Educational Psychology by Anita Woolfolk

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Value Added in CPS. What is value added? A measure of the contribution of schooling to student performance Uses statistical techniques to isolate the.
Advertisements

NCLB, Highly Qualified and IDEA 2004 How it all fits together and What it means for you. RIDE Spring Leadership Conference May 11, 2006 Grossi/Olsen 2006.
Competencies for beginning teachers
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
1 The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Financial Impact on Manchester Public Schools Fiscal Year
Educational Policies Present Zachary Schrage.
Annual Parent Informational Meeting Presenter Date Location 1.
VALUE – ADDED 101 Ken Bernacki and Denise Brewster.
Target Testing 101 Parent Informational Power Point
Chapter Fifteen Understanding and Using Standardized Tests.
Kauchak and Eggen, Introduction to Teaching: Becoming a Professional, 3rd Ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 7 The Organization.
Copyright 2001 by Allyn and Bacon Anita Woolfolk: Educational Psychology 8 th Edition Chapter 1 Teachers, Teaching, and Educational Psychology.
Beyond the Classroom: The Use of Essential Skills for Remediation and Extension Christine Koch November 2008.
Forum on Educational Accountability Assessment and ESEA Reauthorization.
AYP: Are You Perfect? By: Jalynn Speck, Linda Oller, and Jill Polsley.
Learning, Teaching, and Educational Psychology
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant. It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
MULTI-GRADE CLASS Amee T. Arong.
Keystone Instructional Specialist. Keystone Exams Offered three times each year – winter, spring and summer. Offered in Algebra I, Biology and Literature.
Module 4 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 4 Explain the current official federal and state standards, including professional and accrediting groups.
1 Curriculum and Instruction Report Pocantico Hills School February 28, 2005.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data SLO Process – Step 4 Monitoring Progress and Refining.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
Alaska’s Standards for Culturally Responsive Schools 1 TLS Institute, Anchorage Hilton, Sept th, 2013.
What is Title I? Prepared by the Fairfax County Public Schools Title I office and Lorton Station ES.
Copyright Allyn & Bacon 1997 Woolfolk : Educational Psychology Chapter 1 Teachers, Teaching, and Educational Psychology.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
The Federal Government
C&I292: Standards Workshop Presented by: Dana Karraker and Tami Dean August 24, 2011.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Mapping the Road: Success in Language Training How schools and teachers exercise considerable influence over the learning curve.
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
Council of State Science Supervisors Secretary’s Math and Science Initiative NCLB M/S Partnerships Philadelphia, PA March, 2003 Presented by: Triangle.
Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice, 9/e Timothy J. Piciullo Ed.D. EDU 5301-Human Development and the Learning Process in.
Overview of the Title I Program at [school name] Presenter Date Location.
What Are We Learning About Evaluating Teachers More Effectively? A District’s Perspective 2012 Southern Regional Education Board Meeting and 61st Legislative.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right – Using It Well.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
Presenters: Emily & Lily Professor: Dr. James C. Lawlor Date: July 23rd.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Fraser TEACH © 2011 McGraw- Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Good Teaching: What Is Its Impact?
No Child Left Behind Education Week
Teaching Students with Mild and Moderate Disabilities: Research-Based Practices Second Edition © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Improving Math and Science Achievement in Low-Performing, High-Poverty Schools: Implications for Professional.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6. Purpose of Understanding  If you don’t know where you are going, how will you know when you get there?  How.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Neo-Conservative Ideas Berliner and Biddle ( ) Neo-conservative “centrist” thought won out in school reform. Main approaches to school reform: Get.
Continuous Improvement Priority Schools CIPS. Passage of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Passage All Students Meet Standards Adequate Yearly Progress.
DIAGNOSIS OF NEEDS IN CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT
Differentiation Compacting Curriculum Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD.
ACTIVE RESEARCH Group 1 – Assignment 2 Chloe Weaver Narelle Webb Bec Wheldon, Dallas Wolf Emily Weight.
Cora Howe Annual Title I Meeting and Open House Understanding Title 1 Support for Schools September 12, 2013.
Effectiveness of Co-Teaching Shelby Grubesky Department of Education, Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, PA Co-teaching is defined as the partnering of a.
Discussion of W-APT, ACCESS Testing, Adequate Yearly Progress and Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
OCES MAP Data Team Meeting and And
Learning, Teaching, and Educational Psychology
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6
Quarterly Meeting Focus
Understanding and Using Standardized Tests
Teacher Education for an Expert Profession: Current Issues
Becoming a High-Quality Teacher in a Changing World
Presentation transcript:

