Objective 1: Provide an Appropriate Response to Allegations, Based on Risk and Needs Arizona Department of Child Safety Douglas A. Ducey Governor Charles.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Differential Response and Data American Humane 2007 Conference on Differential Response in Child Welfare Patricia Schene, Ph.D.

Advertisements

Supervisor’s Core: Fiscal Essentials Version 2.0 July 2009.

Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.

1 Milwaukee County Child Welfare Legislative Audit Bureau September 2007.

Lorain County Children Services Providing safety, permanency, and well-being to Lorain County’s abused and neglected children.

Chubaka Producciones Presenta :.

Listening to you, working for you Bexley’s Children’s Services Prevention Agenda Thriving Families Service Vision Children do not wait.

2012 JANUARY Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Child Protection Transformation Overview October 18, 2012.

The Norfolk Hotline and the Homeless Action Response Team (HART) Presentation by Jill Baker Norfolk Department of Human Services.

Collaborative Mental Health Care Pilot Program Bidder’s Conference October 27, 2014.

COMMUNITY PROFILE: TULSA 2014 Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission November 2014.

10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.

2 3 Regional Manager Employment Services Supervisors Employment Services Supervisors Social Worker Supervisors Social Worker Supervisors Adult Services.

1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.

DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING May 2009.

A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.

1 G-FORCE MEETING Division of Family & Children Services September 25, 2009.

Indicating Success in Public Child Welfare Child Outcomes, System Performance and the CFSR Process Susan Smith and Lisa Tuttle Casey Family Programs July.

The Child Welfare System An Introduction Child Welfare in Numbers Nationally, an estimated 896,000 children were determined to be victims of child abuse.

Maine DHHS: Putting Children First

Performance and Progress 2005/2006. Introduction  Data collected during 2005/2006 fiscal year.  Who did our programs serve?  Did programs reach the.

Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene WB&A Market Research Executive Summary THE 2003 MARYLAND MEDICAID MANAGED CARE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY.

1 Reporting to DOJ Child Abuse Investigation Report (SS 8583) County of Santa Clara, Social Services Agency, Department of Family and Children Services.

Richard P. Barth, PhD, MSW Presented to the Workshop on Child Maltreatment Research, Policy, and Practice for the Next Generation Washington, DC January,

SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.

1 G-FORCE MEETING October 23, 2008 ON THE ROAD TO GREATNESS!

2004 Chartbook of Major Indicators: Conditions Placing Children in the South at Risk.

1 DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING April 23, 2009.

Stemming the Tides Minnesota’s Child Maltreatment Prevention Programs Seventh Annual Citizen Review Panel Conference May 22, 2008 Brenda Lockwood, MN Dept.

Performance and Progress 2006/2007. Introduction Data collected during 2006/2007 fiscal year. Who did our programs serve? Did programs reach the intended.

Rhode Island Health Home Initiative NASHP 24 th Annual State Health Policy Conference, October 4, 2011 Deborah J. Florio, Administrator Medicaid Division.

Family Care Community Partnerships (FCCP) Selected Logic Model Outcomes in the System of Care CY15 1 st and 2 nd Quarters Rhode Island Department of Children,

WORD JUMBLE. Months of the year Word in jumbled form e r r f b u y a Word in jumbled form e r r f b u y a february Click for the answer Next Question.

DATE POWER 2 INCOME JANUARY 100member X 25.00P2, FEBRUARY 200member X 25.00P5, MARCH 400member X 25.00P10, APRIL 800member.

Los Angeles County’s Department of Children and Family Services Title IV-E California Well-Being Project and Strategic Plan June 3, 2015.

1 CPA PROVIDER G-FORCE MEETING January 12, Agenda Maltreatment in Care Permanency Continuum Permanency Status Exercise for February DFCS Data.

Using Data to Make the Case for Policy Change in Times of Fiscal Crisis National Association of Council for Children Conference October 21, 2010 Jane Burstain,

Uma Ahluwalia October 15,  Most populous county in Maryland  Immigration was the largest component of population change since Source: U.S.

NCADS Child Maltreatment 2000 Data about child abuse and neglect known to child protective Services (CPS) agencies in the United States in 2000.

SAFE AND THRIVING FOREVER FAMILIES SOONER Division of Family & Children Services G-Force Meeting June 25, 2009.

2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January

A NEW APPROACH TO CHILD PROTECTIVE INVESTIGATIONS ALTERNATIVE RESPONSE SYSTEMS DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE SYSTEMS.

FY12 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee January 9, 2012.

1 Milwaukee County Child Welfare Legislative Audit Bureau March 2007.

1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.

