Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Education Curriculum Anthony Scorsone. Each child's IEP should state that the placement is the least restrictive environment for that particular.
Advertisements

ALIGNING STATE SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE TEACHER QUALITY FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES.
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
Helping State Leaders Shape Education Policy Presentation Prepared for Panel Discussion Colorado Association for Teacher Educators Spring 2004 Conference.
The 10 Components of a Schoolwide Title I Program Presented by: Dr. Denise Ellis Director State and Federal Programs Dr. Ken Wagner Principal Rancho Mirage.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Connecticut Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform (CEEDAR) Grant.
September 20, 2004CTQ National Forum Rhode Island’s Journey Toward Aligning the State Teacher Licensing System: An Example of One State’s Reform.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
The National Policy Landscape Elizabeth B. Kozleski, Professor Arizona State University.
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
Professional Teaching Portfolio First Name, Last Name Contact Information, .
Professional Teaching Portfolio
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
1. ORIENTATION & OVERVIEW Alabama Teacher Education Reform Ensuring no child is left behind Elizabeth W. Beale, Ed.D SERRC Jayne Meyer, Ph.D. Mabrey Whetstone,
Weber State University Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction Candidate Assessment Plan.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
Certification, Teacher Education, and Professional Development Marcia Harmon Rosenbusch National K-12 Foreign Language Resource Center Iowa State University.
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Technology Standards. NETS-T Background International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) created National Educational Technology.
What are Federal Programs and How Can I be Involved? Professional Development Meeting Stanley Hupfeld Academy August 2014.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
The Stages of Professional Development: A Resource for All Teachers Responsible for the Achievement of Students with Disabilities Online Professional Development.
Donald Kauchak and Paul Eggen
Wazz up with Education : Looking at Challenges, Contexts, and Complexities Elizabeth B. Kozleski Arizona State University.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
The Federal Government
ASSESSING CANDIDATE PERFORMANCE William Sharpton Richard Hall University of New Orleans Project Directors’ Meeting July 2007.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Engineering & Technology Committee The Engineering & Technology Committee’s Mission To identify and promote the development of skills and competencies.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Designing and Delivering Preparation in Response to Local Need: Challenges in Preparing and Retaining HQ Special Education Personnel presented by: Phoebe.
Center for Improving Teacher Quality (CTQ) Funded through the Office of Special Education Programs, U. S. Department of Education.
1 August 22, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D, Assistant Commissioner Division of Educational Standards and Programs SURVEY RESULTS OF THE HIGHLY QUALIFIED.
+ Welcome! Agenda: 5:00-5:30 Influences discussion 5:30-6:30 Review of last week’s discussion NBPTS standards 6:30-6:45 Break 6:45-7:00 NAEA Standards.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Forum on Educational Accountability Gene Wilhoit Council of Chief State School Officers January 7, 2010.
1 Willa Spicer, Deputy Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and Higher.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
School Improvement Plan (SIP) Accreditation Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
Center for Improving Teacher Quality (CTQ) Ensuring that Special Education Students are Served by Highly Qualified Teachers Funded by the Office of Special.
Contemporary Issues September 12, NJEA Today.
Leveraging Federal Resources: Teacher Quality, Research, and Program Improvement Peggi Zelinko Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Robert Ochsendorf.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
“Successes, Challenges and Technical Assistance: A Dialog with State Teams” Lisa Stooksberry – AACTE David Paradise – CTQ Kathleen Paliokas –CTQ Michele.
Standards-Based Online Professional Development to Mentor and Retain Special Education Personnel Presented to Teacher Education Division of Council for.
Systems-level Alignment Issues Challenges and Strategies to Recruiting, Preparing and Retaining HQ Special Education Personnel presented by The contents.
Universal Design for Learning in Public Policy. The National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard NIMAS (2006) A harbinger of the future.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Grant Activities, Needs Assessments And other SPDG application Issues to Consider.
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
BCCHS Annual Title I Meeting A Single-School District LEA September 10, 2015 December 3, 2015.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Looking To The Future: NASDSE’s Role
Preparing Educators for Results-Focused Careers
Presentation transcript:

Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC) A program of the Council of Chief State School Officers

What Is INTASC? The Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium is a membership organization of state education agencies and professional standards boards responsible for licensing teachers. Thirty-five states plus a number of national education organizations are members of INTASC.

Purpose of INTASC To provide a forum for states to: find their collective voice regarding model standards for licensing teachers. share strategies and engage in joint activities to change teacher policy and practice. regularly assess the alignment of their teacher licensure system with state standards.

State Teacher Licensing System State PK-12 Student Standards State Teacher Licensing Standards Pre-Service Preparation State Licensing Professional Dev For Re-Licensing State Program Approval Standards State Licensing Assessment State Prof. Dev. Requirements © INTASC/CCSSO

INTASC Core Principles #1 - Subject Matter Knowledge #2 - Child Development #3 - Diversity #4 - Instructional Strategies #5 - Learning Environment #6 - Communication #7 - Planning #8 - Assessment #9 - Reflection/ Professional Dev #10 - Collaboration DECISION TO USE 10-PRINCIPLE FORMAT Used INTASC core standards as the framework for committee discussion and for final format of the document We first focused on Principles #2-10 first to get dialog going – we knew #1 would be more challenging [SEE P.19 IN RED BOOK] [Principle #2] Structure for each principle is as follows: Core Principle/Intro/All teachers/Arts specialists – this structure parallels our special ed standards Included introductory paragraph that highlights the key ideas of that principle when teaching the arts Goal was to get at distinctions in roles and how gen/spec can collaborate to support each other

INTASC’s Standards for Teachers of Students with Disabilities Address for first time what GENERAL EDUCATION teachers should know and be able to do to effectively teach students with disabilities Drafted by 27 practicing teachers and teacher educators from both general and special education Aligned with INTASC’s core standards

Center for Improving Teacher Quality (CTQ) Ensuring that Special Education Students are Served by Highly Qualified Teachers Funded by the Office of Special Education Programs U. S. Department of Education

Mission of CTQ To enhance educational opportunities for all students, particularly students with disabilities, through improving teacher licensing systems

INTASC/CCSSO in collaboration with National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE) American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education (AACTE) Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Federal Regional Resource Centers Federal Labs and Comprehensive Centers

State Teams as Vehicles for Change Key Team Members State Director of Teacher Licensing/ Program Approval State Director of Special Education Representative from Higher Education

Strategies for Helping States Effect Change Annual Forums Brokered, customized technical assistance Grant monies Communities of practice Telecasts Website Intensive Case Studies

Federal Context for Change No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Disaggregated Subgroup Progress Accountability Highly Qualified Teachers IDEA Reauthorization HQ implication is that special educators must demonstrate subject matter competency if involved in direct instruction of the general curriculum

IDEA Re-Authorization and Highly Qualified Teachers Will incorporate teacher quality requirements of NCLB What are implications for special education teachers? Must demonstrate subject matter competency if involved in direct instruction of the general curriculum