Educational Psychology by Anita Woolfolk Chapter 1

Teaching after No Child Left Behind January 2002, NCLB Teaching will never be the same—no judgment! Reauthorization of ESEA, 1965 Age of Accountability Each state’s HOUSSE (high objective uniform state standard of evaluation) Age of Testing All students in grades 3-8, plus one high school exam. Others to be added after 2002. Age of making Adequate Yearly Progress Age of being a “highly qualified teacher” More to come on NCLB……………………. Accountability came to play in 2002: ESEA = first influx of federal regulation into American education, sputink, thought we were behind in sciences, major emphasis in our political system on education of future scientist by 1965 bill passed Elementary and Secondary Education Act = light fires under school systems to improve math science and engineering instruction and curriculum; provided money to school divisions by flow through monies, federal money to states, distribute as you see fit. Federal aspect can’t make you do anything, but can withhold money they gave you that you have grown to need if you don’t do what they asked you to do! Education not in the national constitution; anything not mentioned is the job of the states. Now NCLB, schools do it to keep their money HOUSSE = SOLs, test mastery of content learned and have to pass at acceptable rates, feds didn’t give the test, states made their own SOL and tests VA already had their SOLs Some states made easy SOLs and tests as they could so would have high % of pass rates When hate NCLB; you hate the state’s tests Fed govt graded the states on their standards: VA got a B+ Only 3 states were A’s, 11B’s, 20 C’s, 50% got D or a F and revise 12 months of growth on a normal learning curve = adequate yearly progress, can’t leave a child behind! “highly qualified” college degree with major as the subject

Do Teachers Make a Difference? 1966—Coleman Report—wealth and social status were noted as major factors determining learning in schools. Effective Schools Research—refuted the Coleman Report. More to come on Effective Schools Research….. Good teaching does make a difference in student learning: Three Studies on Teacher Effectiveness Effective Teacher-Student relationships affect student learning. (Harme/Pianta-2001) K-8 study. Conclusions: the association between the quality of early teacher-child relationships and later school performance is both strong and persistent. Coleman = selected children CANNOT learn, ESR = refuted the report = most school divisions there are “sister schools” similar demographics, why does some sister schools outscore others if coleman report is correct? Nothing to do with wealth and social status, must be something else, teachers and principals and community

Do Teachers Make a Difference? Teacher Preparation and Quality—Linda Darling-Hammond (2000) found that the quality of teachers (fully certified and majored in their teaching field) was related to teacher performance. Tennessee math study of 5th graders: students with best teachers three years in a row (3,4,5)-83rd percentile in one district; 96th in another. Students with the least effective teachers scored 29th percentile and 44th percentile. All students benefit from good teachers, but particularly low achieving students. Effects were cumulative and residual.

What is good teaching? What are the qualities and characteristics of good teachers? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7., 8., 9., 10, 11., 12., 13., 14., 15., 16., 17…..

Woolfolk’s take on “good teaching” Expert Knowledge; they know content General teaching strategies (effective classroom management, effective teaching, and evaluation) Curriculum: the “what” of teaching Subject-specific knowledge for teaching Characteristics and cultural backgrounds of students. The settings in which students learn—pairs, small groups, teams, classes, schools, and community The goals and purposes of teaching Self-knowledge (biases, strengths, blind spots)

Educational Psychology Goals of educational psychology are to understand and to improve the teaching and learning process Educational psychologists develop knowledge and methods. Use knowledge and methods of psychology and other related disciplines to study learning and teaching in everyday situations. Goal is to make better teachers based on research

Concerns of Beginning Teachers Learning to teach is a gradual process. The concerns and problems of teachers change as they progress. Beginning years often focused on maintaining discipline, motivating students, evaluating students’ work, and dealing with parents. More experienced teachers might focus on professional growth and effectiveness with a wide range of students.

There is so much to learn… …and so little time!