PUSD Site Administrator Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 23, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Advertisements

Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 9, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent
Peoria Unified Common Core Curriculum Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent August 27, 2013.
Site Administrator Evaluation Update Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012 Dr. Heather L. Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
Most current teacher evaluations provide little information that can be used to give teachers the training and tools they need to be effective; better.
Praxis Assessment Overview Educational Testing Service Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board Frankfort, Kentucky January 21, 2007 Copyright 2004.
Teacher & Principal Evaluation: As Easy as Doing the Hula.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Pay for Performance Programs in Arizona CPRE Conference February 21, 2007 Arizona Performance Based Compensation SystemArizona Performance Based Compensation.
The Leadership and Learning Center ® Teacher Evaluation System for Florida’s Charter Schools An Overview: Florida Consortium of Public Charter Schools.
Delaware’s Performance Evaluation System II for School Administrators Jackie O. Wilson, Ed.D. Interim Director Delaware Academy for School Leadership College.
Guidance Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation September 13, 2012.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Statewide Awareness Presentation Dr. Karen Butterfield, Associate Superintendent Jan Amator, Deputy Associate Superintendent Highly Effective Teachers.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Update on Teacher Principal Evaluation System (TPEP) Implementation July, 2014.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data Overview of the SLO Process April 7,
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
WELCOME Professional Growth and Evaluation System.
DRAFT 4.0 PRESENTED TO THE OREGON STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY 17, 2012 Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems.
Teacher Effectiveness Pilot II Presented by PDE. Project Development - Goal  To develop a teacher effectiveness model that will reform the way we evaluate.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
The Leadership and Learning Center ® Teacher Evaluation System for Florida’s Charter Schools An Overview: The Danielson Framework Name of School.
E VALUATION C HANGES SB290 R EQUIREMENTS January 17, 2013.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
Recommendations Recommendation 1: Regrade the ten classifications found to be 20 percent or more below market midpoint to be in alignment with the market.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
PUSD Evaluations for Governing Board Presentation May 14, 2015 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY 14/15 Governing Board Presentation May 13, 2014 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
The Law  Section , paragraph 3… A requirement that a pupil not be promoted from the third grade if the pupil obtains a score on the reading portion.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
14/15 301Plan for Governing Board December 2, 2014 Dr. Heather Cruz.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
TESS & LEADS Implementation Awareness for End-of-Year Success Office of Educator Effectiveness Arkansas Department of Education Spring, 2016.
1 SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 Purpose: School Site Council The organization by which the school community comes together to chart the school’s path to improvement.
Professional Development Options Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent February 25, 2016.
Arizona Framework for Teacher Effectiveness Governing Board Meeting May 1, 2012.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
House Bill 97: Recent Legislation Impact on Educator Preparation Dr. Rebecca Garland Deputy State Superintendent Joyce Gardner Dr. Andrew Sioberg NCDPI.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
NOT YOUR GRANDMA’S SCHOOL LIBRARIAN
Certified Evaluation Orientation
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Document Submission
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
State Board of Education Progress Update
MSBSD Principal Evaluation
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

PUSD Site Administrator Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 23, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent

Presentation Overview  Legislative History  The Peoria Unified Journey  New Required Legislation  Process  Recommended Changes  Next Steps

Arizona Revised Statutes § (A)(38)  The State Board of Education shall…”on or before December 15, 2011 adopt and maintain a model framework for a teacher and principal evaluation instrument that includes quantitative data on student academic progress that accounts for between thirty-three percent and fifty percent of the evaluation outcomes and best practices for professional development and evaluator training. School districts and charter schools shall use an instrument that meets the data requirements established by the State Board of Education to annually evaluate individual teachers and principals beginning in school year 2012 – 2013.”

ADE Adopted Model Framework  ADE Adopted Model Framework for Educator Effectiveness April, 2011  Evaluation tool must be:  Rubric-based  Tied to Leadership Standards ISLLC: Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium  33% to 50% of the evaluation must be based on student achievement data  PUSD began to make the shift in evaluation practices in SY 12/13

Overview of the Peoria Model  50% of total score  Professional Practices – Implemented 12/13 Self-Evaluation Goals Reflection Rubric Components Aligned to ISLLC Standards Professional Expectations  50% of total score  Student Achievement Data

Data – 50/50  50% - All possible valid and reliable data required  Same rubric-based process as teachers  Reflects their responsibility for ALL learning on their campus  Surveys are also required Parent Teacher Climate (administration)  50% - Professional Practices

Recommended Change for 13/14  Aligns final Performance Classifications to ADE required framework  Current  Unsatisfactory  Developing  Proficient  Excelling  Will remain the same in Domains 1-4  Proposed for 13/14  Ineffective  Developing  Effective  Highly Effective  Required by SB 2823

Next Steps  Committee will reconvene in the fall to analyze the data and make necessary adjustments to instrument  A full cycle is needed to see if the current model has the desired result  Changes will be procedural

9 Questions