: Center for Public Education, Forthcoming report (2012)

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Principal Effectiveness

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION 2 nd only to teachers on impacting student outcomes The impact is greater the longer they are a principal Principals have a greater impact at the most challenging schools. Principals have a greater impact in elementary schools Effective principals stay longer at the most challenging schools Principal Effectiveness SOURCE: Center for Public Education, Forthcoming report (2012)

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION What impact do principals have on their teachers? Improve instruction by providing instructional support Retain effective teachers Recruit effective teachers Principal Effectiveness SOURCE: Center for Public Education, Forthcoming report (2012)

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Evaluation systems

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Current systems are lacking Value-added models have flaws, but are much better than the systems we have now. There are ways to improve value-added models Statistical measures are used to evaluate people in other industries effectively Multiple measures are the way to go Evaluating Teachers SOURCE: Center for Public Education, Building a Better Evaluation System,2011

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION  Value-added models isolate the effect of factors a teacher on students’ change in achievement.  In a value-added model, a teacher’s effectiveness is measured by the academic growth of students in his or her classroom separate from outside factors, such students’ prior achievement or characteristics. What is a value-added growth model? SOURCE: Center for Public Education, Measuring Student Growth, 2007

TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION  How accurate are our current principal and teacher evaluations?  What data can we include to improve our evaluation systems?  How can the data from the evaluations be used to improve student achievement?  How can the data from the evaluations be used to improve teacher/principal performance? Questions for school board members