Jefferson Township Public Schools Spring 2007 Testing Analysis Presented to: Jefferson Township Board of Education Presented by: Mary K. Thornton, Ph.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.
Advertisements

Jefferson Township Public Schools Spring 2009 Testing Analysis Presented to: Jefferson Township Board of Education Presented by: Mary K. Thornton, Ph.D.
No Child Left Behind. ALL students will attain proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by ALL limited English students will become.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Knowledge is Power Pitt County Schools Title I Workshop.
1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
School District of University City Jackson Park Elementary School SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Joylynn Wilson, Superintendent Monica Hudson, Principal.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
Title I Parent Information Session Applegate School Laura Donovan School.
Angilee M. Downing, M.Ed. Vision: Educational Excellence For All Students.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Spring 2009 MCAS Results. Dedham Elementary Schools.
Berkshire Local School District Strategic Plan Update Fourth Update, 10/14/09.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind  NCLB Overview  Assessment and Accountability Requirements  Educator Quality.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Assessing Intended Learning Outcomes. What We Have Done.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Click to edit Master subtitle style 2010 Adequate Yearly Progress Report Lawrence Public Schools August 9, 2010.
Goal 1: To successfully educate all students Objective 3 Identify subgroups and content areas which contributed Identify subgroups and content areas which.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
NJASK 3-5 Report Sean Siet Director of Curriculum and Instruction October 20, 2011.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
K - 12 students are identified as English Language Learners (ELLs) if, at the time of their enrollment, they meet the following criteria: 1. There is a.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
Ace it!SM Tutoring Teacher Training
Presentation transcript:

Jefferson Township Public Schools Spring 2007 Testing Analysis Presented to: Jefferson Township Board of Education Presented by: Mary K. Thornton, Ph.D. Director of Curriculum & Instruction July 16, 2007

Background No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) – signed into law on January 8, 2002 This law represents some of the most significant changes to the Elementary and Secondary Act (ESEA) since its enactment in 1965

Introduction NCLB contains four basic major education reform principals: increased focus on accountability, increased flexibility and local control, expanded educational options for parents, and focus on research-based methods and practices

Stronger Accountability for Results SY, schools must administer tests in each of three grade spans: grades 3-5, grades 6-9, and grades in all schools SY, tests must be administered every year in grades 3 through 8 and one year in grades States must develop standards in science by the school year SY, science achievement must also be tested

Guidelines for Assessing Students Goal: All students will be assessed At least 95% of each student group must participate in the assessment process Students enrolled for < 1 year will not be included in the accountability process (July 1) Students with severe disabilities must be assessed utilizing the Alternative Proficiency Assessment (APA)

Guidelines for Assessing Students Out of district students will be included in their home school’s accountability process LEP students must also be assessed

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Each state must establish a definition by AYP to measure the yearly incremental progress of schools in reaching 100 % proficiency by the SY Each state must establish a minimum standard for percentage of students proficient for each year during that period

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Student progress will also be assessed by student groups Racial/EthnicIncome LEPSpecial Education Starting points were established for language arts literacy and mathematics for 4 th, 8 th, and 11 th grades

Establishing AYP States are required to raise the standard once in the first two years, then at least every three years, therefore, standards will be raised in NJ 2005, 2008, 2011, and 2014 In 2014, all groups must attain 100% proficiency in language arts literacy, mathematics, and science

Preliminary Starting Points for AYP Test/Grade Level Subject2003 and 2004 AYP Target HSPA (Grade 11) LAL Mathematics 73% 55% GEPA (Grade 8) LAL Mathematics 58% 39% NJASK 3 &4 (Grades 3 & 4) LAL Mathematics 68% 53%

Incremental Increases Starting Point LALGrades Grades Grade MathGrades Grades Grade

School-level Accountability Each school’s proficiency statistics in each area (reading and math) and student subgroup will be compared to the statewide benchmark Results for subgroups with fewer than 20 (SPED- 35) students will be suppressed or excluded from the analysis A misclassification rate of 5% will also be applied (error margin) If a subgroup is identified as not having met AYP, “safe harbor”may be reached

Multiple Measures States must also utilize additional indicators of student performance or achievement in conjunction with statewide assessments MS/HS level – graduation rate Elementary level – attendance rate

