WTEP Conceptual Framework and Assessment System Preparing professional educators to be effective communicators who integrate and care.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Advertisements

Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
MYP (Middle Years Programme).  m7oU.
Hendrick’’s Science Complex Auditorium Friday Sept 7, 201`2 11:00.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education February 2006 image files formats.
SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.
CSRA RESA TAPP Purpose: Identify and Prepare Teachers for TEACHER ALTERNATIVE PREPARATION PROGRAM.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division BPC Conceptual Framework.
The Role of the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation (NAQAAE) in Egyptian Education   The National Authority for Quality Assurance.
+ School Psychology Program MISSION Program Overview Structure and Curriculum Sequence Program Highlights Clinical Faculty Cohort Assessment System Use.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Weber State University Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction Candidate Assessment Plan.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Teacher Education Program. Where are you now? Where are you now? Admission to Purdue University Waiting to CODO to Respective Academic College for Teacher.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Assistant Provost for Institutional Effectiveness Texas Christian University TAMU Assessment Conference 2011.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Hiring Practices “Getting it Right” Brenda Hammons- Assistant Superintendent Dave Cox – Director of Academic Programs.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Joint Advisory Board/Working Group Meeting November 18, 2010 School of Education.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Teacher Education Advisory Council University of South Carolina Beaufort May 5, :00 p.m.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
A Comprehensive Unit Assessment Plan Program Improvement, Accountability, and Research Johns Hopkins University School of Education Faculty Meeting October.
Maryland Technology Grant “ Our goal is to ensure that all Maryland teacher candidates are proficient in integrating technology in the classroom for teaching.
Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
Achievement Portfolio
The Areas of Interaction are…
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
© International Baccalaureate Organization 2006 The Middle Years Program At a Glance.
UCF University-wide System for Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Dr. Julia Pet-Armacost Assistant VP, Information, Planning, and Assessment University.
TWS Aids for Student Teachers & Interns Overview of TWS.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Expectations What do you expect from: C&I Faculty? Yourself and other students? The Bachelor of Science in Education Program?
March 15-16, Inquiry and Evidence An introduction to the TEAC system for accrediting educator preparation programs 3/15/12, 9:00-10:00a.m. CAEP.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Sharon M. Livingston, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Director of Assessment Department of Education LaGrange College LaGrange, GA GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
College of Education Graduate Programs
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Assessment Presentation Day For Faculty Cindy J. Speaker, Ph.D. Wells College August 21, 2006.
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010.
Preparing your Portfolio for Admission to Program (Gate 1) --EAA & ECA-- Department of Curriculum & Instruction College of Education and Human Sciences.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
Academic Program Review Bachelor of Science Self-Design Bachelor of Arts Liberal Studies: Self-Design Presented to: Granite State College Executive Committee.
KRISTIE WOOD EDU /26/15 Birth-Second Grade Teacher  Praxis Core Academic Skills for Educators  Praxis Content Area Test  Hold a bachelor's degree.
NCATE Program Review Process Margaret D. Crutchfield, Ph.D. September 2006
Conversation with the SLOA&C March 20, 2015 Professional Development Day SJCC Presenters: C. Cruz-Johnson, S. Datta, and R. Gamez Paving the Way for Student.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Standards-Based Teacher Education Continuous Assessment of Teacher Education Candidates.
Middle Years Programme (MYP)
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Why Consider Becoming a Teacher?
Special Education Teachers and Highly Qualified Requirements
NJCU College of Education
SUMMARY OF Teacher Preparation In US
Presentation transcript:

WTEP Conceptual Framework and Assessment System Preparing professional educators to be effective communicators who integrate and care

Williams Baptist College Vision Statement of the college o The result of the college’s efforts o “To produce exceptional graduates prepared to engage local and global cultures through a Christ-centered worldview.” Mission of the college o The need to society that the college provides o “To provide an excellent, holistic Christian liberal arts education, while compassionately shaping student lives.”

Williams Baptist College Brief history of the college ◦Founded in 1941 and was located in Pocahontas, AR for five years ◦In 1947, the campus was relocated to a Marine Corps Air Base near Walnut Ridge, AR. ◦Since 1984 the college has been accredited at the baccalaureate level. ◦In 1989, the Williams Baptist College Education program began. During this time, the informal work of designing a conceptual framework began.

Conceptual Framework In 1998, after an extensive examination of research, design of curriculum, evaluation of faculty and candidates, and an examination of many other facets of the education arena, the Williams Teacher Education Program Conceptual Framework was adopted. “The Williams Teacher Education Program is committed to preparing professional educators to be effective communicators who integrate and care.”

Conceptual Framework Development of the current conceptual framework was accomplished by a committee of the following WTEP stakeholders: ◦President of the College ◦Vice President of Academic Affairs ◦Williams Baptist College Board of Trustees ◦Chair of The Division of Arts and Sciences ◦Chair of The Division of Professional Studies ◦Department Chairs from the Education Unit ◦Faculty, teacher candidates, K-12 teachers and administrators Leadership was provided by National and State consultants/personnel

Conceptual Framework The goal of the Conceptual Framework Committee was to establish a body of knowledge for consideration in focusing the framework statement. The following learned societies were examined in the development of the Williams Teacher Education Program Conceptual Framework ◦Holmes group ◦National Board for Professional Teaching Standards ◦Goodlad Consortium ◦Carnegie Forum ◦Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium

Conceptual Framework The Conceptual Framework Committee members shared their research and identified commonalities that express the alignment of research to the three components of communicating, integrating, and caring. The WTEP imperative is that its teacher preparation programs share the philosophy and practices that meet this commitment for optimal preparation of teacher candidates.

