Van Buren School District Principal Evaluation Pilot District July 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEING AN ETHICAL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADER SHIRLEY JOHNSON & KEISHA D. SMITH BASED ON THE WORKSHOP FROM AEA 2012 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE.
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Katonah-Lewisboro School District Annual Professional Performance Review Update 5/23/
Contextualized Goals Setting: How to operationalize ISLLC standards for school improvement Dawn Shannon Assistant Superintendent, Broome-Tioga BOCES
Most current teacher evaluations provide little information that can be used to give teachers the training and tools they need to be effective; better.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
SAM LPLP Provider Training Program June 27, 2014Helena, Montana.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
1. 6 leadership standards what are they? 3 2 Teaching & Learning 1 Vision, Mission & Goals 6 The Education System 4 Collaborating with Families and Stakeholders.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
STRATEGIES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR BEGINNING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS BY MACARTHUR JONES ROSANNA LOYA MICHAEL SAENZ FALL 2011 A Leader’s First 100 Days.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Sherri M. Kenley Seeking ~ MCPS Elementary School Assistant Principal position position.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
ISLLC Standard #4 ISLLC Standard #4 Monitoring Diverse Needs Name Workshop Facilitator.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Overview.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Click to edit Master subtitle style New Evaluation Assessment for Principals and School Leaders Jan Hammond Jan Hammond
BUILDING CAPACITY THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP DR. SANDRA J. MOORE DR. ROBERT C. MCCRACKEN RADFORD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE.
Arkansas Association of Educational Administrators Henderson State University April 28, 2012 Dr. Richard Abernathy AAEA Executive Director.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
EDAD 5389 Domains and Competencies. Domain I—School Community Leadership Domain II—Instructional Leadership Domain III—Administrative Leadership.
Kevin Croff Educational Leadership Portfolio March 2005.
A Mission of Restoration
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
Rachelle Kuehl Assistant Principal Applicant Roanoke City Public Schools.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
OCM BOCES Day 2 Principal Evaluator Training 1. Back to the beginning: 2 Nine Components.
Candidate’s Name: Date:.  Candidates who complete the program are educational leaders who have the knowledge and ability to promote the success of.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementing Professional Learning Communities Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #4 Collaborating with Families (and Stakeholders) Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #3 Planning for School – wide Behavior Management
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Educational Service Unit 7 Wednesday, September 24, 2008 Dr. Dan Ernst and Dr. Bill Kenagy Administrator Evaluation: Superintendent Principal.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Child Development Parent Training Jessica Amezcua-Gallegos.
Competency Reflections Tawana Daniels Dr. Laura Henry EDUC 6331 Administrative Internship 2.
Student Achievement Teacher & Leader Effectiveness Overview of Stronge & MyLearningPlan/OASYS Interim Report #1 January 27,
ISLLC Standard #3 Implementing Effective Meetings Name Workshop Facilitator.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Vermont’s Core Teaching & Leadership Standards. 13-member, teacher majority, policy-making board appointed by the Governor What is the VSBPE?
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Competency Reflections
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Van Buren School District Principal Evaluation Pilot District July 2012

During the 87th General Assembly, the Arkansas State Legislature passed Act 222 of 2009, Arkansas Code Annotated Et. Seq which states: The purpose of the School Leadership Coordinating Council is to: (3) Aid in the development of model evaluation tools for use in the evaluation of school administrators. * Principal Evaluation Task Force created During the 87th General Assembly, the Arkansas State Legislature passed Act 222 of 2009, Arkansas Code Annotated Et. Seq which states: The purpose of the School Leadership Coordinating Council is to: (3) Aid in the development of model evaluation tools for use in the evaluation of school administrators. * Principal Evaluation Task Force created Evaluation Overview

During the 88 th General Assembly, the Arkansas State Legislature passed Act 1209 of 2011, Arkansas Code Annotated Et. Seq which states: The Department of Education shall provide technical assistance to school districts for developing and implementing instruments to evaluate administrators that weight an administrator evaluation on student performance and growth to the same extent as provided for teachers under the Teacher Excellence and Support System. * Task Force aligned system with the Interstate School Leaders’ Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards. During the 88 th General Assembly, the Arkansas State Legislature passed Act 1209 of 2011, Arkansas Code Annotated Et. Seq which states: The Department of Education shall provide technical assistance to school districts for developing and implementing instruments to evaluate administrators that weight an administrator evaluation on student performance and growth to the same extent as provided for teachers under the Teacher Excellence and Support System. * Task Force aligned system with the Interstate School Leaders’ Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards. Evaluation Overview