School Improvement Identification Schools that have not made AYP for two consecutive school years in the same content area will be identified as needing school improvement before the beginning of the next school year Schools are responsible for improving the academic performance of all students “Real consequences” exist for schools and districts that fail to make AYP

School Improvement Process- Sanctions YearBaselineYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Year 6 StatusBaseline Year Fail to make AYP 1 st year of school impr. 2 nd year of school impr. 3 rd year of school impr. 4 th year of school impr. Services from district None Tech. Assist. Corr. Action Resturc. Parental Choice None School Choice School Choice SES

Jefferson Township Public Schools Detailed Longitudinal View for All Groups by District and Schools NJ ASK to 2007

NJ ASK 3 TOTAL PROFICIENCY (Proficient and Advanced Proficient)

Jefferson Township Public Schools Detailed Longitudinal View for All Groups by District and Schools NJ ASK to 2007

NJ ASK4 TOTAL PROFICIENCY (Proficient and Advanced Proficient)

NJ ASK 5 TOTAL PROFICIENCY (Proficient and Advanced Proficient)

NJ ASK 6/NJ ASK 7/GEPA TOTAL PROFICIENCY (Proficient and Advanced Proficient)

Jefferson Township Public Schools Detailed Longitudinal View for all Groups by District and Schools GEPA and HSPA 2004 to 2007

HSPA TOTAL PROFICIENCY (Proficient and Advanced Proficient)

How Were Student Assessment Results Used?

Curriculum Revision – aligned with 2004 NJ CCCS Language Arts (updated 2006) Math (updated 2006 and 2007) Science World Languages (2006) Health & Physical Education (2007) High School Electives (2006) Art (2006) Social Studies (2007) *Reviewed and revised all HS AP courses (2007)

Purchased Teachers’ Desk Reference Books for all staff in Grades K-12 New instructional materials for all areas including textbooks, audio visuals and computer software (Social Studies, Math, Language Arts, Science)

Extensive Professional Development Computer and Interactive White Board training Differentiated Instruction and Assessment Collaborative teaching Using NJ CCCS in planning Assessment design Use of rubrics for student assessment Specific computer software Student writing (elementary – Four Square) Learning Centers Guided Reading Literacy Center Management Study Groups for teachers – writing, using grammar, guided reading Learning Styles Instructional Strategies

Administrative Initiatives Elementary Curriculum Councils Professional Development provided at all faculty and department meetings STI program used for recording student grades (6-12) STI program used for lesson planning (6-12) Grade level meetings (K-5) Pacing Guides written by teachers for all subject areas (K-12) Designed and implemented district student assessment program (Grades 1-12)

Analysis by teachers, supervisors and administrators led to: Identification of areas of weakness and re-teaching Pacing guides Increased small group instruction Changes in instructional materials Increased emphasis on writing Use of alternate assessments Identification of students at-risk of failure Emphasis on basic math skills Increased use of problems solving skills Targeted remedial programs Use of rubrics in assignments and grading Use of differentiated instruction Use of state test format questions in assignments and assessments

What’s Next – Continue effective programs: Create lists of at-risk students and track their progress. Remediate with targeted instruction. Smaller groups in Middle School Specific to needs of individual Fundamentals of Literacy Expand use of Guided Reading (K-12) Expand practice of elementary learning and literacy centers Continue use of the differentiated spelling program, (Gr. 1-5) Continue use of integrated test prep materials in elementary Expand use of integrated test prep materials to Middle School Continue to implement Four Square Writing (K-5) Expand use of Four Square Writing to Middle School

New Initiatives for Revise Language Arts curriculum (Character Education themes) Study Island – web based instruction in LAL and Math, grades 2-12 Writing Portfolios for all students (K-12) Re-evaluate content, materials, and instruction in 9 th, 10 th and 11 th grade Math courses Add Honors level Statistics class in HS Fall baseline testing in LAL and Math for 10 th grade Address targeted writing skills in MS program

New Initiatives (continued) Year long, curriculum based, integrated test prep (Gr. 3-11) Incorporate Singapore Math practices in K-8 Math curriculum E.G.G.S. (Everyone Gets a Great Start) intervention program for Kindergarten Review and revise content matter for MS Fundamentals of Literacy classes Review instructional materials and methodologies in Special Education programs Create and implement a district framework for instruction Review and update mentoring program Provide continuous professional development for all staff

Questions/Comments