Connecticut Department of Children and Families POLICY, PROTOCOLS, PRACTICE + PARTNERSHIPS SUSAN R. SMITH CHIEF OF QUALITY AND PLANNING CHILD FATALITY.

The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.

DHS Board Meeting DFCS Subcommittee Report Performance Highlights July 21, 2010.

July 2007 SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday

The comparability of Australian statutory child protection activity data: Making sense of differences across Australian states and territories Prue Holzer,

Tools that Work Conference Carrie Friedman, Director of NDAS Sophia Smalls, Research Assistant November 13, 2003.

Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services

Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near Poverty Rates for Children Under Age 5, by Living Arrangement: 2011 The data for Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near.

FY12 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee February 6, 2012

Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services

EMPLOYER TESTING On-Going Employees (one who has been with the employer for at least one standard measurement period) STANDARD MEASUREMENT PERIOD 3 – 12.

Disproportionality in Child Welfare

McDonald’s calendar 2007.

Broward Quality Performance Review

Module 7 Closing an Investigation: Family Functioning Assessment-Investigation and Case Transfer

February 2007 Note: Source:.

Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services

Overview of Public Facing ODJFS Child Welfare Dashboards

McDonald’s calendar 2007.

POC: ASAP Prevention Branch Chief (706)

In-Home Safety Services (IHSS) Financials: Current and Future State

Production Month Sun Hours K Monthly Kwh Tou Peak Value After Kwh

2015 January February March April May June July August September

Presentation transcript:

Objective 1: Provide an Appropriate Response to Allegations, Based on Risk and Needs Arizona Department of Child Safety Douglas A. Ducey Governor Charles Flanagan Director

Child Abuse Hotline Referral Screen Out Rate Source: Child Maltreatment 2012, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau

Child Abuse Hotline Referral Screen Out Rate In federal fiscal year (FFY) 2012, Arizona's rate of screened out referrals was below the median state rate of 47% and very near the national rate of 40%. Referrals may be screened out when they do not meet the statutory criteria of a report for investigation by DCS, such as referrals about abuse by an adult who is not the child’s parent/caretaker (such as a neighbor or community member). Arizona reported to the federal government that 22,431 referrals were screened out in FFY 2012, including 2,403 reports that had been designated “not investigated” at the time this data was submitted, or that the agency had no jurisdiction to investigate. All of the uninvestigated reports have since been assigned and investigated. Caution must be used when drawing conclusions from this data due to substantial differences in state child welfare systems and the methodology used by the federal government to calculate this measure.

Monthly Child Abuse Hotline Referral Screen Out Rate Source: CHILDS, DCS Business Intelligence Dashboard, Communications Received by Weekday and Hour, CHILDS extract date

Monthly Child Abuse Hotline Referral Screen Out Rate Source: CHILDS, DCS Business Intelligence Dashboard, Communications Received by Weekday and Hour, CHILDS extract date

Monthly Child Abuse Hotline Referral Screen Out Rate From January 2013 through December 2014, the monthly total of referrals ranged from 4,406 to 6,264. Referrals were lowest in June, July, and December in 2013; and June, July, and February in The number of referrals received increased 3.5% between 2013 and Between January and October 2013, Arizona's rate of screened out referrals remained between 29% and 33%. Starting in November 2013, the rate of screened out referrals decreased (that is, the Child Abuse Hotline categorized a higher percentage of referrals as reports). In January through December 2014, the percentage of screened out referrals ranged from 22% to 27%. The number of reports received increased 12% between 2013 and 2014.

Rate of Children Reported per 1,000 in Arizona Source: Arizona rate: CHILDS, All Reports Received data report; all other states: Casey Family Programs, FFY2012 NCANDS and Claritas population estimates for 2012

Rate of Children Reported per 1,000 in Arizona Source: CHILDS, All Reports Received data report, extract date ; population estimates provided by Arizona Department of Administration.

Rate of Children Reported per 1,000 in Arizona After screening out referrals that do not meet the criteria for DCS investigation, Arizona’s rate of children reported per 1,000 in the child population is just below the national median state rate of 38 per 1,000 and the national rate of 40 per 1,000. Arizona's rate of children reported to DCS per 1,000 in the child population increased from 27.7 in FFY 2010 to 35.6 in FFY 2013.

Re-report Rate Source: CHILDS, All Reports Received data report, extract date

Re-report Rate Prevention of repeat reports is one indicator of success preventing repeat maltreatment and ongoing risk to children. Reducing repeat reports will decrease the total number of reports received and therefore reduce investigation case volume. The repeat report rate for children who were not removed within 30 days of the first report has been increasing: The percentage of children re-reported to DCS within six months increased from 18% to 22%. The percentage of children re-reported to DCS within one year increased from 28% to 31%. For more information, go to: