Comprehensive Planning Strategies and Implementation Steps : Charter School Training Comprehensive Planning Strategies and Implementation Steps : Charter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
Migrant Education Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
PORTFOLIO.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
Campus Improvement Plans
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Office of Migrant Education: Comprehensive Needs Assessment Pilot Arizona Component.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Comprehensive Planning Update PAIUCC Presentation June 3, 2015 Jill Neuhard Statewide Comprehensive Planning Coordinator CAIU
Comprehensive Planning Phase 3 Districts – Day 1 February 14 th, :30 am – 3:30 pm 1.
1 Please log-in to your Comprehensive Plan  Visit:  Under “I Would Like To”, select “Access My PDE Applications”
1 Please log-in to your Comprehensive Plan  Visit:  Under “I Would Like To”, select “Access My PDE Applications”
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
District Planning in ePlan July Consolidated Planning & Monitoring Eve Carney Executive Director Renee Palakovic Director of Planning
June 10, 2015 PA Planning Team Capital Area Intermediate Unit 15 PRIORITY AND FOCUS CHARTER SCHOOL TRAINING 1.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Title I Schoolwide Planning and Implementation in Small Rural Schools Nancy Forseth
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
English Language Arts Single Plan for Student Achievement.
SASIT Thomas E. Gluck, Acting Secretary of Education Amy Morton, Deputy Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Ed Vollbrecht, Ph.D., Director,
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Presentation to the Board December 17,  Spring 2011 – Economically Disadvantaged subgroup – Reading  Warning List – Begin to Develop Plan  Spring.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OVERVIEW IU 5. CHAPTER 4 - STANDARDS Effective March 1, 2014 PA Core Standards English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Reading.
SAISD Focus/Priority Training Samantha Gallegos, Coordinator III
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Pennsylvania’s ESEA Flexibility Proposal May 23, >
Implementing School Plans in ePlan
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
A Mission of Restoration
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Edit the text with your own short phrases. To change the sample image, select the picture and delete it. Now click the Pictures icon in the placeholder.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Comprehensive Planning: Charter School Training Comprehensive Planning: Charter School Training Comprehensive Planning Team
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
Confidential 1 Regional Achievement Center 3 Essex and Hudson Counties School Improvement Plan April 2013.
Office of Service Quality
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Focus Schools 1. How are Focus Schools identified?  Title I schools with in-school gaps between the highest- achieving.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Comprehensive Planning: Charter School Training Comprehensive Planning: Charter School Training Comprehensive Planning Team
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Building Your Title I Schoolwide Plan
The Alabama Continuous Improvement Plan ACIP
Presentation transcript:

Comprehensive Planning Strategies and Implementation Steps : Charter School Training Comprehensive Planning Strategies and Implementation Steps : Charter School Training Comprehensive Planning Team

2  Review PLANNING PROCESSES and REGULATIONS.  Assess needs to inform ACTION PLANS.  Identify STRATEGIES that have a significant probability of achieving School Improvement Goals.  Design IMPLEMENTATION STEPS necessary to successfully execute the strategies. Training Goals

Components of the Comprehensive Plan 3 Charter Schools School Improvement Plan (Priority and Focus Schools) Teacher Induction Plan Professional Education Plan Student Services Plan Charter Annual Report LEA Comprehensive Plan (Phases) The Pennsylvania Planning Web Application

4 Charter Schools  Comprehensive Plan (required)  School Improvement Plan (required for Priority & Focus schools)  Charter Annual Report (required) Planning Overview Your school name

Due Dates and Workflow 5  November 30, 2014 – Phase 3 LEA Comprehensive Plan due (28-day public review and Board approval prior)  November 30, 2015 – Phase 1 LEA Comprehensive Plan due (28-day public review and Board approval prior)  November 30, Phase 2 LEA Comprehensive Plan due (28-day public review and Board approval prior)  June 30, 2015 – School Improvement Plan resubmission (Board approval prior)  Major changes to plan – 28 day public review  Minor changes to plan – no need for public review  August 1, Charter Annual Report due

The CP Resource Page 6

7

Professional Education Plan 8 The Comprehensive Plan must contain a minimum of 2 Professional Development implementation steps:  1 aligned to improving language and literacy acquisition  1 aligned to teaching diverse learners in an inclusive setting

