Current Status and Emerging Directions for PBIS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SISEP Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai
Advertisements

Using the PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) E-12
Measuring Performance within School Climate Transformation Grants
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBIS) – Implementers’ Blueprint Michael Mahoney, M.S., NCSP Safe & Healthy School Coordinator Oregon Department.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Overview of SW-PBIS Cohort 10 ( ) Metro RIP (Regional Implementation Project) November 6, 2013 Shoreview Community Center T. J. Larson, MAT Barack.
Moving School-wide PBIS Forward with Quality, Equity and Efficiency 2011 Tennessee School-wide PBIS State Conf Rob Horner, University of Oregon
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Aligning Educational Initiatives
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
Friday Plenary Sessions 12:20 PM - 1:00 PM Bigger than Us: PBIS is Impacting National Discussions Renee Bradley, Assistant to Director of Research to Practice,
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
Vermont Positive Behavior Support Services
Training and Coaching Capacity
Implementation Action Planning
Rob Horner and Steve Goodman. Goals Logic for investing in Trainer development For state leadership teams developing action plan For individuals identified.
The 2015 PBIS Summer Institute June 18-19, 2015 Eric Kloos Minnesota Department of Education PBIS Team Minnesota State PBIS Leadership Team.
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Keys to Sustaining School-wide PBIS Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior.
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Connecticut Scaling.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Designing and Implementing Evaluation of School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob HornerHolly Lewandowski University of Oregon Illinois State Board of.
Blending Academics and Behavior Dawn Miller Shawnee Mission School District Steve Goodman Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning.
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
Aligning Educational Initiatives Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
V 2.1 Evaluation Tools, On-Line Systems and Action Planning.
Youth Forum Cities Implementation of School-wide PBIS Rob Horner, University of Oregon Rebecca Mendiola, Santa Clara County Office of Education.
Scaling Up in Illinois Integrated System for Student Achievement (ISSA)
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
Moving PBS Forward with Quality, Equity and Efficiency 2011 APBS Conference Rob Horner, University of Oregon
School-wide Positive Behavior Support February 24, 2004 Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas Beth Robinett, Topeka 501 (
2015 WI PBIS Conference A5. Benchmark of Quality – Implementation Plan Dave Kunelius - WI RtI Center Regional Coordinator-PBIS.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Data Systems Northwest AEA September 7, 2010.
V 2.1 TFI Wordle. V 2.1 Objectives of Session: 1.Not bore you to sleep 2.Types of PBIS Data 3.pbisapps.org 4.PBIS Evaluation Tools 5.Action Planning.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Establishing Multi-tiered Behavior Support Frameworks to Achieve Positive School-wide Climate George Sugai Tim Lewis Rob Horner University of Connecticut,
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
Evaluation Planning & Reporting for School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG) Sites Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte Steve GoodmanMichigan's.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: District Coaches’ Meeting Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral.
OSEP Project Director’s Meeting: Establishing, Sustaining and Scaling Effective Practices Rob Horner University of Oregon OSEP TA Center on PBIS
State and District-level Role in Implementation, Scaling and Sustaining PBIS Session A-3 Washington Leadership Discussion Rob Horner University of Oregon.
VTPBiS Coordinators as Coaches Learning and Networking Workshop Presented by VTPBiS State Team.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Linking Social and Academic Gains Washington Association of School Administrators Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Aligning PBIS to Achieve Educational Excellence Rob Horner University of Oregon Acknowledge: George Sugai, Lucille Eber, Susan Barrett, Justyn Poulos,
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network PAPBS Network Coaches Day January 28, Fidelity Measures Lisa Brunschwyler- School Age- School.
Aligning Educational Initiatives Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Lessons Learned in SWPBS Implementation: Sustainability & Scaling Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Connecticut January 15,
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
Iowa Behavior Alliance: School-wide PBS Third Annual State Conference October 2-3, 2007.
POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS)
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
School Climate Transformation Grants SEA Session October
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
Current Issues Related to MTSS for Academic and Behavior Difficulties: Building Capacity to Implement PBIS District Wide at All Three Tiers OSEP conference.
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
2018 SEA Title IV Part A Coordinator’s Meeting
State and District Role in
School-wide PBIS: A Framework for Effective Teaching & Learning
Oregon Coaches’ Training School-wide PBIS
Aligning Educational Initiatives
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
Presentation transcript:

