Chapter 14 THE SECTIONAL CRISIS America Past and Present Eighth Edition Divine Breen Fredrickson Williams Gross Brand Copyright 2007, Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman
The Caning of Charles Sumner 1856 – Representative Preston Brooks caned Senator Charles Sumner for an antislavery speech Sumner gave. Caused by the Kansas-Nebraska Act 1854
The Compromise of 1850 North and South conflict violently over slavery’s extension into the territories (Mexican Cession) 2
The Problem of Slavery in the Mexican Cession Slavery traditionally kept out of politics Congressional power over slavery includes Setting conditions to make territories states Forbidding slavery in new states Mexican Cession of 1848 puts status of slavery in new territory into question 3
The Wilmot Proviso Launches the Free-Soil Movement Mexican War mobilized antislavery groups Wilmot Proviso Amendment to Mexican War Appropriations Bill by David Wilmont (D-PA) Ban all blacks from new territories – Mexican Cession - (free & slave) to prevent job competition from black slaves and free blacks Proviso passes in House, fails in Senate 4
Squatter Sovereignty and the Election of 1848 Democratic presidential candidate Lewis Cass proposes popular sovereignty Congress allows territorial settlers to decide Supported by many antislavery forces A new 3rd party - Free-Soil Party – chose Martin Van Buren who demanded definite limits on slavery Whig Zachary Taylor takes no position on slavery Taylor wins election with less than 50% 5
The Election of 1848
Taylor Takes Charge Taylor proposes admitting California and New Mexico as states immediately South reacts angrily Not enough time for planters to settle Immediate admission would result in no slavery Proposed Nashville convention prompts fears of Southern secession 6
Forging a Compromise Henry Clay’s Compromise of 1850 included: California admitted as a free state The rest of the Mexican Cession – slavery based on popular sovereignty Slave trade prohibited in District of Columbia Strong fugitive slave law that denied slaves any Constitutional rights New border between New Mexico & Texas President Taylor opposed, VP Fillmore supported Compromise of 1850 July 1850 Taylor dies; Compromise passed as separate measures, not as an omnibus bill 7
The Compromise of 1850
The Party System in Crisis Whigs & Democrats Parties need new issues after 1850; slavery had been decided in the Compromise of 1850 and the economy was prospering under the Democrats’ policy of laissez faire. The Election of 1852 marked the end of the Whigs. Why? No main issues. Whigs’ antislavery stand destroyed the party and their failure to appeal to voters in the North & in the South. Democrat Franklin Pierce won in 1852. 9
The Election of 1852
The Kansas-Nebraska Act Raises a Storm Senator Stephen Douglas (D-IL) wanted Kansas and Nebraska open to settlement to facilitate a Transcontinental RR to Chicago 1854: Douglas’s Kansas-Nebraska bill Apply popular sovereignty to Kansas, Nebraska Repeal Missouri Compromise line – seen as a surrender to the slave power because it permitted slavery in an area where it had previously been prohibited Act passes on sectional vote Northerners outraged, Democratic party split 10
The Kansas-Nebraska Act Raises a Storm, cont. KS-NE Act seen as North making concessions to South, but not getting anything in return Whig indecision causes party to disintegrate Led to the Caning of Charles Sumner Led to the rise of the Republican Party Democrats become sole Southern party President Pierce’s effort to acquire Cuba (Ostend Manifesto) provoked antislavery firestorm 11
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854
An Appeal to Nativism: The Know-Nothing Episode Know-Nothings (American Party) appealed to anti-immigrant (Nativism) and to anti-Catholic sentiment Also called the Order of the Star-Spangled Banner The collapse of the Whigs led to the rise of another 3rd party – the American Party By 1856 Know-Nothings collapsed Probable cause: No response to slavery 12
Kansas and the Rise of the Republicans Republican party unites former Whigs, Know-Nothings, Free-Soilers, Northern Democrats Position on slavery – no extension of slavery (Mexican Cession) “Bleeding Kansas” helped Republicans Struggle among abolitionists, proslavery forces for control of Kansas territory Republicans use conflict to appeal for voters 13
“Bleeding Kansas”
Sectional Division in the Election of 1856 Republicans represented a sectional party – the part of the North Democrat James Buchanan defended the Compromise of 1850 and won the election because he promised to protect slavery where it existed 14
The Election of 1856 Candidate Party Popular Vote Electoral Vote Buchanan Democratic 1,832,955 174 Frémont Republican 1,339,932 114 Fillmore American 871,731 8 (Know-Nothing)
The House Divided, 1857–1860 Sectional quarrel becomes virtually irreconcilable Growing sense of deep cultural differences, opposing interests between North and South
Cultural Sectionalism Major Protestant denominations (Baptists & Methodist) divided into Northern and Southern entities over slavery. Northern preachers denounced slavery as a sin; southern preachers used the Bible to defend slavery. Southern literature romanticized plantation life. Southern writers such as Edgar Allen Poe (pro-South); Northern writers such as Emerson & Thoreau (antislavery) Uncle Tom's Cabin an immense success in North; written by Harriet Beecher Stowe; portrayed slavery as a threat to the family & the cult of domesticity. Cannibals All! – (George Fitzhugh) Southern response to Uncle Tom’s Cabin; portrayed Northerners as the slave owners and factory workers as the slaves. 15
The Dred Scott Case Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857): Supreme Court can decide on slavery in the territories – President Buchanan encouraged the Court to make this decision. Chief Justice was Roger Taney Major arguments Scott has no right to sue because neither he nor any other black, slave or free, is a citizen. Congress has no authority to prohibit slavery in territories, thus declaring the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional. Ruling supports Republican claim that an aggressive slave power dominated all branches of federal government 16
The Lecompton Controversy 1856: Lawrence had been established as the capital of the free-state of Kansas 1857: Proslavery supporters established Lecompton as the capital of the slave-state of Kansas. 1858 – Kansas is a free state The Lecompton Controversy showed how popular sovereignty could lead to civil war. 17
The Lincoln/Douglas Debates Was not an abolitionist; promised not to interfere with slavery where it existed, but to prevent the spread of slavery Casts slavery as a moral problem “House Divided” speech Freeport Doctrine – Lincoln wanted Douglas to explain how popular sovereignty could still work after the Supreme Court’s decision in the Dred Scott case. 18
The South's Crisis of Fear October, 1859: John Brown’s raid Harper’s Ferry – wanted to start a slave rebellion Brown executed, many Northerners see him as martyr Hinton Helper’s Impending Crisis of the South asked poor white Southerners to overthrow planter dominance and abolish slavery To Southerners, Republicans seen as radical abolitionists Southerners convinced they must secede on election of Republican president 19
The Election of 1860: Republicans Abraham Lincoln elected without receiving a single Southern vote Platform to widen party’s appeal High tariffs for industry Free homesteads for small farmers Government aid for internal improvements No expansion of slavery SOUTHERN RESPONSE: SC SECEDED! 22