Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Secondary Level. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Norman L. Webb, University of Wisconsin Began 1997 Complexity of both content and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Advertisements

Depth of Knowledge It’s NOT the VERB, It’s the ACTION! Portions of this presentation were taken from.
 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades K-5) Day 1.
2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12)
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
Depth of Knowledge. Why Depth of Knowledge? Mechanism to ensure that the intent of the standard and the level of student demonstration required by that.
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610) Unpacking the PA Common Core for Specialists October 2012.
Standards Scaling– Teacher Leaders LMS Team
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457. Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge in Math K-5 Math Back to School Conference
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
Steve Williams DESE Fine Arts Consultant Presented at: Missouri Music Educators Association January 30,
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Rigor in Assessment. The purpose of this session is to understand how the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) are fundamentally different.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
Preparing to Cultivate 21 st Century Skills. Development of instruction and assessment that is rigorous and relevant. Measure progress in adding rigor.
Teaching with Depth… using Questions Partially Adapted from Polk County, Florida Professional Development Presentation.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
Modified from Depth of Knowledge presentation by Dr. Robin Smith at 2009 PRESA Leadership Conference… Adapted from Kentucky Department of Education, Mississippi.
A scale of cognitive demand.  Code with a ? to indicate that you have never heard of this,  Code with a + to indicate that you know something about.
DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE (DOK)
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Page 1 Teaching with Depth: An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge by Karen Taylor
February 14,  Sign in and pick up name tag  Mingle  Log in to Keystone Commons 
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.
PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) SUN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align.
Major Science Project Process A blueprint for experiment success.
Today’s Learning Target I can explain how Webb’s Depth of Knowledge compliments Bloom’s Taxonomy to build rigor in the classroom.
With great power comes great responsibility.
SBAC Overview. SBAC Data SBAC Data Using ATLAS Protocol Step 1- GETTING STARTED 0 The educator providing the student work gives a very brief statement.
Getting to Know Webb’s. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level One (recall) requires simple recall of such information as fact, definition, term, or simple procedure.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
Depth of Knowledge Civic Literacy Teacher Network Social Studies.
Mathematics Common Core Standards and Depth of Knowledge Presented February 8, 2012.
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
Definitions & Examples
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Preplanning Presentation
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Norman L Webb.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Presentation transcript:

Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Secondary Level

Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Norman L. Webb, University of Wisconsin Began 1997 Complexity of both content and task required Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Depth of Knowledge Classification of cognitive complexity Nominative rather than taxonomy Not about easy vs. difficult Verb and it’s context Considers complexity of both content and task required Content: simple vs. complex data displays Task: solving routine vs. non-routine problems using those data displays Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Depth of Knowledge “The DOK level describes the kind of thinking involved in the task, not whether it will be completed correctly. A greater DOK level requires greater conceptual understanding and cognitive processing by the students. Therefore, on average, students who reach greater DOK levels more regularly will have increased student achievement.” Marconi, Smith, and Lombardi; “Depth of Knowledge: An Effective Tool for Education Students” in Shop Talk Vol. 4, No. 2 Spring 2009, The Southern Nevada Regional Professional Development Program. Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Why Depth of Knowledge? To ensure that the intent of the standard and the level of student demonstration required by that standard matches the assessment items (required under NCLB) To assist in teaching to a level that will promote student achievement Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE - Level One Recall and Reproduction requires recall of information, such as a fact, definition, term, or simple procedure, as well as performing a simple process or procedure. Level 1 problems involve only one step. A student answering a Level 1 item either knows the answer or does not: that is, the answer does not need to be “figured out” or “solved.” Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE - Level Two Skills and Concepts/Basic Reasoning includes the engagement of some mental processing beyond recalling or reproducing a response. The content knowledge or process involved is more complex. These actions imply more than one step. Level 2 activities include making observations and collecting data. Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE - Level Three Strategic Thinking/Complex Reasoning requires deep knowledge using reasoning, planning, using evidence, and a higher level of thinking than the previous two levels. The cognitive demands at Level 3 are complex and abstract. The multi-step task requires more demanding reasoning. In most instances, requiring students to explain their thinking is at Level 3. Other Level 3 activities include drawing conclusions from observations; citing evidence and developing a logical argument for concepts; explaining phenomena in terms of concepts; and using concepts to solve non-routine problems. Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE - Level Four Extended Thinking/Reasoning requires high cognitive demand and is very complex. Students are required to make several connections – relate ideas within the content area or among content areas – and have to select or devise one approach among many alternatives on how the situation can be solved. Performance assessments and open- ended/constructed response assessment activities requiring significant thought will be Level 4. Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Depth of Knowledge Level 1 Level 1 — Identify this utensil. Level 2 Level 2 — Explain the function of the fork. Level 3 Level 3 — Identify two examples of when a fork would not be the best utensil for a type of food and explain why. Level 4 Level 4 — Design an investigation to determine the optimal number and length of tines for a salad fork. From: Lois Barnes SREB/HSTW Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Depth of Knowledge Level 1 Level 1 — Identify the type of tree. Level 2 Level 2 — Explain the function of the leaves. Level 3 Level 3 — Explain how a drought might affect the growth of the tree. Level 4 Level 4 — Design an investigation of seedling growth to determine the best fertilizer for this type of tree. Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Your Turn – What Level? Darlene is throwing a ball. Which goal is she most likely to accomplish if she releases the ball at a 45- degree angle? A.better flexibility B.greater speed C.better accuracy D.greater distance Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Your Turn – What Level? Rosa is on the way home from work when she remembers she needs to stop and purchase a birthday gift for tonight's party. In this situation, which type of purchase will Rosa most likely make? A.Impulse B.Bargain C.Comparison D.coupon Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Your Turn – What Level? Investigate the causes for and reactions to the Great Depression and compare them to the causes and reactions to today's economic situation, identifying the differences and explaining why those strategies may or may not work. Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Your Turn – What Level? What literary device is the narrator using when he says, "Within the week it sickened to a raging fever, and its pulse went up to a hundred and fifty in the shade"? Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Your Turn – What Level? A user wants to detect and clean a virus infected file as it is opened. Which of the following would best achieve this? A.Schedule a local virus scan B.utilize a real-time virus scan C.perform a scheduled network virus scan D.perform a complete virus scan of all hard disks Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Your Turn – What Level? What is one way to create a rough texture in a painting? Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Your Turn – What Level? S = a/b + c/d If 0<a<b<c<d in the equation above, then the greatest increase in S would result from adding 1 to the value of which variable? A.a B.b C.c D.d E.There is not enough information. Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Your Turn – What Level? Read and perform the following rhythm. (several measures of a rhythm are given in notation form) Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Your Turn – What Level? Scientists have evidence that the landforms we see on Earth, such as mountains, islands, and canyons, as well as the shapes of continents, are the result of constructive and destructive forces at work over a long period of time. Describe in detail two pieces of evidence that show that landforms on Earth are constantly changing. Provide a specific example for each piece of evidence. Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Your Turn – What Level? Which of these conclusions is best supported by information from the passage? A.If a candidate meets the personal and educational qualifications and is in fair physical shape, his or her chances of becoming an agent are very good. B.Compared with other law enforcement agencies in the country, the F.B.I. has a low success rate for tracking down and apprehending suspected offenders. C.The job of an agent is not for everyone; it takes someone with special training who is not afraid of danger and doesn’t mind being socially isolated at times. D.The life of a federal investigator is not as interesting as most people think; agents spend most of their time working at desks. Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Increasing Rigor Recall – Webb’s Depth of Knowledge looks at the cognitive demand of both content and task Content: simple to complex Task: routine to non-routine Increase the cognitive demand of either the content, the task or both Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Let’s Increase Rigor Students were walking to the library when it began to rain. The 18 students shared three umbrellas. If the same number of students were under each umbrella, how many students were under each umbrella? Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Let’s Increase Rigor - Content Students were walking to the library when it began to rain. The 7 students in Mr. Snow’s group shared three umbrellas they had with Ms. Winter’s group of 11 students. If the same number of students were under each umbrella, how many students were under each umbrella? Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Let’s Increase Rigor – Task Students were walking to the library when it began to rain. The 18 students shared three umbrellas. If the same number of students were under each umbrella, how many students were under each umbrella? Show two different strategies for solving this problem. Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Let’s Increase Rigor - Both Students were walking to the library when it began to rain. The 7 students in Mr. Snow’s group shared three umbrellas they had with Ms. Winter’s group of 11 students. If the same number of students were under each umbrella, how many students were under each umbrella? Illustrate your solution with words and diagrams. Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

Let’s Increase Rigor – Your Turn The students are selling cookies for a fundraiser. There are 24 cookies in each box and each student must sell 5 boxes. How many cookies much each student sell? Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)

More Information Curriculum & Instruction/Educational Technologies Department (610)