Essential Questions: What are the components of the (SPP)? How is PVAAS used as part of the calculation for the School Performance Profile (SPP)?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educator Effectiveness System November 5, Agenda – Town Hall Meeting Community Builder/Video (OPTIONAL) Today, we will be presenting an overview.
Advertisements

PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2012 Science Results Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent, Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems August.
PVAAS School Consultation Fall 2011 PVAAS Statewide Core Team
Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System Overview: PVAAS
Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
PVAAS + Other Data Consultation 2013 PVAAS AND OTHER DATA TOOLS SCHOOL CONSULTATION FALL 2013.
ESEA Flexibility: College & Career Readiness Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 7 of 8.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
PA School Performance Profile January 13, 2013 Superintendent Advisory Council 1.
MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS STATE ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS Multiple Measurement Rating (MMR) – Initial Designation.
School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
SY PVAAS Scatterplots State to IU Region to LEA Public Schools/Charter Schools/Comprehensive CTCs Math, Reading, Writing, Science Template Contact.
SY PVAAS Scatter Plots State to IU Region to School District Grades 4-8, 11 Math & Reading PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE Contact your IU PVAAS contact.
PVAAS – Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System added_assessment_system_(pvaas)/8751.
Comparison PVAAS Scatter Plots State to IU Region to School District Grades 4-8, Math & Reading PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE Contact your IU PVAAS.
A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.
ESEA Waiver and Accountability Status School Committee Presentation September 24, 2013.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
Understanding the SPP September 26, > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building.
PA School Performance Profile June /3/13. Your Role: Communicate the purpose and design of the proposed PA School Performance Profile (SPP) Create.
UMASD CURRICULUM/TECHNOLOGY/STUDENT SERVICES COMMITTEE December 17, 2012.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness Educator Effectiveness:
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
ESEA Flexibility: Student Growth Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 6 of 8.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT 2014 Standardized Testing Data Review 11/17/2014 MAXIMIZING OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUCCESS.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
PA School Performance Profile 1 Tamaqua Area Middle School.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
ESEA Flexibility: Achievement Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 4 of 8.
PVAAS School Consultation Guide Fall 2010 Session C: 9-12 High School – All Data Tools PVAAS Statewide Core Team
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Mohawk Jr-Sr High School PSSA/PVAAS Act 82 – New Teacher Evaluation Law Beginning in the school year, fifty percent (50%) of the evaluation.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
 Educator Effectiveness System  Comparative Measures  Resource for Professional Development.
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
Boyertown Area School District Data Summary
Minnesota’s Proposed Accountability System “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
PA School Performance Profile
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Teacher SLTs
Cedar Falls Board of Education October 2017
2012 Accountability Determinations
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
PVSD PDE School Performance Profile
Teacher SLTs
Alaska School Performance Index Annual Measurable Objectives Results
Media Briefing School Progress 2012 Results Mary L. Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy July 10, 2012 Meeting the requirements.
Teacher SLTs
MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA ! ?.
So what is PVAAS? PVAAS measures a group of students as they move from one grade level to the next. PVAAS is not concerned with “Achievement” PVAAS is.
Presentation transcript:

Essential Questions: What are the components of the (SPP)? How is PVAAS used as part of the calculation for the School Performance Profile (SPP)?

Who is responsible for creating all of this? USDOE NCLB State Board of Education Waiver for NCLB (moved from AYP to SPP) Chapter 4 Regulations PDE Systems to meet the requirements in Ch. 4

How are building scores calculated? (Handout) Quantitative academic score based upon a 100-point scale using: Section 1:Indicators of Academic Achievement (40%) Section 2:Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap (10%) Section 3: Indicators of Academic Growth (PVAAS) (40%) Section 4:Other Academic Indicators (10%) Total (100%) Extra Credit (up to 4 points) for elementary

Section 1: “Achievement” Achievement (PSSA Percentage Prof & Adv) Math ? X 7.5% = ____ Reading? X 7.5% = ____ Science ? X 7.5% = ____ Writing ? X 7.5% = ____ GR 3 Reading ? X 10% = ____ ___________________________________ Total 40%

Calculating SPP – “Achievement” Achievement (PSSA Percentage Prof & Adv) – Math 94% x7.5 = 7.1 – Reading80% x7.5 = 6 – Science90% x7.5 = 6.7 – Writing89% x7.5 = 6.7 – GR 3 Reading87% x10 = 8.7 Total40 = 35.2

Indicators of Academic Achievement (40%)34/40 Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap (10%) Indicators of Academic Growth (PVAAS) (40%) Other Academic Indictors (10%) Total (100%) Extra Credit (up to 4 points) for elementary

Section 2: “Closing the Achievement Gap” To calculate this measure, PDE determines the percent of students in the school who score proficient or advanced on each subject area of the PSSA. The percentage of proficient or advanced students is subtracted from 100 to arrive at the “GAP” between current achievement levels and full proficiency.

Closing the Achievement Gap In order to attain full credit for this measure, a school must make steady progress to close the gap by “half” within the next six years. For example: 2014: 78%2017: 84% 2019: 86% 2015: 80% 2016: 82% 2020: 88% Step 12013: 76% (Proficient & Advanced) Step 2100 – 76 = 24 (24 is the “gap”) Step 324/2 = 12 (12 is 50% of the “gap”) Step 412/6 = 2 (2% per year is the target)

Closing the Gap 10% 5% for “ALL” Students 5% for “historically low performing” students Students in the “historically low performing” group include: IEP, ELL, and ED (also referred to as the super sub-group) *a student can only count 1 time, even if they fall in more than one of the groups

Indicators of Academic Achievement (40%)34/40 Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap (10%)8/10 Indicators of Academic Growth (PVAAS) (40%) Other Academic Indictors (10%) Total (100%) Extra Credit (up to 4 points) for elementary

Section 3: PVAAS 40% Average Growth Index (AGI) The PVAAS AGI for a school is converted to a “scale” ranging from 50 – or higher = 100 a score of zero = or lower = 50

DACBE Met the Standard For Growth Did not Meet the Standard for Growth Exceeded the Standard for Growth 50 pts. 75pts. 100 pts.

PVAAS Calculation A school will receive a score between 50 – 100 for all 4 content areas: Indicators of Academic Growth/PVAAS Mathematics Reading Science Writing Total = 32.2

How are school scores calculated? Quantitative academic score based upon a 100-point scale using: Indicators of Academic Achievement (40%)34/40 Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap (10%)8/10 Indicators of Academic Growth (PVAAS) (40%)32/40 Other Academic Indictors (10%) Total (100%) Extra Credit (up to 4 points) for elementary

Other Academic Indicators 10% Promotion 5%5 Attendance 5%5 Total = 10/10

Indicators of Academic Achievement (40%)34/40 Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap (10%)8/10 Indicators of Academic Growth (PVAAS) (40%)32/40 Other Academic Indictors (10%)10/10 Total (100%) 84/100 Extra Credit (up to 4 points) for elementary

Last Item – Extra Credit 1% for all students who score “Advanced” on the PSSA For example: 60% Adv Math = (.6) Let’s take a look at the scores online unity/pennsylvania_department_of_education/7 237

Indicators of Academic Achievement (40%)34/40 Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap (10%)8/10 Indicators of Academic Growth (PVAAS) (40%)32/40 Other Academic Indictors (10%)10/10 (100%) 84/100 Extra Credit M 60% =.6 R 50 % =.5 S 70% =.7 W 40% =.4 Total = 2.2 Total SPP= = 86.2

Let’s take a look at the scores online