ISLLC Standards Standard 1- An education leader promotes the success of every student by facilitating development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by all appropriate stakeholders. Standard 1- An education leader promotes the success of every student by facilitating development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by all appropriate stakeholders. Standard 2- An education leader promotes the success of every student by advocating, nurturing, and sustaining a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth. Standard 2- An education leader promotes the success of every student by advocating, nurturing, and sustaining a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth. Standard 1- An education leader promotes the success of every student by facilitating development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by all appropriate stakeholders. Standard 1- An education leader promotes the success of every student by facilitating development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by all appropriate stakeholders. Standard 2- An education leader promotes the success of every student by advocating, nurturing, and sustaining a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth. Standard 2- An education leader promotes the success of every student by advocating, nurturing, and sustaining a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth.

ISLCC Standards Standard 3- An education leader promotes the success of every student by ensuring management of the organization, operation, and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment. Standard 3- An education leader promotes the success of every student by ensuring management of the organization, operation, and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment. Standard 4- An education leader promotes the success of every student by collaborating with faculty and community members, responding to diverse community interests and mobilizing community resources. Standard 4- An education leader promotes the success of every student by collaborating with faculty and community members, responding to diverse community interests and mobilizing community resources. Standard 3- An education leader promotes the success of every student by ensuring management of the organization, operation, and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment. Standard 3- An education leader promotes the success of every student by ensuring management of the organization, operation, and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment. Standard 4- An education leader promotes the success of every student by collaborating with faculty and community members, responding to diverse community interests and mobilizing community resources. Standard 4- An education leader promotes the success of every student by collaborating with faculty and community members, responding to diverse community interests and mobilizing community resources.

ISLCC Standards Standard 5- An education leader promotes the success of every student by acting with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner. Standard 5- An education leader promotes the success of every student by acting with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner. Standard 6- An education leader promotes the success of every student by understanding, responding to, and influencing the political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context. Standard 6- An education leader promotes the success of every student by understanding, responding to, and influencing the political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context. Standard 5- An education leader promotes the success of every student by acting with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner. Standard 5- An education leader promotes the success of every student by acting with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner. Standard 6- An education leader promotes the success of every student by understanding, responding to, and influencing the political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context. Standard 6- An education leader promotes the success of every student by understanding, responding to, and influencing the political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context.

Exemplary- Principals have made a contribution to the profession both in and outside of their school system. Not only meets requirements of Proficient, but creates a model for other principals. Proficient- Meeting the organization’s needs. Challenging and may take years. Progressing- Understanding what it takes to attain proficiency, and motivated to take action to become proficient. Not Meeting Standards- Not meeting the organization’s needs. Not demonstrating the necessary skills to be rated progressing or proficient. Exemplary- Principals have made a contribution to the profession both in and outside of their school system. Not only meets requirements of Proficient, but creates a model for other principals. Proficient- Meeting the organization’s needs. Challenging and may take years. Progressing- Understanding what it takes to attain proficiency, and motivated to take action to become proficient. Not Meeting Standards- Not meeting the organization’s needs. Not demonstrating the necessary skills to be rated progressing or proficient. Levels of Performance

Principal Evaluation Categories NoviceInquiry Intensive Non-Renewal

Novice Category – Principals who are new to the district, the principalship, or have transitioned from assistant principal to principal. Principals working under an Alternative Licensure Completion Plan (ALCP) to become fully licensed remain in the novice category until the ALCP is completed. Novice Category – Principals who are new to the district, the principalship, or have transitioned from assistant principal to principal. Principals working under an Alternative Licensure Completion Plan (ALCP) to become fully licensed remain in the novice category until the ALCP is completed. Leadership Categories

Inquiry Category- Principals who model life-long learning and consistently demonstrate progressing, proficient, and/or exemplary performance on standards and functions in the Arkansas Principal Evaluation Rubric. Inquiry Category- Principals who model life-long learning and consistently demonstrate progressing, proficient, and/or exemplary performance on standards and functions in the Arkansas Principal Evaluation Rubric. Leadership Categories