Conceptual Framework - Goals Teacher candidates will competently communicate a)Their competence in content areas of the general studies. b)Their knowledge of the learning processes, especially the stages and characteristics of physical, cognitive, affective, and communicative growth and development. c)Their respective specialization and professional content. d)Their understanding of professionalism with regard to appearance, verbal and written expressions, and civility.

Conceptual Framework - Goals Teacher candidates will integrate a)Content, resources, and methods of instruction with assessment in response to students’ abilities and exceptional needs. b)Methods of classroom in instruction by using multimedia, technology, and community resources. c)Content with character education for the advantage of all learners. d)Content, character education, and methods of instruction through classroom experiences by which students will be encouraged to inquire, receive, and construct knowledge.

Conceptual Framework - Goals Teacher candidates will demonstrate that they care in the following ways: a)By exemplifying values of sharing and altruism in local, national, and global communities. b)By exhibiting commitment to all aspects of the students’ academic, social, emotional, and moral well-being. c)By involving themselves in activities and events that expand and explore their aesthetic appreciation, academic betterment, and refinement of character. d)By reflecting the attitudes of life-long learners.

Williams Teacher Education Program Assessment System

How WTEP Assesses New Applicants: Baseline Requirements: 45 semester hours completed Copy of transcript submitted to WTEP office 2.0 or better GPA in English Composition I, English Composition II, Speech & Communication, College Algebra or Contemporary Mathematics, and Introduction to Teaching Overall GPA of 2.5 or better at time of admission request

How WTEP Assesses New Applicants: Baseline Requirements (continued): Official Praxis Core scores on file in registrar’s office and meeting or exceeding minimum score requirements: 156 on Reading, 150 on Mathematics, 162 on Writing Degree Plan on file in registrar’s office and in WTEP office Autobiographical sketch on file in WTEP office Two letters of recommendation from Williams faculty Portfolio prepared for interview

How WTEP Assesses New Applicants: Dispositions: Candidates are evaluated by participating WTEP faculty on eight academic and professional dispositions: Intellectual curiosity In-class performance Communication skills Responsibility Respect for rules and policies Appearance Personal integrity Group work

How WTEP Assesses New Applicants: Admission Interviews: Conducted each semester by panel of three WTEP faculty, who evaluate applicants independently and jointly on the following criteria: Ability to respond with organized explanations Ability to respond with confidence Use of proper grammar (in spoken responses as well as in submitted documents, such as autobiography) Display of professional grooming Display of professional dress Display of poise

How WTEP Assesses New Applicants: Admission Interviews (continued): Letters of recommendation and Disposition Forms also consulted Decision options: (1) admit without conditions (2) admit with conditions (develop remediation plan) (3) deny admission at present

How WTEP Assesses Admitted Candidates: Academic Monitoring Candidates must maintain overall 2.5 GPA Dispositions Candidates regularly evaluated Remediation plan developed if deficiencies are noted

How WTEP Assesses Admitted Candidates: Praxis II Candidates must take all required Praxis II Content tests and submit official scores before enrolling in Directed Student Teaching WTEP requires minimum scores mandated by the Arkansas Department of Education Office of Professional Licensure

How WTEP Assesses Admitted Candidates: Internship Evaluations Used to gather information on the effectiveness of candidates and the WTEP program. Candidates are evaluated by cooperating teachers, WTEP supervisors, and themselves, using several methods: ◦Student Intern Evaluation ◦Early Childhood Evaluation (for P-4 candidates only) ◦Middle Level Evaluation (for Mid-Level candidates only) ◦Cooperating Teacher’s Recommendations ◦Self-Rating Evaluation ◦Student Teaching Reflections

How WTEP Assesses Admitted Candidates: Internship Evaluations (continued) Candidates also evaluate their cooperating teachers and WTEP supervisors, using following methods: ◦Cooperating Teacher Evaluation ◦Supervisor Evaluation

How WTEP Assesses Admitted Candidates: Exit Survey Face to face professional conversation with interns Teacher Work Sample Interns conduct a Pre-Post Test to assess their impact on K-12 learners: ◦This assessment was implemented in Spring 2012

How WTEP Assesses Admitted Candidates: Praxis III Evaluation of WTEP graduates based on the PATHWISE model, by a trained external assessor This assessment has been removed by the Arkansas Department of Education as a requirement for licensure

How WTEP Assesses Admitted Candidates: Employer Survey Evaluation of WTEP graduates, by a licensed K- 12 School Administrator

How WTEP Assesses Admitted Candidates: Novice Teacher Data Self Evaluation of WTEP graduates

WTEP Gates GATE 1 Praxis Core tests GATE 2 Screened for admission into the WTEP GATE 3 Admission to ED 4113 Study of the School and ED 4133 Measurement and Evaluation GATE 4 Teacher candidates must take all required Praxis II content tests prior to enrolling in Directed Student Teaching GATE 5 Teacher candidates must take the Praxis II PLT, and submit official scores GATE 6 Apply for licensure to be considered a WTEP Program Completer

WTEP Assessments Baseline Requirements Dispositions Admission Interviews ∙ Academic Monitoring ∙ Dispositions Praxis II Internship Evaluations, completed by professionals Internship Evaluations, completed by interns Teacher Work Sample Impact of intern on K- 12 learners Exit Interviews Praxis III Employer Survey Novice Teacher Data