Current Status and Emerging Directions for PBIS Rob Horner University of Oregon Www.pbis.org

Goals Current status of PBIS in US and Internationally Emerging directions Focus on core features of PBIS Use of fidelity measures Role of state and district Alignment with mental health, restorative practices, social/emotional learning, bully prevention

Current Status Implementation of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.

Schools using PBIS February, 2015 20,384 20% of all Schools in US

14 States with more than 500 schools Number of Schools Implementation SWPBIS (Tier I) by State February , 2015 14 States with more than 500 schools

Proportion of Schools Implementing SWPBIS by State February, 2015 13 States with at least 40% of all schools using PBIS

9130 Schools with Fidelity Data Number of PBIS schools (Green) Implementing, (Red) measuring fidelity and (Blue) at Tier I fidelity by state >75% ------------------- Connecticut Iowa Kentucky Michigan Minnesota Missouri Oregon South Carolina Vermont 9130 Schools with Fidelity Data Florida Illinois North Carolina Wisconsin Total number of schools using SWPBIS Total number of schools measuring fidelity Schools at Tier I fidelity

International Implementation of PBIS Denmark Norway

1. Focus on Core Features Core features are the strategies and practices that you can see when you go into a school.

Tier I PBIS Core Features Consequences for Problem Behavior Classroom Systems System to Acknowledge Behavior Tier I PBIS Data-based Decision System School-wide Expectations Bully Prevention Leadership Team Family / Community Engagement

Practices  Core Features Effective Practice Effective Practice Effective Practice Effective Practice Technology Core Features Science Values Valued Outcomes

Tier II PBIS Core Features Increased Level of Feedback Additional instruction on Behavior Tier II PBIS Increased Structure Increased Intensity of Data Collection Tier II, III Leadership Team Increased Family Engagement

Tier III PBIS Core Features Individualized Support Delivery Individual Support Planning Tier III PBIS Increased Intensity of Data Collection Individualized Assessment Individual Student Team Increased Family Engagement

Why Focus on Core Features? Core features are a key to culturally sensitive PBIS. They allow use of different strategies and paths to achieve the features of a school that benefit all students. The focus on Core Features facilitates large-scale implementation Core features are critical to state and district alignment of multiple initiatives

2. Use of Fidelity Measures Providing teams with a valid, reliable, efficient fidelity measure is among the most empowering actions a leader can make. Fidelity measures shift the focus from “are we implementing program X?” to “are we establishing the features of a school that will benefit students?” Fidelity measures should be done at least 2-3 times a year and ALWAYS result in an action plan.

TFI- Technical Adequacy (McIntosh, Massar et al. 2015) Available from OSEP TA-Center www.pbis.org www.pbisapps.org No Cost Assessors Training PowerPoint and Assessors Training Video at www.pbisapps.org TFI- Technical Adequacy (McIntosh, Massar et al. 2015) Content Validity (Tier 1 .95; Tier II .93; Tier III .91) Usability (12 of 14 > 80%) (15 min per Tier) Inter-rater Agreement (.95; .96; .89) Test-retest reliability (.98; .99; .99) Factor Analysis