Intensive Category- Principals who receive a rating of not-meeting standards on the Summative Evaluation Rubric according to the following guidelines: The principal receives not meeting standards on two or more functions in Standard Two and/or The principal receives not meeting standards and/or progressing on the majority of functions in any of the standards. Must create an Intensive Growth Plan and complete Intensive Category- Principals who receive a rating of not-meeting standards on the Summative Evaluation Rubric according to the following guidelines: The principal receives not meeting standards on two or more functions in Standard Two and/or The principal receives not meeting standards and/or progressing on the majority of functions in any of the standards. Must create an Intensive Growth Plan and complete Leadership Categories

Step 1: Orientation Step 2: Self Assessment Step 3: Initial Meeting with Superintendent/Designee Step 4:Principal Professional Growth Plan Step 5: Formative Assessment Step 6: Summative Evaluation Step 1: Orientation Step 2: Self Assessment Step 3: Initial Meeting with Superintendent/Designee Step 4:Principal Professional Growth Plan Step 5: Formative Assessment Step 6: Summative Evaluation Evaluation Process

Superintendent/Designee meets with all principals as a group to outline the evaluation process and discuss rubric and the four levels of performance. Superintendent/Designee will also explain the leadership categories: Novice, Inquiry and Intensive Superintendent/Designee meets with all principals as a group to outline the evaluation process and discuss rubric and the four levels of performance. Superintendent/Designee will also explain the leadership categories: Novice, Inquiry and Intensive Step 1: Orientation

Principal will complete a Self Assessment of all areas of the rubric. Principal may also choose to gather input from the Principal Staff Leadership Survey. (Optional) **** Superintendent/Designee completes same form on their perceptions of the principal’s performance. Principal will complete a Self Assessment of all areas of the rubric. Principal may also choose to gather input from the Principal Staff Leadership Survey. (Optional) **** Superintendent/Designee completes same form on their perceptions of the principal’s performance. Step 2: Self Assessment

Principal meets with superintendent to discuss self- assessment ratings Superintendent discusses their perceptions of the principal related to the rubric Superintendent and principal select standards and functions of the rubric that the principal will focus on in their professional growth plan. Principal meets with superintendent to discuss self- assessment ratings Superintendent discusses their perceptions of the principal related to the rubric Superintendent and principal select standards and functions of the rubric that the principal will focus on in their professional growth plan. Step 3: Initial Meeting with Superintendent/Designee

Principal completes PPGP based on standards and functions of rubric agreed upon in initial meetings. Step 4: Principal Professional Growth Plan

Principal meets with superintendent to discuss progress of the PPGP. Principal provides data and other documentation of progress. Superintendent provides documentation from school visits and other evidence of implementation of leadership strategies. During the conference revisions can be made. Number of Formative Conferences by category: Novice- minimally four times Inquiry- minimally two times Intensive- Monthly Principal meets with superintendent to discuss progress of the PPGP. Principal provides data and other documentation of progress. Superintendent provides documentation from school visits and other evidence of implementation of leadership strategies. During the conference revisions can be made. Number of Formative Conferences by category: Novice- minimally four times Inquiry- minimally two times Intensive- Monthly Step 5: Formative Assessment Conference

Superintendent completes the Principal Evaluation Rubric on all standards and functions. Superintendent make recommendation concerning employment based on: Performance levels of rubric, evidence of student learning and teacher growth, as well as progression on PPGP. Summative evaluations are conducted every year for principals in the Novice Category or Intensive Category Summative evaluations are conducted minimally once every three years for principals in the Inquiry Category Superintendent completes the Principal Evaluation Rubric on all standards and functions. Superintendent make recommendation concerning employment based on: Performance levels of rubric, evidence of student learning and teacher growth, as well as progression on PPGP. Summative evaluations are conducted every year for principals in the Novice Category or Intensive Category Summative evaluations are conducted minimally once every three years for principals in the Inquiry Category Step 6: Summative Evaluation

Arkansas Department of Education click Educators- scroll down to Principal Evaluation Van Buren School District- Brian Summerhill, Assistant Superintendent- Dr. Harry Tommey, Assistant Superintendent- Lonnie Mitchell, Principal – Northridge Middle School- Stacie Wood, Principal- Parkview Elementary- Steve Davis - Director of Career Center- Robert Childers, Principal- Tate Elementary- Arkansas Department of Education click Educators- scroll down to Principal Evaluation Van Buren School District- Brian Summerhill, Assistant Superintendent- Dr. Harry Tommey, Assistant Superintendent- Lonnie Mitchell, Principal – Northridge Middle School- Stacie Wood, Principal- Parkview Elementary- Steve Davis - Director of Career Center- Robert Childers, Principal- Tate Elementary-