9 ESEA Flexibility Waiver – Federal Accountability Differences New under ESEA All public schools in PA 100% proficiency on state tests by 2014 “Adequate Yearly Progress” (AYP) Disaggregated subgroups: N=40 Each school receives a designation based on AYP status Federal designations only apply to Title I schools Close “achievement gap” by half in 6 years Annual Measureable Objectives (AMOs) Two student groups: N=11 Only highest and lowest Title I schools receive designations Old under NCLB

10 The new accountability system focuses on four Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs): 1)Test Participation Rate 2)Graduation Rate/Attendance Rate 3)Closing Achievement Gap-for all students 4)Closing the Achievement Gap of Historically Underperforming Students ESEA Flexibility Waiver – Accountability Measures

ESEA Flexibility Waiver Update 11 3-Year Required School Improvement Plans Only required for Title I Schools designated as “Priority” or “Focus” Annual resubmission required by June 30th A 3-year Comprehensive Plan is also required, but may not fall in same timeframe

12 Web Application- Roles for Access  Two Administrator roles are needed to set up Initial Access to the Comp Plan web application: a) Local Security Administrator: Top-level users, responsible for the overall security of the Education Portal for their institution b) Local Administrator: has the ability to add users who can access the Comp Plan web application stration+for+Comp+Plan

13 Web Application- Roles for Access Within the Comp Plan web application, three different groups can view, edit and/or submit plans:  Viewer (can view)  Author (can view, edit and check plan for issues)  Planning Leader (can view, edit, check plan for issues, and submit)

14 Roles for Access - Wikispace

15 Web Application: Navigation Your school name

16 Your school name Web Application: Annual Report Charter Annual Report – a component of the Comprehensive Planning Process Purpose: To provide an overview of the information within the Charter School annually

17 Web Application: Annual Report 2 new Special Education sections of the Annual Report

18 Web Application: Annual Report 2 new sections: Special Education Personnel Development Special Education Program Profile

19 Web Application: Components Your school name

20

21 NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Data Analysis  Every discussion conducted and every decision made during an entire planning process should be based upon relevant, meaningful, and timely data  Planning teams may wish to utilize the Data Walkthroughs provided within the CP web application 22

Data Analysis 23 Your school name

Data Analysis The Planning Processes require planning teams to document data-based statements of ACCOMPLISHMENTS and data-based statements of CONCERNS 24

Data Analysis 25 Statements of concern should identify specific findings from analysis of data related to student academic achievement and performance (e.g. attendance, behavior, graduation rate, etc.) which the planning team believes to be most worrisome.  72% of our students did not score at the proficient or advanced level in the 2014 PSSA Reading exam.  The total number of behavioral referrals increased by 11% from to

Systems Analysis Data Analysis informs Systems Analysis. The guiding questions in the web application were identified and aligned to researched-based systems. The sources of the system(s) include the following: – SAS portal – 7 Turnaround Principles – Educator Effectiveness Principles 26

27

Systems Analysis 28 Your school name

Systems Analysis 29 Your school name

Systems Analysis 30 Your school name

31 1)Analyze data to identify symptoms of the overall health of the organization: Accomplishments & Concerns 1)Analyze data to identify symptoms of the overall health of the organization: Accomplishments & Concerns 2)Analyze Entity Systems: a data- based, diagnostic effort to identify systemic deficiencies that may be reasons for Systemic Challenges: Guiding Questions 3)Based upon timely and relevant data, Prioritize Systemic Challenges 4)Build Action Plans to address high- priority Systemic Challenges Needs Assessment Overview

32

33 Web Application: Action Plan

34 Action Plan Goal: Lose 20 lbs in 1 year Strategy: Exercise using T25 Implementation Steps: 1.Purchase the T25 program (receipt) 2.Develop an exercise schedule (schedule) 3.Research T25 for best practices (techniques) 4.Designate a space for working out (blueprint of space) 5.Purchase exercise apparel (receipt)

35 Action Planning  Identify all of the “to-do list” steps that will be needed to implement the Strategies: Each “to-do list” step is an Implementation Step  Identify Strategies that have a significant probability of meeting the Action Plan Goal  Select/create a Systemic Challenge to be the Goal of an Action Plan (or create a Goal)

36 Action Planning: Goals

37 Action Planning : Goals

38 Action Planning: Strategies

39 Descriptions of proven interventions / best practices Descriptors tell “how” goals will be implemented Strategies provide significant probability of attaining goal Strategies designed for systemic implementation