1.1 Team Composition Subscale: Teams Feature Data Sources Scoring Criteria 0 = Not implemented 1 = Partially implemented 2 = Fully implemented 1.1 Team Composition: Team Composition: Tier I team includes a Tier I systems coordinator, a school administrator, a family member, and individuals able to provide (a) applied behavioral expertise, (b) coaching expertise, (c) knowledge of student academic and behavior patterns, (d) knowledge about the operations of the school across grade levels and programs, and for high schools, (e) student representation. School organizational chart Tier I team meeting minutes   0 = Tier I team does not exist or does not include coordinator, school administrator, or individuals with applied behavioral expertise 1 = Tier I team exists, but does not include all identified roles or attendance of these members is below 80% 2 = Tier I team exists with coordinator, administrator, and all identified roles represented, AND attendance of all roles is at or above 80% Main Idea: Teams need people with multiple skills and perspectives to implement PBIS well.

Total score (TFI)

Sub-scale report

Sub-subscale report Tier I Teams Implementation Evaluation Tier II Interventions Evaluation Tier III Teams Resources Assessment Support plan Monitoring and adaptation

Item Report

Action Planning 1. Team to propose teaching template and Fall teaching schedule at Feb 16 Faculty meeting. Alan Feb 16

3. District as Unit of Implementation Student is unit of impact School is unit of analysis District is unit of implementation (Region) State is unit of capacity development

Building Capacity State District School Classroom SISEP and Scaling UP Current PBIS Initial PBIS Available at www.sisep.org Traditional Behavior/ Classroom Management

4. Aligning Multiple Initiatives Taking PBIS to the next level of scaling will depend largely on our ability to define practical and efficient systems for aligning multiple initiatives at the state, region and district level.

Percentage of Schools Implementing Predicted Trajectory based on theory of critical mass 80% Percentage of Schools Implementing 50% Replications Too often, actual results Model Demonstrations 10% 0% Early Later Time in Years Steve Goodman

---------------------------- Restorative Practice/ Justice Discipline Disproportionality Challenge: We have more “programs,” “initiatives” or “practices” than can be implemented well. ---------------------------- How to organize and align for efficiency and effectiveness Trauma-based Support School Climate/ PBIS Schools Bully Prevention Restraint Seclusion Common Core Academic Failure Your Addition Teacher Effectiveness

4 Key Features of Effective Alignment Align multiple initiatives at the organizational level where a common budget authority exists. Align multiple initiatives by using a common outcome measure to assess effectiveness. Build aligned professional development by comparing and combining the “core features” of multiple initiatives. Compare fundamental assumptions Start with common “core features” and compare the practices used to achieve these features. Determine how to incorporate additional core features with efficiency Build single Professional Development curricula that combine core features. Resolve Logic Model Conflict

Effective Alignment of Initiatives Organizational Unit Core Feature Summary for each Initiative Single Prof Devel Plan (with coaching, policy, data systems) Initiative A Initiative B Initiative C Fidelity and Outcome Measures

Summary School-wide social culture is increasingly being recognized as a fundamental element of effective schools. PBIS is an effective and efficient framework for establishing and sustaining a school-wide social culture For the near future: Focus on “core features” of PBIS Measure and use fidelity data Focus on district capacity Establish a formal protocol for selecting and aligning multiple initiatives.

Integrated Multi-Tiered Framework for Educational Success October 22-23, 2015 OSEP Technical Assistance Center on PBIS 2015 Leadership Forum Sessions are organized by strands that support initial through advanced implementation in elementary, middle, and high schools as well as juvenile justice facilities:    PBIS Foundations Classroom Applications Tier 2 Systems & Practices Tier 3 Systems & Practices Aligning Systems Juvenile Justice Mental Health Integration Equity Applied Evaluation Special Topics   Integrated Multi-Tiered Framework for Educational Success SAVE THE DATE Donald E. Stephens Convention Center Rosemont, Illinois This two-day forum for school, state, district and regional Leadership Teams and other professionals has been designed to increase the effectiveness of PBIS implementation.   Featuring sessions specifically designed for our Mental Health, Juvenile Justice, and Family/Community Partners! Visit the Upcoming Events page at www.pbis.org for more information