What it means for New Teachers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
District Accreditation
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
1 UW-Whitewater & CESA 2 Licensure Renewal & Support Center.
NEW MEXICO Three-Tiered Teacher Licensure EDUCATOR QUALITY DIVISION New Mexico Public Education Department September, 2005.
The Quality Educator Initiative PI 34
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Slides originally developed by NJDOE A New Vision For Professional Development.
E-Program Portfolio Let’s Begin Department of Reading and Language Arts Program Portfolio Central Connecticut State University Name: Date Submitted: Program.
 Please sign in.  You must register for the course to receive PAC.  PAC is valuable for advancing on the salary schedule.
Developing an Individual Professional Growth Plan
1 ADEPT Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty Winthrop University.
Working Smarter, Not Harder (making Educator Effectiveness and Licensure work together for your benefit)
Linda Helf and Ann Cattau
 Morning Ice Breaker: › Only child, oldest child, middle child, or youngest child  What do you like best about your familial position? What drove or.
QUICK START An Orientation to PI 34 Information for Today and Tomorrow presented by Chippewa Valley Regional PI 34 Network.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
PDP for the Initial Educator Modified from the South West Education Association.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2005 Wisconsin Quality Educator Initiative Educator Preparation Program Approval and Licensing.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
PI -34 What Every Educator Should Know R. Schemelin.
PI 34 Synopsis Wisconsin Quality Educator Initiative.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
The Professional Development Plan for License Renewal in Wisconsin Goal Writing Workshop.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
DPI PDP Verification Refresher Growing the Profession: Educator PDP Verification The Top Ten Things to Remember When Reviewing Educators’ PDPs for.
Beginning Teacher Support Program Charter Schools New Principal Institute June 2015.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Content Pedagogy Design Group: Jeanne Bennett, Corrine Chalifour, Warren Dobbins, Julie Jones, Liz Linear, Lindi McCurry, Jigna Patel, Sue Varga-Ward,
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
Where are you in the process? What do you want to know? What kind of support do you need?
 Morning Ice Breaker: › Only child, oldest child, middle child, or youngest child  What do you like best about your familial position? What drove or.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
REFLECTING, WRITING, AND REVIEWING THE PDP PRESENTED BY: MARY T. CIESLEWICZ SEWNTP PI-34 COORDINATOR
Performance Evaluation for Occupational Therapists and Physical Therapists North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Exceptional Children Division.
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
TEAM Teacher Education and Mentoring Program. What is the TEAM Program? Legislation passed in October 2009 has established a Teacher Education and Mentoring.
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
APS Teacher Evaluation System Preparing for Implementation May 2012.
What it means for New Teachers
Dissemination Training
ED 690: Reflecting, Writing, and Reviewing the PDP
A Guide for Wisconsin’s Initial Educators By: Cynthia L. Teal
Creating the Professional Development Plan (PDP) – Verification
Supporting Beginning Teachers
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2005
Resident Educator Program
PI -34 “The Big Picture” MAS Mentor Forum.
PI-34 (It is 3-4, not 34).
Presentation transcript:

What it means for New Teachers PI34 & the PDP What it means for New Teachers

Guiding Principles Improved student learning Career-long teacher preparation Collaboration between higher education, P-12, and DPI Community of learners Diversity and equity Performance based program approval and licensure Shared vision of what educators should know and be able to do

Continuum

WI Educator Standards 10 Teacher Standards 7 Pupil Services Standards 7 Administrator Standards

License Stages Initial Educator Professional Educator Options Maintain Professional Educator License Pursue Master Educator License Pursue Administrative or Pupil Service License

Initial Educator Length of license is 5-yr, non-renewable (minimum 3 years) Educator develops a Professional Development Plan (PDP) addressing 2 or more Standards PDP is approved by a majority of a review team

Initial Educator NOTE: Initial Educator License may be renewed if the individual has not been employed as an educator for at least 3 yrs. within the 5-year period.

Initial Educator School District Requirements Must provide collaboratively developed ongoing orientation to Initial Educator Must provide support seminars reflecting the Standards and district goals Must provide a qualified trained mentor to the Initial Educator “Qualified” means holding an appropriate license

Initial Educator PDP Review Team (PDT) Composition: A teacher of the same subject or level; or a pupil service professional of the same license category; or an administrator in the same license category selected by you (not mentor) An administrator designated by the district administrator and subject to approval by the school board A higher education (IHE) representative (We are all here to help you!)