Action Planning: Strategies 40 Effective Strategy? Why or why not? Goal: Ensure that there is a system within the school the fully ensures school-wide use of data that is focused on school improvement and the academic growth of all students. Strategy: Make data part of an ongoing cycle of instructional improvement Strategy description: Our school will develop a data team that will select data and analyze it weekly in order to help our teachers make instructional decisions. We will rely on our data coordinators to pull data and organize it for analyzing purposes. Once data teams have reviewed the data, it will be shared during weekly, grade-level Professional Learning Communities (PLCs); and instructional practices will be prioritized accordingly.

Action Planning: Strategies 41 Effective Strategy? Why or why not? Goal: Ensure that there is a system within the school the fully ensures school-wide use of data that is focused on school improvement and the academic growth of all students. Strategy: Provide professional development on differentiated instruction. Strategy description: Provide a PD session on differentiated instruction; emphasizing varied ways for students to acquire, process and/or construct content.

Action Planning: Strategies 42 Effective Strategy? Why or why not? Goal: Ensure that there is a system within the school the fully ensures school-wide use of data that is focused on school improvement and the academic growth of all students. Strategy: Create Response to Intervention and Instruction schedules Strategy description: Bell schedules, program ideas, planning documents, and management systems from schools around the country will be shared and high school principals will schedule intervention/enrichment periods to provide interventions to students.

Action Planning: Strategies 43 Effective Strategy? Why or why not? Goal: Ensure that there is a system within the school the fully ensures school-wide use of data that is focused on school improvement and the academic growth of all students. Strategy: Implement classroom walk-through system Strategy description: The Principal will implement classroom walk-through culture within the school in which observable evidence of teaching practice and learning results to support inquiry will be collected and used. This process provides data for reflection, dialogue between the principal and teacher, and decision-making that improves student learning. Walk- throughs are non-evaluative. They are the basis for questions, observations, and professional dialogue in ways that turn inquiry into action. They link the philosophical beliefs that the school has embraced -- and plans to which the school has committed -- with observable change at the classroom and student level.

Action Planning: Strategies 44 Effective Strategy? Why or why not? Goal: Ensure that there is a system within the school the fully ensures school-wide use of data that is focused on school improvement and the academic growth of all students. Strategy: Create an Early Identification Academic Support Program. Strategy description: The Leadership Team will create a program that incorporates a variety of data sources, including diagnostic assessment results, which allow teachers, administrators and other school staff to identify students at risk prior to or soon after their enrollment in the school and to prescribe and monitor the effectiveness of interventions for individual students during their years at our elementary school.

45 Action Planning: Strategies Consider accessing these pages to obtain helpful information; however, it is recommended the import function not be used because most descriptions will not describe how the strategy will be used by the LEA

46

47 Action Planning: Strategies Do you have a strategy that has made a positive impact in your school? Share out using Padlet

Action Planning: Implementation Steps 48 A list of “to-dos” (the WORK) that includes evidence of the implementation step Tell HOW strategy will be executed Tell WHAT sequential actions will occur Tell WHO and WHEN actions will occur

49 Action Planning: Implementation Steps The leadership teams from each school will determine the most appropriate groupings of teachers (e.g. grade level, content area, etc.,) that will engage in the analysis of common assessment results to inform those teachers about their collective and individual instructional practices.

50 Action Planning: Implementation Steps A list from each school of the teachers in each data team with a postscript that describes the rationale for the establishment of data teams.

Goal: Establish that there is a system within the school that fully ensures school-wide use of data that is focused on school improvement and the academic growth of all students. Strategy Title: Make data part of an ongoing cycle of instructional improvement. Implementation Steps: (include evidence!) 51 Action Planning: Implementation Steps

Do any of your implementation steps need refined? 52 Action Planning: Implementation Steps

53 (Data Analysis & Systems Analysis) (Goals, Strategies & Implementation Steps)

CP Planning Committees… – If you would like to receive feedback on revisions you make, please contact Kelly Fortney 54

55 Support and Communication  Click PA Planning  Click on Subscribe or Unsubscribe Comprehensive Planning Support Join the Listserv

56 Support and Communication support.caiu.org

57 Support and Communication support.caiu.org

58 Please go here to take a short survey