Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Advertisements

Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Review of Performance Index Framework and Accountability Ratings RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT To serve and prepare all students for their global.
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Linda Jolly Region 18 ESC.
Burton Secondary EOC/STAAR Data INDEX 1 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STARR SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE All Students=3-8 grades spring administration.
Index 4 Description: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 is : the Post-secondary Readiness index, which is used to show the readiness of students on campus.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver Accountability Development What do we know? What do we want to know? March 4, 2014.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC
Accountability Update Professional Service Provider Update and Network Meeting April 1,
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
2013 Texas Accountability System. Features of the System No single indicator can lower a rating Focuses on overall campus/district performance rather.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Overview Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
Kelly Baehren Waller ISD Administrative Workshop July 28, 2015.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
Instructional Leaders Advisory Tuesday, April 8, 2014 Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
1 August 8, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of 2014 Accountability.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
Accountability: Current Issues Friday, April Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
1.Welcome (10 minutes) 2.Federal Focus School Update (20 minutes) 3.Upcoming Sessions (30 Minutes) 4.Break (15 minutes) 5.Accountability Update (75 minutes)
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Accountability 2014!! Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Shauna Lane, ESC 17 Ty.
Overview of 2015 Accountability SUMMER 2015 MICKI WESLEY, DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTABILITY & COMPLIANCE CINDY TEICHMAN, COORDINATOR OF INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
2015 Texas Accountability System La Porte Independent School District August 5, 2015.
LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
Accountability Update Ty
Accountability 2013 Interpreting Your 2013 Accountability Report It’s Like Learning To Read All Over Again Ervin Knezek John Fessenden.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.
June 5, 2014 Accountability Update. Accountability Updates 110% for At-Risk, Criterion #4 Accountability Manual Updates.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
July 11, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Michael Murphy State and Federal Accountability.
Every Student Matters Understanding the Indexes, the Tests, and Targeted Goal for STAAR 2016.
Accountability Overview 2016
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Accountability Update
Texas State Accountability
2013 Texas Accountability System
A-F Accountability and Special Education
State and Federal Accountability Overview
2014 State Accountability Ratings
Accountability Updates
MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA ! ?.
2016 – 2017 Accountability Performance Index Framework
Presentation transcript:

Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING

 2013  Index 1  Target 50%  All Subjects/All Students  EOC- 15 tests  English Reading & Writing tests separate  Substitute assessments not available  ELL in Years 1, 2, 3 Excluded  STAAR L not included  2014  Index 1  Target 55%  All Subjects/All Students  EOC- 5 tests  English Reading & Writing tests combined  Substitute assessments for EOC included  ELL in Year 1 Excluded, but include Years 2 and higher  STAAR L included in ELL Progress Measure INDEX 1: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

 2013  Index 2  Reading, Math & Writing  Progress Measure: STAAR only  All districts and campuses with progress measure are evaluated  ELLs in Years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5+ excluded  2014  Index 2  Reading, Math  Progress Measures: STAAR, STAAR Modified, STAAR Alternate & ELL Progress Measure  High Schools not evaluated  ELLs in Years 2 and higher included INDEX 2: STUDENT PROGRESS

 2013  Target 55%-by subjects  Economically Disadvantaged  Minimum Size Criteria  Race/Ethnicity 25 or more tests in All Subjects  Lowest performing group 25 or more in All Subjects  Points  1 point for Level II Satisfactory  ELLs  Years 1-4 excluded  Years 5+ included  STAAR L not included  2014  Target based on 5 th percentile of campus performance across all campus types-by subjects  Economically Disadvantaged  Minimum Size Criteria  Race/Ethnicity 25 or more tests in both Reading/ELA and Math  Lowest performing group 25 or more in All Subjects  Points  1 point for Level II Satisfactory and 2 points for Level III Advanced  ELLs  Year 1 excluded  Years 2 and higher included  STAAR L evaluated in ELL Progress Measure INDEX 3: CLOSING PERFORMANCE GAPS

 2013  Elementary not evaluated  Junior High not evaluated  High School-75  District-75  Based on 2 components  Graduation Score  Graduation Plan  STAAR results not included  Substitute assessments not available  ELLs  Years 1-5+ excluded  2014  Elementary: 12  Junior High: 13  High School & District: 57 on all 4 components  Based on 4 component  STAAR Final Level II  Graduation Score  Graduation Plan  College-Ready Graduates  STAAR results Percent Met Final Level II  Substitute assessments for EOC are included  ELLs  Years 5+ included (Final Level II) INDEX 4: POSTSECONDARY READINESS

 Performance Rate Targets-State=55%  All subjects  All Students, African American, Hispanic, White, American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander, Two or More Races/Ethnicity, Economically Disadvantaged, Special Education, Current/Monitored ELLs  Performance Rate Targets-Federal=79%  Reading and Mathematics  All Students, African American, Hispanic, White, Economically Disadvantaged, Special Education, Current/Monitored ELLs  Participation Rates=95%  Reading and Mathematics  All Students, African American, Hispanic, White, American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander, Two or More Races/Ethnicity, Economically Disadvantaged, Special Education, Current/Monitored ELLs  Federal Graduation Rate=4 year is 80% & 5 year is 85%  All Subjects and all groups listed  District Limits on Use of Alternative Assessment Results  All Students  Reading and Mathematics  2% Modified  1% Alternate 2014 ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM SAFEGUARDS MEASURES AND TARGETS

 Due to new revised TEKS for Mathematics, K-8 th, performance standards for STAAR grades 3-8 will not be set until after the Spring 2015 administrations, therefore:  Only raw score will be given  Spring administration results will be used to establish new performance standards by summer 2015  SSI retest for grades 5 & 8 will not be offered in May and June, 2015 Note: Reading SSI retest will be offered in May and June, 2015 UPDATE IMPACTING 5 TH & 8 TH MATH

May the STAARS be with US and aligned to be OUR guiding light as WE focus on the academic needs of each one of OUR “Shining STAR Students” COMMENTS