Initial Educator PDT Role Trained on WI Standards and Professional Development Plan Trained to use the checklist for the Professional Development Plan Reviews & approves professional development goals Majority verifies successful completion of plan to State Superintendent

Initial Educator CAVEAT This team.. Reviews & approves the initial educator's professional development goals Verifies successful completion of the educator's PDP Does NOT evaluate teaching performance – this is the role of licensed administrators and the school board

PDP Guidelines Now let’s talk about the Principles for creating a PDP Purpose of the PDP Licensure Cycle

PDP Guidelines Principles for Creating the PDP To give you the opportunity to: Direct your own growth Work with others to further your vision/goals Address 2 or more of the WI Educator Standards Be a risk taker

PDP Guidelines Purpose of the PDP To serve as a mechanism for license renewal between you, your PDT and the State Superintendent To show how you plan to increase your proficiency based on the WI Educator Standards To show how you plan to improve your pupils’ learning

PDP Guidelines Timeline Year 1: Reflection and work with mentor. Between June 1 and January 1: Submit goal plan, with checklist to PDT for approval of goal. Goal Approval must be to DPI by Jan 1. Years 2-4: Document your annual review. If major revisions to the goal occur in years 2, 3, or 4, submit the changes to the PDT for review by April 1 of the year the changes occur.

PDP Guidelines Timeline Year 5: Submit completed PDP with documentation to the PDT between July 1 and January 15 Year 5: The PDT will review the PDP by April 1. Clarification of discrepancies between the PDT and the candidate will occur by June 1 Year 5: Submit completed application with PDP verification form to DPI to advance to a Professional Educator License

Process for Creating Your PDP Before you write the plan: Self-reflection Writing the Plan: Components Annual Review of the PDP Successful Completion of the PDP

Process for Creating Your PDP Self-Reflection Examples of the self-reflection process: Reflection journal logs Student, peer, and parent feedback Collection of student data over time Analysis from classroom observations Examination of critical incidents Rubrics describing components of good teaching based on WI Educator Standards

Process for Creating Your PDP I. Self-Reflection As you self-reflect, look for: Patterns of performance Areas of interest Compelling student or professional needs Effectiveness of teaching based on student learning results

Process for Creating Your PDP Reflection questions: In what areas do I demonstrate strengths of performance? How do I know? What areas challenge my ability to perform in the classroom and with pupils’ learning? What keeps me passionate and proud to be an educator?

Writing the Plan: Components Description of School and Teaching Assignment Goals / Standards to be Addressed

Writing the Plan: Components Writing a Goal Look at your reflection Based on where you are now, what knowledge, skills, and dispositions will advance your current performance? What Standards are represented in your goal?

Writing the Plan: Components Rationale for the Goal Link goal to your self reflection Link goal to your school/teaching situation Goal should promote growth in two or more WI Educator Standards

Writing the Plan: Components Plan for Assessment/Documentation of Achieving the Goal You must indicate how you plan to assess the results of your goal. The assessment must document the results of your efforts to improve your professional performance.

Writing the Plan: Components Plan to meet the Goal: Objectives…are verifiable actions. Their completion should result in goal accomplishment Activities & Timeline…outline actions and steps that lead to the achievement of your objectives/goal Collaboration…takes many forms

Writing the Plan: Review III. Annual Review of the PDP Is the responsibility of the educator If major revision to the plan is made during years 2, 3 or 4, a Annual Review Form must be submitted to the PDT for their review by April 1 of that year and must include Reflection Revision

Writing the Plan: Completion Successful Completion of the Plan A. Summary and reflection statement B. Documentation of successful completion of the plan

Writing the Plan: Completion Summary and Reflection Statement includes: Discussion of the achievement of your goal and any changes made to your goal throughout the cycle. An analysis of indicators of growth. Reflection and analysis of your professional growth and how it impacted your students’ learning.

Writing the Plan: Completion Documentation of Successful Completion of the Plan Be selective. Choose quality over quantity. Include only 3-5 pieces of evidence of growth over the licensing cycle. This evidence must illustrate the result of the implementation of your goal and the impact on student learning.

PI34 & Portfolios

PDP Resources DPI Websites The PDP

PI34 & the PDP “It is up to each individual licensee to develop a PDP. The planning process for writing a PDP ensures that WI educators are broadly informed, deeply committed, and perform actions that will keep WI schools and districts places that motivate and engage all students and will result in enhanced student learning. The PDP is the property of the applicant.” PDP Educator Toolkit, WI DPI.